Stats for 1984 Wimbledon SF (Connors-Lendl)

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Connors d Lendl 67(4), 63, 75, 61

Connors was 31, Lendl was 24.

Lendl had won their last meeting, 6-0, 6-0 in Forest Hills in May '84.

my stats:

Connors had 45 non service winners: 12 fh, 8 bh, 11 fhv, 12 bhv, 2 ov
Lendl had 32: 14 fh, 12 bh, 2 fhv, 3 bhv, 1 ov

Connors had 6 aces, 1 double
Lendl had 18 aces, 6 doubles

Connors was 87 of 126 on 1st serves, or 69%
Lendl was 90 of 144 on 1st serves, or 62.5%

Connors had 25 unreturned serves, 5 of which I judged as service winners
Lendl had 21 unreturned serves, 5 of which I judged as service winners

Connors was 6 of 14 on breakpoints, Lendl was 1 of 4

Lendl was up a break in the 3rd set, 3-1

Lendl hardly served & volleyed in this match at all, but came in on every serve in his SF with McEnroe the previous Wimbledon.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Winners by set

Connors: 8, 7, 20, 10
Lendl: 9, 4, 14, 5

Connors hit 9 passing shot winners, Lendl 14(9 were bh's)

Lendl had 18 aces, 6 doubles

krosero, do you know what Lendl's high in aces was? He had 17 after 3 sets in this match.
 

krosero

Legend
The Washington Post

July 7, 1984, Saturday, Final Edition

Lendl's Fast Fade Sends Connors to Meet McEnroe

BYLINE: By David Remnick, Washington Post Staff Writer

SECTION: Sports; C1

LENGTH: 1078 words

DATELINE: LONDON, July 6, 1984

Princess Diana bolted Centre Court before the fourth set for a spot of tea. What was Ivan Lendl's excuse?

With today's first Wimbledon men's semifinal tied at a set all and Lendl leading, 5-4, Jimmy Connors held his service and went on an inspired, seven-game tear that gave him the third set and two breaks in the fourth. Lendl, of course, was not permitted to join the royal party for scones, but his mind and a good portion of his physical strength were obviously absent.


Connors and Lendl split the first 214 points of the match. But the contest ended as soon as Lendl wavered.

Connors began banging balls to every quarter with abandon and delight. Lendl missed most everything. The princess did not miss a thing. Connors won, 6-7 (4-7), 6-3, 7-5, 6-1.

Diana returned to the Royal Box for a somewhat less dramatic semifinal, defending champion John McEnroe's 6-3, 7-6 (7-5), 6-4 defeat of Pat Cash.

McEnroe probably expended more energy watching the first semifinal on television than he did playing his match. McEnroe was perfectly content to exchange service games and then get the obligatory break game when he needed it. Cash, 19, is the youngest men's player to reach the semifinals since McEnroe did it in 1977 at the age of 18. But Cash had little to offer McEnroe today other than a decent volley and a tenacious spirit.

McEnroe perspired. It was 86 degrees, after all. But he never did sweat much. Nobody will knock down the doors for a videotape of this match. And yet, it's foolish to think McEnroe will not raise the level of his play for Sunday's final against Connors.

McEnroe has beaten Connors in their last five matches, including a 6-2, 6-2 thrashing three weeks ago on the grass at Queen's Club. But McEnroe is prepared for a highly charged Sunday on the lawn with Connors. Two years ago, Connors beat McEnroe in a five-set Wimbledon final as famous for its emotion as its mastery.

"I've played a lot of big matches with him," said McEnroe, in the final here for the fifth straight year. "That's when he feels he plays his best. The key is not to get overemotional. Connors likes to build it up to that pitch."

Connors knew he would not be able to relax. Lendl had been his master recently, beating him in 20 straight games. Lendl's 6-0, 6-0 destruction at Forest Hills two months ago was the worst defeat of Connors' career.

"Just one of those days," Connors said at the time, but the loss stung him badly.

