triforce defender
Semi-Pro
Would you be satisfied with Federer/Nadal's career accomplishments to date if they won nothing else from here on out or do you need more to be satisfied as a fan?
Let me elaborate: As sports fans, we engage in a hobby for failure. Our favorite teams/players will more often than not fail to win championships/big titles than win them. Very few fan bases experience consistent championship happiness (i.e. New York Yankee fans and fans of Tiger Woods pre-2010).
But Federer fans have experienced more happiness than any tennis fan base in history. Sure, Federer has had some crushing losses, but he has triumphed at more slams and WTFs than anyone else in history; coupled that with his record weeks at #1 and the amount of happiness Federer fans have felt over his career trumps every other tennis player fanbase in history.
Similarly, Nadal fans (like myself) have experienced more happiness than any tennis fan base except Federer's (and possibly Sampras's). Yes, we've endured his many injuries and thus have had the unhappiness of not seeing him play over extended times. But Nadal's career golden slam/channel slams/unprecedented RG dominance have more than made up for those absences. If Nadal never won another title, I would be still be satisfied as a fan because the amount of happiness I have felt being his fan still trumps almost every other tennis fan base in history.
Don't get me wrong: I still want Nadal to win going forward and I'm sure Federer fans still want him to win big titles. But since Federer/Nadal fans have had it better than 99-100% of all other fan bases in history, should we feel satisfied now and not long for more? Or as human beings, are we so flawed that the more we have the more we still want?
Let me elaborate: As sports fans, we engage in a hobby for failure. Our favorite teams/players will more often than not fail to win championships/big titles than win them. Very few fan bases experience consistent championship happiness (i.e. New York Yankee fans and fans of Tiger Woods pre-2010).
But Federer fans have experienced more happiness than any tennis fan base in history. Sure, Federer has had some crushing losses, but he has triumphed at more slams and WTFs than anyone else in history; coupled that with his record weeks at #1 and the amount of happiness Federer fans have felt over his career trumps every other tennis player fanbase in history.
Similarly, Nadal fans (like myself) have experienced more happiness than any tennis fan base except Federer's (and possibly Sampras's). Yes, we've endured his many injuries and thus have had the unhappiness of not seeing him play over extended times. But Nadal's career golden slam/channel slams/unprecedented RG dominance have more than made up for those absences. If Nadal never won another title, I would be still be satisfied as a fan because the amount of happiness I have felt being his fan still trumps almost every other tennis fan base in history.
Don't get me wrong: I still want Nadal to win going forward and I'm sure Federer fans still want him to win big titles. But since Federer/Nadal fans have had it better than 99-100% of all other fan bases in history, should we feel satisfied now and not long for more? Or as human beings, are we so flawed that the more we have the more we still want?