Au contraire'
The same tennis "experts/historians" were ranking players for decades, however, those players rankings are eviscerated in this forum by the Open Era zealots who will not credit, Lenglen, Wills-Moody, BJK, or Court's undervalued similar dominance. I was simply bowing to consensus and only taking into consideration Weeks at Number One during the Open Era by the WTA Computer housed in Chrissy's bedroom in Florida. However, now the same individuals have flip-flopped their support of the rankings, because #Serena is challenging the top. Those who have a natural and embedded disdain for #Serena even tried to discredit the same "Weeks at Number One" data point that they used to wave to the world as the gold standard in tennis history when #Serena's weeks were lower than #Chris'. See, the dysfunctional double-standard, hypocritical vomitus continues to be hurled #Serena's way.
The reality-being, if you took into consideration #Wikipedia's tennis experts and historians (oxymoron) account of rankings, decades prior, #Chris would be further down the list historically. If you take the modern WTA Computer rankings at face value, #Chris still loses in a similar regard. #Serena has already surpassed #Chris in the most important matrix, the #ITF-sanctioned Grand Slam events. Now, #Serena is passing her along #MinorHighway as well.
#Chris had her day historically. #Serena is passing her historically, which ruffles the feather of her more adamant fans (even those from across the Atlantic). That Lipton Tea #Chris enjoyed so much continues to be loved like Kool-Aid in the land of Elizabeth.
#PTL #JC4Ever
Angie