Serena Williams seeded 17 at U.S. Open, nine spots above her ranking

vandre

Hall of Fame
per wikipedia, clijsters was unseeded at the 2009 us open (which she would go on to win). she was given wildcards for cincy, the rodgers cup and the us open.

en route to her us open victory, clijsters beat 5 seeded players (14 bartoli/ 2nd round, 3 v. williams/ 4th round, 18 li na/ qf, 2 s. williams/ sf, 9 wozniacki/ f).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Clijsters#2009:_Comeback_and_second_US_Open_title
That seems a very fair point.
Was Cljsters? I genuinely don't know.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ

helixx

Hall of Fame
she will be packing soon anyways and it will be only more embarassing for her that she needed bump from
usta and even that couldnt help her:p
 

Tostao80

Rookie
Serena is greatly privileged and her return was made way easier unlike other tennis mothers.Yet she still thinks she is being discriminated and the world is against her.

Yes, you are right. The FACT that she’s being/ has been drug tested more than the other top players was just a figment of her imagination. She must have made that up. Again, this was not her decision, it was the decision of the USTA. Strange that it’s her you attack and not them.
 

SQA333

Hall of Fame
Lol so a woman that has given her life to tennis (and more successfully than literally almost anyone who has ever played the game, should stay seeded lower bc your inner Satan is angry? Sounds legit. Shes either going to be good enough or not at the end of the day, this is more PR than it will actually matter.

So a woman with a perfectly legitimate seeding should be bumped up because you’re her fan?
 

VigiliantEagle

New User
Yes, you are right. The FACT that she’s being/ has been drug tested more than the other top players was just a figment of her imagination. She must have made that up. Again, this was not her decision, it was the decision of the USTA. Strange that it’s her you attack and not them.
She was NOT drug tested more than any other top player.Serena had been tested 5 times in 6 months less than Halep and Wozniacki.Cornet had been tested 20(!!)times last year.Federer was tested 7 times in one month.Is that because of his colour too?
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
This subjective seeding is horsesh** no matter how you slice it

I guess it's good for Serena, but not so good for player(s) who were screwed out of their rightfully earned spots


Indeed it isn't. Pregnancy is a choice. Nobody chooses to be injured.

So do enlighten me: why should players be rewarded for taking time off the tour out of their own volition?
Only one person got screwed over by this decision and that was Gavrilova who went from a top 24 seed to #25. As for pregnancy being a choice, remember that without women having children, there would be no tennis so to punish women for continuing the next generation is insanely stupid and the WTA are finally trying to do something about this. Again, I hope Serena isn’t the exception and she is now the rule but only time will tell.
 

Primavera

Rookie
So we're all just going to gloss over the fact that someone on the first page called this "affirmative action"?

Where are the other racists like Chadillac, Mr Freeny, JackGates and Rogerjohnson to support their brethen?

What do races have to do with seeding? Serena! Is that you? It's you who has a nice habit of refering to race and gender in all your wrongdoings.
 

Primavera

Rookie
Yet she still thinks she is being discriminated and the world is against her.

Most of this world is really against her, but never because of her skin colour. This very same world used to admire Arthur Ash, love Zina Garisson and Ivonne Goolagong. It's very favourably disposed to Madison Keath and Sloane Stephens. S.Williams is despised for her abominable rudeness, insolence, impudence, arrogance, and entitled attitude.
 
Last edited:

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
From the NY Times - interesting re Venus, Shriver's comments and other mothers, Azarenka and Minnella.

"At Wimbledon, Williams was given a seeding of 25th, in the lowest stratus of seeds but far above her ranking of 183 at the time. Her seeding upgrade meant that 32nd-ranked Dominika Cibulkova became unseeded, but there is no such issue at the U.S. Open because of Williams’s relatively minor promotion. The only player meaningfully downgraded was the 24th-ranked Gavrilova, who was dropped to 25th, and would now be slated to face a top-eight seed in the third round.

Had Williams been bumped any higher, it would have affected her sister Venus, who is ranked 16th. If Serena Williams had been placed in the top 16, a domino effect would have knocked Venus Williams out of the top half of the 32 seeds, meaning she would have to face a higher-ranked player in the third round.

“We’ll never know, but I actually think Serena would have been in the top 16 had it not pushed Venus out,” the ESPN analyst Pam Shriver said. “I think it’s quite possible they would have seeded her somewhere in the 12 to 16 range, given the Wimbledon final and how many times she’s won it. But I think it became really difficult to push Venus out of 16.”

“Overall, I think it’s kind of where Serena belongs,” Shriver added.

Despite her ranking, Serena Williams is currently a narrow favorite to win the U.S. Open among most oddsmakers, just ahead of top-ranked Simona Halep and Wimbledon champion Angelique Kerber.

Williams has already arrived in New York and has been practicing with her coach Patrick Mouratoglou, who was absent in San Jose.

