Should Federer hire Reyes and /or Cahill?

Should Roger hire heavyweights to help get him back on track?

  • Yes, he should hire Gil Reyes

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Yes, he should hire Darren Cahill

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Yes, he should hire both Reyes and Cahill.

    Votes: 11 52.4%
  • Yes, but he should go back to Tony Roche and beg forgiveness.

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • No, he should carry on by himself, he doesn't need help.

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .

cueboyzn

Professional
The Tennis Week Interview: Gil Reyes
By Richard Pagliaro

Wednesday, March 19, 2008



It wasn't the fountain of youth, but a sustained source of strength that helped Andre Agassi craft a career Renaissance at an age when most of his rivals were already retired.

During his inspired run to the 2005 U.S. Open final, a then 35-year-old Andre Agassi revealed his source of inspiration when asked the secret to his success.

"Surround yourself with good people that know how to help you and make good decisions," Agassi said. "And train and work hard."

For nearly two decades Gil Reyes, the man often clad in black looking like the silk suits he wore were ready to burst at the seams from the strain of containing his biceps, was a key member of Agassi's support team.

From box seats in the most prestigious Grand Slam stadiums in the world to side-by-side seats on planes embarking on countless flights to tournament sites to backyard barbecues to Christmas mornings watching the former World No. 1 sprint up and down the hill near his home until his legs and lungs felt on the verge of exploding, Reyes has been in Agassi's corner throughout his career and has been astounded by what the two friends who dared to dream big achieved together.

Pumping iron strengthened Agassi's position as a perennial top 10 power as he joined Rod Laver as the only man to win five Grand Slam titles after celebrating his 29th birthday.

Physical fitness was a key component to Agassi's career Renaissance. The rigorous strength and conditioning program Agassi adhered to under the guidance of Reyes helped him transform himself from a scrawny 145-pound teenager whose shoulder-length streaked hair was the defining characteristic of his slender frame to a chiseled 173-pound package of power. Agassi attributes the nearly 30 pounds of muscle mass he's added over the years to his training with Reyes, the former strength and conditioning trainer for the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. A teenage Agassi walked into the weight room and asked Reyes for guidance launching one of the longest and most successful partnerships in tennis.

Born in East L.A. Reyes acquired his work ethic from his parents. His father was a mechanic at a chemical plant and his mother maintained a tight-knit family. It was the common willingness to tough it out the training room trenches that bonded Agassi and Reyes as every rep and every run brought both one step closer toward achieving their aims and fulfilling a pact the pair made at the start of their partnership.

"I met Andre when he was a teenager and we talked about dreams and wishes and I said 'Hey, if we're gonna do this then we're gonna lock arms and close ranks and we're gonna go the distance,' " Reyes remembers. "I had a saying we would often refer to: when you talk about achieving your dreams and wishes make sure your backbone is as busy as your wishbone. I said that to Andre and he said "I'm all in." And you know where we come from in Vegas when you say "all in" that really means something — that's a commitment, there's no turning back at that point."

Reyes was much more than a fitness trainer for Agassi, he has been a friend, advisor and mentor, a man so influential Agassi named his son, Jaden Gil, in honor of Reyes. A philosophical man, Reyes says his greatest reward for working with the eight-time Grand Slam champion was not always the glint of the silver title trophies, it's the impact Agassi had on people that resonates with Reyes the most.

"I'll tell you a quick story," Reyes said. "We had tasted defeat at Roland Garros many times and it was very painful and cut very deep and as I was sitting there in the stadium I would see these beautifully-dressed women and elegantly dressed men in tailored suits smiling and applauding the French Open champion. But even after all those painful losses, Andre's attitude was never 'Oh, poor me.' It was always 'Let's get back to work and come back again next year.' But on June 6, 1999 when Andre was down two sets to none and came back to win Roland Garros for the first time, I still remember looking around me and seeing some of the same fans who were smiling during past matches and now all of sudden many of them were sobbing and crying because what Andre achieved had touched them so deeply. Because he had been knocked down so many times but got back up and kept fighting until he came back and won. And as I saw that I said to myself 'I'll be darned, this kid has worked his way into their hearts. He has really touched people.' "

