Neptune
Hall of Fame
by age 23 | vs Top5 | T5 Weight | vs Top10 | T10 Weight | vs T11+ | T11+ Weight | vs All |
Sinner | 46 (22-24) 47.83% | 13.53% | 71 (39-32) 54.93% | 20.88% | 269 (221-48) 82.16% | 79.12% | 340 (260-80) 76.47% |
Fed | 34 (24-10) 70.59% | 7.98% | 74 (46-28) 62.16% | 17.37% | 352 (264-88) 75.00% | 82.63% | 426 (310-116) 72.77% |
| | | | | | | |
by age 21 | vs Top5 | T5 Weight | vs Top10 | T10 Weight | vs T11+ | T11+ Weight | vs All |
Alcaraz | 31 (20-11) 64.52% | 11.74% | 55 (35-20) 63.64% | 20.83% | 209 (173-36) 82.78% | 79.17% | 264 (208-56) 78.79% |
Rafa | 28 (18-10) 64.29% | 8.78% | 46 (30-16) 65.22% | 14.42% | 273 (223-50) 81.68% | 85.58% | 319 (253-66) 79.31% |
What do you see? Which duo had the easier path?
Some started out in the vacuum, how nice when top5 and top10 opponents hardly even show up.
Does this reflect the era's strength?
Can era strength be used to mislead the actual difficulty of a player's actual path?
Last edited: