Gonzo_style
Hall of Fame
Bet Konta will be on the other side of the draw
That seems a very fair point.
Was Cljsters? I genuinely don't know.
Serena is greatly privileged and her return was made way easier unlike other tennis mothers.Yet she still thinks she is being discriminated and the world is against her.
Lol so a woman that has given her life to tennis (and more successfully than literally almost anyone who has ever played the game, should stay seeded lower bc your inner Satan is angry? Sounds legit. Shes either going to be good enough or not at the end of the day, this is more PR than it will actually matter.
She was NOT drug tested more than any other top player.Serena had been tested 5 times in 6 months less than Halep and Wozniacki.Cornet had been tested 20(!!)times last year.Federer was tested 7 times in one month.Is that because of his colour too?Yes, you are right. The FACT that she’s being/ has been drug tested more than the other top players was just a figment of her imagination. She must have made that up. Again, this was not her decision, it was the decision of the USTA. Strange that it’s her you attack and not them.
She was NOT drug tested more than any other top player.Serena had been tested 5 times in 6 months less than Halep and Wozniacki.Cornet had been tested 20(!!)times last year.Federer was tested 7 times in one month.Is that because of his colour too?
Azarenka is not a US citizen, duhI have no hatred or otherwise. But if maternity leave is a reason, did they do the same for Victoria Azarenka?
Only one person got screwed over by this decision and that was Gavrilova who went from a top 24 seed to #25. As for pregnancy being a choice, remember that without women having children, there would be no tennis so to punish women for continuing the next generation is insanely stupid and the WTA are finally trying to do something about this. Again, I hope Serena isn’t the exception and she is now the rule but only time will tell.This subjective seeding is horsesh** no matter how you slice it
I guess it's good for Serena, but not so good for player(s) who were screwed out of their rightfully earned spots
Indeed it isn't. Pregnancy is a choice. Nobody chooses to be injured.
So do enlighten me: why should players be rewarded for taking time off the tour out of their own volition?
If you think the only reason she got bumped a bracket is because of her fans and not also because she had a baby less than 12 months ago shows how stupid some people are on this forum.So a woman with a perfectly legitimate seeding should be bumped up because you’re her fan?
Yeah Serena was scared of her pigeon who she hasn’t lost to in 14 years. Lmao y’all are a joke.I bet Serena's team baught this seeding because after 7 months of being back Serena couldn't bear to be behind Sharapova.
So a woman with a perfectly legitimate seeding should be bumped up because you’re her fan?
So we're all just going to gloss over the fact that someone on the first page called this "affirmative action"?
Where are the other racists like Chadillac, Mr Freeny, JackGates and Rogerjohnson to support their brethen?
Yet she still thinks she is being discriminated and the world is against her.
Had Williams been bumped any higher, it would have affected her sister Venus, who is ranked 16th. If Serena Williams had been placed in the top 16, a domino effect would have knocked Venus Williams out of the top half of the 32 seeds, meaning she would have to face a higher-ranked player in the third round.
“We’ll never know, but I actually think Serena would have been in the top 16 had it not pushed Venus out,” the ESPN analyst Pam Shriver said. “I think it’s quite possible they would have seeded her somewhere in the 12 to 16 range, given the Wimbledon final and how many times she’s won it. But I think it became really difficult to push Venus out of 16."
No matter if she was moved to the 17th or 24th place. It is useless to dissect. What is important is that she has been shifted to a better eight group seeds.If this is correct, they only had to move her from 26 to 24. This also benefits the top 8. If you were a top 8 player, you don't play her in the 3rd round. The only player worse off is number 24.
Unless someone drops out above her- moving up to 16th. That's a big difference.No matter if she was moved to the 17th or 24th place. It is useless to dissect. What is important is that she has been shifted to a better eight group seeds.
You're not a big fan of history, I take it.Most of this world is really against her, but never because of her skin colour. This very same world used to admire Arthur Ash, love Zina Garisson and Ivonne Goolagong. It's very fabourably disposed to Madison Keath and Sloane Stephens. S.Williams is despised for her abominable rudeness, insolence, impudence, arrogance, and entitled attitude.
curious wordingIt’s pretty funny.
America has so many things wrong with them
from police brutality to campus rape culture to Trump (where do I start) and more but Serena being bumped up a seeding bracket and suddenly it’s all hell breaks loose. It’s why you can’t take these trolls seriously, their Serena hatred knows no bounds.
+1Here you come to the new users rescue. How sweet of you. It's embarrassing because we as Americans are condoning changing the rules in the middle of the game. This is a tennis forum, not a political/social isuues forum that you try so desperately to turn it into. It's pathetic.
