Even in high school And college tennis this was not allowed. On change overs - coaches had a few seconds.This is now an ethical question. JCF is giving minute instructions on every single point to Alcaraz. Would he even be half the player he currently is without this on court coaching? Time to level the playing field for the have-nots and stop on court coaching
The beauty of tennis was the ability to problem solve on your own. It’s goneNot disgusting. Every major sport allows for real time coaching. Why not tennis?
This is now an ethical question. JCF is giving minute instructions on every single point to Alcaraz. Would he even be half the player he currently is without this on court coaching? Time to level the playing field for the have-nots and stop on court coaching
He’s getting strategic adviceDon't like it either. Even if he's not getting strategic advice it just seems weird going to the box after virtually every point for encouragement or whatever.
Roger Federer went years without a coach in his box. Enough said.I wouldn't want to talk to a coach during a match. I'd want it all planned out beforehand on the practice court and during tactical discussions, i.e. How do we expect things to go? What to do if things go as we expect, what to do if things go better than we expect, what to do if things go worse than we expect or go really, really bad. The best generals never let a retreat turn into a rout. It should all be planned out beforehand so that nothing is that much of a surprise. Needing to coached on every point in real time is embarrassing.
He's won tournaments without Ferrero's presence.Watching Alcaraz ask for instructions on every point is weird, certainly not something seen before, makes you wonder how he could perform when Ferrero is not around to instruct and bro pump him on every point.
Not grand slams thoughHe's won tournaments without Ferrero's presence.
More I believe.This is what I admire about Federer so much. Didn’t he win 3 slams in 2004 without a coach?
Yes, officially. Mirka outcoached Brad Gilbert during the third set rain delay in the 2004 Wimbledon final. At the time it was 1 set all against Roddick, and Roddick up 4-2 in the third set. Federer won in 4 sets.This is what I admire about Federer so much. Didn’t he win 3 slams in 2004 without a coach?
Dude he’s literally telling him right before the serve where to go.Some of the advice is just plain garbage, some of the things I hear are "if he gets hard then you get harder" and "push him to the limit, TO THE LIMIT". I guess as Alcaraz matures he won't need as much validation/support from Ferrero.
Why don't they discuss it before the match?Dude he’s literally telling him right before the serve where to go.
He’s getting strategic advice.
I don’t mind motivational cheering as much as long as it’s limited
No idea. But it’s too much strategic advice on court and too oftenWhy don't they discuss it before the match?
It’s honestly like this in life outside of sports. So many people need hand holding and told 100x what to do. One of the most important things I was taught growing up was to figure things out or research on your own before asking for help.Absolutely in agreement with OP. It's disgusting the way it's happening right now with every point, Off-court, sure get all the training/coaching you need but on court it should be player vs player using both physical skills and mental skills to see who is superior. The reason coaching is allowed in TEAM sports is because you need to get the team working together and giving instructions in that way makes sense, for solo sports it's a joke and shouldn't be allowed or should only be allowed at change-overs.
This is a victim of how the world is now though, it's just the way technology and learning has changed. People don't retain information the way they used to because it's simply easier to just look it up and all these next gen players need hand-holding to win matches.
I just find it weird. I can understand if you and your coach were both taken by surprise by what the opponent was doing and had never taken that situation into account, but otherwise it should have all been done before the match starts.No idea. But it’s too much strategic advice on court and too often
Instead of the last 2 minutes of the game taking a mind numbing 20 minutes it would take 5 minutes.What would happen if on-court coaching in the NBA was banned?
I mean I think the whole bathroom break is nonsense. The atp does a horrible job scheduling matches sometimes. They should be able to use the bathroom on change overs if they need to.What about timeouts? I think the ATP should allow timeouts. Maybe 2 or 3 per match. If you use them up to break your opponent's momentum and later you actually have to use the toilet, then too bad. Wear some adult diapers.
Other sports have to coordinate multiple players on court or the field. 1:1 is different.So other sports have an ethical question too? Ridiculous, let's leave ethics and morality out of this.
The normal breaks between sets should still be in place to be used as bathroom breaks if need be, but then add 2 or 3 timeouts that can be used whenever they want. The only limitation I would put is that you can only take a timeout before your own service game and not before the opponent's service game.I mean I think the whole bathroom break is nonsense. The atp does a horrible job scheduling matches sometimes. They should be able to use the bathroom on change overs if they need to.
How about the NFL without coaching except by the QB giving directions and calling plays in the huddle?Instead of the last 2 minutes of the game taking a mind numbing 20 minutes it would take 5 minutes.
I think the young lad was going to him constantly for guidance bc meddy found an aggressive tactic to his game.Honestly hes just confusing the hell out of the young lad. should just let him play his natural game.
If it doesn't slow down the match, I don't care. But the TV cameras are going to Alcaraz's box every point. Stop!