Sinner is made to miss 4 Masters tournament

N

ND-13

Legend
For all those thinking Sinner did not get enough punishment , I don’t know what to say.

Sinner is barred from 4 masters . He was primed to make an assault on the masters tally , all time highest points tally and those records are now forever asterisked as Sinner has not been allowed to play at the peak of his powers .

Additionally , this could have a negative impact on the 2 majors to follow in quick succession.

Ideally the month ban should have come after YEC and before AO
 
He will be fine. I didn’t like his schedule before RG. Too many hardcourt events close in succession then a big transition to clay. Now he’s gonna focus entirely on clay, play 1 warmup to test his level, then brush off the rust at RG while being fresh as a daisy. I think he makes the F this year, the very least.
 
He needs 3 tournaments to get in shape before RG (only clay specialists can adapt in a short time).
He has no chance at RG this season. It would be best if he started preparing for the grass now.
 
Missing 4 tournaments where last year his results were a not too shabby SF/W/SF/QF, will his ranking be impacted?
 
Come on man, its his worst part of the year and the only one where 3 months dont make you miss a slam, its practically a nonexisting punishment, points and money are not a problem for him, missing slams or WTF is, as is missing masters at the end of the year where he is more dominant, i cant think of a lesser punishment for him except not getting punished at all, personally i wished he didnt miss these 3 months, It doesnt change anything in the grand scheme of things except we dont see him competing against Carlos or Djokovic in some tourneys, its a lame situation
 
And the fact that the ban started a week ago so he can play rome is just the cherry on top, its just really funny, but lame at the same time
 
As a Nolefam, I am happy that Novak’s records for masters tally or the highest points in a year are little more secure , but I like a even playfield for everyone to compete and this will always remain a question mark now
 
The bigger question is....would Federer have choked on 40-15 against Sinner also in that W 2019 final which sealed everyone's fate? Is Sinner good enough to get Federer to choke? It will remain a question mark if Sinner could have ever done this to Federer.

 
ibbi said:
Missing 4 tournaments where last year his results were a not too shabby SF/W/SF/QF, will his ranking be impacted?
Click to expand...
At Indian Wells he had no points to defend for last year's semi-final because those points were taken away from him after the positive tests.

Once the disqualification has been served, Sinner will be able to return having around 9700 points.
 
dking68 said:
He will be fine. I didn’t like his schedule before RG. Too many hardcourt events close in succession then a big transition to clay. Now he’s gonna focus entirely on clay, play 1 warmup to test his level, then brush off the rust at RG while being fresh as a daisy. I think he makes the F this year, the very least.
Click to expand...
Its the best outcome he could have wished for. Last season he got injured at IW that persisted throughout the clay court season despite him winning Miami. He is a huge threat to Alcaraz at FO. Also i think i am right in saying he cannot lose is no.1 ranking now either?
 
Winner Sinner said:
At Indian Wells he had no points to defend for last year's semi-final because those points were taken away from him after the positive tests.

Once the disqualification has been served, Sinner will be able to return having around 9700 points.
Click to expand...

And he would have been the heavy favorite for the IW-Miami double.

Now we can't say with a straight face that the likes of Federer and Djokovic would not have found an equal for this twin achievement.
 
Hitman said:
The bigger question is....would Federer have choked on 40-15 against Sinner also in that W 2019 final which sealed everyone's fate? Is Sinner good enough to get Federer to choke? It will remain a question mark if Sinner could have ever done this to Federer.

Click to expand...
Sealed everyone's fate? Sorry i dont follow? Are you saying Sinner was under suspicion back then? I cannot even remember if he played W that year?
 
Winner Sinner said:
At Indian Wells he had no points to defend for last year's semi-final because those points were taken away from him after the positive tests.

