Simona Halep criticizes ITIA

vokazu

Legend

Two-time Grand Slam champion Simona Halep has questioned the "big difference" in how tennis doping cases are handled after world number two Iga Swiatek received a one-month ban.

The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) announced on Thursday that Swiatek had accepted a one-month suspension after testing positive for banned substance trimetazidine (TMZ).

Halep, who was out of action for more than 18 months following two separate anti-doping violations, has criticised the ITIA for having "completely different approaches".

"I stand and ask myself, why is there such a big difference in treatment and judgment?" Halep posted on Instagram on Friday.

"I can't find and I don’t think there can be a logical answer. It can only be bad will from ITIA, the organization that has done absolutely everything to destroy me despite the evidence."

Halep was provisionally suspended in October 2022 after testing positive for banned substance roxadustat - an anti-anaemia drug which stimulates the production of red blood cells in the body.

The Romanian was later banned for four years - a period which was reduced to nine months in March after an appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Halep always maintained her innocence and argued she had taken a contaminated supplement.

"I lost two years of my career, I lost many nights when I couldn't sleep, thoughts, anxiety, questions without answers," the former world number one said.

"How is it possible that in identical cases happening around the same time, ITIA to have completely different approaches to my detriment?"

Swiatek tested positive for a heart medication, TMZ, in an out-of-competition sample in August 2024, when she was world number one.

The ITIA accepted the five-time major winner's violation was caused by contamination of the regulated non-prescription medication melatonin, manufactured and sold in Poland, which Swiatek took for jet lag and sleep issues.

An ITIA spokesperson told BBC Sport there were "very important differences" between Halep's case and Swiatek's.

"No two cases are the same, they often involve different circumstances, and direct comparisons are not always helpful," the ITIA said.

"The product contaminated in Ms Swiatek's case was a regulated medication, not a supplement."

Swiatek's suspension comes after men's world number one Jannik Sinner tested positive for clostebol in March.

Although the ITIA accepted there was "no fault or negligence" attached to the 23-year-old Italian, the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) has launched an appeal to CAS.

The ITIA said: "We deal with each case based on the facts and evidence, not a player's name, ranking or nationality. When a prohibited substance is found in a player's system, we investigate it thoroughly.

"We urge players to exercise extreme caution when taking supplements and we are always happy to answer any questions they have."
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
Serious question. Does anyone on earth have the slightest clue on what the ATP/WTAs policies are regarding PEDs? Like what are the procedures. Who is making these decisions? Just from an outsiders perspective they just seem to make up things as they come along. I mean maybe they dont but it sure seems to be a giant mess.

If I was Halep of lord knows all the other players who got popped I would be pissed. And probably consider suing a bunch of people for lost wages.
 

ibbi

G.O.A.T.
An ITIA spokesperson told BBC Sport there were "very important differences" between Halep's case and Swiatek's.

"No two cases are the same, they often involve different circumstances, and direct comparisons are not always helpful," the ITIA said.
Is Simona so dim that someone needed to point this out to her?
 

jeroenn

Professional
Serious question. Does anyone on earth have the slightest clue on what the ATP/WTAs policies are regarding PEDs? Like what are the procedures. Who is making these decisions? Just from an outsiders perspective they just seem to make up things as they come along. I mean maybe they dont but it sure seems to be a giant mess.

If I was Halep of lord knows all the other players who got popped I would be pissed. And probably consider suing a bunch of people for lost wages.

Certainly.

One thing to keep in mind is that the ITIA exists since 2021 - anything that happened before that may have been done under different rules.

Start here with the Tennis Anti Doping Programme:
This details everything about related to doping, testing, etc:

There is the ITIA, tennis specific, created by ITF, ATP, WTA as an independent integrity agency. They deal with doping, but also match fixing etc. https://www.itia.tennis/about/
Then there is the WADA, World Anti Doping Agency, which goes over all sports, including tennis.They had a part in creating the TADP rules as they follow WADA guidelines.
You may also hear about CAS, which is a court of arbitration for sports https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-information/index/
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The ITIA is a new body that seems far too close to the industry. It needs to be shut down.

Certainly.

One thing to keep in mind is that the ITIA exists since 2021 - anything that happened before that may have been done under different rules.

Start here with the Tennis Anti Doping Programme:
This details everything about related to doping, testing, etc:

There is the ITIA, tennis specific, created by ITF, ATP, WTA as an independent integrity agency. They deal with doping, but also match fixing etc. https://www.itia.tennis/about/
Then there is the WADA, World Anti Doping Agency, which goes over all sports, including tennis.They had a part in creating the TADP rules as they follow WADA guidelines.
You may also hear about CAS, which is a court of arbitration for sports https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-information/index/
 

RSJfan

Professional
Serious question. Does anyone on earth have the slightest clue on what the ATP/WTAs policies are regarding PEDs? Like what are the procedures. Who is making these decisions? Just from an outsiders perspective they just seem to make up things as they come along. I mean maybe they dont but it sure seems to be a giant mess.

