Someone shared with me a couple of (non) DQ's from Eastern Sectionals so I went ahead and took a look at them to see if my ratings agreed. Once again, they did! http://tennislink.usta.com/Leagues/...97D9D1D0C7368514FB1A69483FAE&par2=2013&par3=0 steamrolled through Sectionals not dropping a set and dishing out six 6-1 or 6-0 sets, and his team expected him to be DQ'd, but he wasn't. I showed him likely having just one strike. http://tennislink.usta.com/Leagues/...F8E05E74B5846B6A59480F6E4D4C&par2=2013&par3=0 also won at sectionals, but 3 of his 4 matches were match tie-break wins. Surprisingly, he did get DQ'd. I showed him actually having 4 strikes, but the last two were on the same day so I'm guessing they weren't able to do the calculations between matches and he was allowed to play the 2nd one that day. See http://computerratings.blogspot.com/2013/09/more-unexpected-dqs-and-non-dqs.html for a longer write-up with charts.