Stringway MS140 or ProStringer 1.0?

RSA Tennis

New User
Hi Guys.

Looking for advice on these 2 stringing machines. I do travel about 20 weeks a year and portability is important but I also need to deliver a consistent tension.

What would you suggest? Pros and Cons of both etc.
 

Tennis_dude101

Professional
I've been using a Version 1.0 Pro Stringer for the last 10 years. Its half the weight of the MS140 and it will produce a consistent string tension. Plenty of pros are using them on the Futures/Challenger circuit.
The original plastic/metal clamps supplied with them are rubbish, Get as set of PS Claws or Stringway Clamps to solve this issue.

Cheers,
TD
 

Sardines

Hall of Fame
Hi Guys.

Looking for advice on these 2 stringing machines. I do travel about 20 weeks a year and portability is important but I also need to deliver a consistent tension.

What would you suggest? Pros and Cons of both etc.
I assume you are a Saffer from the RSA moniker. I think you know the PS founder is from SA. And their PSX system is assembled in SA.
I think you have answered your own question, especially on portability on planes. We've had our PS2.0 machine since '20, strung over 3-5 racquets almost every week 46 weeks a year, travelled 4 continents many times, with the PS2 in cabin luggage, even in JNB/CPT/DUR, and only twice had curved needle nose pliers confiscated once by overzealous security officers, but fortunately leaving). I always keep a backup in the checked bags. This means the machine will arrive and won't get lost. If you drive, then it's a non-issue.
The PS also saves on non-gut string wastage, since it pulls on the frame. My tennis shop stringer uses 5.7-8m of string for mains and crosses, because the pull is significantly further away for the last grommet. Eg: for a 200m reel, thats 35 half sets or less depending on racquet. With our PS2, we get an extra 1-3 extra sets, depending on racquet, especially on cross strings.
As for Stringway, we looked ML100 fixed clamp, but the weight and size put my wife off as she would be lugging it when we travel with the kids. You really can't beat the portability of the PS system, compared to other table top fixed clamp machines. The MS140 I believe uses the flying clamps, which defeats the purpose of a tabletop machine since you will have to string the same way as the PS.
The Stringway does have a 5 pt mount system, which depending on what you believe, is superior and essential, or unimportant and extraneous.
You may also wish to do a search on the mods for the PS mounting system. It will help a lot with the cross stringing speed even with 2cm height addition. That is the weakest point of the PS system. Their new X system is better but heavier, and more finicky.
Since you are asking about the PS1, I assume you are buying 2nd hand? I would suggest you get a digital luggage scale, and do various pulls at different tensions to test. Which brings us to one of the other limitations of the PS design, tension range limitation. My PS2 is from 38.6lbs to about 68lbs (didn't test any higher).
The biggest caveat, in my experience, is if you deal with natural gut quite a bit, you will need to approach Pro Stringer for newer 3D attachments which make it much less likely to break, especially if you string at 60+lbs/27+kg for the mains with gut. For those higher tensions, it overlaps on the gut on the throat pulls, due to the elasticity of gut, and the length of string due to the butt pull. On rare occasions, it does damage the gut, and for me a couple of times, snap the gut, when I was testing for 65+lbs pulls on leftover string. So for me, stringing gut takes an extra 5-8 minutes to make sure the throat mains are done correctly.
Get as set of PS Claws or Stringway Clamps to solve this issue.
I agree tension consistency is easier with the latest PS Claws 2.0, and also depends on technique and maintenance of those clamps. I have the Stringway triple and double, and find them to be less accurate than the PS Claw 2.0, because the dial is looser and does lose the setting easier. It also does not fit the gap between the strings, being fixed width, whereas the Claws have a wedge shape to fit the gap easily.
 
I think this is important to know for users of the Stringway flying clamps.

There is a “built in friction” which should avoid changing of the setting.
The friction is provided by a small piece of string in the aluminum pull rod.

If the adjustment knob turns too light just put a new piece of mono string in.


dsSPc3.jpg

I13eyt.jpg

I realize now that we do not tell this any ware in a manual ☹.
 

Tennis_dude101

Professional
This must be a "new" feature of the Stringway clamps, as mine don't have this "string hole"? I purchased them about 8 years ago....
 
Last edited:

Sardines

Hall of Fame
I have the 2020 versions sold by your US distributor NewTech, and stripped it a few times because of the looseness. Couldn't do anything and just went back to the Claws, then upgraded to Claw 2.0. There was no mono string in the assembly that I remember. I just stripped it again to make sure mine is the updated version. It's a pity this is the first time I've read this in the last 4 years. However, I'm very happy with the Claws, which fills the string gap much better than the Stringway. If I ever bother to resell the clamps, I now know to make sure to put a mono string in the assembly as a courtesy to the buyer.
Yes you are right we added this in 2017.
 

Tennis_dude101

Professional
I have the 2020 versions sold by your US distributor NewTech, and stripped it a few times because of the looseness. Couldn't do anything and just went back to the Claws, then upgraded to Claw 2.0. There was no mono string in the assembly that I remember. I just stripped it again to make sure mine is the updated version. It's a pity this is the first time I've read this in the last 4 years. However, I'm very happy with the Claws, which fills the string gap much better than the Stringway. If I ever bother to resell the clamps, I now know to make sure to put a mono string in the assembly as a courtesy to the buyer.
Maybe old stock?
 
Top