Rybakina - Coaching too much

dannythomas

Professional
I‘m not against Coaching during matches but there should be limits. During her match against Muchova , Rybakina was being coached audibly almost every point throughout the 3rd set . Personally i think coaching should be allowed on change overs or maybe in between games but the players really should be able to figure some things out themselves. It is ok for college tennis and even then it can be too much. But these are the top players in the world and this kind of coaching is overkill.
 
it has been discussed in AO thread, apparently that's something Rybakina needs, she is too quiet on court and she needs that interaction/motivation from her coach.
 
I‘m not against Coaching during matches but there should be limits. During her match against Muchova , Rybakina was being coached audibly almost every point throughout the 3rd set . Personally i think coaching should be allowed on change overs or maybe in between games but the players really should be able to figure some things out themselves. It is ok for college tennis and even then it can be too much. But these are the top players in the world and this kind of coaching is overkill.

This is what happens : the slippery slope.

You only allow coaching at the same end as your coach between points and before you know it, they're getting hand signals from the other side of the stadium when they aren't supposed to, and getting coached from behind between the change of ends as well.
 
I get it. Coaching is controversial but that’s not why she smoked Iga. Great player. Iga has the right to be frustrated by it but she also has to ignore it and move on.
 
I get it. Coaching is controversial but that’s not why she smoked Iga. Great player. Iga has the right to be frustrated by it but she also has to ignore it and move on.
Rybakina didn't get coached much today against Iga, almost at all, actually. Just "keep on doing the same thing" after the first set.
Iga being a pusher (and claiming to be injured), got overpowerd. As real tennis should be.
So did Sakarri against Sabalaneka.
 
I missed the first set. And watched that destruction in the second. Lol. Is it me or does Iga seem quite salty when she loses? I notice in all her matches that she does lose the hand shake at the net and head down - doesn’t seem to handle it well.
 
Iga's NOT a pusher

No she’s not. Pros aren’t pushers either. People get confused with counter punchers being pushers and I don’t think she’s necessarily that.

Rybakana is under the radar and is quite consistent with her aggressive play. Her and sabalanka are hitting their stride and honestly - when they’re on point - Iga can be over powered by them. We’ve seen her dominate the tour but both Sabalanka and Rybakina have become top level opponents that are probably playing much better than her right now.
 
Against Iga the world number 1 Elena had nothing to lose and played great. Didn’t need much coaching during the match. Received her coaching before the match and knew Iga’s serve tendencies as they pointed out on TC. That is how it should be. But would she have got to the semis without the point by point coaching she received against Muchova and is that how it should be ?
 
No she’s not. Pros aren’t pushers either. People get confused with counter punchers being pushers and I don’t think she’s necessarily that.

Rybakana is under the radar and is quite consistent with her aggressive play. Her and sabalanka are hitting their stride and honestly - when they’re on point - Iga can be over powered by them. We’ve seen her dominate the tour but both Sabalanka and Rybakina have become top level opponents that are probably playing much better than her right now.
@RaulRamirez Semantics lol Waiting for your opponent to make mistakes is pushing in my books.
 
@RaulRamirez Semantics lol Waiting for your opponent to make mistakes is pushing in my books.

At the pro level - if they’re pushers why can’t the attacker hit through them? Oh wait. Court coverage, pace, redirecting pace, and counterpunching and depth that technically forces mistakes.

This isn’t club tennis where a 3.5 - fringe 4.0 level player is hitting moon balls hoping you sail it out with improper form.
 
it has been discussed in AO thread, apparently that's something Rybakina needs, she is too quiet on court and she needs that interaction/motivation from her coach.
In my professional playing days, I had a coach in the stands yapping, yapping, and yapping at me after every point. At a changeover I walked over to near his seating and told him: "Will you please quit yapping. I'm doing fine figuring things out on my own. Now listen, if I want your advice, I'll ask for it. Otherwise, shut your mouth and sit quietly.

The coach stayed hushed. I won the match. And I fired the coach the next day. No one who knew me was surprised.
 
At the pro level - if they’re pushers why can’t the attacker hit through them? Oh wait. Court coverage, pace, redirecting pace, and counterpunching and depth that technically forces mistakes.

This isn’t club tennis where a 3.5 - fringe 4.0 level player is hitting moon balls hoping you sail it out with improper form.
Iga is a pusher of the highest level :) Or if you want a counter puncher, not a first striker!
 
I didn’t think Rybakina‘s on court coaching could be exceeded but then there was Medvedev v Alcarez. Not only was Carlos getting point by point coaching but ESPN highlighted it more by having MaryJo provide translations of the instructions JCF was giving him. It was just too much. Ferrero might as well have been playing himself. Can’t Alcarez problem solve himself ?

i repeat again something should be done to limit this.
 
Back
Top