Tennis Warehouse Playtest: Babolat SFX EVO

For me, the size 11 fits about how I would want it to fit lengthwise, in the initial try on and walk around.
With one caveat, the uppers are very spacious and feel very light (i.e. they may stretch)
My feet are skinny, not necessarily narrow. So top to bottom, I have ALOT of extra room in the uppers. The toebox, in particular, feels tall on my foot. This gives wide and larger footed individuals more room and comfort.
For me, I'm not 100% sure going down a half size would help, we'll see once I actually get on court if it feels like I'm tripping over myself.
Those are my initials thoughts and observations.
 
First almost 2 hrs on court, it was on a clay court but I have some hard court tennis lined up next week.

Overall, the uppers are spacious, if you have a large foot these will be great.
Again, length is ok for me, but they felt a little loose due to the uppers and my skinny feet. I can also cinch them up a bit more next time. They weren't slipping or sliding just roomy. I'm not 100% sure going down half a size would help as these are clearly designed for the larger/wider footed fellow.

This outsole tread, would be great for someone who is a natural slider on clay. (I am absolutely not, but I never slipped.) These shoes are also pretty plush and forgiving, they feel very nice walking around. Also the laces seem plenty long for all you fancy-knot aficionados, the laces also seem durable.
Overall, this feels like it is going to be a very forgiving shoe for hard court while also being light and quick.
Can't wait to get them on hard court.
My mainstay for hard court was the Ubersonic 2, I used my last pair and just broke out the Vapor 9.5 Tour leathers, stiff competition (literally).
 
Wore them for over 2 hours on hard court.

Latest impressions are:
Yep, they run larger than my usual size of tennis shoes. I wear mostly Nike Vapor Pro 2s and occasionally On Roger Pros.
I thought I would be slipping out of them, but I cinched them up and they actually held fine.
The comfort is pretty good! Feet never felt fatigued even at the end of play.
Speed? Hard to say. Maybe if I got another pair half sized down, I could push off harder and be more reflective of the shoes’ capability?
I won’t spoil my actual review but I will say that for the money, it’s pretty darn good!
 
Well one session on hardcourt and I agree with everyone else, these run about a half size large.
Assumingly, less traction on clay masked this some on my first time out, but it was apparent how much extra room there was playing on hard court tonight.
Still a very light and speedy shoe even being a little larger.
However, with only a little over an hour on hardcourt I already have some cosmetic damage.
Need to grab a pic, so stay tuned
 
I thought this was only cosmetic but upon further inspection...
C2H30F.jpg

The red threads are absolutely accents but it does look like it cut through the black threads underneath as well. Now despite this, I did pull on the drag guard and it did not come apart. Not a great look in terms of quality though.
This was only about 1hr and 15 mins of hard court. I don't really slide and don't know how I developed this dragging habit. I am a toe dragger but never used to do this, regardless, my other shoes would hold up fine with more substantial drag guards.
 
I thought this was only cosmetic but upon further inspection...
C2H30F.jpg

The red threads are absolutely accents but it does look like it cut through the black threads underneath as well. Now despite this, I did pull on the drag guard and it did not come apart. Not a great look in terms of quality though.
This was only about 1hr and 15 mins of hard court. I don't really slide and don't know how I developed this dragging habit. I am a toe dragger but never used to do this, regardless, my other shoes would hold up fine with more substantial drag guards.

Did they come in contact with something else? That's an excessive toe drag, if not! :oops:
 
I had another session with these kicks and it was a rather warm day. They still performed fairly well as I last stated. But one knock I may give the shoe is the heat and sweat retention. I wouldn’t say my feet were completely soaked but there definitely is more a sweaty feeling in these than in other shoes I’ve played in. Honestly with the mesh upper, I didn’t expect this amount of heat retention. Does this one ding ruin my overall impression? Not at all, but I thought it would be valid to state this observation. I really do like this shoe, otherwise.
 
Lol. Would you classify this toe drag as more of a top-foot drag?

J/K...sort of.
No it is definitely a drag, medial side of the foot. You mostly see it in players who slide, the trailing foot gets pronated for slowing/stabilization. I don't slide on hardcourt but I guess I drag my foot slowing down to make contact after running to a shot. I mostly play on clay, so maybe it is some kind of holdover from clay court footwork. I really don't know.
As I said, I used to not do this and it is very subconscious as I don't feel myself doing it.
 
