Should I prestretch polys?

On the other hand, there are factory prestretched polys...


That was kind of the thing I am looking for. I don't like the first few hours if I string a bit higher. It will reduce the total life for sure but I don't care as I am stringing myself.
It will become even more stiff for the first few hours as you are taking the elasticity out of the string in order to get better tension maintainance.
 
If you prestretch polys you lose twistweight by 0.8 points, its dangerous, racquet could twist too much at impact and ball could en Up in your face, i dont recomend it
 
Can you elaborate please?
I'd assume he means that you stretch out the string more and use less string because of it, hence less weight, less swingweight and less twistweight.
You'd need to lose about 12g (guesstimate) of stringweight to reduce the TW by 0.8 so seems unlikely to hold up. (or it's a joke)
 
I'd assume he means that you stretch out the string more and use less string because of it, hence less weight, less swingweight and less twistweight.
You'd need to lose about 12g (guesstimate) of stringweight to reduce the TW by 0.8 so seems unlikely to hold up. (or it's a joke)
 
It will become even more stiff for the first few hours as you are taking the elasticity out of the string in order to get better tension maintainance.
I am talking about stringing at 46 with 10% prestretch vs stringing 50 without prestretch.
 
I am talking about stringing at 46 with prestretch vs stringing 49-50 without prestretch
Isn’t it easier to string at the higher tension and do practice with the new stringjob for 1-2 sessions if you want the tension to drop for match play?
 
Isn’t it easier to string at the higher tension and do practice with the new stringjob for 1-2 sessions if you want the tension to drop for match play.
Why would it be easier? I set the machine for 10% prestretch function druing stringing that's all. The only reason I consider prestretching is to avoid those 1-2 sessions as it feels too boardy.
 
I haven't tried yet. I was wondering if it would help avoiding the breakin period of stringing a couple of pound higher. .
My best advice is simply to try it out for yourself, string 2 racquets and see what you prefer.
 
I am talking about stringing at 46 with 10% prestretch vs stringing 50 without prestretch.
I've been doing this for the last year and it works for me. I won't claim it has any benefits over not pre-stretching, but this is just what I'm used to by now. Even without two similar racquets, you can string it once with the stretch, and then once without the stretch, and see how you feel about it.
 
There are "a lot" contributers who claim you kill the elasticity when pre-stretching.
Just try it, and you will be surprised.

I myself "normally" would string mains at ~20kg, X'ses at 18kg.
I know pre-stretch at 30kg, then ref.tensions mains 18kg, X'ses 16kg.

Edit: in both scenario's I have a DT of 34 (measured with my ERT700). But with pre-stretching the stability of the tension is much better.
 
Last edited:
There are "a lot" contributers who claim you kill the elasticity when pre-stretching.
Just try it, and you will be surprised.

I myself "normally" would string mains at ~20kg, X'ses at 18kg.
I know pre-stretch at 30kg, then ref.tensions mains 18kg, X'ses 16kg.

Edit: in both scenario's I have a DT of 34 (measured with my ERT700). But with pre-stretching the stability of the tension is much better.
Finally, someone with a common sense and a ERT to prove my hypothesis seems true :)

The only downside I can think of might be string becoming stiffer.

Also

ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

In a sense, it would appear that the string actually gets better with use, but you just have to re-tension it to get the benefit. Strings do lose more energy with more impacts and decreasing tension. That is mainly from increased friction within the string due to chain reconfigurations as opposed to chain degradation and breakage.
 
Back
Top