Sharapova lost on purpose

peoplespeace

peoplespeace

Professional
I guess im happy that Wozzy beat Sharapova since im Danish and she is good albeit not so deserved PR for Denmark. However, most likely Sharapova lost on purpose. Not only was it obvious that she was playing better and strangely underperformed on key points that Wozzy won. but why would Sharapova lose on purpose? Well, sports at this level is also political, as we see in FIFAs fight against racism etc. In the case on Wozniacki the issue is not race but gender. Now that Wozzys ex, Rory, is playing the best golf of his life after dumping Caroline, pressure from feminists mounts on Caroline to perform her best too to make it look like the break up has been just as good for her as it has been for Rory. And we know that womens tennis at the top organizational is full of feminists. So if Caroline is not able to win at the highst level in her own right after the break up then we (ie the feminists) have to make it look like she is, ie u make the other players understand that they are expected to lose, and voila, suddenly it magically looks like the break from Rory has been just as good for Wozzy as it seems to have for Rory. And thus the feminist movement is happy cus now it looks like it is just as good for as woman to get rid of a man as it is for a man to dump his woman. So now u know why Sharapova lost on purpose. Your Welcome!
 
Last edited:
Even so if this allegations were to be proven true...what then if Rory wins a ton of the biggies while Woz only manage a single (''gift'') slam?:eek: It would still be a glaring contrast.
 
Match fixing orchestrated by the feminist mafia.

I believe now I've heard every conspiracy theory. That's enough internet for today.
 
Vcore89 said:
Even so if this allegations were to be proven true...what then if Rory wins a ton of the biggies while Woz only manage a single (''gift'') slam?:eek: It would still be a glaring contrast.
Click to expand...

Sure, but what everybody is focused on is the break-up period, ie who gains from getting away from the other. Rory seems to have gained, however I wont exclude the possibility that Rorys golfing competitors, having anticipated the actions of the "feminist mafia" have lost to Rory on purpose.

I don't think that anybody is too concerned about what happens in two or three years time as this will not be ascribed to the break up and thus doesn't have relevance in the war of the feminists on men.
 
Last edited:
Another win for Wozzy, this time by way of cramp! And Chris Evert says to USA Today that the break up was not only good for Rory but also for Wozzy :shock:

How can a break up be as good for the person who was dumped as it is for the person who got rid of the partner he didn't love anymore?
 
Never did a grand slam final come closer to an exhibition match than todays final betewwn Wozzy and Williams. im not gonna bother watching it.

And the mens final is another scandal. To gifted semi final matched to two very nice guys. But a grand slam is not a mr congeniality contest and matches should not be gifted at this level!
 
peoplespeace said:
but why would Sharapova lose on purpose? Well, sports at this level is also political, as we see in FIFAs fight against racism etc. In the case on Wozniacki the issue is not race but gender. Now that Wozzys ex, Rory, is playing the best golf of his life after dumping Caroline, pressure from feminists mounts on Caroline to perform her best too to make it look like the break up has been just as good for her as it has been for Rory.
Click to expand...

Today must have been tough for those that fix matches, but I guess they decided to fight against racism instead of siding with the feminists.

To me it was also obvious that Federer and Djokovic lost on purpose as did Berdych and Stan in the earlier round.

I'm glad I'm not the only one that can see this obvious match fixing. Keep up the fight peoplepeace. The people that are calling you crazy are just naive to how the world really works.
 
Vcore89 said:
What?:rolleyes:

You can not be serious!:lol:

Number 18 plus an asterisk.
Click to expand...
lol this entire thread is

UglyLividHanumanmonkey.gif
 
Omg this thread is ridiculous! It is so obvious she has been tanking matches for a decade now to elevate Serena. She is part of a PC cabal hell bent on creating a narrative of an African American champion. In fact, Maria doesn't even exist anymore. They wisked her away after the second time she beat Serena and replaced her with an android. That's why her interviews are so robotic and even her sarcasm seems rehearsed. They had to allow the first 2 wins so that Serena's later wins would seem like an accomplishment.
 
Last edited:
What if I was a professional tennis player and someone whispered in my ear during a Grand Slam tournament
that it is in my best interest to lose the next match, and I refused and went on to win the match and even the tournament.
What then? Would the match-fixing mafia make sure I fall off a hotel balcony after my press conference, under "mysterious circumstances"?
Or would they just put something radioactive in my food?

I want to know why athletes who are told to lose a match, never go on to win, just out of spite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MatsPhilander
Sharapova Under Investigation
Replies
37
Views
2K
Sentinel
Sentinel
conway
Rory already the 2nd greatest player of the Tiger era shows something
Replies
14
Views
1K
ACE of Hearts
ACE of Hearts
Nostradamus
Maria Sharapova in Shark tank-- credibility issues ?
Replies
16
Views
2K
puppybutts
puppybutts
Shroud
How did you find your purpose?
7 8 9
Replies
419
Views
12K
ByeByePoly
ByeByePoly
Northern
I know what the purpose of life is
2 3 4
Replies
153
Views
6K
Azure
Azure
Back
Top