serious RG prediction :: if nadal and djokovic meet RG SF , dominic thiem win can RG

[Sport]

Serious RG prediction? You lost me at "skypadq". I’m questioning the “seriousness” of your prediction based on your posting history. That’s what.

That is a logical fallacy (wrong argument) known as argumentum ad hominem which consists in attacking the person who makes an argument rather than the argument in itself. You have not criticized what he talked about in the OP (the possibility of Thiem winning RG). Merely criticizing his posting history is an invalid argument, as he could be right this time despite the posting history.

I do not agree with skypadq, but it is important to respect logic in the forum. We must criticize the arguments, not only the person who makes an argument. Another option is to simply ignore a particular user if you are "tired" of his arguments. Now, using fallacies is illogical and thus not serious.

 

[Deleted member 770948]

let 's think this way

RG ,no . 1 seed will be novak djokovic , right ?
no . 2 seed will be nadal or medvedev
let 's say no .2 seed will be danil medvedev
no .3 seed will be rafa
no .4 seed will be dominic thiem

so if that seed happen , rafa and novak can meet SF in RG
you knows danil medvedev is non factor in RG
if thiem can recover well his injury , i really belive thiem has stood a chance this year
but this only happen , has to novak djokovic and rafa meet semi at RG

so , plan for thiem is rafa beat novak djokovic in over four hour match at RG
and RG final is rafa vs thiem
and final place is indoor and rafa is tired physically

thiem beat rafa in five set and takes the crown
this is thiem 's only shot

How many games is Djokovic going to win vs. Nadal? He only won 7 games when they met at Roland Garros last year, indoor!
My pet dog could wear out Nadal more than Djokovic did.....
Also all Nadjokovic meetings in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 were easy wins for Nadal.
Thiem needs a lot more than Djovovic to hurt Nadal at Roland Garros!
Also Thiem would need to have brain surgery and heart surgery, because he's as weak as crap vs. Nadal at Roland Garros......Nadal has won 12 of their 13 sets!
Thiem has always been able to beat Nadal in best-of-3-sets.....but Roland Garros is a different universe.

 

[ChrisRF]

2019: Nadal can't even beat Fognini/Thiem/Tsitsipas (Thiem/Fognini were straight sets). Then he goes on to lose a total of 2 sets over the entirety of RG.

And then imagine that this was his worst RG of the last 4 editions. In the other 3 he lost one set altogether!

Nadal has declined in the other clay tournaments, but at RG he is better than ever. In fact, his last 4 years at RG were the most dominant 4-year-period of any player at a single Slam in tennis history, and by far. 3 lost sets in 4 years, that has no equivalent, not even close!

I think he knows better how to peak for RG right now. Years ago he wanted to dominate the whole clay season in the same fashion, but now he will take the other titles if easily possible, but won't go mad over some losses before RG.

 

[OldschoolKIaus]

Only when facing "Have you seen my serve?"-Zverev in the final.

 

[Villain]

That is a logical fallacy (wrong argument) known as argumentum ad hominem which consists in attacking the person who makes an argument rather than the argument in itself. You have not criticized what he talked about in the OP (the possibility of Thiem winning RG). Merely criticizing his posting history is an invalid argument, as he could be right this time despite the posting history.

I do not agree with skypadq, but it is important to respect logic in the forum. We must criticize the arguments, not only the person who makes an argument. Another option is to simply ignore a particular user if you are "tired" of his arguments. Now, using fallacies is illogical and thus not serious.

You just tried to bring logic into a skypadq thread:

 

[Deleted member 771911]

Thiem is in a slump while the likes of Tsitsipas and Rublev are going up a gear. Not happening for Thiem.

 

[DIMI_D]

Sky is the greatest poster on TTW period

 

[kishnabe]

If it goes 5 sets, and the winner is hampere/injured during the match.

Winning the SF on adrenaline and pain killer.

Even so, Thiem will find a way to hit some timely UE to lose the match.

 

[USO]

let 's think this way

RG ,no . 1 seed will be novak djokovic , right ?
no . 2 seed will be nadal or medvedev
let 's say no .2 seed will be danil medvedev
no .3 seed will be rafa
no .4 seed will be dominic thiem

so if that seed happen , rafa and novak can meet SF in RG
you knows danil medvedev is non factor in RG
if thiem can recover well his injury , i really belive thiem has stood a chance this year
but this only happen , has to novak djokovic and rafa meet semi at RG

so , plan for thiem is rafa beat novak djokovic in over four hour match at RG
and RG final is rafa vs thiem
and final place is indoor and rafa is tired physically

thiem beat rafa in five set and takes the crown
this is thiem 's only shot

Impossible because Djokovic won't reach the SF.

Impossible because Djokovic won't reach the SF.

Sorry but this time I couldn't choose between both emojis.

 

[Nadalgaenger]

We already know Thiem can take out Nole at RG.
Can he take out Nadal? Not unless he conjurés magic...

 

[zagor]

My prediction is Thiem loses in QF or earlier at the FO.

 

[vex]

I think Rafa suffers some kind of upset tho I’m not pinning down who. I think Thiem wins it all

 

[weakera]

Lol

 

[daphne]

If Nadl does not win Barca = no title at RG (no F at Wim, no SF at USO, FFA will be coached by Srdjan!)

 

[blablavla]

If Nadl does not win Barca = no title at RG (no F at Wim, no SF at USO, FFA will be coached by Srdjan!)

what happens if Nole doesn't win Belgrade title?