Sinner s woes are not over. WADA is considering appeal

roysid

Legend

RSJfan

Semi-Pro

There are multiple news articles on the same. If WADA appeals it willl be a big dent in Sinners reputation and career. Not to mention, the suspension that comes with it

Capture.png
 
Last edited:

RSJfan

Semi-Pro
The Carrot will be OK. On the other hand, WADA is on thin ice. It is time for the US to cut its contribution to corrupt WADA down to $0 dollars.

Tennis governing bodies should withdraw from WADA. Tennis does not need WADA weirdos chasing after tennis pros at all hours demanding pi#s and blood.

 
Last edited:

RSJfan

Semi-Pro
Nike and its friends have a slice of the pie and they won’t let it go.
Yeh there is too much invested in Carrot and not just by his sponsors but tennis generally. And Carrot v Charlie. No chance Carrot is getting any kind of suspension. It’s more likely WADA is suspended from involvement in tennis. They would have to catch Carrot red-handed on a live, widely broadcasted stream clearly ingesting some prohibited substance and even then would probably find a way to get around it. Without Carrot it could have been Draper v. Fritz in a major final. :sick: Besides the chance this Boy Scout knowingly doped seems far fetched. But if someone has to go down it will be Cahill.:giggle:

 
Last edited:

Jack the Hack

Hall of Fame

There are multiple news articles on the same. If WADA appeals it willl be a big dent in Sinners reputation and career. Not to mention, the suspension that comes with it

This is a procedural deadline. There is nothing in the Independent Tribunal decision that WADA would have a basis to appeal. The Tribunal followed everything to the letter of the rules in their adjudication, and all three of the scientists who provided analysis for the case either currently run or have formerly run WADA-accredited labs in their anti-doping program. The findings and rationale in the Sinner case match that of the earlier decision with Bortolotti, which also had no basis for WADA appeal. This story is over.
 
Last edited:

roysid

Legend
Yeh there is too much invested in Carrot and not just by his sponsors but tennis generally. And Carrot v Charlie. No chance Carrot is getting any kind of suspension. It’s more likely WADA is suspended from involvement in tennis. They would have to catch Carrot red-handed on a live, widely broadcasted stream clearly ingesting some prohibited substance and even then would probably find a way to get around it. Without Carrot it could have been Draper v. Fritz in a major final. :sick: Besides the chance this Boy Scout knowingly doped seems far fetched. But if someone has to go down it will be Cahill.:giggle:

More likely it would be be Med vs Fritz final
 

roysid

Legend
This is a procedural deadline. There is nothing in the Independent Tribunal decision that WADA would have a basis to appeal. The Tribunal followed everything the letter of the rules in their adjudication, and all three of the scientists who provided analysis for the case either currently run or have formerly run WADA-accredited labs in their anti-doping program. The findings and rationale in the Sinner case match that of the earlier decision with Bortolotti, which also had no basis for WADA appeal. This story is over.
I hope that's what it comes to be. Sinner is the best tennis player right now and he be under provision or suspicion will be huge chaos
 

DJ-

Hall of Fame
Wada have a chance before he becomes untouchable and brings in more revenue for the game.
 

Rovesciarete

Hall of Fame
This is a procedural deadline. There is nothing in the Independent Tribunal decision that WADA would have a basis to appeal. The Tribunal followed everything to the letter of the rules in their adjudication, and all three of the scientists who provided analysis for the case either currently run or have formerly run WADA-accredited labs in their anti-doping program. The findings and rationale in the Sinner case match that of the earlier decision with Bortolotti, which also had no basis for WADA appeal. This story is over.

Indeed it would be incredible if they appeal such a clear-cut case after the Bortolotti precedent...
 

TennisBro

Professional
The Carrot will be OK. On the other hand, WADA is on thin ice. It is time for the US to cut its contribution to corrupt WADA down to $0 dollars.

Tennis governing bodies should withdraw from WADA. Tennis does not need WADA weirdos chasing after tennis pros at all hours demanding pi#s and blood.

This wouldn't be a bad idea but how has that worked for the NHL, NFL or the Baseball league in North America? Don't get me wrong for I am in to see some top notch shows in the hockey stadiums or on ATP tour where tickets may be steeply priced. But the scary part is how many performance enhancing substances are available and how far the science is reaching with discoveries; also, it's concerning some with resources can get what others without them can't. I'd like to see all the healthy, talented and skillful athletes get their chances equally.
 

RSJfan

Semi-Pro
This is a procedural deadline. There is nothing in the Independent Tribunal decision that WADA would have a basis to appeal. The Tribunal followed everything to the letter of the rules in their adjudication, and all three of the scientists who provided analysis for the case either currently run or have formerly run WADA-accredited labs in their anti-doping program. The findings and rationale in the Sinner case match that of the earlier decision with Bortolotti, which also had no basis for WADA appeal.
Appeals to CAS are not traditional limited appeals proceedings. They’re all “de novo.” The CAS panel may review both the law and the facts. It can annul the original decision and send it back down for further proceedings or it may replace it entirely with its own decision. Parties may raise new facts and theories and introduce new evidence.

