*** T-Fight Club***

[azrael201]

thinking of getting a second dynacore 315 16*19

anyone recommend or should I wait for the new iteration of it? I dont honestly see how they can improve on it

I didn't get to hit with Dynacore 315 that long but it felt like a stiffer 315ltd. It was nice, reminded me of a AeroPro almost.

I am a bit confused what you are planning? You like the Dynacore315 enough that you are considering a second one, but are concerned there's a better one coming out (or maybe like Irvin mentioned with the new eyelets)? I mean if you need a second racquet in general because you are breaking strings in matches or love strings that go dead fast then you should just get the second one cause I don't think another generation of 315 will be out for a while. Do you know what I mean? If you need a second racquet you probably should just buy it but if you don't need it then you could wait to see.

 

[Irvin]

@azrael201 the 315 is the same size head, different pattern, and stiffer than the Ltds.

The Dynacore line just came out this year and has the new eyelets, I doubt you will see upgrades for the Dynacore for a while.

 

[Egoista]

The Dynacore line just recentlly came out. Are you talking about the older T-Fight series rackets? Does you racket have the red eyelets in it? The Dynacore 315 racket is a great racket.

I was talking about the newest dynacore 315

 

[Egoista]

I didn't get to hit with Dynacore 315 that long but it felt like a stiffer 315ltd. It was nice, reminded me of a AeroPro almost.

I am a bit confused what you are planning? You like the Dynacore315 enough that you are considering a second one, but are concerned there's a better one coming out (or maybe like Irvin mentioned with the new eyelets)? I mean if you need a second racquet in general because you are breaking strings in matches or love strings that go dead fast then you should just get the second one cause I don't think another generation of 315 will be out for a while. Do you know what I mean? If you need a second racquet you probably should just buy it but if you don't need it then you could wait to see.

Yes I am leaning toward this because for what I am looking for I do not think I will find it either in Head or Wilson having been a prestige mid user all my life and then lately Donnay Gold. This technifibre enables me to hit freely. The only thing is against a harder flatter hitter than me I seem to hit more balls out with it. Hence, my confusion .

I used to play in tournaments alot but now more for rec use although it is still frustrating when I break strings (which is often ) and i have to wait a couple of days for my racquet even though I have spares like my Donnay and the prestige. I just do not want to make a mistake and then regret it if some better version of the 315 comes out.

 

[Irvin]

I was talking about the newest dynacore 315

There is only one, the T-Fight 315 was replaced by the T-Fight 315 Dynacore which was released around March of this year.

 

[Egoista]

There is only one, the T-Fight 315 was replaced by the T-Fight 315 Dynacore which was released around March of this year.

YES I was referring to the Dynacore 315 of March vintage. I have already bought one and enjoy it which is why I was thinking of purchasing another one. The only thing is I need to play against a much harder hitter because I feel I get pushed around and resort to hitting long unfortunately..........
But it is a tremendous stick which is why I was wondering if there was another iteration coming up soon. but general consensus seems to be that it wont be out soon another version

YOu see previously I bought two sticks and got tired of the second one did not enjoy it as much as the weights seem to be off...but I am sure I would like a second stick of this..


do many people in your country play with this stick?

 

[Irvin]

I can't answer that question. I know several people that play with it but I do not see a lot of them. Most ask, "Who's Tecnifibre." Tecnifibre is better known for their strings than their rackets.

 

[Egoista]

thanks so much for your help

 

[stylez_911]

Hey everyone,

I am a recreational player that plays for the fun of it, usually against decent recreational players that vary in power and skill.

Now, I am very interested in purchasing the Tecnifibre TFight 315 Ltd. 16 main but I would prefer not to tinker with lead tape or anything and hope that playing it stock will work out for my recreational play.

I provide my own power, and I don't often play against any hard-hitters, and I just want a fun, comfy (flexy), top-spin friendly frame that has a players racquet feel and comfort level. I used to play with the Volkl C10 pro, but wanted something lighter and more maneuverable.

