Stats for 2002 USO final (Sampras-Agassi)

krosero

Legend
Sampras officially hit 84 winners in this four-set match, which is his best performance that I'm aware of. He hit an average of 2.05 winners per game, which is higher than his published rates for the 1999 W final (1.87), the 1995 W final (1.74), a '97 Davis Cup victory over Rafter (1.68 ), his loss to Agassi in the 2000 AO (1.65), and his four-tiebreak win over Agassi in the 2001 USO (1.54).

Of his 84 winners in '02, I counted 75 clean winners. So he hit a clean winner or ace on just over 27% of all the points in the match, which is among the higher rates that we have in this list (see the column second from right).

Those matches (and his loss to Becker in Hanover in '96) are the highest Sampras rates I know about, though I'm sure he has other high ones in his career, particularly in victories over lesser players.

However Sampras himself thought that this '02 final against Agassi was the highest level he ever played.

From http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/t...as-577514.html

Many among the cognoscenti would point to 1993-97 - when he collected nine of his majors - as his prime. But Sampras contends: "The best tennis I played was when I was older. I wasn't as consistent week in and week out but that match I played against Andre at the 2002 US Open - my last match ever - was the highest level I have ever played.

"Everyone was getting better when I was No 1 in the world and winning majors left and right. I was 10 times the player as I got older. When I was dominating I didn't have any bad matches and players overall weren't as good. The 2002 US Open Pete would beat the 1994 or 1995 Pete easily."

Sampras was 31, Agassi 32.

McEnroe said Agassi’s serve had improved in the last few years, that he volleyed better than ever, and that he was one of the few players who were better after the age of 30 than before.

This was Sampras’ 14th Slam title -- and his 5th U.S. Open, tying him in the Open Era with Connors. His 7th Slam on hard court set a new record since 1978 when Slams started being played on that surface (Federer broke the mark a few weeks ago).

And it was Sampras’ 8th U.S. final, tying him in the Open Era with Lendl.

He hadn’t won any of his previous 33 tournaments.

The final was Pete’s fifth match in 7 days and he started getting weary in the third set.


Score: Sampras d. Agassi 6-3, 6-4, 5-7, 6-4


The following are my own stats.

Sampras won 151 points overall, Agassi 126.

SERVICE

Sampras won 104 of 152 points on serve, Agassi 78 of 125.

Sampras won 15 straight points on serve, including the first dozen of the second set.

Sampras won 10 service games at love, Agassi just 3. On the other hand, Sampras served the longest games of the match.

Sampras served at 57%, making 87 of 152 first serves.

Agassi served at 66%, making 82 of 125 first serves.

Sampras’ first-serve percentages by set:
18/32 (56%)
17/24 (71%)
28/51 (55%)
24/45 (53%)

Agassi’s first-serve percentages by set:
14/19 (74%)
21/31 (68%)
26/41 (63%)
21/34 (62%)

Sampras served 27 more points than Agassi, but that is a little inflated given that he had one more service game. Still it's a large margin. He got caught in three long service games, holding after 14 points in the middle of the third set, getting broken after 16 points in the last game of the set, and holding after 20 points a few games later.

In the first two sets, by contrast, they were even: each man had to serve an average of 5.6 points in his service games.


Sampras converted 4 of 8 break points, Agassi 2 of 12.

Sampras put his first serve into play on 6 of 12 break points. (On his last 5 break points he was down to second serve). Both times he was broken it was on second serve.

Agassi put his first serve into play on 5 of 8 break points. (On his last 5 break points he made his first serve). He was broken twice on first serve and twice on second.


Sampras hit 33 aces and 13 doubles.
Agassi hit 7 aces and 4 doubles.

(Sampras was up from 25 aces in their four-tiebreak match the previous year, Agassi down from 18).

Sampras' aces by set: 12, 4, 10, 7
Agassi's aces by set: 3, 1, 1, 2


Sampras drew 34 return errors, with 12 serves that I judged as service winners.

Agassi drew 31 return errors; by my judgment he didn’t have any service winners.

But even though they were pretty even in return errors, Sampras got more credit in the published stats. In the New York Daily News boxscore he had 84 winners – 9 more than my count of clean winners. Probably most of those 9 were service winners. Agassi was credited with 27 total winners, which looks like he was credited with just 1 service winner.

Sampras drew 11 of 34 return errors with second serves, Agassi 10 of 31.


WINNERS

Sampras had 42 clean winners apart from service: 6 FH, 12 BH, 16 FHV, 8 BHV.

Agassi had 19: 14 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHV.

Sampras’ winners by set: 5, 10, 11, 16
Agassi’s winners by set: 3, 2, 8, 6

Sampras, then, had 15 winners in the first two sets, but nearly twice as many in the last two sets when he was more tired. It reflects to some degree how much he was trying to finish points quickly. He was going for big returns in the fourth set.

Each man had 18 ground stroke winners. But Pete led 24 to 1 in volleys/overheads.

Agassi didn’t have winners from any stroke except his FH, until he hit a BHV winner at 4-all in the third set: his only volley winner of the match.

Sampras had 6 return winners, all backhands, and four of them off first serve. None of them were passes, but he had one regular BH pass.

Agassi had 5 return winners: three FH’s off first serves and two BH’s off second serves. All were passes, and he had 7 more passes (including six FH’s).


ERRORS (forced and unforced)

Sampras made 100 errors of every kind; Agassi made 76. I didn’t count all those; it’s just the totals I get by subtracting the winners/aces from the Total Points Won.

Of Sampras’ 100 errors, I counted 13 double-faults and 31 return errors. So that leaves 56 errors that he made in actual rallies (a rally consisting of at least a successful return of serve).

Of Agassi’s 76 errors, I counted 4 double-faults and 34 return errors. So that leaves 38 errors that he made in actual rallies.

So in the rallies Agassi made 18 fewer errors than Sampras, but also 23 fewer winners. And Sampras had a 26-point lead in aces, which is really what won him his 25-point lead in total points. That’s essentially what won him the match.
 
Last edited:
Published stats

From the New York Daily News:

GRAPHIC: FINAL BREAKDOWN
Agassi Sampras
1st Serve percentage 66 57
Aces 7 33
Double Faults 4 13
Unforced Errors 21 46
1st Serve Winning Pct. 67 80
2nd Serve Winning Pct. 53 52
Winners (inc. service) 27 84
Break Points 2-12 4-8
Net Points 10-13 60-105
Total Points Won 126 151
Time of Match 2:54

No disagreements here with the ATP, except that the ATP put the elapsed time at 2 hours 52 minutes.


CBS credited Sampras with 105 approaches.

At 3-4 in the fourth, he'd won 65 of 100 approaches, Agassi 9 of 11.

Pete's 65% rate of success compares nicely with his 70% in their quarterfinal the year before (when USA gave him 88 of 125 late in the match).
 
Sampras officially hit 84 winners in this four-set match, which is his best performance that I'm aware of. He hit an average of 2.05 winners per game, which is higher than his published rates for the 1999 W final (1.87), the 1995 W final (1.74), a '97 Davis Cup victory over Rafter (1.68 ), his loss to Agassi in the 2000 AO (1.65), and his four-tiebreak win over Agassi in the 2001 USO (1.54).

Of his 84 winners in '02, I counted 75 clean winners. So he hit a clean winner or ace on just over 27% of all the points in the match, which is among the higher rates that we have in this list (see the column second from right).

Those matches (and his loss to Becker in Hanover in '96) are the highest Sampras rates I know about, though I'm sure he has other high ones in his career, particularly in victories over lesser players.
I'd forgotten another, the 2000 W final over Rafter. In clean winners/aces, not including his service winners, I got a rate of 1.5 per game: 66 winners in 44 games. I don't have a published figure for his total winners, but NBC seems to have given him around 10 service winners (and so did I).
 
