Tecnifibre Tflash 315 speedflex vs Tflash vs aerogel 300 4D

[panta77]

Hello, I have been using the 16x19 tflash 310 for more than a year now, and pretty happy with it. I saw they came out with the new tflash 315 speedflex and in the tw video review there is a comment that says it plays similar to the old tflash 310, and by all playtesters' comments it sounds correct. Powerful, plenty of access to spin, lots of pop for serve and net put-aways. My only concern is some lack of feel for delicate shots, as the frame is not very flexible. I have been thinking about demoing something with open pattern, with a little less power and a bit more of control, and I have been thinking of aerogel 300 4D, as the reviews are great.
I have been using big ace mains gosen sheep xs at 60. Plenty of power with this string. Thinking also dadozen to try your older strings that you had great comments PLII. How do you think the transition from a tflash 310 (similar to a pure drive but better control and stability for me) to a Ag300 4D could be?
Thank you for your comments

 

[ollinger]

I used the 310 16x19 for nearly a year and then tried the 315 Speedflex....completely different racquets in every respect. Far more control with the considerably flexier 310, the 315 feels board stiff and I had much trouble volleying with it. Oddly the 315 plays lighter and feels more maneuverable but also less stable. The 310 has near-greatness about it, not so for the 315.

 

[panta77]

I have compared the tflash 310 to the Pure Drives and the head in the tecnif is a bit longer and a bit narrower. Would you say the longer head and narrower makes it play a bit differently from the PD? Or mostly the more flex it has which I think it is? Was your tflash open pattern? Ever tried the 18x20?
What other rackets would you say are similar to the tflash 310 but with a bit more possibilities to variety? (althought I know its the player that makes it that way 90%) Do you know if tecnif is coming with any new frames with that feel/a bit flexiness as the 310 or the stifness has gone up since then?

 

[getsby]

I tried SF 315, and I do not agree that this reminds PD. PD is more powerful, but, oddly enough, more comfortable. but not both, for those who have problems with the elbow