Would the 315 Ltd. 16 m work fine in stock form for recreational play in your opinions?

Again - just want something comfy with a classic feel that offers decent pop and spin and I love the feedback on the 315 ltd. i've been seeing.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated

 

[dnj30]

Hey everyone,

I am a recreational player that plays for the fun of it, usually against decent recreational players that vary in power and skill.

Now, I am very interested in purchasing the Tecnifibre TFight 315 Ltd. 16 main but I would prefer not to tinker with lead tape or anything and hope that playing it stock will work out for my recreational play.

I provide my own power, and I don't often play against any hard-hitters, and I just want a fun, comfy (flexy), top-spin friendly frame that has a players racquet feel and comfort level. I used to play with the Volkl C10 pro, but wanted something lighter and more maneuverable.

Would the 315 Ltd. 16 m work fine in stock form for recreational play in your opinions?

Again - just want something comfy with a classic feel that offers decent pop and spin and I love the feedback on the 315 ltd. i've been seeing.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated

You will probably be fine. Most players want a higher swingweight, but that doesn't mean the racket can't be played stock. The only thing I would say is that I wouldn't call this a frame with "decent pop", but otherwise it meets your wants. It's very low powered, specially without any lead.

 

[stylez_911]

You will probably be fine. Most players want a higher swingweight, but that doesn't mean the racket can't be played stock. The only thing I would say is that I wouldn't call this a frame with "decent pop", but otherwise it meets your wants. It's very low powered, specially without any lead.

Thanks so much for your input! Really appreciate it.

Yeah... I hear that alot about the frame being low-powered... and that is my only concern to be honest. I love to take really big cuts at the ball usually, and in the past with other so called low-powered racquets, I would find myself hitting the ball long allll the time. Granted, that was probably due to me using the wrong strings with my topspin-centric strokes that didn't bite the ball well enough to generate the spin needed to keep the ball in the lines, but basically I'm just saying I do prefer to swing out fast and full as opposed to letting the racquet provide the power. I am a recreational player but I have been playing for years so I consider myself to have good form for the most part and don't swing wildly or anything.

I guess I would have to just try it out and see how it feels as i'm sure it wouldn't be much fun either having to swing away really hard for every single shot just to get it over the net. That would be exhausting... Even with the low SW and relatively low static weight.

Wouldn't the lack of power from the frame be somewhat improved by a strategic string setup?

 

[dnj30]

Thanks so much for your input! Really appreciate it.

Yeah... I hear that alot about the frame being low-powered... and that is my only concern to be honest. I love to take really big cuts at the ball usually, and in the past with other so called low-powered racquets, I would find myself hitting the ball long allll the time. Granted, that was probably due to me using the wrong strings with my topspin-centric strokes that didn't bite the ball well enough to generate the spin needed to keep the ball in the lines, but basically I'm just saying I do prefer to swing out fast and full as opposed to letting the racquet provide the power. I am a recreational player but I have been playing for years so I consider myself to have good form for the most part and don't swing wildly or anything.

I guess I would have to just try it out and see how it feels as i'm sure it wouldn't be much fun either having to swing away really hard for every single shot just to get it over the net. That would be exhausting... Even with the low SW and relatively low static weight.

Wouldn't the lack of power from the frame be somewhat improved by a strategic string setup?

Yes, as with any frame, string choice and tension will affect playing characteristics. I know you said you want to avoid using lead, but i don't see why. It's quite simple. And if you're worried about the cosmetics of the racket you can put the lead under the bumper guard as long as it's in the upper half of the hoop, which is where you would put lead to get more pop.

 

[stylez_911]

Yes, as with any frame, string choice and tension will affect playing characteristics. I know you said you want to avoid using lead, but i don't see why. It's quite simple. And if you're worried about the cosmetics of the racket you can put the lead under the bumper guard as long as it's in the upper half of the hoop, which is where you would put lead to get more pop.

