I’m not saying this isn’t in the rules as you quoted, it’s just that those rules aren’t applied evenly. And we’ve all seen it play out. It doesn’t take a genius to know why Sinners multiple failed tests weren’t announced to the world straight away and instead was swept under the rug until he was cleared, at which point he got to announce it to the world. Cause he’s the #1 and it would destroy the ATP. It reeks of bias and a cover up. Halep got hung out to dry while Sinner was protected.
You do realize that they tested positive for different substances, right? You do realize they tested positive for different quantities of different substances, right?
Your question is tantamount to asking why the person put on trial for stealing bread doesn't receive the same treatment (and eventual sentence) as the person put on trial for murder.
Some of you seem to believe that there is only one "doping" substance in existence, and you either take it or you don't. It's either A or B, black or white. But of course here in reality, where luckily there are still a few grown up people in charge, we know that isn't the case.
Going back to my analogy above, even if two people are convicted of the same crime, in most criminal justice systems they can still receive different punishments. Imagine that! Imagine that people much smarter than us, with a much broader understanding and outlook on modern society, decided that the philosophy underlying our criminal justice system should account for nuance, and the uniqueness of human nature. Imagine that!
Lance Armstrong? They obsessively went after him.
Lance, who is an absolutely fascinating character, regularly admits to two things, both of which were responsible for his downfall, and likely in equal measure: 1. Doping, and 2. Making an enemy of just about every single person he came across that wasn't actively helping him win.
Without number 2, he might have never been caught/outed. Without number 2, he most likely does not become the poster boy for doping, because we now know with certainty that the entire sport of cycling was essentially a doping free-for-all for a decade or more.
No see here is my problem and I have said it 20 times. You seem to think it's so simple. HaleP had her career wrecked because she didnt submit her defense on time? Thats what we are boiling this down to? You say oh it's not complex it's right there. So she gets suspended for a year and a half then they say well we didnt have enough evidence. Free to go.
See above. You know that Halep tested positive for a different substance, right?
And you do know that the circumstances were completely different, right? Sinner was basically able to figure out right away where the contamination came from, and thus immediately present his case to the relevant authorities. Halep, unfortunately for her, had no idea where her contamination came from, and so all she could say was, 'I didn't do it,' without any reasonable explanation for the failed test.
Here's another analogy for you: two people are being investigated for a murder. Both have the same alibi: "I was out with friends when the murder took place." One of the people, however, was at a bar with cameras that clearly show them present at the bar, thus confirming the alibi and resulting in an immediate clearing. The other is unlucky and doesn't have any video evidence, so the authorities have to dig a lot further.
TL
R The two cases are NOT THE SAME. Stop comparing them!