Tennis Generations since 1990?

The_Mental_Giant

Hall of Fame
What are the tennis player generations who dominated tennis since 1990?

1) Agassi, Sampras, Courier (all born 1970-1971) Dominated across the 90's more specifically 1990-1996 ... Agassi achieved more in late 90's early 00's and Sampras was dominant all across the decade up 2000.

We have some outliers here who were born a little before/later but who also were part of the same generation due being early/late bloomers, such as Chang (early blomer) and Muster, Stich (late bloomers).

2) Kuerten, Rios, Moya, Henman, Rafter... All born in the middle 70's they became important on tour by 1997-1998... they didnt last that long..and neither they were as dominant as the previous generation...They were a transitional era. Rafter was a quite late bloomer whose success overlaped with younger players. All this Generation was a middle point between generations 1 and 3, except Rios who peaked and was burned out earlier..and Rafter due to his age.

3) Safin, Federer, Gonzalez, Nalbandian, Hewitt , Roddick, Ferrero... all tennis players being born in the early 80's ... more specifically between 1980-1982. The were the continuation of the transitional era but with more success.. those eras clashed between 1999-2002
They are characterized by versatile and talented players who didnt live up to their expectations, except federer.. In this era Safin was the earliest one who did overlap the most with the previous generation.

4) Nadal, Berdych, Gasquet, Murray, Djokovic, Monfils, Tsonga. .... Tennis generation born between 1985-1987... They grow up in the fade of the tennis specialists, they consilidated an all round baseline of fame with consistent grinding and superior athletics.

In this group Nadal was the one who clearly overlaped the most with the earlier generations due to being an early bloomer.


5) Dimitrov, Raonic, Nishikori (althoug from late 1989), the 90's generation... Players who became prominent in the last 3-4 years... All of them are trying to impose their own style in middle of a big 4 domination.
 
Nadal is not in the same generation as Novak and Murray. He started competing as pro and peaked much earlier. He is closer to Fed's generation than to Novak/Murray generation.
 
Nadal is not in the same generation as Novak and Murray. He started competing as pro and peaked much earlier. He is closer to Fed's generation than to Novak/Murray generation.

I wrote earlier... Nadal and Safin are complicated cases both belong to certain generation but not quite much.... The same case could be said for rafter.. he was kind of competitive back in early-mid 90's... in the sampras, agassi, courier, chang, muster.. generation... but he had by far his best results in the late 90's up to 2001.. So he belongs more to the Rios, Kuerten, Henman generation..
 
Nadal is not in the same generation as Novak and Murray. He started competing as pro and peaked much earlier. He is closer to Fed's generation than to Novak/Murray generation.

Nadal was successful earlier than Djokovic and Murray, but age is what counts. They're about a year apart, which means they are in the same generation.
 
Nadal was successful earlier than Djokovic and Murray, but age is what counts. They're about a year apart, which means they are in the same generation.

Age isnt always what counts.. CHang and Rafter were born the same year.. are they from the same generation? hell not... Rafter fits more with the 1975/1976 generation, Chang fits better with the 1970/1971 generation...

You could tell the same for ferrer... he is several months older than roddick.. is he of an earlier or even same generation?
 
Age isnt always what counts.. CHang and Rafter were born the same year.. are they from the same generation? hell not... Rafter fits more with the 1975/1976 generation, Chang fits better with the 1970/1971 generation...

You could tell the same for ferrer... he is several months older than roddick.. is he of an earlier or even same generation?

These are fuzzy arguments. I don't know why some players "peak early" or "bloom late". I don't want to get into unquantifiable stuff like "...fits better with...". One thing about these guys I do know for sure is when they were born. Studies I've seen say athletic ability declines starting around age 27 in humans. So birth date is what really matters.
 
Nadal was successful earlier than Djokovic and Murray, but age is what counts. They're about a year apart, which means they are in the same generation.

Yes. If one believes Nadal is in the same generation with Djokovic and Murray--and of course, he is the most successful player of the generation.

however, he is also seen as a part of Federer's generation.
 
Yes. If one believes Nadal is in the same generation with Djokovic and Murray--and of course, he is the most successful player of the generation.

however, he is also seen as a part of Federer's generation.

It's not a "belief", it's a fact. They're one year apart in age. Nadal is almost 5 years younger than Federer. That's about the same time as someone's athletic prime--the point after which they become adults and before which their athletic abilities decline. Too big a gap. To be a contemporary, the gap should be no more than a couple of years either way.
 
These are fuzzy arguments. I don't know why some players "peak early" or "bloom late". I don't want to get into unquantifiable stuff like "...fits better with...". One thing about these guys I do know for sure is when they were born. Studies I've seen say athletic ability declines starting around age 27 in humans. So birth date is what really matters.

From the mid 70's onwards it does seem that players peak between 22 and 27, if you base it on achievements. Of course there are exceptions, but they tend to have a good reason e.g injuries (Muster, for example).
 
1) Agassi, Sampras, Courier (all born 1970-1971) Dominated across the 90's more specifically 1990-1996 ..,,,.We have some outliers here who were born a little before/later but who also were part of the same generation due being early/late bloomers, such as Chang (early blomer) and Muster, Stich (late bloomers).


Stich, Muster, (and Korda, Krickstein, Forget, E. Sanchez, etc...) are really peers of the Becker and Edberg group. They're a good bit older (in tennis terms) then Sampras/Courier/Agassi/Chang cohort
 
Nadal is not in the same generation as Novak and Murray. He started competing as pro and peaked much earlier. He is closer to Fed's generation than to Novak/Murray generation.

Would disagree. I think a player's generation is kind of +/- 3 years on both sides of them. Nadal is clearly more closely a peer of Djokovic, Murray, Monfils, Tsonga, del Potro, Wawrinka, & Berdych to me then Federer.
 
Hewitt would be more involved in the "Rafter" era than Safin, or at least as involved..

He was a top ranked player around the same time as Safin (1999-2000), and reigned as #1 around the same time as Safin too..
 
Back
Top