All great points, and once again thank you for taking the time to help make sense of everything!

I wouldn't mind if the lead was placed under the bumper guard, but still sorta iffy in general. I'm also considering a few other frames at the moment as well, but in making my decision i'm definitely going to keep all your tips in mind.

Thanks again for your thoughts!

 

[Egoista]

All great points, and once again thank you for taking the time to help make sense of everything!

I wouldn't mind if the lead was placed under the bumper guard, but still sorta iffy in general. I'm also considering a few other frames at the moment as well, but in making my decision i'm definitely going to keep all your tips in mind.

Thanks again for your thoughts!

it is a great stick trust me demo one and I do not think you will be disappointed

 

[Irvin]

Yes, as with any frame, string choice and tension will affect playing characteristics. I know you said you want to avoid using lead, but i don't see why. It's quite simple. And if you're worried about the cosmetics of the racket you can put the lead under the bumper guard as long as it's in the upper half of the hoop, which is where you would put lead to get more pop.

I just changed the grommets in a Dynacore a few days ago. The grommets are wider and fit deeper into the frame so it would be easy to put lead under the grommets all the way around the head. With the eyelets it is also possible to take off the grommets and reinstall them.

 

[stylez_911]

it is a great stick trust me demo one and I do not think you will be disappointed

Thanks for your recommendation!

Now, is this recommendation to demo the racquet with or without lead added?

As you might have seen in my earlier comments I prefer not to tinker with lead tape since i'm more of a rec player, so I would only hope that no lead would be necessary to generate a decent amount of power (if I provided it).

 

[eelhc]

Hey everyone,

I am a recreational player that plays for the fun of it, usually against decent recreational players that vary in power and skill.

Now, I am very interested in purchasing the Tecnifibre TFight 315 Ltd. 16 main but I would prefer not to tinker with lead tape or anything and hope that playing it stock will work out for my recreational play.

I provide my own power, and I don't often play against any hard-hitters, and I just want a fun, comfy (flexy), top-spin friendly frame that has a players racquet feel and comfort level. I used to play with the Volkl C10 pro, but wanted something lighter and more maneuverable.

Would the 315 Ltd. 16 m work fine in stock form for recreational play in your opinions?

Again - just want something comfy with a classic feel that offers decent pop and spin and I love the feedback on the 315 ltd. i've been seeing.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated

315 is fine stock but the specs really invite customization. The 320 is a slightly heftier stick and is more solid IMO. Specs say its a 95 but when I lay a 315, 320 and 325 on top of each other, they look the same.

Also while the 315 is a 16x19, the spacing is pretty tight in the sweet spot. Looks more like a 18x20 to me.

Edit... Not sure why you are not interested in "tinkering" with lead tape unless you want to avoid yet another variable.

 

[dnj30]

Thanks for your recommendation!

Now, is this recommendation to demo the racquet with or without lead added?

As you might have seen in my earlier comments I prefer not to tinker with lead tape since i'm more of a rec player, so I would only hope that no lead would be necessary to generate a decent amount of power (if I provided it).

You may want to consider the babolat pct. Similar specs to the tec, but the sw is a little higher. A little more pop, but still low powered. Nice feeling frame, not quite as soft as the tec, but still pretty flexy.

 

[Egoista]

Thanks for your recommendation!

Now, is this recommendation to demo the racquet with or without lead added?

As you might have seen in my earlier comments I prefer not to tinker with lead tape since i'm more of a rec player, so I would only hope that no lead would be necessary to generate a decent amount of power (if I provided it).

Hi yes I too play with out any addition to the racq. No lead tape. So go ahead the power is not astronomical ...against heavy hitters you might get pushed around...but if you can generate a moderate amount of power yourself you should be good to go! So try it out.....

 

[stylez_911]

315 is fine stock but the specs really invite customization. The 320 is a slightly heftier stick and is more solid IMO. Specs say its a 95 but when I lay a 315, 320 and 325 on top of each other, they look the same.

