Sounds like it is. Pics always help.
The earliest SVs were bumperless and had stickers with that recommended tension range.
String it up at 55 pounds with 16 gauge natural gut and go put on your best Stefan Edberg impersonation!
LOL can edberg play now?
was the buttcap restapled on?
prob st vincentWell, I don't think so. The staple looks really old and corroded - the racquet came gripless. It's either a St.Vin or a Chicago...just which one?
When you first picked it up, did the sky thundered, was there a strange light in the room, was there a tingle running down your spine, did you hear a whipered "desitny" inside your head, did you feel invincilbe if you were facing a demon horde, and did you feel suddenly superior to everyone else because they don't have this racket?
If one of these things failed to occur, you have a fake.
You must be Alliance ;-)When you first picked it up, did the sky thundered, was there a strange light in the room, was there a tingle running down your spine, did you hear a whipered "desitny" inside your head, did you feel invincilbe if you were facing a demon horde, and did you feel suddenly superior to everyone else because they don't have this racket?
If one of these things failed to occur, you have a fake.
Honestly, I doubt there is much difference that we would notice. Out of all PS 85's I've had, I think my first one that was made in Chicago was heavier and more solid on impact..., I guess because it was my first one. It's really a great frame, regardless... , even after 30 years...My greatest score of all time was getting a Pro Staff from a local pro for $20 because he knew I used them and he had no need for it. Little did he know it was a St. Vincent. The grip size was too small for me, and I already had 5 85s at the time, so I ended up selling it for about $350.
But as a buzzkill...I never noticed a huge difference between the St. Vincents, Chicago, China, or Taiwan models.
ugh I found that the racquet's characteristics really changed since it became the 6.0. Lighter, less power, less feel, flimsy, more flexible, smaller sweetspot.Reviving an old thread... because I just had the best time hitting with the old faithful... I didn't hit as hard as I would with the Pure Strike Tour, but I was able to control the points with accuracy. If I had to hit hard, it did with ease and predictability. I stopped using it in favor of the new sticks, namely the Prince Rebel 95 a few years ago, but I think I will be using it more often. This is the only stick I feel somewhat confident volleying with... Could this really be the best all-around stick ever produced? Though I really like the power and pop of the Prestige 600 and the i.Prestige MP, I think the overall feel of the Pro Staff (*Chicago or St. Vincent) is the best among the classic frames of the past. Thinking about getting the reissue so that I preserve the St. Vincent ones longer.
Really? I would love to hear more from the players who've played with the St. Vincent versions but are playing with the re-issued Pro Staff's. Some of the reviews seem to say they are different but not really noticeable. I've seen a review that the new ones are less maneuverable than the original ones.ugh I found that the racquet's characteristics really changed since it became the 6.0. Lighter, less power, less feel, flimsy, more flexible, smaller sweetspot.
LOL can edberg play now?
Yup, check out videos on YouTube. Still plays awesome.Yes! He is almost as graceful as ever.