merlinpinpin
Hall of Fame
Duh? Duplicate thread, nicely done, forum...
"Nadal hasn't been able to beat either Federer or Djokovic for ages when they're healthy." Was Djokovic "injured" during the 2017 Madrid event? Was Novak injured during the US Open 2013? Was Federer injured in the Australian Open 2014? Please find another excuse, dear Nadal hater.
Pumping up Murray again I see.Nadal deserves an extended inflation period. Djokovic had one in 2015 and 2016 where one of his main rivals was coached by a female, lmao. Federer had one in his prime for 4 straight years. 18-7 career ownage is definitely a strong era goat. Fed and Djoko fans have become so pathetic that they have to isolate years, with their form supposedly going on and off like a light switch, instead of just accepting their 18-7 slam ownage
Pumping up Murray again I see.
Even if he had the best coaching staff in the world he wasn't touching Djokovic. Murray isn't that good of a player, I really wish you'd stop.
During one of Djokovic's slump periods.5-6 head to head under Lendl actually, with Djoko having to damn sweat for some of them wins. Keep making them excuses for Djoko though lmao. Hell it ain't really even Djoko fans doing it (they were actually overrating him, praising him obnoxiously in the Mauresmo years), it's Fed fans like you doing it on his behalf for some reason. You guys look even more silly when you even attempt to do it with Rafa like the original poster.
During one of Djokovic's slump periods.5-6 head to head under Lendl actually, with Djoko having to damn sweat for some of them wins. Keep making them excuses for Djoko though lmao. Hell it ain't really even Djoko fans doing it (they were actually overrating him, praising him obnoxiously in the Mauresmo years), it's Fed fans like you doing it on his behalf for some reason. You guys look even more silly when you even attempt to do it with Rafa like the original poster.
During one of Djokovic's slump periods.
At least he lost to Federer when he was actually in his prime. Murray was losing to Federer when he was 30+ and got whalloped worse than they did.Wahey, there is your excuses right on schedule as usual. Can't even try to make them with Rafa though. Both Fed and Djoko his career turkeys in slams. See you're pretty triggered by the Murray thing anyway. Want me to start posting A-Rod and Hewiit's losses against Fed? Lmao.
At least he lost to Federer when he was actually in his prime. Murray was losing to Federer when he was 30+ and got whalloped worse than they did.
And it's because you pump up Murray as some great player lmao. He was pretty much Hewitt/Roddick level when it came to facing Fed.
Hewitt did beat past prime Fed. Lmao.Both had plenty of chances to beat past prime Fed. Don't you have some bogus excuse about why they have zero longetivity anyway? Never seen anyone with so much excuses before.
Hewitt did beat past prime Fed. Lmao.Both had plenty of chances to beat past prime Fed. Don't you have some bogus excuse about why they have zero longetivity anyway? Never seen anyone with so much excuses before.
Hewitt did beat past prime Fed. Lmao.
Once again ignoring that Lleyton had undergone like 50 surgeries. Lmao.Twice? That's great, lmao. One more than your other favourite, Roddick. Post his losses against Fed. You might crash the forum.
Once again ignoring that Lleyton had undergone like 50 surgeries. Lmao.
Pete was lucky he didn't have to face Lleyton in the final.1-1 slam head to head. Yeah, really "destroyed" Pete. Exposing the weak era? Old man Andre regulalry took care of business, taking care of prime Hewitt in 2002 USO lmao.
Pete was lucky he didn't have to face Lleyton in the final.1-1 slam head to head. Yeah, really "destroyed" Pete. Exposing the weak era? Old man Andre regulalry took care of business, taking care of prime Hewitt in 2002 USO lmao.
Pete was lucky he didn't have to face Lleyton in the final.
Love how you cling to a win over a baby Hewitt. A year later and Pete gets destroyed with 50,000 excuses thrown in.
Lleyton was 19 and ranked 9th in the world. Best years of his career?Baby? Those was his best career years, lmao. Old man Andre was beating or competitive with Fed's other pigeons (Safin and Roddick) as well. Can I hear your excuses for that please?
Lleyton was 19 and ranked 9th in the world. Best years of his career?Baby? Those was his best career years, lmao. Old man Andre was beating or competitive with Fed's other pigeons (Safin and Roddick) as well. Can I hear your excuses for that please?
Once again Agassi wasn't even an "old man" during 1999-2003. That was the best period of HIS career. Lmao.
After making the US Open final Agassi won the Australian Open and Miami and made it to No. 1 in the world. That was still the best period of his career lmao.Talking about 2002 and beyond. Sure as hell wasn't the best period of Agassi's career then, yet he's still beating Hewitt and Roddick. Now go ahead and explain why with your excuses so I can laugh.
After making the US Open final Agassi won the Australian Open and Miami and made it to No. 1 in the world. That was still the best period of his career lmao.Talking about 2002 and beyond. Sure as hell wasn't the best period of Agassi's career then, yet he's still beating Hewitt and Roddick. Now go ahead and explain why with your excuses so I can laugh.
After making the US Open final Agassi won the Australian Open and Miami and made it to No. 1 in the world. That was still the best period of his career lmao.Talking about 2002 and beyond. Sure as hell wasn't the best period of Agassi's career then, yet he's still beating Hewitt and Roddick. Now go ahead and explain why with your excuses so I can laugh.
After making the US Open final Agassi won the Australian Open and Miami and made it to No. 1 in the world. That was still the best period of his career lmao.
Keep going though.
Here we go with Murray again.So the guy had one slam left in him and was in the best period of his career? Thanks, I guess Fed getting destroyed by Murray at Olympics on grass in a five set match in the best period of his career, lmao. Keep trying.
18-7 “ownage” thanks to Nadal losing to likes of Murray, Tsonga, Fognini, Berdych, Versasco, Rosol, Pouille, Blake era LMAONadal deserves an extended inflation period. Djokovic had one in 2015 and 2016 where one of his main rivals was coached by a female, lmao. Federer had one in his prime for 4 straight years. 18-7 career ownage is definitely a strong era goat. Fed and Djoko fans have become so pathetic that they have to isolate years, with their form supposedly going on and off like a light switch, instead of just accepting their 18-7 slam ownage
18-7 “ownage” thanks to Nadal losing to likes of Murray, Tsonga, Fognini, Berdych, Versasco, Rosol, Darcis, Pouille etc to avoid playing Fed and Djokovic.Nadal deserves an extended inflation period. Djokovic had one in 2015 and 2016 where one of his main rivals was coached by a female, lmao. Federer had one in his prime for 4 straight years. 18-7 career ownage is definitely a strong era goat. Fed and Djoko fans have become so pathetic that they have to isolate years, with their form supposedly going on and off like a light switch, instead of just accepting their 18-7 slam ownage