Why not? It worked for Ferd last year.Why not take a page out of Fed's book and be well rested for the summer hard court swing?
Only of Queens. Nadal will not stop playing Wimbledon as long as he is a professional tennis player, even when he is 40 years old.
Btw, he is only 32. Federer stopped playing on clay at age 34.
Also, Djokovic is 31. Can you imagine how ridicoulous it would be if Djokovic decides to skip the whole grass season next year?
There is nothing illogical about my statement, it is a logical possibility that Nadal keeps playing Wimbledon at age 40. Ken Rosewall played a Grand Slam final at age 40. We will see. I will believe otherwise when I see a healthy Nadal skipping Wimbledon.Are you Octobrina or BeatlesFan, claiming to know intimate details about players they unduly obsess over?
What a presumptive and illogical statement to make and you're likely to be very wrong.
There is nothing illogical about my statement, it is a logical possibility that Nadal keeps playing Wimbledon at age 40. Ken Rosewall played a Grand Slam final at age 40. We will see. I will believe otherwise when I see a healthy Nadal skipping Wimbledon.
Not this year. He needs as many points as possible as he is a real shot at a 5th YE # 1 which is massive for him.
Federer has more of a chance to end at Number 1. Nadal can’t even play on grass or indoors these days.
This year kinda harder for both. Zverev has highest shot to get YE#1. He will go deep in every hardcourt event.Yes ok - just like last year. He ended # 1 without needing many grass or indoor points at all.
This year kinda harder for both. Zverev has highest shot to get YE#1. He will go deep in every hardcourt event.
Yes ok - just like last year. He ended # 1 without needing many grass or indoor points at all.
Don't worry. He skipped queens last year yet still played wimbledon. Smart move imo. Just in it for the slams.
Federer is defending tooThat’s because he gained so many through the HC and clay season. He’s defending them all this year. Big difference.
Federer is defending too
That’s because he gained so many through the HC and clay season. He’s defending them all this year. Big difference.
Yeah I know... but Fed has a lot to gain especially in Cincinnati, Paris and the USO.
Nadal is basically out for the indoor season and is defending the USO.
There is nothing illogical about my statement, it is a logical possibility that Nadal keeps playing Wimbledon at age 40. Ken Rosewall played a Grand Slam final at age 40. We will see. I will believe otherwise when I see a healthy Nadal skipping Wimbledon.
Rafa should skip all the grass tournaments leading up to Wimbledon but play Wimbledon. That way, he will be fresh and ready to go deep!
Federer stopped playing on clay at age 34.
Said it a few times, I think he should, but really there is no down side and a lot of massive upside.
He has shown that his hard court form is fine - last year he made the final in Australia, Indian Wells and Shanghai and won Beijing and the US Open. I think you are underestimating him a little.
@cc0509There is nothing illogical about my statement, it is a logical possibility that Nadal keeps playing Wimbledon at age 40. Ken Rosewall played a Grand Slam final at age 40. We will see. I will believe otherwise when I see a healthy Nadal skipping Wimbledon.
Why not take a page out of Fed's book and be well rested for the summer hard court swing?
First of all, YE # 1 has nothing to do with defending points. At the end of the season, whoever has accumulated the most is the # 1 at the end of the season. Rafa leads the race so far.
When it comes to defending points though, he's gone ok so far. He's only got 3730 to defend for the rest of the year with big point tournaments Wimby, Canada, Cincy, US Open, Shanghai, Paris and WTF to come - if you throw in Beijing, that's 8 tournaments to do it in. Your assumption that he won't go deep on grass or indoors has little to do with this scenario as he has a total of 360 grass / indoor points to defend.
He has shown that his hard court form is fine - last year he made the final in Australia, Indian Wells and Shanghai and won Beijing and the US Open. I think you are underestimating him a little.
No. Its a shot at a slam, and he needs every shot he can gets if he wants the slam record.
Nadal has left a heap of points on the table. Here is what he is defending for the rest of the year:
The US Open is a tough one but there is nothing I've seen over the last year to say that he can't reproduce this kind of result.
- Wimbledon - 180
- Canada - 90
- Cincinnati - 180
- US Open - 2000
- Beijing - 500
- Shanghai - 600
- Paris - 180
- WTF - 0
Are you Octobrina or BeatlesFan, claiming to know intimate details about players they unduly obsess over?
What a presumptive and illogical statement to make and you're likely to be very wrong.
He'll skip it. If not this year then definitely as he gets older. You're going to be wrong, I'm sure of it.
Why bother playing grass where you are unlikely to win anyway when you can improve your chances at winning USO by giving your body a well deserved rest?Hmm. Haven't your heard that Rafa is 5 year younger than your favourite player.
I mean, the fact that he hasn’t played off clay since January is a LARGE factor as to why he probably won’t produce those results.
Since the Australian open, he hasn’t played ONE match off clay. He’s neck and neck with Fed, having not played off clay since January.
It’ll be tough for Nadal.
Last year....
Not this...
And when did he make final in IW?? Nope he did not...
He got mercilessly murdered by backhanderer in 4th Round at Indian wells 2017
Why bother playing grass where you are unlikely to win anyway when you can improve your chances at winning USO by giving your body a well deserved rest?
Actually that’s wrong. Federer played a full schedule aged 34, and also played clay aged 35 after his knee injury.Only of Queens. Nadal will not stop playing Wimbledon as long as he is a professional tennis player, even when he is 40 years old.
Btw, he is only 32. Federer stopped playing on clay at age 34.
Also, Djokovic is 31. Can you imagine how ridicoulous it would be if Djokovic decides to skip the whole grass season next year?