Once the disqualification has been served, Sinner will be able to return having around 9700 points.
Click to expand...
If im Sinner i am delighted about this. Its almost perfect. He needed to skip Miami or IW anyway as last year playing both messed up his clay court schedule as he isnt physically strong enough to play so many events in close successsion which is what we get from IW through to W
 
intrepidish said:
It's far more likely that it's actually the other way around but I doubt we'll ever be hearing the real deal about the special regime and 'gluten free magic'
Click to expand...
Not so sure about that after wawrinka's tweet tbh. I said this a year ago and i stand by it, Sinner has never been the big target. This whole case has opened up the gateway now for tennis to be under a microscope and there is no doubt investigative journalists will now be going back to past events where there may have been suspicions. I cannot understand why people cannot see the bigger picture and put things together.
 
messiahrobins said:
If im Sinner i am delighted about this. Its almost perfect. He needed to skip Miami or IW anyway as last year playing both messed up his clay court schedule as he isnt physically strong enough to play so many events in close successsion which is what we get from IW through to W
Click to expand...
Yes, Sinner can be said to have fallen on his feet, but I'm frankly sorry that he has to miss Indian Wells, especially.
I consider it one of the most beautiful and fascinating tournaments on the entire circuit.
 
Winner Sinner said:
Yes, Sinner can be said to have fallen on his feet, but I'm frankly sorry that he has to miss Indian Wells, especially.
I consider it one of the most beautiful and fascinating tournaments on the entire circuit.
Click to expand...
Yes i agree but also IW last year set him back in his rivalry with Alcaraz for definite. IW does not suit his game really.
He will win one of FO and W i think, maybe both depending on Alcaraz.
 
TheGoldenEra1990’s said:
But he could still all 4 slams this year (which I think is now a solid possibility). I hate to crap on masters but in the grand scheme of things. They don’t mean much. Slams, Olympic gold and the year end is really the only important titles.
Click to expand...
Suspension from play as a sanction in the anti-doping system is meant to remove the player from his/her profession temporarily, with the expectation that this removal will result in the loss of significant income-generating opportunities as well as many missed ranking points and possibly tournament titles/finals as well. That's the punishment. In Sinner's case, these expected lost opportunities will definitely be realized. The sanction is not based on some notion that the player's "legacy" has to be damaged as much as possible by doing whatever it takes to cut out slams. That would be unworkable and unfair. Indeed, for all the talk about how Sinner had advantages in the process from being no. 1, his three months away will cost him a lot more in money and points than would have been lost by a low-ranked player.
 
Hitman said:
The bigger question is....would Federer have choked on 40-15 against Sinner also in that W 2019 final which sealed everyone's fate? Is Sinner good enough to get Federer to choke? It will remain a question mark if Sinner could have ever done this to Federer.

Click to expand...
How did it seal everyone's fate?
Fed wins over Djoker and you have 23-22-21.
 
Mark-Touch said:
How did it seal everyone's fate?
Fed wins over Djoker and you have 23-22-21.
Click to expand...
Must admit that post baffled me unless there is something about Sinner going that far back that was somehow relevant? Otherwise i am perplexed given that a whole 3 years later Djokovic still had not surpassed Federer's slam tally let alone Nadal's, and Federer had stopped playing anywhere close to a full schedule pretty much for 12 months at that point. Federer's fate was sealed by a bath tub.
 
He's never done well in IW, MC and Madrid anyway. Not even a final. Not a big loss for him.
Miami is more damaging on the other hand, but unless it costs him his world number #1 ranking (can only happen if Alcaraz or Zverev win 2 or 3 of the 4 upcoming Masters1000), he won't lose anything important.

Think about all those cancelled Masters1000 during the covid years. Shanghaï 3 consecutive years, all the US and clay Masters in 2020... Not to mention Wimbledon 2020. It cost the associated world number #1 (in this case Djokovic) a lot more. He was robbed of several big titles because of political decisions... That's a lot more frustrating than losing a few Masters1000 because of a doping ban.
 
Lauren_Girl' said:
He's never done well in IW, MC and Madrid anyway. Not even a final. Not a big loss for him.
Miami is more damaging on the other hand, but unless it costs him his world number #1 ranking (can only happen if Alcaraz or Zverev win 2 or 3 of the 4 upcoming Masters1000), he won't lose anything important.

Think about all those cancelled Masters1000 during the covid years. Shanghaï 3 consecutive years, all the US and clay Masters in 2020... Not to mention Wimbledon 2020. It cost the associated world number #1 (in this case Djokovic) a lot more. He was robbed of several big titles because of political decisions... That's a lot more frustrating than losing a few Masters1000 because of a doping ban.
Click to expand...

I agree on many of the points but whenever our Djokovic competed between 2018-23, he barely had any competition that more than made up for lost opportunities
 
Bartelby said:
Although the GOAT debate is meaningless, I really don't think that someone banned for doping should even be considered for that fanciful honour.
Click to expand...

