Murrayfan31
Hall of Fame
Nadal really is whiny isn't he? I don't know how he still has fans. His attitude is always grumpy and complaining.
Nadal really is whiny isn't he? I don't know how he still has fans. His attitude is always grumpy and complaining.
Nadal really is whiny isn't he? I don't know how he still has fans. His attitude is always grumpy and complaining.
Why good riddancehe should pull out of the tournament.
He was never winning this USO. He is incapable of defending a title outside of clay. Fact.
hence the "it's all about money" comment.
He was never winning this USO. He is incapable of defending a title outside of clay. Fact.
Coming from a guy who's made tens of millions from tennis, the comment is a little screwed up. I'd love to see him comment along the same lines when he cashes in his prize at the end of the tournament. All of a sudden he got worried about the fans being screwed, right!
Defending is when you win it again next year. He has never don that outside clay.
Are you serious?. The problem of course isn't about someone or something making money, but about HOW they make it. In this case, Nadal's criticism of the USTA was that they were willing to put player's health at risk, and cheat people, for money.
Did that really need an explanation?![]()
Irrelevant.
To blindfolded ********* yes
It is irrelevant, and especially so in this thread.
Being one break down sucks but it's not like Nadal is out of this tourney. Nadal wasn't mad cause he was one break down but because he and Muller were forced to play in shi*ty conditions because USTA don't know how to properly organize a slam. Sort of reminds me of the conditions he had to play in with Gonzalez in 2009, when they played in some very windy conditions(especially towards the second tiebreak) and the ump stopped play in the middle of the tiebreak. When they came back the next day, Gonzalez couldn't be bothered with it and lost 6-0 in the third.
And it's not like Nadal is alone in this respect, many other complained as well. Try playing on a slippery surface and then come back and comment. As TennisandMusic said, anyone of these guys could have slipped and done potential damage to their bodies.
This tourney is kinda f**ked for many players now but hopefully they will get a roof and organize better next year. Hopefully.
It is irrelevant, and especially so in this thread.
Being one break down sucks but it's not like Nadal is out of this tourney. Nadal wasn't mad cause he was one break down but because he and Muller were forced to play in shi*ty conditions because USTA don't know how to properly organize a slam. Sort of reminds me of the conditions he had to play in with Gonzalez in 2009, when they played in some very windy conditions(especially towards the second tiebreak) and the ump stopped play in the middle of the tiebreak. When they came back the next day, Gonzalez couldn't be bothered with it and lost 6-0 in the third.
And it's not like Nadal is alone in this respect, many other complained as well. Try playing on a slippery surface and then come back and comment. As TennisandMusic said, anyone of these guys could have slipped and done potential damage to their bodies.
This tourney is kinda f**ked for many players now but hopefully they will get a roof and organize better next year. Hopefully.
Funny how he never complains when it is raining and he is playing on a clay court, given that there is nothing more slippery than those lines on a clay court.
Or how he never complains about the ruling authority when they fail to penalize him for his consistent time violations.
How did Muller get a 3-0 lead? Was Nadal broken once or twice?
If he was up 3-0 he wouldn't have one complaint.
Why do you think they play on clay when it rains mildly? Because Nadal wills it?
Could it be because the clay soaks up some of the rain?
The point here is that all players should not be forced to play in dangerous conditions. Period.
When it comes to "when to play" and "when not to play" The Nadal is one smart cookie. He should become a tournament referee when he retires in a year or two.
I'm not a Nadal fan at all, maybe I'm even a bit of *******...But I am 100% behind Rafa on this one.
Irrelevant.
Yeah it wasn't the rain that caused the bad start. It was Nadal's poor attitude.you could tell he was mad even before he got on court. He used rain to explain his bad start. How come Muller could play no problem
you could tell he was mad even before he got on court. He used rain to explain his bad start. How come Muller could play no problem
Gotta love the Nadal haters in this board. One thing about them though is how consistent they are. Bravo!
Rain/drizzle/mist made the courts slippery---> Nadal complains that it's too dangerous to play--->it's Nadal's fault for complaining
What's funny here is that both Roddick and Murray complained in the same vein, and all the hate is directed at Nadal.
The point here is that all players should not be forced to play in dangerous conditions. Period.
Not being able to defend a non-clay title is far from irrelevant. Winning repeatedly on a surface shows your dominace against the field on that surface. The fact that Nadal at either number 1 or 2 in the world has never been able to defend off clay is just another factor that shows his mostly clay dominance.
you could tell he was mad even before he got on court. He used rain to explain his bad start. How come Muller could play no problem
Nothing is impossible, if he faces Fed in the final especially. Furthemore, some of the next few days could be rained out as well giving him and other players at the bottom half a day of rest inbetween.
I don't care if he wins or not, I want them to have equal chances. If the top half gets a day of rest and the bottom half plays 4 days in a row then it is not fair.
This happened to Ferrero in 2003 and he had nothing left for the final. If players keep on accepting this nothing will change.