Tennis rules question?

ubermeyer

Hall of Fame
Hi. I've been playing tennis for quite some time now, and watching it for even longer, so I am surprised that I do not know the answer to this question.

Recently, Serena Williams beat Elena Dementieva 6-7, 7-5, 8-6. Last year in the famous Wimbledon final, Fed lost to Nadal 4-6, 4-6, 7-6, 7-6, 7-9.

So, why does the final set (3rd for women, 5th for men in major tournaments) never have a tiebreaker? Do you keep playing until one person is 2 games ahead? So, could the final set have a score (in games) of, say, 99-97?

If you don't understand my question, please let me know.
 
It depends on the tournament. Some tournaments, like Wimbledon, have no tiebreak in the final set. So yes, it could go to 99-97, or even higher.

Other tournaments, like the US Open, use a tiebreaker at 6-all in the final set.
 
Tie-breakers are a way of shortening a match, and while the U.S. Open likes the drama over a fifth-set tie-breaker, the other slams recognize the infinitely better drama of allowing the set to continue until someone breaks and holds serve. Also, not having a fifth-set tie-breaker also takes a lot of luck out of the equation. The better player will usually win if there are no tie-breakers, while lesser players can maybe get lucky and eek out a win.

I also think that television had a lot to do with the U.S. Open having a fifth-set tiebreaker. I think it's crap... advantage sets are so much more epic.
 
Last edited:
The only slam that plays final set TB's is the US Open. All the other slams go by the win by two rule in the final sets. So yes, theoretically a match could go to 99-97 if no player is able to break and hold consecutively.
 
Aus Open, Roland Garros, Wimbledon, Davis Cup and Fed Cup use this format. The final set with no tiebreak is officially called an "Advantage Set."
 
"I also think that television had a lot to do with the U.S. Open having a fifth-set tiebreaker"

If a lot means everything then .... Bingo.
 
O.K. the next question is, did any other tournament use the no tiebreak last set? I think that was a case for a while, or am I wrong and tiebreak has been used in all but the three slams since Jimmy Van Alen's days?
 
Back
Top