Also while the 315 is a 16x19, the spacing is pretty tight in the sweet spot. Looks more like a 18x20 to me.

Edit... Not sure why you are not interested in "tinkering" with lead tape unless you want to avoid yet another variable.

I will keep that in mind, thanks for your input

 

[stylez_911]

You may want to consider the babolat pct. Similar specs to the tec, but the sw is a little higher. A little more pop, but still low powered. Nice feeling frame, not quite as soft as the tec, but still pretty flexy.

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll look into that for sure. Specs look good enough!

 

[stylez_911]

Hi yes I too play with out any addition to the racq. No lead tape. So go ahead the power is not astronomical ...against heavy hitters you might get pushed around...but if you can generate a moderate amount of power yourself you should be good to go! So try it out.....

That's great to hear!

To be honest, I love to really swing out on my shots with a lot of topspin anyways, and would love to have confidence that I won't be hitting the ball long... So, the low SW and low power, combined with the spin potential of the 315 ltd. I think it would just be a fun racquet to play with.

I play mostly recreationally against decent hitters, none too heavy, so I doubt i'll have to worry about being pushed around. I also plan to perhaps grab a new C10 Pro or Pacific X Force Pro as well to keep in the bag for fun, and in case I am up against bigger hitters, I can just switch it up.

The Tec 315 Ltd. just sounds like so much fun

 

[rh310]

Thanks so much for your input! Really appreciate it.

Yeah... I hear that alot about the frame being low-powered... and that is my only concern to be honest. I love to take really big cuts at the ball usually, and in the past with other so called low-powered racquets, I would find myself hitting the ball long allll the time. Granted, that was probably due to me using the wrong strings with my topspin-centric strokes that didn't bite the ball well enough to generate the spin needed to keep the ball in the lines, but basically I'm just saying I do prefer to swing out fast and full as opposed to letting the racquet provide the power. I am a recreational player but I have been playing for years so I consider myself to have good form for the most part and don't swing wildly or anything.

I guess I would have to just try it out and see how it feels as i'm sure it wouldn't be much fun either having to swing away really hard for every single shot just to get it over the net. That would be exhausting... Even with the low SW and relatively low static weight.

Wouldn't the lack of power from the frame be somewhat improved by a strategic string setup?

I think the "lack of power" rep is a bad rap. Before I modified mine (after playing briefly with a RF97A, and deciding I liked a headlight frame with more swingweight) I used it completely stock for several months. Routine rally shots are definitely mid-paced and not penetrating, but I was amazed more than once at the power in the frame when flattening the ball out. Strung it with gut-poly hybrid.

 

[Fed Kennedy]

Have any Tfighters switched from the (GOAT) 320 to the Dynacore 315?

Are these racquets cut from the same cloth or what?

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

A little refresh of the TFight Club...

My current TFight collection consists of:

3x 315 Limited 18M (2013)
1x 315 Limited 16M (2013)
1x 315 DC Ltd 18M
2x 305 XTC 18x19
1x 335 16x20 (Texalium) - on its way.
1x 325 XL Texalium (27.4" - Listed as 59RA) - On its way.

I will look to get the TF40 at some point... Probably the 315 but haven't decided yet.

 

[topspn]

A little refresh of the TFight Club...

My current TFight collection consists of:

3x 315 Limited 18M (2013)
1x 315 Limited 16M (2013)
1x 315 DC Ltd 18M
2x 305 XTC 18x19
1x 335 16x20 (Texalium) - on its way.

I will look to get the TF40 at some point... Probably the 315 but haven't decided yet.

wow didn’t realize you’re such a TF fan

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

wow didn’t realize you’re such a TF fan

Yeah, I love the way they play and look (design).

Two of the 315 Limited 18x20s are being kept brand new for later days (once the ones I am using are worn out).

