A few people have been coming here saying how boring Sampras was. So I say to them, fine. I have a challenge for them. And the challenge is to come here on the message board and argue against this: Sampras v Agassi was undoubtedly the greatest rivalry of the 1990s and along with McEnroe v Borg and McEnroe v Connors was among the greatest rivalries in the history of men's tennis. Sampras v Agassi you had to choose one or the other. It was like Rangers v Celtic, Man Utd v Liverpool and so on. It was a rivalry which got sport fans in general talking not just tennis fans. They played in finals and semifinals all over the world and played some of the best tennis together people have ever seen. So, how is that possible if Sampras was boring and his game boring to watch. That would not be possible would it? Lets not forget the great rivalries Sampras also had with Becker, Edberg, Goran, Rafter, Krajicek, Chang and Courier. So, come on, I invite you to say this is all nonsense I'm talking and that Sampras was too boring to make this all possible. BUT, you must have very good arguments.