It’s all for naught though. The Carrot will walk.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
On the other hand, CAS has proven to be far more "lenient" in its jurisprudence than Tribunals.

Appeals to CAS are not traditional limited appeals proceedings. They’re all “de novo.” The CAS panel may review both the law and the facts. It can annul the original decision, replace it entirely or send it back down. Parties may raise new facts and theories and introduce new evidence.

It’s all for naught though, The Carrot will walk.
 

mtommer

Hall of Fame
Skinner was found to bear "no fault". What can you argue against that?
If WADA, or anybody really, can show how Clostebol can be used as a masking agent, I'd be more willing to accept Sinner as an intentional user of ped's.
 

RSJfan

Semi-Pro
This wouldn't be a bad idea but how has that worked for the NHL, NFL or the Baseball league in North America? Don't get me wrong for I am in to see some top notch shows in the hockey stadiums or on ATP tour where tickets may be steeply priced. But the scary part is how many performance enhancing substances are available and how far the science is reaching with discoveries; also, it's concerning some with resources can get what others without them can't. I'd like to see all the healthy, talented and skillful athletes get their chances equally.
Trust the Science!
 

roysid

Legend
I just came to know that Britain's Tara Moore was suspended for 19 months before she could prove her innocence. Tara Moore is a doubles player who reached 2nd round in USO. I never knew Tara Moore before

So obviously her treatment is not fair in comparison with Sinner. But then so if life
 

JMR

Hall of Fame
Wow that is huge, just goes to show how dodgy this whole thing has been and Sinner is not cleared from his multiple positive doping tests!

Sorry, but what you have written makes no sense. It is not "huge" that where a right to appeal exists, that right will be considered by the party holding it. That's a routine step. It would not even be "huge" if an appeal were actually taken, although that would be a significant step that obviously would prolong this controversy. What could be "huge" would be a different, anti-Sinner result on appeal. And merely thinking about an appeal now does not imply that anything about the process has been "dodgy." Talk about jumping the gun.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
Sorry, but what you have written makes no sense. It is not "huge" that where a right to appeal exists, that right will be considered by the party holding it. That's a routine step. It would not even be "huge" if an appeal were actually taken, although that would be a significant step that obviously would prolong this controversy. What could be "huge" would be a different, anti-Sinner result on appeal. And merely thinking about an appeal now does not imply that anything about the process has been "dodgy." Talk about jumping the gun.
I think what was huge was the #1 player in the world testing positive for doping multiple times and having it kept under wraps for months. Only to announce it on his terms that it was over, however, now we know it is not over.

Sinner is still not cleared of being a doper. Have to wait for the appeal process hey?
 

Impetus

Semi-Pro
It would be good for tennis is WADA finds the Sinner guilty. Here is why:

1. It creates excitement and entertainment
2. It restores faith in the system for many
3. It makes Sinner infinite times more interesting

The worst thing is that so many of us believes he's guilty and to see him get away with it is frustrating and infuriating.

Hell, I will be the first to buy a T-shirt from Nike that says 'Just dope it'.
 

Biotic

Hall of Fame
They should investigate it to the end. A scandal of this proportion shouldn't escape scrutiny. And frankly, the who thing stinks.
I wonder if there is something left to investigate. The way they presented the whole thing, you either buy his story or you don't. ITIA did.

But I do think no matter how hard Nike and co. try to sweep it under the rug, it won't be forgotten any time soon.
 

SonnyT

Legend
Then Carlos' first years will be similar to Roger's first five! Except there will be no one similar to Rafa on clay!

No, there's no history of slams given back!
 

roysid

Legend
If they Suspend Sinner for >6 months, it will be such a chaos.

- What will happen to Cincy title. Will it be given to Tiafoe. Zverev will cry foul.
- Then what will happen to US Open title. Zverev wins. Draper will complain, so will Med.

Sinner will also complain. Will his loses against Alcaraz and Med be erased from records
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
It would be good for tennis is WADA finds the Sinner guilty. Here is why:

1. It creates excitement and entertainment
2. It restores faith in the system for many
3. It makes Sinner infinite times more interesting

The worst thing is that so many of us believes he's guilty and to see him get away with it is frustrating and infuriating.

Hell, I will be the first to buy a T-shirt from Nike that says 'Just dope it'.

Hold on ? Why it would be good if Wada finds him guilty even when he's not guilty?lol. Man, are you paid or something? You have been leading anti Sinner propaganda here since last 3 weeks .
 
Top