It is like a musical chair game with coaches and fitness trainers .

How do we know Sinner’s trainers were not bought by some of the players Sinner was thrashing ??
 
Read the part in bold.

Bartelby said:
Although the GOAT debate is meaningless, I really don't think that someone banned for accidental contamination from strict liability should even be considered for that fanciful honour.
Click to expand...

However, to avoid any misunderstanding, let's say this to all those millions of cycling enthusiasts who consider Eddy Merckx the GOAT of cycling.

Having said that, I take this comment of yours as a certificate of esteem towards Sinner which leads you to open up to the hypothesis that with success he could become a candidate.
If you thought that Sinner could never enter the debate, you would never have written that comment of yours.
 
Strict liability is still a thing even if you want to rewrite the rules to favour Sinner.

Winner Sinner said:
Read the part in bold.



However, to avoid any misunderstanding, let's say this to all those millions of cycling enthusiasts who consider Eddy Merckx the GOAT of cycling.

Having said that, I take this comment of yours as a certificate of esteem towards Sinner which leads you to open up to the hypothesis that with success he could become a candidate.
If you thought that Sinner could never enter the debate, you would never have written that comment of yours.
Click to expand...
 
Was really hoping he'll target Djokovic's 16950. He still has chances, but it will be difficult next year by looking at Fonseca's rise.
 
Bartelby said:
Strict liability is still a thing even if you want to rewrite the rules to favour Sinner.
Click to expand...
I always find this part funny.

The party in the history of favoritism towards Sinner expresses its opinion without ever being able to justify it with concrete facts.

Let's see a little;

After you test positive in anti-doping tests resulting in immediate disqualification, do you have the possibility to immediately appeal against the disqualification to an independent tribunal that begins to examine the case?

Absolutely yes.
Anyone who denies this evidently has limited knowledge of the various procedures in question.

Before the trial on Wada's appeal, was there the possibility of a plea agreement between the parties (defendant and accusing party)?

Absolutely yes.

So where exactly would they change the rules to favor him?

If we then enter the sphere of conspiracy theory again where in these various procedural steps the various bodies have tried to protect Sinner by omitting evidence and so on, then everything and the opposite of everything applies.

But my reference question is always the same in these cases where it is hinted that the power games wanted to favor Sinner by saving him from a much more severe sanction;

Why, if Sinner is so untouchable, did they reveal the two positive anti-doping tests without covering them up permanently from the beginning?

Yet another question that will never be answered, simply because a reconstruction with repeated holes in the script remains full of holes in the script even if you try to put a few patches here and there.
 
Missing no slams though, just how they drew it up (and I predicted).

Should be out at least 6 months but the world isn’t fair.
 
TheSlicer said:
Come on man, its his worst part of the year and the only one where 3 months dont make you miss a slam, its practically a nonexisting punishment, points and money are not a problem for him, missing slams or WTF is, as is missing masters at the end of the year where he is more dominant, i cant think of a lesser punishment for him except not getting punished at all, personally i wished he didnt miss these 3 months, It doesnt change anything in the grand scheme of things except we dont see him competing against Carlos or Djokovic in some tourneys, its a lame situation
Click to expand...
Can’t tell you’re happy or sad from this verdict
 
TennisGrandpA said:
Can’t tell you’re happy or sad from this verdict
Click to expand...
Honestly, its stupid they banned him 3 months, its all political, sinner accepted just to be over with this but its such a good deal they offered him that you can tell wada was gonna lose the appeal anyway, my point is that either you catch him doing something wrong and you put a good ban on him or you just dont catch him, and if its such a Big deal for them to be responsable for the members of your team, you dont reach an agreement to ban him during an irrelevant part of the year and just enough time so he doesnt miss anything important... This way It seems a bad joke, and on top of that, we miss the number one player on our screens for 3 months as tennis fans.
 
Last edited:
Sinner is missing 5 tournaments.
4 masters and 1 atp 500 at doha.

So its not like he is having ban in holiday season.

But yes, with no slams affected the weightage is much less.
Slams are big deal for top players i.e potential winners
 
4 masters and 1 ATP 500?
This is an abuse.
Sinner should have been suspended for one masters, one ATP 500 and 2 ATP 500, all of them at his choice during the rest of this season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top