I bought 2013 315 Limited 18M and 16M first, then wanted to see how the DC version was different since it is foam-filled and the 2013 versions aren't. Then the XTCs came out and the 305 XTC had rave reviews and I got to buy almost brand new ones for basically a two-for-one deal, which my holism couldn't resist. Played with it (the 305 XTC) and found them crisper, but I played very well with them. Shortly after that, I found out that I had a double hernia, which I then needed to have repaired. This has kept me away (together with another unrelated procedure) for most of this year.

I tend to play very well with 16x20 string patterns (I find them a good compromise), and so when I got a chance to acquire the TFight 335 16x20 recently... I jumped on it. Hopefully, it's great.

Old-school Head racquets are still the most numerous in my collection though.

 

[Henry Hub]

@Classic-TXP-IG MID You and I seem cut from similar cloth. I have:

3x 315 Limited 18M (2013)
3x 315 Limited 16M (2013)
1x 325 18x20 (Texalium)

I found my way to TF via the YTPP like a few others on here. Took up the 16M about 3 years and never looked back.


And then I got a PT57A a few weeks back. The tyranny of choice rackets...

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

@Classic-TXP-IG MID You and I seem cut from similar cloth. I have:

3x 315 Limited 18M (2013)
3x 315 Limited 16M (2013)
1x 325 18x20 (Texalium)

I found my way to TF via the YTPP like a few others on here. Took up the 16M about 3 years and never looked back.


And then I got a PT57A a few weeks back. The tyranny of choice rackets...

I know... it's a good problem to have.

The TFight 325 looks great but I can't find any in great condition for a good price.

I love the feel of the 315 Limited - both string patterns (2013). They are very customizable and much cheaper than a PT57A. I have a PT630, which is brilliant, but my 315 Limited 18M is almost 20g lighter and feels close.

How does the 325 (Texalium) compare to the 315 Limited 18M in feel and performance? Thanks

 

[Henry Hub]

How does the 325 (Texalium) compare to the 315 Limited 18M in feel and performance? Thanks

There seems to be quite a divergence in views on this question on here. My take is that, while the 2013 TF315 18M is like a bargain lightweight PT630 and customisable to boot, the old Texalium TF325 is more like the YT Prestige MP but with marginally better feel (I think flex for the YTPMP is around 67 while the TF325 was originally listed at 64)

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

There seems to be quite a divergence in views on this question on here. My take is that, while the 2013 TF315 18M is like a bargain lightweight PT630 and customisable to boot, the old Texalium TF325 is more like the YT Prestige MP but with marginally better feel (I think flex for the YTPMP is around 67 while the TF325 was originally listed at 64)

Thanks for your feedback.

I presume the RAs you're quoting are unstrung...? The TF325 is an extended racquet at 27.4 inches, it has a Beam of 20mm, a SW of 335, and TW has it's RA listed as 59. The YTPMP has an RA of 62 according to TW, has a 21mm Beam, and is a standard length racquet with a lower SW. The iPrestige Xtralong MP, which is 27.5 inches, also has an RA of 62 and a more similar SW to the TF325 (slightly lower), therefore, it may be a closer comparison (based on the listed specs).

Based on the specs, the TF325 looks like an extended PT630. Are you trying to say that it doesn't feel as plush as the RA indicates, or are you saying it feels quite nice and plush? When you compare the TF 315 Limited 18M (2013) with the TF325, which one feels plusher?

Sorry about all the questions, I'm just trying to get a clear picture so I know whether the TF325 is something to keep in mind long term. The TF335 seems, on specs at least, to be closer to the iPrestige MP or the IGPMP. Thanks again

 

[hotasice]

I have a couple of the texalium 325xl frames. The guy I bought them from said they are the same mould as the I.prestige MP with the same drill pattern. I also have the I.prest mp and I’d say they feel similar. The 325xl is perhaps a little more crisp feeling on impact to me and more powerful but there is no doubt it has the classic prestige feel to it. Very stable and controlled. It isn’t all that string sensitive either. Poly strung in the mid 40s or gut/ poly hybrid feels great in the TF

 

[Henry Hub]

I think @hotasice is giving better intel than me on this one! I found the RA figures on the auction site so possibly not 100% reliable...

