WIMBLEDON2013 WIMBLEDON2016!!!! USO12!!!!! GOLD HERE GOLD THERE! WTF!!! YE#1!!!!!! MURRAY!!!!!3 different slams, or 2 slams and 2 Gold medals?
Stan got to play with Vekic.
Stan's peak level though.
Andrew had no peak. He was just a consistent pusher.
My countryman without a shadow of a doubt.3 different slams, or 2 slams and 2 Gold medals?
Sorry to tell you that, mate.
3 different slams, or 2 slams and 2 Gold medals?
Don’t see what the issue is, Andy is lucky to pose with someone who met Federer 3 times in Grand Slam semis
I'd rather have Stan's career but Murray's was better and there's absolutely no room for debate.
I think Stan's career is cooler, but worse. I love how he flew under the radar for most of his career but would occasionally play tennis on par with the best players, win and then disappear.
Murray still ended up having a miles better career, and achieved what he set out to do i.e. Win Wimbledon. Even Stan would exchange Murray's career for hisI think Stan's career is cooler, but worse. I love how he flew under the radar for most of his career but would occasionally play tennis on par with the best players, win and then disappear.
More fun than Murray getting hyped up every major of his career and then disappointing and having people constantly mad at you.
I wouldn't go that far LOL. He has as many slams as him.lol Wawrinka's career is nothing compared to Andy's career
Hence why I said Andy's was better with no room for debate.Murray still ended up having a miles better career, and achieved what he set out to do i.e. Win Wimbledon. Even Stan would exchange Murray's career for his
I honestly dislike this new trend of judging player greatness based on grand slams only. 2 gold olympic medals, double digit of masters, YE#1, YEC, over 40 tournaments wins and multiple grand slam finals/semis is much much stronger resume.I wouldn't go that far LOL. He has as many slams as him.
But nowhere near is ridiculous.I honestly dislike this new trend of judging player greatness based on grand slams only. 2 gold olympic medals, double digit of masters, YE#1, YEC, over 40 tournaments wins and multiple grand slam finals/semis is much much stronger resume.
Stan has beaten Nadal,Djokovic in slam finals besides beating Fed once in a QF. He has won 3 slams sames as murray but at 3 different venues.3 different slams, or 2 slams and 2 Gold medals?