Shriver believes Williams has had plenty of time to further improve in the lead-up to her first match in Queens.

“We all know, in 10 days, how much progress she can make with her game,” she said.

The fortunes of other recent mothers have also been mixed heading into the tournament. Victoria Azarenka, a two-time U.S. Open finalist, was given a wild card into the main draw of the tournament, but was not seeded. Mandy Minella missed out on a spot in the main draw by just one spot; she would have entered directly on the strength of her protected ranking had one more player withdrawn before qualifying rounds began.

The men’s seedings were unchanged from the rankings. Two recent U.S. Open winners on the men’s side, the 2012 champion Andy Murray and the 2016 champion Stan Wawrinka, will both be unseeded after having struggled with injuries recently."
 
Had Williams been bumped any higher, it would have affected her sister Venus, who is ranked 16th. If Serena Williams had been placed in the top 16, a domino effect would have knocked Venus Williams out of the top half of the 32 seeds, meaning she would have to face a higher-ranked player in the third round.

“We’ll never know, but I actually think Serena would have been in the top 16 had it not pushed Venus out,” the ESPN analyst Pam Shriver said. “I think it’s quite possible they would have seeded her somewhere in the 12 to 16 range, given the Wimbledon final and how many times she’s won it. But I think it became really difficult to push Venus out of 16."

Now, THIS is epic.

:cool:
 

Enceladus

Legend
If this is correct, they only had to move her from 26 to 24. This also benefits the top 8. If you were a top 8 player, you don't play her in the 3rd round. The only player worse off is number 24.
No matter if she was moved to the 17th or 24th place. It is useless to dissect. What is important is that she has been shifted to a better eight group seeds.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
No matter if she was moved to the 17th or 24th place. It is useless to dissect. What is important is that she has been shifted to a better eight group seeds.
Unless someone drops out above her- moving up to 16th. That's a big difference.
 

big ted

Legend
i dont like serena much but after what the us open did to her in that 2004 match against capriati,
bumping her up a little is the least they could do...
 

TennisLBC

Professional
Most of this world is really against her, but never because of her skin colour. This very same world used to admire Arthur Ash, love Zina Garisson and Ivonne Goolagong. It's very fabourably disposed to Madison Keath and Sloane Stephens. S.Williams is despised for her abominable rudeness, insolence, impudence, arrogance, and entitled attitude.
You're not a big fan of history, I take it.
 
It’s pretty funny.

America has so many things wrong with them

from police brutality to campus rape culture to Trump (where do I start) and more but Serena being bumped up a seeding bracket and suddenly it’s all hell breaks loose. It’s why you can’t take these trolls seriously, their Serena hatred knows no bounds.
curious wording
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
Here you come to the new users rescue. How sweet of you. It's embarrassing because we as Americans are condoning changing the rules in the middle of the game. This is a tennis forum, not a political/social isuues forum that you try so desperately to turn it into. It's pathetic.
+1
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
Here you come to the new users rescue. How sweet of you. It's embarrassing because we as Americans are condoning changing the rules in the middle of the game. This is a tennis forum, not a political/social isuues forum that you try so desperately to turn it into. It's pathetic.
It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.

Oh and it’s not changing the rules, slams have the discretion to change the seeds. Just hasn’t now been implemented except at Wimbledon.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.

Oh and it’s not changing the rules, slams have the discretion to change the seeds. Just hasn’t now been implemented except at Wimbledon.
This is you trying to trigger a social argument ONCE again.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
It’s funny that you didn’t bother to respond to me calling out your lie that it’s changing the rules in the middle of the game except that the slams have the discretion to amend seedings as we regularly see at Wimbledon. But hey whatever suits your negative agenda.

But yeah try to make out like I’m not participating and instead trying to make this a social argument. Ignore the actual facts though.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
It’s funny that you didn’t bother to respond to me calling out your lie that it’s changing the rules in the middle of the game except that the slams have the discretion to amend seedings as we regularly see at Wimbledon. But hey whatever suits your negative agenda.

But yeah try to make out like I’m not participating and instead trying to make this a social argument. Ignore the actual facts though.
My apologies for responding to what you REALLY wanted to talk about since 80% of your post was about social crap. You added a miniscule P.S. at the bottom for cosmetic purposes. LMAO. The draw is out BTW. Let's argue about that instead of pointless issues that you will never back down from no matter what I say anyways.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
My apologies for responding to what you REALLY wanted to talk about since 80% of your post was about social crap. You added a miniscule P.S. at the bottom for cosmetic purposes. LMAO. The draw is out BTW. Let's argue about that instead of pointless issues that you will never back down from no matter what I say anyways.
Lmao more like you couldn’t respond to it cause I called out your usual BS about rules being changed for Serena which just isn’t true, nice try ignoring it again.