I’ll be wearing the Babolats out for the 4th time for practice tonight. So far the wear on the outsoles are still minimal and I’m still enjoying the comfort level and performance overall.
 
Another observation and I wonder what other playtesters think: the outsole of the shoe seems to have a lot of grip. Maybe it’s because I’ve been wearing the Nike Vapor Pro 2 which seems to facilitate sliding more; my ON Roger Pros tread pattern is also on the slicker side. But these SFX EVOs herringbone pattern sticks to the surface and will squeal loudly in response to my movement on court.
 
I've played 3 hrs singles and 3 hrs dubs in the shoes and I think guys with large volume feet are going to love them. I've been wearing 2 pair of thick socks to fill em up and with a runner's loop I have no problem with foot movement or instability and they are extremely comfortable.

Yesterday after hitting in the EVO's I put on a pair of Hypercourt Supremes to compare...the EVO's are waay bigger in every department: width, height, forefoot, midfoot etc. Run a bit longer than HCS too.

Another observation and I wonder what other playtesters think: the outsole of the shoe seems to have a lot of grip. Maybe it’s because I’ve been wearing the Nike Vapor Pro 2 which seems to facilitate sliding more; my ON Roger Pros tread pattern is also on the slicker side. But these SFX EVOs herringbone pattern sticks to the surface and will squeal loudly in response to my movement on court.

Agree that the outsole is very grippy, also seems pretty durable so far. I play on public courts so I like the extra grip as it works well with the more dirt/dust buildup compared to club courts.
 
Played 2hrs of singles today and my feet did not wear out.
Definitely some movement, I even wore thicker socks, but that is ALL size related. Length feels ok wearing them and then you start playing and realize they do run big. It was a little deceiving to me.
The uppers are definitely softer but seem durable.
Rubber seems like it is going to be durable and probably not great if you slide on hard court. I had to chase down quite a few balls and never slipped making cuts.

Agree with @Devil_dog, positive experience and I am building the archetype of this shoe in my mind.
Lot of hours to go yet before the review deadline, couple leagues starting, so that helps.
 
I have to agree with @Devil_dog and @Chairman3, I've got about 9 hours on mine (split evenly between practice and matches) and I really like them ! I would probably love these for hitting practice and days when I'll be on the court a long long time, because they are so comfortable. I can say they are kinder to my feet than some higher performance and much more expensive offerings.

I would love these even more, but they are at least a half-size too big for me. That's my fault and if I were getting another pair I could easily go down a half size. This is only drawback I've seen. Get the right size and you will be happy. I feel they run a bit long and they are designed to be wider. Other than that, I've got no complaints about these shoes, but you have to know what you are getting. If I were expecting a high-end ultra performance oriented show - I would be disappointed. On the other hand my performance oriented shoes cannot match the comfort (and space) of these Babolat SFX Evos. I can wear these for just about anything and enjoy them, but if I were playing a match I would choose something made for competition.

The SFX Evo are great for their intended purpose as a court shoe that is wide, comfortable, looks good, provides adequate support, excellent traction and stability. Having said all that, the upper materials are not as robust as some other Babolat offerings, which is to be expected at this price point. I thought the soles have been surprisingly good and while I like the tread pattern of my Babolat Jet and Propulse better, there is absolutely nothing wrong with these. In fact they are quite good and more than do the job. It seems the compound is just a bit softer but to this point they show very little wear - and I am usually pretty hard on shoes playing an all court game.
 
Good morning everyone! Here is my review over this shoe. Hopefully it helps provide insight.

Tennis experience/background: Former college player now just playing league matches when possible
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Mainly an agressive baseliner, but trying to work on my net game
Current shoe: Nike Vapor Cage 4
How many hours did you play with the shoe?: about 32 hrs (worn on and off the court)
Normal Size: 12.5/13
Playtesting Size: 13

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort: 4.5/5
To kick off my review on this shoe, I really think the comfort stuck out to me when comparing shoes to some of my other rotations. I notice that with some other shoes I would have to usually take a break from just due to the comforting, but with the Babolat shoes, I was ok with keeping them on even after my session as well as walking around in as well. I believe the plushness was there and the combination with a thicker sock and cushioned shoe for me, it very well checked off comfort.