Stats for 2001 USO quarterfinal

Sampras d. Agassi 6-7 (7-9), 7-6 (2), 7-6 (2), 7-6 (5)

This was their longest match in terms of points (338), games (52) and elapsed time (3:32). Their five-set semi at the 2000 AO tied this one in games but not in points (304) or in elapsed time (2:55).

Each man held serve 24 times.

Sampras extended his streak of consecutive service holds to 72, going back to the second round.


The Washington Post:

Last night was no exception, as Agassi and Sampras combined for 135 winners, 43 aces, four tiebreaks and dozens of big shots in a classic match that lasted three hours and thirty-two minutes.

With the victory, Sampras extended his all-time head-to-head lead over Agassi to 18-14, snapping a three-match Agassi win streak to boot.

Though Sampras dominated the pair's previous Open matches - winning the 1990 and 1995 finals with relative ease - their third tete-a-tete came down to a series of harrowing tiebreaks, as neither player allowed a break of serve.

And it was in the tiebreaks that Agassi, who otherwise played a notably clean match, faltered slightly. Though he hit just 19 unforced errors overall, eight of those came in the tiebreaker play - none more costly than in the fourth set.

Up 3-1 and on serve, Agassi hit an easy forehand into the net. Down 5-3, he plunked a wide open backhand volley wide. And on match point, he fired another forehand into the cord, leaving Sampras to raise his arms in triumph.

"A match like this boils down to a few shots," Agassi said. "That's the difficulty in it, and that's the beauty of it. Pete played the big points well and pulled it out. It was disappointing for me, but I was glad to be a part of it."


The Age (Melbourne):

Sampras seemed vulnerable in the second set, but managed to recover on the big points. His first-serve percentage plummeted from a stunning 70 per cent in the first set to just 47 in the second, giving Agassi attacking opportunities that Sampras countered by coming into the net.

Agassi was within his rights to have felt confident at that stage. Of the 50 US Open matches in which he had taken a one-set lead, he had gone on to win 49. But Sampras isn't big on statistics, just winning points. He did that in the second-set tiebreak with a clinical exhibition of power serving.


Agence France Presse – English:

Sampras, now 17-0 in US Open night matches, connected on 62 percent of his first serves, firing 25 aces with 12 double faults.


The New York Times:

The thriller, in which every set went to a tie breaker, produced a 4.1 cable rating for the USA Network, which is the equivalent of 3.42 million households. While the rating was not the highest ever for tennis on cable, the household delivery was. The Jimmy Connors-Paul Haarhuis quarterfinal marathon at the 1991 Open generated a 5.9 rating, or 3.38 million households. At the time, USA was in 62 percent of American households. Now it is in more than 80 percent.

Per the Times, Sampras served 25 aces and hit 80 winners to 40 unforced errors while Agassi had 18 aces, 55 winners and 19 unforced errors.

Agassi's 18 aces would ultimately be the most that he had in any of his 9 Slam meetings with Sampras (and probably in any of their tour meetings).


The Advertiser:

Sampras Agassi
62 First serve pc 65
25 Aces 18
12 Double faults 4
10 Forehand winners 20
12 Backhand winners 13
40 Unforced errors 19
0 of 6 Break point conversions 0 of 3
96 of 137 Pts won at net 12 of 21
176 Total points won 162

The ATP has no disagreements with this boxscore, so I decided only to count winners/aces and return errors.


Sampras drew 45 return errors, Agassi 28. Out of those serves I gave Pete 11 service winners, Andre 2.

I don’t know if USA credited either player with service winners or other judgment calls. Early in the fourth set the network had given Sampras 64 total winners while I had him at 62 clean winners and aces. They had Agassi at 48, same as in my count.

Even in the boxscore, Sampras’ total winners are ahead of my count of clean winners by only 3, and Agassi’s are ahead by just 1.


Sampras hit 52 clean winners: 11 FH, 13 BH, 13 FHV, 5 BHV, 10 OH.

Agassi hit 36 clean winners: 20 FH, 13 BH, 3 BHV.


Pete's winners by set: 12, 16, 11, 13
Andre's winners by set: 5, 10, 13, 8

Sampras hit 6 return winners, all of them BH’s off second serves. None were passes, but he did make 3 passing shots – again all BH’s.

Agassi hit 7 return winners: 3 FH’s (one off first serve) and 4 BH’s (two off first serve). All were passes. On top of these he had 9 passing shots: 3 FH’s (including one lob) and 6 BH’s. So altogether he passed Sampras 16 times; but curiously he didn’t have any passes in the first set.


Sampras made 108 errors, Agassi 99. Those totals consist of both forced and unforced; I got them by subtracting the aces and clean winners from the Total Points Won.

Of Sampras’ 108 errors, I counted 28 return errors and 12 double-faults. So that leaves 68 errors that he made in actual rallies (a rally consisting of at least a successful return of serve).

Of Agassi’s 99 errors, I counted 45 return errors and 4 double-faults. So that leaves 50 errors that he made in actual rallies.
 
Last edited:
From the New York Daily News:



No disagreements here with the ATP, except that the ATP put the elapsed time at 2 hours 52 minutes.


CBS credited Sampras with 105 approaches.

At 3-4 in the fourth, he'd won 65 of 100 approaches, Agassi 9 of 11.

Pete's 65% rate of success compares nicely with his 70% in their quarterfinal the year before (when USA gave him 88 of 125 late in the match).

This would be correct. Sampras finished 69 of 105 trips to the net in 2002 final.
http://www.samprasfanz.com/news/2002/20020907_08.html
And was 96 of 137 of their 2001 match.
http://216.194.87.192/onefortheages.htm
 
agassi got screwed in that match. he had to play the second match the previous day against hewitt who was #1 in the world. it was a brutal match. sampras got a straight set cakewalk in the earlier match against schalken. agassi said he was extremely stiff in those first two sets. if the US Open would finally wake up and not play the semis/finals back to back days then agassi would have won that match.
 
agassi got screwed in that match. he had to play the second match the previous day against hewitt who was #1 in the world. it was a brutal match. sampras got a straight set cakewalk in the earlier match against schalken. agassi said he was extremely stiff in those first two sets. if the US Open would finally wake up and not play the semis/finals back to back days then agassi would have won that match.

True but Sampras had to play his last 5 matches over seven days. He completed 4+ sets with Rusedksi on Monday night (which was scheduled for Saturday), went 4 sets with Haas on Tuesday night, straight setted Roddick on Thursday night, and the Schalken on Saturday before Agassi on Sunday.

Edberg in 1992 went 4 hrs 2 min with Krajicek in 4th rd (down 1-3 in the 5th), 3 hr 58 with Lendl in QF (down a break 3-4 in the 5th), the 5hr 26 min with Chang in SF (down 0-3 and 2-4 in the 5th), before coming out the next day and beating Sampras.

Mac in 1984 (the best Super Saturday), had to wait for Lendl to beat Cash 7-6 in the 5th, then Martina and Evert went 3 sets (6-4 in the 3rd) before Mac went 5 with Connors. McEnroe's SF didn't start 'til after 7 PM, and he finished around 11 PM.

Tes a day off in between would be beter, but we're likely not gonna get it.... blame CBS. But at least they had the common sense to Men SF/Men SF/Women F unlike the old scenario Men SF/Women F/Men SF. Thak the Williams sisters for that.

And in 3 of the 5 US Opens Sampras won he played the 3rd match on Super Saturday (1990,1993, 1996) after the 1st Men SF and Women F.
 
Back
Top