If I was Halep of lord knows all the other players who got popped I would be pissed. And probably consider suing a bunch of people for lost wages.

ATP/WTA “policies” are that players adhere to the WADA Code. However, the ATP/WTA are not in the anti-doping enforcement business*** — nor are they neutral bodies. They are player associations and while they have agreed to have their players adhere to the code their ultimate interest is in protecting and advancing tennis. If a relatively low level player is charged with an anti-doping rules violation it may not be a big deal. If the #1 player is charged it’s a crises. Unless such player is caught with a smoking gun it‘s to be expected they would issue a statement as they did. Something along the lines of “we support adherence to the Code“ (obviously since they signed on to it) and “we support top player x.”

***ATP/WTA/Slams delegate anti-doping management and enforcement to the ITF which is a WADA signatory. Together with the ITF these entities set up the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) as an independent entity to essentially administer and enforce the anti-doping code for tennis. The ITIA which brings enforcement actions against players can not (due to obvious gross conflict of interests) also be the entity that runs the arbitration panel deciding the case. The ITIA (or ITF, I’m unclear which) hired Sports Resolutions an independent entity to review appeals of provisional suspensions as well as conduct anti-doping related arbitrations.

If the Sports Resolution arbitration panel (aka Tennis Independent Tribunal) issues a decision then both the player and ITIA (and WADA) have the right to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Notwithstanding its misleading name it’s not a court. CAS will run its own arbitration which may not be appealed further (except for very limited circumstances) and is binding on the parties.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The ITIA is a formally independent body. It needs to be independently reviewed after its calamitous 2024.

ATP/WTA “policies” are that players adhere to the WADA Code. However, they are not in the enforcement business*** nor are they neutral bodies. They are player associations and while they have agreed to have their players adhere to the code their ultimate interest is in protecting and advancing tennis. If a relatively low level player is charged with an anti-doping rules violation it may not be a big deal. If the #1 player is charged it’s a crises. Unless such player is caught with a smoking gun it‘s to be expected they would issue a statement as they did. Something along the lines of “we support adherence to the Code“ (obviously since they signed on to it) and “we support top player x.”

***ATP/WTA/Slams delegate anti-doping management and enforcement to the ITF which is a WADA signatory. Together with the ITF these entities set up the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) as an independent body to essentially administer and enforce the code for tennis. The ITIA which brings enforcement actions against players can not (due to obvious gross conflict of interests) also be the entity that runs the arbitration panel deciding the case. The ITIA (or ITF, I’m unclear which) hired Sports Resolutions an independent entity to review appeals of provisional suspensions as well as conduct anti-doping related arbitrations.
 

RSJfan

Professional
Yeah there should be only 1 doping agency for all Sports.

Not politically practical and not functionally practical. Appeal to CAS is your remedy if you think the ITIA done you wrong. :(

giphy.gif
 

rigged

Semi-Pro
He also criticized Sharapova after the latter was caught. After that, Halep got caught. Sometimes it feels like tennis world is a TV series.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
She has a point. She is a doper but she has a point.

This is exactly the type of stuff that happens when you water down rules.
I don't know if Iga doped.

I basically know that Halep DOPED because first report said there was no way she can accidently get such high Roxadustat.

This is a doper and should not be respected.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
And then Halep spent money on scientists to cast doubt on that finding and it worked.

I don't know if Iga doped.

I basically know that Halep DOPED because first report said there was no way she can accidently get such high Roxadustat.

This is a doper and should not be respected.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
I don't know if Iga doped.

I basically know that Halep DOPED because first report said there was no way she can accidently get such high Roxadustat.

This is a doper and should not be respected.
Patrick Mouratoglou, i.e. Simona Halep's coach at the time of her positive test, said that it came from collagen, which was contaminated with roxadustat.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
Patrick Mouratoglou, i.e. Simona Halep's coach at the time of her positive test, said that it came from collagen, which was contaminated with roxadustat.
I don't care a little bit about who says what. What AITA said is it was highly improbable this was an accident.
 

LOBALOT

Legend
I don't know if Iga doped.

I basically know that Halep DOPED because first report said there was no way she can accidently get such high Roxadustat.

This is a doper and should not be respected.

I am not respecting Halep. I indicated she is a doper just like the rest but her point about applying the rules are spot on.

When one starts listening to this stupid excuse and that is when you end up with these types of situations. They should all be banned.
 

Arak

Legend
What Halep failed to do was to come up with a good story. ITIA loves a good story. Melatonin contaminated with a PED or masseuse hands contaminated with a steroid are good stories. Now, Sinner and Swiatek have established a precedent and a blueprint on how to circumvent bans. Other players will follow and implement the same strategy.
 

TennisBro

Professional
Serious question. Does anyone on earth have the slightest clue on what the ATP/WTAs policies are regarding PEDs? Like what are the procedures. Who is making these decisions? Just from an outsiders perspective they just seem to make up things as they come along. I mean maybe they dont but it sure seems to be a giant mess.

