First of all huuuge thanks to TW and Babolat for this opportunity and early Christmas Present in form of this Racquet playtest
Tennis experience/background:
4.5 player, playing since childhood, more actively (tournaments and leagues) in the last 10 yrs
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Power/offensive baseliner that is recently learning to incorporate more all court game style
Current racquet/string:
Yonex 95d / Pure Drive +/ Pure Drive std
How many hours did you play with the racquet?
Approx. 8.5 hrs or 2436 shots (stats provided by Play app)
How easy was the racquet to use (turning on/off, synchronizing with app)?
Racquet was easy to use in terms of synchronizing turning on/off. I did get annoyed initially that app would show other devices that I paired via Bluetooth (my laptop, tablet etc…) cluttering sync window when, I am sure, some form of filtering could have been applied to show only Play devices available for connection BUT that’s minor issue that did not affect my overall enjoyment
How did the racquet play (if you have used a Pure Drive in the past, did it play similarly)?
I ended up playing several league matches and several tournament matches, in between practice hits with my hitting partner, and I am pleased to report that this play test Babolat Pure Drive Play racquet plays exactly like standard Pure Drive. It is the same mold as Pure Drive 2012. Babolat engineers were able to fit all the technology necessary in the first 2-4 inches of the racquet handle of the now classic Pure Drive mold. I was skeptical at first thinking it will make racquet more head light but it turned out to be the same. I was even able to spec out matching regular pure drive before purchase so I could have it as my backup racquet to my Babolat Play Pure Drive.
I did end up tweaking stock Pure Drive Play to my preferred specs. For those of you interested my final specs which I play tested this racquet are: 345 grams, 340 sw 32.1 cm balance (that’s with overgrip 16 gauge Volkl Cyclone poly and rubber band dampener )
How easy was the app to use?
App was easy to use from functionality standpoint and it is getting even better now that we have access to final release (we can now see other community members and how we stack up against one another, something that was “grayed out” during our beta playtest). There is always, of course, some more room for improvement. I am a geek that lives this stuff on a daily basic so I have higher UX expectations than an average user. I would love to see little bit more of initial user “hand holding” for less technical users. Namely, I would love to see guided tour (see this for one of the easier JavaScript examples
http://usablica.github.io/intro.js/)
Other than that, my main gripe was trying to figure out what is and what is not clickable on my phone app since there is no indicator of what can and cannot be clicked (It took me a while to figure out that Pulse stats can be clicked for more details). Do not get me wrong these are minor easily fixable “annoyances” otherwise beta app was rock solid on my nexus 4
What did you like about the app?
While I loved every single feature of this app, my MAIN “likes” fall into two main groups.
Community/Social and Technical Analysis:
Social: I loved to “Compete” though community option of the web app (Browser Web app was the only place available to see this at beta period) Ranking play users on our pulse % was very cool for me since you can kind of validate your efforts and use this a your motivation to improve your technique, power or stamina.
Technical: Initially what grabbed my attention were all these new technical details at my disposal that I could never really quantify in the past. I could see my shot selection during the sets and percentage of shots that I executed correctly (good technique = less off center hits or higher sweet spot percentage). I really used this to the max in my League matches.
What did you dislike about the app?
I wish there was a detail in-app explanation how endurance % was calculated. It was almost reverse of what I thought would be…more I played less my endurance score was. I am still somewhat confused why initially my endurance was in the 70’s and now it is in the 50’s despite the fact that I played longer sessions than I did in the beginning.
Was there anything you thought was missing?
I would add following “easy picking” features to the app:
1) If developer just “repurposes” existing data, you could have “Time since last strung” or “String Log”. This would be where the end user could see how many shots current stringbed has and what force was imparted on the strings during the same period. You can already deduct this from the data but if Babolat added this as a menu option the app would feel fuller featured with minimal hassle to the developer. All they have to do is ask user ONE standard question (date of stringing).
2) If there was a way to ask the user 2 questions (Date of restringing AND Tension)We could also use this “e-string log” instead of the sticker on the racquet to remind of when we last string the racquet and at what tension.
Following NOT so easy picking to add:
3) Wonder if in partnership with racquet tune, or even developed from scratch we can measure racquet bed stiffness and or tension drop. It would be a nice addition to the app.
4) I would love to see “challenge” option from the community menu where certain “Play users” from the same geo area AND same or similar skill level can be challenged to a match. This would add a whole another dimension to community aspect of the app.
5) In addition, if app becomes location aware there WOULD be endless monetization features and added benefits to us the end user. I can already see it:
“Welcome to Miami, FL “Mr Babolat Play User” there are 34 Babolat play users located in your 10 mile radius would you like me to point you to local Tennis Park or would you like to restring at one of our Babolat dealers located 2.3 miles to the North of your location? Here is your 10% discount on your favorite string at “Insert Babolat Auth Dealer name here in that GEO area”… ;-) "
How did you use the data you received from the app?
I found myself analyzing each played set to see my tendencies and power level and how all this translated to the scoreboard. For one example, I found interesting correlation of power and my opponent game style. I always thought that I was hitting the ball with roughly the same power level but it turns out that if my opponent was harder hitter I responded with higher power level shots while if I was playing someone of more of a retriever (or popularly called pushers) my power level throughout the set dropped by 10%.
Lastly, please excuse any spelling and grammatical errors I am writing this after xmas dinner before going for a trip tomorrow so if anything major if left for me to correct I will fix it as soon as possible.