I am surprised by the RA of 59. It feels stiffer than that and certainly nowhere near as plush as the TF315 - much more like a prestige (by the sounds of the above, specifically the i.prestige). Great control racket though.

 

[hotasice]

Yep when I bought the tf 325xl’s I did see they RA of 59 but they do feel stiffer than that——more like in the 63-65 range but still very comfy and so controlled and stable

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

Got a Texalium TFight 325 XL for a good price... it's on its way.

 

[aarenes]

So I just got a TFight 295 MP 16x20. It's bare naked and unstrung

I searched the entire thread and everyone talks about the 320 and 335.

Anyone have experience with the 295 MP?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

[topspn]

Given the sale going on on tec frames, i picked up a 300 XTC to try. Will be tinkering around with leather grip and weight and see what i got. I am hoping for a bit of that gorgeous TF40 feel in a 16x19.

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

Given the sale going on on tec frames, i picked up a 300 XTC to try. Will be tinkering around with leather grip and weight and see what i got. I am hoping for a bit of that gorgeous TF40 feel in a 16x19.

The 300 XTC is going to be much stiffer... no?

 

[topspn]

The 300 XTC is going to be much stiffer... no?

Oh yeah, it sure is. I was thinking more of the clean connected feel but you’re right of course firmness will be different although there will also be a firmness difference between 18x20 and 16x19

 

[Deki]

Can anyone compare here the XTC Ltd 16x19 with the YTIG Prestige Pro? Hit with both?
Is the LTD a real 98’ sqin or 95 like Prestige?

 

[Classic-TXP-IG MID]

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ONE AND ALL!!!

May 2020 be filled with great health, prosperity, lots of tennis, and fantastic gear purchases and product lines.

Looking forward to talking to you all throughout the coming year.

 

[taydbear7]

Late to the party but I recently bought two XTC LTD 315 16x19. Absolutely love the feel of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[esm]

Maybe we can bring this one back alive? lol.
I have recently moved over to Tecnifibre and currently have 1 x RS 305 and 1 x ISO 305, matched very closely to each other.
The foam filled feeling is quite addictive.

 

[swish41]

Maybe we can bring this one back alive? lol.
I have recently moved over to Tecnifibre and currently have 1 x RS 305 and 1 x ISO 305, matched very closely to each other.
The foam filled feeling is quite addictive.

Which one do you prefer in terms of feel? RS or ISO?

 

[z00]

Maybe we can bring this one back alive? lol.
I have recently moved over to Tecnifibre and currently have 1 x RS 305 and 1 x ISO 305, matched very closely to each other.
The foam filled feeling is quite addictive.

What strings and tensions on ISO 305?
Also, would you recommend going with an underspec ISO 305 or close to spec for someone coming from vcore98 tour that craves more agility & versatility on all court play?

 

[esm]

Which one do you prefer in terms of feel? RS or ISO?

Not played with the ISO yet. Only got delivered earlier this week and am still nursing a non-tennis related injure. Hoping to have a proper swing of the ISO in the coming days.
The RS is a joy to use, coming from PA23 of similar final specs.
I am aware the ISO is “softer” in terms of the RA, compared to the RS, but in the similar range to the PA23… so will see.

 

[esm]

What strings and tensions on ISO 305?
Also, would you recommend going with an underspec ISO 305 or close to spec for someone coming from vcore98 tour that craves more agility & versatility on all court play?

I have syn gut 16 on both the RS (49/49) and ISO (53/53).
Probably an underspec ISO as it should give you more room for customisation if you are into that (if you can find one…). But most people will add weight to the handle end to make it less head heavy.