And yeah the draw is out and she pretty much ended up getting a shocker of a draw anyway so all your whinging and whining was for nothing. Not surprising as all you seem to do is whinge about Serena anytime a thread pops up about her.
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
i dont like serena much but after what the us open did to her in that 2004 match against capriati,
bumping her up a little is the least they could do...

I agree that there were multiple bad calls in 2004 USO, but the blame should be on the umpire Alves and those line judges.

But to make it up by placing Serena higher seed while punishing other top seeded players who had nothing to do with the 2004 incident is wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Only one person got screwed over by this decision and that was Gavrilova who went from a top 24 seed to #25. As for pregnancy being a choice, remember that without women having children, there would be no tennis so to punish women for continuing the next generation is insanely stupid and the WTA are finally trying to do something about this. Again, I hope Serena isn’t the exception and she is now the rule but only time will tell.
Nobody is being "punished," and framing the debate this way is highly dishonest. It's about not unjustly handing seeding spots to someone who's been away from the game for personal reasons.

The reason doesn't matter. They could just be taking a mental and physical break, or volunteering to do charity work in Africa. It doesn't matter. Or at least it shouldn't.

How many current pros had mothers who were active top players anyway? Most pros don't want to encourage their kids to do the same thing because they know how harsh life on tour is
 

Tostao80

Rookie
Most of this world is really against her, but never because of her skin colour. This very same world used to admire Arthur Ash, love Zina Garisson and Ivonne Goolagong. It's very favourably disposed to Madison Keath and Sloane Stephens. S.Williams is despised for her abominable rudeness, insolence, impudence, arrogance, and entitled attitude.

What a truly ignorant post. You think that there aren’t any people out there who don’t like her because she’s black? Have you lived under a rock the last 30 Years? Furthermore, this very same world that used to admire the likes of Arthur Ashe? do you know how much racist crap he had to put up with in the 70s, in America? It wasn’t pleasant. Listen to those who put up with this crap on a daily basis. Revisionism at its finest. And no, I’m not saying everyone who hates Serena is racist, I’m saying some are.
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
Lmao more like you couldn’t respond to it cause I called out your usual BS about rules being changed for Serena which just isn’t true, nice try ignoring it again.

And yeah the draw is out and she pretty much ended up getting a shocker of a draw anyway so all your whinging and whining was for nothing. Not surprising as all you seem to do is whinge about Serena anytime a thread pops up about her.
I meant the real draw. You won't see me arguing WTA very often.
 

cluckcluck

Hall of Fame
I must be the only one who understand this move from the US Open’s viewpoint.

She would’ve been the #25 seed so she could’ve faced a top 8 player in the 3R, they boost her to #17 so it’s the 4R instead before she meets a top 8 player. They factored in her recent performances (Wimbledon final being a good result and then the poor loss in San Jose and ok result in Cincy). Instead of making her a top 8 or top 16 seed they made her a top 24 seed. You can argue they should’ve just left her as the #25 seed but from an economic standpoint and trying to make sure they have the second biggest name in tennis in later rounds, I understand. (Yes, I just said Serena was the second biggest name in tennis, don’t @ me your anger).
So a second round exit is considered “OK”?
 
It’s pathetic that this is what you decide to take a stand on and get so outraged about. Serena gets bumped up a seed and it’s suddenly the end of the world. I can think of far worse things that have happened this year by American players. Jared Donaldson abusing an umpire comes to mind. Donald Young v Ryan harrison comes to mind as well. But hey, Serena getting bumped a seed bracket, wahhhhh.

Oh and it’s not changing the rules, slams have the discretion to change the seeds. Just hasn’t now been implemented except at Wimbledon.

It is pathetic to think that a player that already enjoys a lot of privileges shouldn't be treated to even more such (and at the expense of other top players)?

Where did you learn that?

:cool:
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
It's a double edged sword: Serena Williams thrives on publicity so it can't be a shock when it's negative.
Yes, the USTA are responsible, not Williams, for the seeding debacle, but it's her name/status that generates headlines. Be they good or bad headlines.
And, therefore, people will have views one way or another. I get the impression she likes to keep her name in the media so I doubt she'll mind much.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
We all thrive on publicity if we can get it. We live in a celebrity culture after all. And all great tennis players are celebrities who thrive on keeping their names in the media.

They even set up tax-friendly Foundations stuffed full of well-paid friends and relatives to demonstrate how much in love with the great unwashed they are and do so to great media acclaim.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
We all thrive on publicity if we can get it. We live in a celebrity culture after all. And all great tennis players are celebrities who thrive on keeping their names in the media.

They even set up tax-friendly Foundations stuffed full of well-paid friends and relatives to demonstrate how much in love with the great unwashed they are and do so to great media acclaim.
Some 'celebrities' crave publicity more than others.
And some manage it better than others.
 
Top