It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.Here you come to the new users rescue. How sweet of you. It's embarrassing because we as Americans are condoning changing the rules in the middle of the game. This is a tennis forum, not a political/social isuues forum that you try so desperately to turn it into. It's pathetic.
This is you trying to trigger a social argument ONCE again.It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.
Oh and it’s not changing the rules, slams have the discretion to change the seeds. Just hasn’t now been implemented except at Wimbledon.
This is you trying to trigger a social argument ONCE again.
My apologies for responding to what you REALLY wanted to talk about since 80% of your post was about social crap. You added a miniscule P.S. at the bottom for cosmetic purposes. LMAO. The draw is out BTW. Let's argue about that instead of pointless issues that you will never back down from no matter what I say anyways.It’s funny that you didn’t bother to respond to me calling out your lie that it’s changing the rules in the middle of the game except that the slams have the discretion to amend seedings as we regularly see at Wimbledon. But hey whatever suits your negative agenda.
But yeah try to make out like I’m not participating and instead trying to make this a social argument. Ignore the actual facts though.
If Federer gets pregnant and drops below the top 30 let him work his way back.
Welcome to the US Open, where seeds are made up and the ranking doesn't matter.
Lmao more like you couldn’t respond to it cause I called out your usual BS about rules being changed for Serena which just isn’t true, nice try ignoring it again.My apologies for responding to what you REALLY wanted to talk about since 80% of your post was about social crap. You added a miniscule P.S. at the bottom for cosmetic purposes. LMAO. The draw is out BTW. Let's argue about that instead of pointless issues that you will never back down from no matter what I say anyways.
i dont like serena much but after what the us open did to her in that 2004 match against capriati,
bumping her up a little is the least they could do...
What would her draw look like if she'd kept her original/actual ranking?lmao that bumping didnt end well
venus in third round and halep in fourth
Nobody is being "punished," and framing the debate this way is highly dishonest. It's about not unjustly handing seeding spots to someone who's been away from the game for personal reasons.Only one person got screwed over by this decision and that was Gavrilova who went from a top 24 seed to #25. As for pregnancy being a choice, remember that without women having children, there would be no tennis so to punish women for continuing the next generation is insanely stupid and the WTA are finally trying to do something about this. Again, I hope Serena isn’t the exception and she is now the rule but only time will tell.
Most of this world is really against her, but never because of her skin colour. This very same world used to admire Arthur Ash, love Zina Garisson and Ivonne Goolagong. It's very favourably disposed to Madison Keath and Sloane Stephens. S.Williams is despised for her abominable rudeness, insolence, impudence, arrogance, and entitled attitude.
I meant the real draw. You won't see me arguing WTA very often.Lmao more like you couldn’t respond to it cause I called out your usual BS about rules being changed for Serena which just isn’t true, nice try ignoring it again.
And yeah the draw is out and she pretty much ended up getting a shocker of a draw anyway so all your whinging and whining was for nothing. Not surprising as all you seem to do is whinge about Serena anytime a thread pops up about her.
So a second round exit is considered “OK”?I must be the only one who understand this move from the US Open’s viewpoint.
She would’ve been the #25 seed so she could’ve faced a top 8 player in the 3R, they boost her to #17 so it’s the 4R instead before she meets a top 8 player. They factored in her recent performances (Wimbledon final being a good result and then the poor loss in San Jose and ok result in Cincy). Instead of making her a top 8 or top 16 seed they made her a top 24 seed. You can argue they should’ve just left her as the #25 seed but from an economic standpoint and trying to make sure they have the second biggest name in tennis in later rounds, I understand. (Yes, I just said Serena was the second biggest name in tennis, don’t @ me your anger).
If you think the only reason she got bumped a bracket is because of her fans and not also because she had a baby less than 12 months ago shows how stupid some people are on this forum.
So a second round exit is considered “OK”?
Then it wouldn’t matter if she faced a top 8 seed in the third round if she were seeded her ranking, right?Considering who she played, it’s more than ok
Konta has a terrible draw!Bet Konta will be on the other side of the draw
It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.
Oh and it’s not changing the rules, slams have the discretion to change the seeds. Just hasn’t now been implemented except at Wimbledon.
Some 'celebrities' crave publicity more than others.We all thrive on publicity if we can get it. We live in a celebrity culture after all. And all great tennis players are celebrities who thrive on keeping their names in the media.
They even set up tax-friendly Foundations stuffed full of well-paid friends and relatives to demonstrate how much in love with the great unwashed they are and do so to great media acclaim.
Some 'celebrities' crave publicity more than others.
And some manage it better than others.