Sinner's dominance is more impressive than Alcaraz's...

GRASScaraz

GRASScaraz

Hall of Fame
Never-ending luck for Alcaraz, he only won Wimbledon because of Sinner's illness and French Open because of Sinner's physical issue.

Two slams with huge asterisks this year, every other slam Sinner won.

Only deserved slam this year was Sinner at Australian open.

Sinner is winning slams by skills and Alcaraz is winning slams by luck.

Sinner > Alcaraz
 
Last edited:
Bad trolling, im gonna have to start trolling again to Up the level, this is just not acceptable, really really poor from asscaraz
 
GRASScaraz said:
Never-ending luck for Alcaraz, he only won Wimbledon because of Sinner's illness and French Open because of Sinner's physical issue.

Two slams with huge asterisked this year, every other slam Sinner won.

Only deserved slam this year was Sinner at Australian open.

Sinner is winning slams by skills and Alcaraz is winning slams by luck.

Sinner > Alcaraz
Click to expand...
I can't tell if you are just a bad troll or a complete idiot :)
 
Alcaraz has been injured more than Sinner, so the fact Sinner has only ONE slam and is almost TWO whole years older... really is pathetic.
Alcaraz already has FOUR slams, and also has more Masters (5) titles than Sinner (2).
 
GRASScaraz said:
Never-ending luck for Alcaraz, he only won Wimbledon because of Sinner's illness and French Open because of Sinner's physical issue.

Two slams with huge asterisks this year, every other slam Sinner won.

Only deserved slam this year was Sinner at Australian open.

Sinner is winning slams by skills and Alcaraz is winning slams by luck.

Sinner > Alcaraz
Click to expand...
Really? You ve proven your point . Everybody knows that Alcaraz is better than Sinner, however Sinner is the only one capable of beating zoning Alcaraz. Alcaraz will be more successful no doubt, but Sinner will be close behind.
 
Not really dominance when you got gifted a slam (ghost of Novak worse than the Wimby Novak, and 20 hour on-court Medvedev in the finals)

0-2 against Carlos this year, 4 slams to 1.

/thread.
 
Benoit Paire has been super unlucky. I've have had the the worst luck of anybody in history. And only I know this.

Pheasant>Paire>>>>>>Sinneraz.
 
kangaroo1973 said:
Really? You ve proven your point . Everybody knows that Alcaraz is better than Sinner, however Sinner is the only one capable of beating zoning Alcaraz. Alcaraz will be more successful no doubt, but Sinner will be close behind.
Click to expand...
Sinner close behind?
How many years will it take Sinner to win FOUR slam titles (if ever)?
And how many will Alcaraz have by then? :-D
And Sinner's AO title was only possible because Medvedev played 6 more hours than Sinner before the Final.
Medvedev led 2-sets-to-love, and then in the 3rd Set we heard Medvedev grunt - as exhaustion became a factor - for the first time and his forehand dropped 10km...
 
Winning one slam is not a dominance, especially when the other guy has two. Not like it was a particularly dominant title run either, he had to come back from 0-2 against Med in the final.
 
Djokovic after losing to Sinner at 2024 AO: “I was, in a way, shocked with my level, you know, in a bad way. There was not much I was doing right in the first two sets. I guess this is one of the worst Grand Slam matches I've ever played. At least that I remember."
 
legcramp said:
Not really dominance when you got gifted a slam (ghost of Novak worse than the Wimby Novak, and 20 hour on-court Medvedev in the finals)

0-2 against Carlos this year, 4 slams to 1.

/thread.
Click to expand...

Novak is Novak and med is med

Those are two of the top 5 players in the world for the past few years
 
MeatTornado said:
The forum would be pretty cool if we could actually have a few genuine Sinner and Alcaraz fans instead of extremely blatant trolls just trying to tick off the other side.
Click to expand...
Alcaraz fans are genuine, because Alcaraz has had injuries every year (including this year), so only the strong Alcaraz fans survive.
Sinner fans are bragging constantly about someone with ONE slam title and TWO masters titles in his WHOLE career, which makes no sense to be so excited over...
 
Even though the OP is trolling, there’s some truth in the fact that sinner has had an incredibly Dominating season On a match by match, set by set, point by point basis.

Of course it all boils down to two matches lost at the slams, which of course mean just about everything. He has one of the highest dominance ratios ever this year a number that’s rarely reached, especially by someone who winds up winning only one slam.
 
Bad trolling can't ignore the fact that Sinner indeed had a big stretch when he barely lost and Madrid injury derailed his invincible form. Sinner will be back to dominate the HC season again and win USO.
 
ghostofMecir said:
Even though the OP is trolling, there’s some truth in the fact that sinner has had an incredibly Dominating season On a match by match, set by set, point by point basis.

Of course it all boils down to two matches lost at the slams, which of course mean just about everything. He has one of the highest dominance ratios ever this year a number that’s rarely reached, especially by someone who winds up winning only one slam.
Click to expand...
Also the fact that Sinner never beat Alcaraz or Zverev this year...
So his streak is more "Andy Murray style" than Big3 style.
He's not the first nancy boy to have a streak...
 
MeatTornado said:
The forum would be pretty cool if we could actually have a few genuine Sinner and Alcaraz fans instead of extremely blatant trolls just trying to tick off the other side.
Click to expand...
A relative parody between Carlos and Sinner would be good for tennis. So for that reason I think it would be great if Sinner can win the US Open.

But the open warfare between stupid Carlos fans and stupid Sinner fans is beyond insane. I try to remember at all times that the most unpleasant, unreasonable and immature fanatics dominate most conversations simply because they will not shut up.
 
So Alcaraz fans rate Alcaraz highly (something only a stupid person would have a problem with) because he's the youngest man ever to win FOUR slam titles by age 21.
And Sinner fans call Alcaraz overrated, while constantly promising that Sinner - the man with only ONE slam title, despite being almost 2 years older - will win every slam.
Gee, I wonder which fan base is stupid on this forum...
 
GRASScaraz said:
Never-ending luck for Alcaraz, he only won Wimbledon because of Sinner's illness and French Open because of Sinner's physical issue.

Two slams with huge asterisks this year, every other slam Sinner won.

Only deserved slam this year was Sinner at Australian open.

Sinner is winning slams by skills and Alcaraz is winning slams by luck.

Sinner > Alcaraz
Click to expand...
Alcaraz beat Sinner IW
RG
Beijing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hitman
AO, W and USO have all fallen to the young guns - RG remains the final unconquered mountain
2
Replies
79
Views
3K
Move
Move
D
Will Djokovic always be Alcaraz's bunny?
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
Rattie
Rattie
CrunchJann
Who needs the W25 win more, Sinner, Djokovic or Alcaraz?
2
Replies
86
Views
1K
Hitman
Hitman
Lozo1016
Stefanos Tsitsipas Should Take Jannik Sinner's Success Personally
Replies
14
Views
717
SneederFeeder
SneederFeeder
Winner Sinner
  • Poll Poll
[POLL] If Djokovic won his 25th slam by beating Sinner, would it be more of a manifestation of his greatness or a perpetual downsizing of Sinner?
Replies
48
Views
1K
RS
RS
Back
Top