Since the day he stepped onto Centre Court against Bob Hewitt 13 years ago to play his first match at Wimbledon, Connors has gone for every winner here. He does not know how to coast or even wait. He is Rocky Marciano dressed more politely.

Lendl knew that Connors would play a power game. He knew he needed a way to defuse it, to deflect it with variety and patience. Lendl could not afford to blast every ground stroke, as he had in the quarterfinals against Tomas Smid.

Instead, Lendl continually chipped his backhand cross court to Connors' forehand. Lendl wisely sought to vary the rhythm of the match. He scored 18 aces and a bushel of service winners against one of the best return artists in the history of the game.

Without a single break point in the first set, the players exchanged service to 6-6. In the tie breaker, Connors was the one to crack. He double-faulted to trail, 4-6, then put the first set point into the net.

Considering how well Lendl was serving, Connors won the second set in no time at all. Leading, 1-0, Connors made good on the first break point of the match. Leading, 5-3, he even engaged officials in some street theater. After a suspect call, Connors held his nose as if a skunk, and not a princess, were in the vicinity.

"Court violation," umpire Malcolm Huntington intoned.

The solemnity was comic.

Connors won the point, game and set, anyway, and brought down the house by repeating the nasal antic.

"That'll probably cost me another $500," Connors said later.

Then came the third set, the pivotal series in the match. Lendl seemed to take charge when he broke Connors for a 3-1 lead. But Connors fought back immediately. Lendl had two ads but could not put his opponent away. Lendl blew an easy volley to give Connors the ad. As usual, Connors knew an opportunity when he saw it and smashed his next volley for a service break.

There were signs that Lendl was begining to tire. His service toss was lower. His backhand slice was often lazy and wide. He was taking position three feet behind the base line and hitting ground strokes very late.

The signals turned grave with the set tied at 5-5 and Lendl serving.

Connors pumped his fists as he chased down a volley to lead, 15-30. Lendl did not seem able to match Connors for hustle or spirit. On his fourth try at break point, Connors finally won it when Lendl poked a lazy half-volley into the net.

Lendl's body sagged. He sat in his chair on the sideline and poured cups of ice water over his head and neck. Nothing would rouse him.

Connors is not known for his serve, but he scored two aces in the next game and caught Lendl going in the wrong direction for set point. He closed the set easily, 7-5.

Lendl was tiring and Connors could sense it.

"Jimmy's good at seeing when a guy's not at his peak," McEnroe said.

After the match, Lendl would admit only to physical exhaustion and not mental distraction, but his mind seemed to join his body in decline.

Lendl could not hold his service or his concentration in the first game of the fourth set. He double-faulted for 30-30, then mysteriously stopped playing on the next point.

"I thought somebody had called it out," Lendl explained. Then Lendl walked to the net and conferred with Connors. Microphones on court picked up the odd conversation.

"Did you call it out?" Lendl asked.

Connors smiled.

"No," he said. "I didn't call it out."

Connors patted Lendl on the head with his racket and returned to the business of finishing the match.

Connors took a fast 4-0 lead and coasted to the end. He won the final point in typical fashion, chasing down a drop shot for a stunning forehand down the line. The match lasted 2 hours 56 minutes, but he could have played until dark.

Someone asked McEnroe if he expected Connors to tire in a prolonged match, as Lendl had. Connors is 31, after all, four years away from the senior division.

"(Connors) fakes it pretty well," McEnroe said. "It may be mental. If he's tired, he just doesn't let it bother him."
Can't help but notice how similar the pattern of the match was to their U.S. Open final ten months earlier, which Connors won 6-3, 6-7, 7-5, 6-0
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Considering how well Lendl was serving, Connors won the second set in no time at all. Leading, 1-0, Connors made good on the first break point of the match. Leading, 5-3, he even engaged officials in some street theater. After a suspect call, Connors held his nose as if a skunk, and not a princess, were in the vicinity.

"Court violation," umpire Malcolm Huntington intoned.

