Neptune
Hall of Fame
by age 23 | vs Top5 | T5 Weight | vs Top10 | T10 Weight | vs T11+ | T11+ Weight | vs All |
Sinner | 40 (17-23) 42.50% | 12.35% | 63 (32-31) 50.79% | 19.44% | 261 (213-48) 81.61% | 80.56% | 324 (245-79) 75.62% |
Fed | 34 (24-10) 70.59% | 7.98% | 74 (46-28) 62.16% | 17.37% | 352 (264-88) 75.00% | 82.63% | 426 (310-116) 72.77% |
by age 21 | vs Top5 | T5 Weight | vs Top10 | T10 Weight | vs T11+ | T11+ Weight | vs All |
Alcaraz | 28 (18-10) 64.29% | 11.38% | 49 (31-18) 63.27% | 19.92% | 197 (163-34) 82.74% | 80.08% | 246 (194-52) 78.86% |
Rafa | 28 (18-10) 64.29% | 8.78% | 46 (30-16) 65.22% | 14.42% | 273 (223-50) 81.68% | 85.58% | 319 (253-66) 79.31% |
What do you see? Which duo had the easier path?
Does this reflect the era's strength?
Can era strength be used to mislead the actual difficulty of a player's path?
Last edited: