GrahamIsSuper
Semi-Pro
I just was doing a search of TW for my next reel of poly, and noticed something interesting in the review for Unique Big Hitter. It says:
"The variation of the diameter of the string suggests that Tourna Poly is purposely made oval. This seemingly insignificant out-of-roundness is important, however, as the International Tennis Federation (ITF) is investigating whether oval strings give the player an unfair advantage in producing spin, as lab tests indicate. "
This is interesting to me, because, if the ITF is actually doing research on oval strings and its effect on unfair spins (read: the banning of spaghetti strings), you would think that signum pro poly-speed would already have been outlawed since it is pyramid/triangular-shaped. I can imagine that the triangular shape would provide a significant increase in the abillity to play heavy, heavy spins; spins that no other player could produce.
The problem with this is that if oval and triangular-shaped strings are banned from atp play, then why wouldn't any rough or textured strings be banned as well? I am concerned that the newest string technologies are going to be banned, even if they improve the way players can play. But then again, these strings simply encourage the use of heavy topspin (but at the same time ANY spin, so volleys/slice/serves would be improved as well) and the power game.
Has anyone had any experience with either of the afore-mentioned strings and, more importantly, did you notice a significant advantage to using either of these odd-shaped strings in comparasin to traditional round shapes?
"The variation of the diameter of the string suggests that Tourna Poly is purposely made oval. This seemingly insignificant out-of-roundness is important, however, as the International Tennis Federation (ITF) is investigating whether oval strings give the player an unfair advantage in producing spin, as lab tests indicate. "
This is interesting to me, because, if the ITF is actually doing research on oval strings and its effect on unfair spins (read: the banning of spaghetti strings), you would think that signum pro poly-speed would already have been outlawed since it is pyramid/triangular-shaped. I can imagine that the triangular shape would provide a significant increase in the abillity to play heavy, heavy spins; spins that no other player could produce.
The problem with this is that if oval and triangular-shaped strings are banned from atp play, then why wouldn't any rough or textured strings be banned as well? I am concerned that the newest string technologies are going to be banned, even if they improve the way players can play. But then again, these strings simply encourage the use of heavy topspin (but at the same time ANY spin, so volleys/slice/serves would be improved as well) and the power game.
Has anyone had any experience with either of the afore-mentioned strings and, more importantly, did you notice a significant advantage to using either of these odd-shaped strings in comparasin to traditional round shapes?