This was one of the worst code violations I've seen, and Connors acted perfectly the entire match, so the umpire had no reason to pull the trigger like that.

I was a bit surprised at how well Jimmy took it, some other players would have gone ballistic at getting a code out of nowhere.
 

jrepac

Hall of Fame
interesting stats...looks like Connors served particularly well (based on total serve winners including un-returnables) and was very much the aggressor, given the volley winners. Would like very much to see this match again. I recall a very tense 3rd set, as Lendl could've run away with it. But, somehow, Connors found another gear and his game "caught fire" while Lendl receded. This was Connors last "big win" over Lendl on a major stage. And was pretty darn impressive.
 

kiki

Banned
Connors also beat Lendl at the then massive Tokyo Super Seiko final, baggeling him in one set, at the end of 1984.It was one of the world´s greatest indoor events of that era.
 

suwanee4712

Professional
I remember watching this match live and unwisely expecting Lendl to win as if the French F was a cure all to his problems. But Connors' willyness was amplified on an unpredictable surface like grass. Lendl had the right tactic, chipping low to the forehand. But I am surprised to hear that he tired in a 4 set match. Clearly he still had a ways to go.
 

kiki

Banned
Lendl beaten by Mc Enroe in the 83 sf and Connors in the 84 sf was about normal.Nobody expected him to go down in the last 16 against Leconte in 1985, but Leconte always spelt trouble when inspired, and he clearly was inspired that fortnight, playing off his mind.Possibly his best tennis production ever.
 

Gizo

Legend
This was a strong and aggressive performance by Connors, and he showcased his grass court superiority over Lendl. Confident serving and he dealt with Lendl's attempt to blunt his power and chipped shots to his forehand well.

That humorous incident at the start of the 4th set where the players had that exchange at the net 'Did you call it out?' 'I didn't call it out', was very funny. So much for the false myth of Lendl having no personality on the court. It's difficult to imagine modern day players doing that in an ATP 250 event nowadays, let alone a big Wimbledon semi-final.
 

kiki

Banned
yeah, it was great.Connors did some funny gestures when he heard Lendl ask him in his unique anglo czech accent " Did you call it out"?

I think even Jimmy was upset at that attempt of humour by Lendl.
 

Gizo

Legend
There was another incident early in the 80s (I can't remember the exact match) where Lendl hit a powerful serve that was just long and hit one of the line judges, who called it out. Lendl then joked 'did you say out or ouch'. Funny stuff.

Definitely in the interview room, and possibly on the court as well, he had a much bigger sense of humour than McEnroe did during their playing days. If he had no personality, then 21st century notably funny interviewees and 'bad boys' like Roddick or Safin who were so tame compared to him, had no personalities either.
 

kiki

Banned
There was another incident early in the 80s (I can't remember the exact match) where Lendl hit a powerful serve that was just long and hit one of the line judges, who called it out. Lendl then joked 'did you say out or ouch'. Funny stuff.

Definitely in the interview room, and possibly on the court as well, he had a much bigger sense of humour than McEnroe did during their playing days. If he had no personality, then 21st century notably funny interviewees and 'bad boys' like Roddick or Safin who were so tame compared to him, had no personalities either.

yes, that is a big difference.Lendl, the dull character of the 80´s, is a comic compared to the current croop.

His press conferences were followed by al journalists because he would drop some deadly sentences or some dry humour speeches.

I recall one when a french presswoman, who didn´t speak english well was constantly asking to him

" And when Mc Enroe is your partner".He just gave her a cold look and answers " Mc Enroe is never my partner".

The woman is confused and insists : " well, but Mc Enroe is often your partner".Once again, Lendl answers back " Mc Enroe has never been my partner"
At this point, everybody understood that she meant " your opponent" and not " your partner" and, of course, Lendl had also noticed that.But when some english speaking journalist asked him to melt down a bit because the lady, obviously didn´t speak good english, he said
" I know she means my opponent, but, anyway, whatever I say, you press guys just turn it around"...
 
Top