If I was Halep of lord knows all the other players who got popped I would be pissed. And probably consider suing a bunch of people for lost wages.
Food for Thought
 

TennisBro

Professional
Certainly.

One thing to keep in mind is that the ITIA exists since 2021 - anything that happened before that may have been done under different rules.

Start here with the Tennis Anti Doping Programme:
This details everything about related to doping, testing, etc:

There is the ITIA, tennis specific, created by ITF, ATP, WTA as an independent integrity agency. They deal with doping, but also match fixing etc. https://www.itia.tennis/about/
Then there is the WADA, World Anti Doping Agency, which goes over all sports, including tennis.They had a part in creating the TADP rules as they follow WADA guidelines.
You may also hear about CAS, which is a court of arbitration for sports https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-information/index/
Do you really think it was different before 2021? There's a difference in between changes and progress.
 

TennisBro

Professional
I am not respecting Halep. I indicated she is a doper just like the rest but her point about applying the rules are spot on.

When one starts listening to this stupid excuse and that is when you end up with these types of situations. They should all be banned.
That's quite clear from Halep's stance now but seemingly not from some TTW posters that just want to bring in their glorious opinions here. Halep got banned for a long time when she was over 30 while just a bit over 20 years old Iga for Christmas only. Bans are manipulated and so is the system.
 

LOBALOT

Legend
That's quite clear from Halep's stance now but seemingly not from some TTW posters that just want to bring in their glorious opinions here. Halep got banned for a long time when she was over 30 while just a bit over 20 years old Iga for Christmas only. Bans are manipulated and so is the system.

Who cares how old either are?

If they cheat they cheat and they should be out.

So many people try to add other things into these decisions which is the real reason why it should be a simple yes no ban on a + result.

Age now is reasoning for ban and length? That is nuts.
 

Kerouac

Rookie
Halep, Swiatek and Sinner should've all been given four year bans - they would've in cycling and athletics. Tired of hearing how Halep was hard done to, no she wasn't.
 

LOBALOT

Legend
I was thinking last night what was nuts about all these crazy positions people are trying to make about stories of accidental this and massage that and girlfriend this and now player age is:

All the players that don't cheat and the livelihood that is taken from them by all these dopers.

Every argument I have seen so far is a bunch of BS excuses for players that do cheat at the expense of those that don't.
 

insideguy

G.O.A.T.
I was thinking last night what was nuts about all these crazy positions people are trying to make about stories of accidental this and massage that and girlfriend this and now player age is:

All the players that don't cheat and the livelihood that is taken from them by all these dopers.

Every argument I have seen so far is a bunch of BS excuses for players that do cheat at the expense of those that don't.
I agree. Its ridiculous. If there are clean players they are getting screwed over. BIG TIME.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
What Halep failed to do was to come up with a good story. ITIA loves a good story. Melatonin contaminated with a PED or masseuse hands contaminated with a steroid are good stories. Now, Sinner and Swiatek have established a precedent and a blueprint on how to circumvent bans. Other players will follow and implement the same strategy.
Sharapova explained her story in detail, and got hammered.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
Halep, Swiatek and Sinner should've all been given four year bans - they would've in cycling and athletics. Tired of hearing how Halep was hard done to, no she wasn't.
Halep was hard done by if Swiatek gets a 1 month ban and Sinner gets no ban. It's even worse for Halep if we consider reputation damage. The authorities basically act like Sinner and Swiatek shouldn't face any reputational fallout at all, while Halep got the Ben Johnson treatment for a time.
 

TennisBro

Professional
Who cares how old either are?

If they cheat they cheat and they should be out.

So many people try to add other things into these decisions which is the real reason why it should be a simple yes no ban on a + result.

Age now is reasoning for ban and length? That is nuts.
The reason I brought up age difference in between Halep and Swiatek when banned is that the older one got banned for a lot longer than the younger one. The one month Christmas ban of 23 year old Polish is a heavy punch to the old Halep. I'd say Swiatek's ban's nutty.
 

Arak

Legend
Sharapova explained her story in detail, and got hammered.
She told the truth, which they don’t like. The right approach to that case would have been to deny taking Meldonium after 1 January. Since it stays in the system for several months, it’s impossible to refute this allegation. Unfortunately, as it can be seen from the cases of Sinner and Swiatek, telling an outrageous lie works best.
 

Arak

Legend
I was thinking last night what was nuts about all these crazy positions people are trying to make about stories of accidental this and massage that and girlfriend this and now player age is:

All the players that don't cheat and the livelihood that is taken from them by all these dopers.

Every argument I have seen so far is a bunch of BS excuses for players that do cheat at the expense of those that don't.
This is a point I didn’t consider until now. In fact, dopers are also thieves. They steal award money and other income from honest players who do not dope. You make a great point.
 
Top