Okay, good point...
Skiracer, I appreciate your thoughts, and of course an overhead is ideal. But consider the ground the server has to cover. She is serving from several feet over from the center hash. She has to get waaaaay over to her left before the ball bounces, in good enough position to smash? Oooh, not 4.0 stuff.
FWIW, serve and volley is not something I am seeing at ladies 4.0 except on the very high end. The serves are rarely that strong, and the returns are smoked. Personally, I am not all that successful with it unless the returners are hitting big angled returns or are routinely following their serves to net.
...I guess then all I would have said is what I ended up with, which is "this puts you in a defensive position, hit a defensive shot, don't try to go for a winner, just do whatever you have to to stay in the point, there is no perfect shot in this situation", instead of dictating that the ideal shot is a DTL passing shot.
Just some follow-up thoughts on S&V at whatever level. It used to be a few years ago that S&V, chip and charge was the
only way to play doubles, at whatever level. Now, you're seeing all kinds of formations and strategies, so, as I said, in many ways, doubles is a whole lot less "scripted" than singles. "Scripting" is not bad, if it's done effectively. S&V, for example, is a "scripting" that can close off the opposing team's options...if the S&V is done right. If done poorly...well, it's a liability, which you allude to.
I *do* think more doubles teams, at all levels, ought to at least experiment with S&V, chip and charge because it somewhat simplifies things for the team using these strategies. To an extent, if I serve and stay back with my partner at the net...well, it's kind of open ended, with a lot of "it depends" for how an individual point plays out (Strong serve? Net person has an opportunity to hit a winning volley? Not strong serve? Now it's the responsibility of the server, who stayed back...unless, of course, the serve was such a helium ball that the returner gave the net person an extra navel. Semi-strong serve, return cross-court? Server hit a forcing ground stroke, and move into the net...or maybe not, if the server doesn't have a forcing ground stroke, or can't volley for beans).
You get the picture. It's almost like we're inventing new doubles strategies based on the fact that we haven't, in some cases, mastered stroke fundamentals. IMHO, at the 4.0 level, and even before, you ought to be working on beefing up your serve (and I'm using the editorial "you" here, not anyone in this forum...), or you're going to have to come up with all kinds of unnatural acts to make up for your deficiencies. Remember, the two most important shots in the game are the serve and the return,
in that order. If you have neither, it doesn't matter how good your volley is, and in some ways, that is true at all levels,
and moreso in doubles than in singles.
I have a fairly fast serve, but this last year, what I found was that it's a lot more important to (a) get in lots of first serves, (b) do so (get first serves in) with variety (don't serve to where they *think* I'm going, vary my spins) and (b) work always on making sure I have a dependable, heavy second serve that I can thump down the middle of the box so I'm at least starting on equal terms with the returner. I'm 62, and though I'm in good shape, I don't like playing long points, so a heavy, unpredictable serve and strong return let me take command of the point sooner than later and play short, offensive points. Defensive skills are important, but I think the days are over when you can win with pure defense (Eddie Dibbs, Harold Solomon, on clay, some years ago).
A service ace is a nice thing, but just as good is a service winner. And, practically speaking, what I'm really trying to do, on most points, is hit a serve that will give me what I want for the
next shot. A couple of weeks back, before it
really started snowing in Colorado, I was playing points with my regular hitting partner, who is a little younger than I am and as strong as a horse. I hit a heavy, wide slice serve in the deuce court to his forehand, came in behind it, he gave me a hard return at my shoetops...and I hit a backhand volley cross-court for a winner.
Afterwords, he said something like "That backhand volley...I
know you had your eyes closed, because that was a Twilight Zone shot." And what I said was "I
expected the ball to come exactly where it did, and I was looking for it. Serving where I did, and knowing what you usually do on your forehand return with that ball, the return came back right where I thought it would, so I just stepped in and volleyed it away. If you'd have done something different, well, I'd have reacted to that and played through
that variation...but it didn't work that way, it worked like I thought it would."
So that's my lecture for today. The drill you were doing was a good one, because you have to learn defensive skills. Too many teams and players spend all their time trying to figure out how to hit only the best shots they're capable of, which is maybe not reality. But didn't someone say "The best defense is a good offense." Or, as we say in ski racing:
Question: How do you stop your skis from skidding?
Answer: Don't let them start!
So y'all did your defensive drills for the week, now go out and work on your serves and returns...