Two years after Agassi's retirement, Reyes is now back in the game. The long-time trainer has signed on with adidas as a member of its coaching team. Adidas director of global tennis marketing Jim Latham created the concept of assembling a coaching and training team to support adidas top players and hired highly-respected coach Sven Groeneveld, who has coached Tommy Haas and Mary Pierce in the past, to head the initiative. The program paid immediate dividends as Groeneveld helped coach Ana Ivanovic to the French Open final last year. He has continued working with Ivanovic and spent some time coaching Sania Mirza at Indian Wells this week. Reyes, whose role will be working with the players on training and preparation, made his adidas debut at this week's Pacific Life Open. Tennis Week caught up with the man in black for this interview.



http://www.tennisweek.com/news/fullstory.sps?inewsid=542531#top



Maybe if Roger had people like this in his corner it would help him deal with Nadal and his game? Maybe pumping some iron (as Agassi did) would help him add some zip and power to that backhand? Surely even just the moral support of having people like this in his corner would help his mental approach? Surely if Roger is really serous about stamping his mark as the all-time Slam Leader.. then he has to get some heavyweights in his corner to deal with this heavyweight thorn in his side (i.e. Nadal)?

Surely if there in any player who can afford to hire people like this, it is Roger?

Maybe the Real question is: With his legacy in the sport ultimately being determined by the Grand Slams he wins from now until he retires, can he afford Not to hire people like this?

Discuss...
 
Last edited:
Totally agree. Look at the support and strength Nadal gets from his box. Federer needs the same thing. Also no matter how great an athlete is he must have others to push him beyond what he thinks he's capable of. Federer does not have that person. We all also benefit when we have someone to bounce ideas and thoughts off of. Conversation with others helps crystalize thoughts and define the right path.
 
Last edited:
fed needs a coach that can teach him how to deal with high topspin shots to his backhand, and learn how to dictate rallies with it.
 
Everyone needs a third-party perspective...Fed has gotten by without one for far too long. Sometimes you're too close to a situation to see the forest through the trees...
 
He needs to see a sports psychologist. Seriously. he does fine against everyone on tour, and can "pull the trigger" and get into another gear against them. However, against Nadal>>> he just can't squeeze the trigger. He plays "not to lose", rather than playing his game.
 
He needs to see a sports psychologist. Seriously. he does fine against everyone on tour, and can "pull the trigger" and get into another gear against them. However, against Nadal>>> he just can't squeeze the trigger. He plays "not to lose", rather than playing his game.

A coach can act as a mental support as well,not just work on his game and tactics but he just needs someone else to rely on IMO other than Mirka.
 
He needs to see a sports psychologist. Seriously. he does fine against everyone on tour, and can "pull the trigger" and get into another gear against them. However, against Nadal>>> he just can't squeeze the trigger. He plays "not to lose", rather than playing his game.

Totally agree on this one. When he had 6 break points in the 3rd set, he let off the gas, hoping Nadal would miss. You have to step on the gas in those times. He only needed to win one of three points when up 0-40. Go for a winner.
 
^^His "game and tactics", as evidenced by his play against other pros is fine.

Agasint Nadal, he "collapses". He doesn't knwo what to do. In watching the match I found it interesting that he played better when he didn't have time to think (running wide, or scrambling). It is very apparent, he has lost all confidence in playing against Nadal. he doesn't know what to do.

I'm actually surprised Nadal didn't beat him in straights (convicningly).

Neither guy played at a high level, or what they are capable of. each one could have easily wiped out the other in straights, had either one played at the level they are capable of.
 
I reckon that Federer should hire Paul Annaconne and Gil Reyes. Firstly Annaconne was a serve and volleyer and reached World No.3 he doubles, apparently he also chip and charged on opponents serves meaning that he knows the net well. Gil Reyes will also help him ALOT with his physical conditioning as he did with Agassi. I think he needs to get rid of Pierre Paganini and replace him with Gil Reyes. Also, I think he should maybe look at hiring Lance Luciani as a tactician helper. Lance could help Federer develop tactics for facing different players and especially tactics for Nadal. Also I think that he needs a sports psychologist. Basically if Federer wants to win more slams, regain the no.1 spot and dominate again I believe he can if he assembles the right team and puts in the hard work.


