terribleIVAN
Hall of Fame
Do you realize that these two feats are a separate streaks ?
If it meant 23 straight hard court titles won, my bad.
But the way it's phrased implies clearly Fed won 23 straight tournaments, which is false.
Do you realize that these two feats are a separate streaks ?
Silly comment. All records are there to be broken sooner or later. If Nole hadn't been around Nadal would have already likely broken this record.For someone to win 18 majors and beat Federer is 0% chance.
4.5 years of winning majors. LOL. Not happening.
The only record that will never be broken is Laver's CYGS. This one can only be equaled; all the others can be broken.
Silly comment. All records are there to be broken sooner or later. If Nole hadn't been around Nadal would have already likely broken this record.
Doesnt Vilas have a longer clay win streak than Nadal (I know mostly mickey mouse events but he still has it I thought).
Agree on Federer. But that doesn't mean his records can't be beat.Ifs and Buts don't count finally.
There are tennis players and tennis greats and then there is Federer.
Nadal's nine look tough but I think Laver's 200 is tougher. You have to win ten tournaments a year for twenty years! Some guys have won I believe as many or close in one tournaments. Pancho Gonzalez I believe won eight US Pros for example.Wrong. Don Budge won 6 straight majors, something no other player has done.
I think all the tennis records will eventually be broken. The safest one now looks to be Nadal's 9 RG's, but none of us knows what tremendous player will appear in the future. That record will also eventually be broken, they always are.
To the person who said nobody will ever break 17 slams IMO that is silly. That is an impressive mark but in no way is it unapproachable like some other marks seem to be. Heck it is unlikely it would even be the slam record today had Open tennis been in place sooner. Nadal looked on his way to breaking it at one point, now no longer. Some are speculating on Djokovic, right not it is probably unlikely, but there are still some who think he can. This alone shows at some point someone will break that mark. It is far from an untouchable mark. Whether it is 5 years, 20 years, or 50 years, it is almost100% for sure going down at some point, especialy with the homogenized playing conditions. 8 Wimbledons is Federer can somehow get there would be a far harder mark than 18 slams (should he win a 8th Wimbledon).
The era has seen 3 amazing players reach 10 or more Slams.
Let's suppose another future time sees 2 players on the level of Federer and Nadal, but the next player down isn't quite GOAT level.. well one of those players would probably break the Slam record.
If he hadn't lost that second set tie break....in 1981 he would have been up 2 sets to love...different outcome I thinkBorg's record should be updated from 3 consecutive Channel Slams to 4 since he made finals the following season; just didn't win Wimbledon title! ;-)
If he hadn't lost that second set tie break....in 1981 he would have been up 2 sets to love...different outcome I think
To the person who said nobody will ever break 17 slams IMO that is silly. That is an impressive mark but in no way is it unapproachable like some other marks seem to be. Heck it is unlikely it would even be the slam record today had Open tennis been in place sooner. Nadal looked on his way to breaking it at one point, now no longer. Some are speculating on Djokovic, right not it is probably unlikely, but there are still some who think he can. This alone shows at some point someone will break that mark. It is far from an untouchable mark. Whether it is 5 years, 20 years, or 50 years, it is almost100% for sure going down at some point, especialy with the homogenized playing conditions. 8 Wimbledons is Federer can somehow get there would be a far harder mark than 18 slams (should he win a 8th Wimbledon).
And before Navratilova I think it was Wills Moody 60+ years before.Only record that seems relatively unassisable is 9 Roland Garros titles. In men's its unheard of winning 9 titles at same major. Your window for winning majors it at max 12/13 years so to a slam 9 times out of them is pretty astonishing.
Even in WTA where parity at the top is distorted, we have Navaratilova record lasting for past 20 years and no one is even close to beating it. Certianly not Serena.
And before Navratilova I think it was Wills Moody 60+ years before.
If he hadn't lost that second set tie break....in 1981 he would have been up 2 sets to love...different outcome I think
Except for Rafa's 9 RG titles and Federer's 17 everything will be broken.
I think five in a row including 4 in a calendar year breaks the CYGS.The only record that will never be broken is Laver's CYGS. This one can only be equaled; all the others can be broken.
Only record that seems relatively unassisable is 9 Roland Garros titles. In men's its unheard of winning 9 titles at same major. Your window for winning majors it at max 12/13 years so to a slam 9 times out of them is pretty astonishing.
Even in WTA where parity at the top is distorted, we have Navaratilova record lasting for past 20 years and no one is even close to beating it. Certianly not Serena.
Tennis Records That Will Likely Never Be Broken
Like Federer, she has some records that will never be touched due to her 20+ year singles career; adding to it with a return to doubles, winning majors after 6 years off the tour! At the time, it didn't say much for the tour, but you have to give all due credit to Martina for a number of unattainable records in longevity, streaks at multiple tournaments, and an iconic rivalry with Evert! ;-) I'm no fan of Connors, but his records will endure as well; for excellence and for hanging around longer than he should'of! His 109 titles, winning 3 USO's on 3 different surfaces, and his rivalries with Borg and McEnroe! ;-)
^ 6 French opens for Graf.
7 RG for Evert. The most won by a woman in the Open Era.6 wow.
7 RG for Evert. The most won by a woman in the Open Era.
Rod Laver's 2 Grand Slams. 53 & 46 years. Generations of tennis history, yet the zenith of tennis still stands.
Anything else can be matched.
He is not a 'man'Nadal: Beaten in 3 consecutive GS finals by 1 man.
How many weeks is he on at the moment?Djokovic could break Federer's 237 consecutive weeks at #1 looking at how pathetic the ATP field is the next 3 years.
Laver has one CYGS in the open era, not two.
Laver won a Grand Slam as an amateur. Then again when tennis went open.Maybe they're referring to a pro Slam no one heard about; '67! I never knew each major had a pro event before '68! ;-)
He is not a 'man'
Go play on the highway, oiled men in Lycra-loving boyFirst thing you've said that made sense in a long time.
Go play on the highway, oiled men in Lycra-loving boy
Don't you have some soapies to catch-up on? latest Glee season?
He is not a 'man'
Grey's Anatomy - nailed on2. And no, I wouldn't be caught dead watching Glee.
Federer also has 5 consecutive titles at 2 different majors.
Silly comment. All records are there to be broken sooner or later. If Nole hadn't been around Nadal would have already likely broken this record.
Ah yes, he (or it???) is T1000. No wonder why he can fake everything
Laver has one CYGS in the open era, not two.
Laver won a Grand Slam as an amateur. Then again when tennis went open.
He has two legitimate Grand Slams. Impressive.
Nobody?????Trivia question: As far as I'm aware only one current no,1 has beaten the current no.2 6-0 6-0 for either gender.
Do you know which players?
Where the match took place, the year?
This is THE most unbreakable record along with Nadal's 9 FO titles.