L lacade1967 New User Oct 11, 2020 #1 It's so unfair how a few inches could be what decises who is the GOAT. I think he should not have been disqualified from the USO.
It's so unfair how a few inches could be what decises who is the GOAT. I think he should not have been disqualified from the USO.
conjoshruk Semi-Pro Oct 11, 2020 #4 As much as the DQ annoyed me, its too late know. All Djokovic can do know, is learn from that incident. The decision was made, it happened, I feel like this topic has been discussed enough. Move on people!
As much as the DQ annoyed me, its too late know. All Djokovic can do know, is learn from that incident. The decision was made, it happened, I feel like this topic has been discussed enough. Move on people!
Djokovic_is_the_best#1 Bionic Poster Oct 11, 2020 #5 Yes he should have. I was guttered at time but he did break the rules sadly.
L lacade1967 New User Oct 11, 2020 #8 Legend of Borg said: yes? what else should have happened? Click to expand... Warning and point penalty. You cannot compare this to what Shapo and Nalbandian did
Legend of Borg said: yes? what else should have happened? Click to expand... Warning and point penalty. You cannot compare this to what Shapo and Nalbandian did
Bertie B Hall of Fame Oct 11, 2020 #9 Yes. He was asked to be more careful on court, and he said, talk to me when I'm penalized for it. The real question is, should Nadal have skipped USO.
Yes. He was asked to be more careful on court, and he said, talk to me when I'm penalized for it. The real question is, should Nadal have skipped USO.
MugOpponent Hall of Fame Oct 11, 2020 #10 I don't think so. Game misconduct would have been enough. It was reckless and foolish but not intentional.
I don't think so. Game misconduct would have been enough. It was reckless and foolish but not intentional.