Coach - Paul Annaconne
Physical Trainer - Gil Reyes
Strategist/tactician assistant - Lance Luciani
Sports Psychologist - Unknown
General Manager - Mirka (already is basically)


I believe that if that team could gel Roger could be formidable.
 
I think it comes down to his 1HBH having trouble handling all those high spinning balls coming from Nadal's FH. I've noticed that Murray and can counter that by hitting 2HBHs down the line so Nadal can't stray too far over to his FH side. Maybe Fed needs someone like Reys to help him get stronger so he can do the same thing.
 
^^His "game and tactics", as evidenced by his play against other pros is fine.

Agasint Nadal, he "collapses". He doesn't knwo what to do. In watching the match I found it interesting that he played better when he didn't have time to think (running wide, or scrambling). It is very apparent, he has lost all confidence in playing against Nadal. he doesn't know what to do.

I'm actually surprised Nadal didn't beat him in straights (convicningly).

Neither guy played at a high level, or what they are capable of. each one could have easily wiped out the other in straights, had either one played at the level they are capable of.

So,what do you think he should do about that if he wants to have a shot to break Pete's slam record? Cause the way Nadal is playing Fed will probably have to go through him in any slam if he wants the title.
 
I think it comes down to his 1HBH having trouble handling all those high spinning balls coming from Nadal's FH. I've noticed that Murray and can counter that by hitting 2HBHs down the line so Nadal can't stray too far over to his FH side. Maybe Fed needs someone like Reys to help him get stronger so he can do the same thing.

yeah. i noticed that too. he needs to figure out how to attack the ball and hit DTL like Giles Simon.
 
^^Hire a sports psychologist.




nick, he was handling that shot fine. I guarantee you he missed a larger percentage of FH's than Bh's.
 
I think it comes down to his 1HBH having trouble handling all those high spinning balls coming from Nadal's FH. I've noticed that Murray and can counter that by hitting 2HBHs down the line so Nadal can't stray too far over to his FH side. Maybe Fed needs someone like Reys to help him get stronger so he can do the same thing.

No,his BH held up surprisingly well against Nadal yesterday,it was his serve,passive return of serve and FH to some extent that let him down not his BH.
 
^^Hire a sports psychologist.




nick, he was handling that shot fine. I guarantee you he missed a larger percentage of FH's than Bh's.
I think that part of the reason for him missing more FHs is that he goes for more with that shot - he attacks more with it. His BH, by and large, doesn't keep Nadal honest enough and lets him cheat over and hit those high spinning FHs. Fed generally hits the same BH roller back to Nadal's FH so to compensate I'd practice my *** off hitting down the line BHs(and get physically stronger at the same time).
Actually, that's I shot that I've been practising a lot lately myself - it's a great way to open the court up!
 
I think that part of the reason for him missing more FHs is that he goes for more with that shot - he attacks more with it. His BH, by and large, doesn't keep Nadal honest enough and lets him cheat over and hit those high spinning FHs.


It's no secret that they way to attack Nadal is hitting wide and to his Forehand. Fed was doing this throughout the match. It's when he goes down the line (bh to bh) that he gives up too much court, thus giving away the geometrical advantage, and why you see Nadal blasting those flat crosscourt winners from his backhand. When Federer beat nadal at hamburg, re rolled his bh to nadal's Fh, and then when he would get the reply, he would step into the court, and blast his own fh down the line.


Look, Fed din't lose because of the stupid idiotic idea ranted about all over these boards because of his BH. His loss to Nadal goes much deeper than that. For starters, Nadal is a beast. Period. Couple that with the fact that mentally fed goes away, and you have the results that everyone has witnessed over the last year and a half.

