Beauty is subjective.Safin did not have to train like crazy to produce tons of smooth and effortless Backhands down the line or crosscourt winners.
Sinner is a hard worker and dedicated player who has good backhand, but it is nowhere close to beauty, that Marat had back in the day.
It’s hard for me to take your opinions seriously when you make outlandish claims like that.Sinner has average BH.
It's not even close - Safin easy had much better backhand. Even not in his prime
It would make more sense to compare Safin's BH with Agassi, Nalbandan, Djokovic or Kafelnikov.
Obviously agree with everything.Z was confused throughout the match , he tried attacking then made more Unforced errors and Sinner’s phenomenal defending and shot tolerance wore him off in the last set Sinner was in full offensive mode and Z basically gave up. It’s scary how Sinner is making his weakness a weapon now, his movement and defense has become insane now , two years back these aspects of his game were considered liabilities.
I think sinner has ability to be better backhand player than Djokovic if he isn't already.Reviewing highlight videos allows us to appreciate some aspects of their respective backhands. Safin relied far more on it to finish points, while current Sinner has one of the best forehands of the last two decades. Spectacular shots from sharp angels cross-court and down-the-line dominate in Safin's highlights. Still Murat could not defend so well on that wing, lacking the ability to slide into shots.
His backhands were more dualistic, flat and hard or loopy and softish.
Not just backhands but moments of brilliance...
Sinner is from the post-Djokovic era. Jannik can do everything Safin could, but mostly better and a lot more. In fact the great quality and versatility of his groundstrokes enable him to win matches from the back...
I think sinner has ability to be better backhand player than Djokovic if he isn't already.
I think sinner has ability to be better backhand player than Djokovic if he isn't already.
True. Safin hardly used his BH as a defensive shot, he had majority of winners from his backhand (DL or deep angles).Safin is better at going DTL, and cross-court he can generate more angles.
Sinner hits very powerful and deep but he doesn't have Safin's versatility, he is a bit more solid and defends better.
I already responded to this useless argument. I never said any of that.Grand slam titles to decide who has the best stroke ? Then Roger Federer with 20 slams has better serve than Ivo Karlovic with zero slams
You’re the fourth person saying this after I’ve painstakingly explained that that wasn’t my point. Please learn to not just read the words in front of you, but also think about what the message was that the other person is trying to convey.I think Safin has a better backhand than Nadal and Federer and they both reached 20 grand slam titles.
Del Potro has a better forehand than Djokovic too.
Obviously agree with everything.
The only thing I wonder is how we could come to consider his movement, let's say before 2024, as a weak point.
But does anyone remember the Sinner sunshine double 2023 version?
The one who humiliated Rublev in Miami with some fearsome defenses resulting from an incredible movement compared to his height?
Obviously he has perfected the movement in recent years, consequently he has also significantly improved his defense, given that here too two things are quite consequential.
But Sinner 2023 was already an elite athlete.
The real change of gear on a physical and athletic level in his career occurred between 2022 and 2023, in the first off-season in which he was able to work with let's call Vagnozzi's staff.
The Sinner at the beginning of 2023 was already a monster.
PS
Incidentally, purely personal taste, I consider her sunshine double 2023 outfit to be the best I've ever worn.
I think sinner has ability to be better backhand player than Djokovic if he isn't already.
Sinner showed the same ability at similar age vs Nadal.Naaj, Djokovic in his prime could break Rafa’s FH with his own BH, it was that good. Basically Djokovic’s BH had everything from shot tolerance to attacking prowess , could generate crazy angle and would barely make errors.
Sinner showed the same ability at similar age vs Nadal.
I don't see any difference. Nadal beat him in 2020 and 2021 rome ? Both times winning the title. In 2021 rg Nadal played superbly.I am a big Sinner fan but old Nadal exposed his movement ( Djokodal were best at it) and made Sinner go for extra in their RG matches. Sinner can be scary good but Djokovic faced prime Nadal.
As already mentioned, with the Vagnozzi staff they began to strengthen the physical and athletic part during the 2022 off-season which preceded the 2023 season.He started working on his movement from 2023 and reached his peak in 2024. His movement was not world class when dealing with angled shots as we saw that in his matches against Djokovic in Wimbledon .Rublev is a flat hitter and doesn’t have variety in his shots to exploit movement.
I am a big Sinner fan but old Nadal exposed his movement ( Djokodal were best at it) and made Sinner go for extra in their RG matches. Sinner can be scary good but Djokovic faced prime Nadal.
I don't see any difference. Nadal beat him in 2020 and 2021 rome ? Both times winning the title. In 2021 rg Nadal played superbly.
The peak or prime is just a suggestion. It's not binding anyone from playing their best. Nadal played his best in those matches.
It can take a while to work up to a challenge. Djokovic's first victories against Nadal on clay occurred in 2011, when Djoker was 24. Before then, Djokovic lost nine straight matches on clay to Nadal. Sinner obviously couldn't have the same long-term opportunity to improve, adapt, and problem-solve against an opponent who was 15 years older than he.I am a big Sinner fan but old Nadal exposed his movement ( Djokodal were best at it) and made Sinner go for extra in their RG matches. Sinner can be scary good but Djokovic faced prime Nadal.
And even at that time he was not bad except physically.It can take a while to work up to a challenge. Djokovic's first victories against Nadal on clay occurred in 2011, when Djoker was 24. Before then, Djokovic lost nine straight matches on clay to Nadal. Sinner obviously couldn't have the same long-term opportunity to improve, adapt, and problem-solve against an opponent who was 15 years older than he.
Sinner also has a better serve and broader sex appealThis thread needs to be executed.
And even at that time he was not bad except physically.