Hayward Butler
Rookie
Is the T-Fight 285 foam filled and does it have a soft flex? Has anyone tested the 285 with the original synthetic gut set-up it come with?
Technifibre T-Fight 285 [2025] . Is the T-Fight foam filled and does it have a soft flex?
- Thread starter Hayward Butler
- Start date
buttersandbrie
New User
I have the racket and I believe it is foam filled. I don't believe it comes pre-strung. (mine did not, TW). A bit raw but I think it's one of the best light rackets out there (good platform racket).
Circa 1762
Rookie
I just demoed the 285, and it was plenty comfortable. Not a SUPER soft flex - the Gravity MP L I was testing at the same time definitely felt softer - but I never felt it was anywhere close to too stiff. I agree with the previous poster, good platform racket.
dimitri_lda
New User
Head Speed has smaller sweet spot, slightly better spin, higher launch angle, less maneuverable comparing T-fight.
dimitri_lda
New User
It has 63 RA, so comfort shouldn't be a problem. Technically all T-fights are foam filled.
I recommend to use Luxilon Eco Power or Toroline o-toro (or another soft poly) and just use lower tension.
Synthetic gut or MLT strings has much worse control for me.
Maybe only Head Lynx Touch can be good option
dimitri_lda
New User
I tested the T-Fight 285 yesterday with a thick overgrip and compared it to the Vcore 100L and Blade 100 v9.
The comfort is solid – it really feels like a true 63 RA. Control and feel are very close to the Blade v9, though the launch angle is slightly higher. But, since I’m more used to the Blade, my game flowed better with the v9. Wilson’s StableFlex technology really does its job.
The balance feels closer to 323 mm, so there’s a bit more weight in the head. With an overgrip, it shifts down to around 320 mm.
Spin isn’t a standout here, honestly, but it’s acceptable for a control/power-oriented racquet. Power, however, is excellent – especially strung at 48–49 lbs. I’d recommend pairing it with MSV Focus Hex or Toroline O-Toro.
Compared to both, the Yonex Vcore is in its own category – built for spin, with a much higher launch angle and a stiffer feel at 65 RA.
So, if you’re looking for a control-focused racquet with a slightly higher launch angle and power potential than the Blade v9, the T-Fight is a strong option. Personally, I’ll stick with my Blade v9, since my game feels more natural with it.
Probably also Ezone 100l and Head MPL can be alternative
The comfort is solid – it really feels like a true 63 RA. Control and feel are very close to the Blade v9, though the launch angle is slightly higher. But, since I’m more used to the Blade, my game flowed better with the v9. Wilson’s StableFlex technology really does its job.
The balance feels closer to 323 mm, so there’s a bit more weight in the head. With an overgrip, it shifts down to around 320 mm.
Spin isn’t a standout here, honestly, but it’s acceptable for a control/power-oriented racquet. Power, however, is excellent – especially strung at 48–49 lbs. I’d recommend pairing it with MSV Focus Hex or Toroline O-Toro.
Compared to both, the Yonex Vcore is in its own category – built for spin, with a much higher launch angle and a stiffer feel at 65 RA.
So, if you’re looking for a control-focused racquet with a slightly higher launch angle and power potential than the Blade v9, the T-Fight is a strong option. Personally, I’ll stick with my Blade v9, since my game feels more natural with it.
Probably also Ezone 100l and Head MPL can be alternative
dimitri_lda
New User
If the new T-Fight 2025 feels a bit harsh, try a gel replacement grip. I tested Tourna Pro Gel and Babolat Xcel Gel, plus a thicker overgrip. The combo softened the feel, reduced vibration, and my arm felt much fresher.
Dadof2wildmonkeys
Rookie
I thought the vcore was 62 RA?
dimitri_lda
New User
Yeah, sorry. Vcore 98l/98 has 62 + VDM definitely feels much more comfortable than T-fight.
Vcore 100l/100 - 65 but with VDM it's like T-fight 62
dimitri_lda
New User
After 3 months of testing T-fight 285 + 15g lead tape (like T-fight 300) vs Wilson Blade 100 V9. I've sold my Blade and fully switched to T-fight. Awesome racket, stability and feel are very good
What is so different with 300 one? I know the ra of 285 is similiar to 305s. Or mind u share how u add lead tape to this frame?
dimitri_lda
New User
300 Is too heavy for me. And SW is much higher.
285 - cheaper (in EU), lighter, lower SW
And yes. RA is also lower
Lead tape - 7g to the 12 o'clock on the top, and 5g to the handle + (I used Babolat xcel gel grip)
DF tennis
Rookie
Does the 285 follow the same design philosophy as the 300s and 305s? With the focus on swing speed, and a slightly thicker but not wider hoop for more stability? Or is it more of the old RS/ISO line.
I noticed that it's not just a lighter 300. It has a lower balance point, larger sweet spot and lower flex rating according to TW figures.
I noticed that it's not just a lighter 300. It has a lower balance point, larger sweet spot and lower flex rating according to TW figures.
Last edited:
dimitri_lda
New User
Yes, 285 follow same design philosophy, it's stiff and very maneuverable. But comparing to the 300 version, 285 feels hollower and vibrates more than the 300 version. I have more arm issues with the 285 than with the 300.
DF tennis
Rookie
Tried it today. Kind of felt similar to my 305s the string pattern not withstanding. Was strung with Poly Tour Rev at 21kg same as a 300RS we have. The 300 RS was plusher, and far more solid, but then it is even compared to the 305s. I think if the 300 RS had a more head light balance, it would be my preferred choice. I've not tried the 300 ISO though.