How do you explain that Fed couldn't handle slice serves between 65-75 mph to the ad side, yet could handle 80-90 mph FH's with over 4000 of spin on them to his BH. Simply put>>> he freezes, and has no idea what to do. He plays not to lose, rather than going after the shot, and playing his game.
 
No doubt - although he played agressively in spurts, at critical moments he often was basically pushing and hoping for a Rafa miss, not going to happen sufficiently for him to win. Couple that with his first serve blowing, that equaled loss. Not adapting to the Nadal second serve was really bizarre to watch
 
No doubt - although he played agressively in spurts, at critical moments he often was basically pushing and hoping for a Rafa miss, not going to happen sufficiently for him to win. Couple that with his first serve blowing, that equaled loss. Not adapting to the Nadal second serve was really bizarre to watch


I agree. It was not only bizarre, but coming from the psycholigical field I work in>>> was sad to see someone who loses all "self-belief". It's like watching someone who is having their spirit taken away/or a "deer in head lights". No "will" to go on.

I strongly believe the emotional out burst from Fed after the match wasn't because he lost, but more because he knows playing Nadal has completely stripped him of his self-belief. he was emotionally deflated.
 
No doubt - although he played agressively in spurts, at critical moments he often was basically pushing and hoping for a Rafa miss, not going to happen sufficiently for him to win. Couple that with his first serve blowing, that equaled loss. Not adapting to the Nadal second serve was really bizarre to watch


It's actually not bizarre at all. Federer has had like 100 BPs total in the last 5 slam finals he has played Nadal, and he rarely converts.
 
It's like his aura of invincibilty was destroyed by Nadal yesterday. The random losses to Canas, ROddick, Djok, Nadal on clay could be reasoned away. but this loss to Nadal on hard court final of Australia delivered the cold hard truth, he is the undisputed second banana now to Rafael Nadal.

This could possibly spell doom for Federer too. Its like when Mike Tyson lost his aura of invincibility to Buster Douglas, it killed him it really did. though Tyson kept up the facade he was still the baddest man on the planet and talked the talk, Tyson, was never the same force after Buster koed him.

Federer took this loss very very hard, like he knows his reign could be over. even if he makes major changes, trains wiht Gil, gets much physically stronger, etc. , there is no guarantee it will be enough to take down this unstoppable bull.
 
Without some heavy-duty behind-the-scenes negotiation, I don't think either Nike or Adidas would permit even Roger to hire Gil Reyes.

Isn't Reyes contractually obligated to work only with players sponsored by Adidas?

Don't jump on me, TT posters. I'm just wondering.
 
Absolutely...........

Coach - Paul Annaconne or Daren Cahill
Physical Trainer - ****Gil Reyes****
Strategist/tactician assistant - Lance Luciani
Sports Psychologist - Dr. Jim Loehr
General Manager - Mirka and Godsick
I believe that if that team could gel Roger could be formidable.

It would give Fed the confidence back to know that he can match Rafa's stamina and intensity. That matched with Fed's abundant talent would be too much for Rafa or anyone else to handle. The high BH issue in not really an issue but a weakness that can be remidied. Becker used to throw 80-100lbs logs to strengthen this high backhands. Add that capability to his other backhand talents and you give Raf no where to go.

Stop running around the backhand and completely smother the court with vicious forehands and backhand hitting. Improve footspeed and agility along with volleys and second serves. Lately Fed has not been improving and actually using less of his talents, so he needs to up the anty to regain the confidence and flow.

Cheers, TennezSport :cool:
 
Maybe true but..........

Without some heavy-duty behind-the-scenes negotiation, I don't think either Nike or Adidas would permit even Roger to hire Gil Reyes. Isn't Reyes contractually obligated to work only with players sponsored by Adidas?

This may be true but Fed does not have to actually hire Reyes. just go train in LV with him at his camp. Other players are doing this already. I do not think that Fed needs Reyes to travel with him, just get him to another level physically. Look at what Reyes did for Nando in less than 1 month. Imagine what he could do for Fed.

Cheers, TennezSport :cool:
 
Back
Top