-arch support: 4/5
I had no issues with any arch support for these shoes. Like I previously mentioned there were days with other shoes ive used where I would have to strech out and use a massage gun. But for this shoe really no complaints as I could wear them with full confidence during my hitting sessions, as well as using them to walk around in after and not feeling any fatigue.

-stability/support: 3.5/5
Don't get me wrong, I think I would have scored this section a lot higher if I had looked up the specs of the shoe and gone half a size down. When wearing thick socks I felt fine using this shoe, but I did lack stability when using regular socks and seeing my foot slide just a bit due to the sizing issue. Support wise it would fall along the same feedback, felt that the support was there, it was just my fault for getting a size that made it too big for me. I do think that if you were to get the sizing right, this would be higher up from 4-4.5.

-ventilation: 3/5
Even with getting the right size and using different socks I think this is where I ran into issues with the Babolat playtest shoes. I noticed my feet being a lot warmer, probably due to the thicker socks, but noticed that with both scenarios that I was not getting good ventilation through the mesh as much as I thought I would. On some heavy training sessions, I started to see that the mesh would visibly show that there was heat/sweat marks on the upper tounge and towards the front of the top of the shoe.

-sole durability: 4/5
No issues with the sole durability. Even after weating these shoes on and off the court no changes as of yet. Typically I wouldnt wear my tennis shoes outside the court but I really wanted to get the full feel for these shoes and even when warming up or running laps it feels perfectly fine to me. I dont usually go through soles as quick but found it to hold up despite me using this shoe for other uses than tennis.

-toe durability: 4/5
I dont really drag my toes as much but with the added reinforcement towards the toes, I found no issues with this shoe. There was a bit of wiggle room but when it came to where my toes were throughout the review it was mentioned that it was more of my issue since not reading up on the sizing issue. Overall everything is holding up and wanting to see how long it would take before more wear sets in after this review.

-traction: 3.5/5
So after everything with the shoe, I did notice that traction after my first inital hit was lacking. I typically dont slide or anything for my other shoes, but found myself screeching a lot when stopping with this shoe. It was still good enough where I kept using them on court, but just noticed how especially when fully sprinting from side to side when covering or running drills, I was a lot louder than usually with some slippage here and there.

-weight: 4/5
For what it was, this shoe reminded me of something in between a Nike Air Zoom zero and New Balance 996 (older version). To me it felt pretty lightweight and easy to move in straight out the box. Compared to when I started with my cages, there was a bit of break in/transition period going from a lighter shoe to something heavier. Where as going back to Babolat, it felt light weight and comfortable for me from the get go.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
Overall I was really surprised with this playtest as I havent really used any babolat shoes since Roddick was still on tour. Really liked the chance to try something other than New Balance, Asicis or Nike like with my usual rotations. Like mentioned above this shoe reminded me of a Air Zoom Zero which I loved so much since the newer vapor tours were going a different diretion compared to my all time favorite for the 9.5 tours. Overall I would definately say give this shoe a try if youre looking for something comfortable, just remember to go half a size down and youll be all set.
 
3.5 hours on court in these today
2 hrs clay
1.5 hard court

Confirming my earlier conclusion, if you are a natural clay mover, this outsole would be pretty good for you.
It has enough tread to grip but also "lets go" pretty easily to allow sliding.
I'm not a natural mover on clay, so I'd still want the clay court version.
Upper is tightly woven and doesn't let clay in.

For hard court, the rubber continues to grip and hold up well, durability wise.
These are nice, light, and nimble shoes.
I don't think they would promote hard court sliding, but I also don't do that.
Cushioned but not quite plush, they could be softer, and I think part of it is the rubber being "harder" to promote durability.
Probably a fair compromise for most given the other features of the shoe and that alot of people use their own insoles/orthotics.

Only negative so far is the sizing, kind of drives me nuts these shoe companies can't be consistent. But most major retailers allow returns so (shoulder shrug emoji)?
 
Tennis experience/background: I play in men's 4.0 USTA league, mostly doubles but hit singles too. I've been playing since 2009 when I came back to tennis after a long hiatus.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I play a mostly all court game with a majority of my movement coming from the baseline.

Current shoe: Nike Vapor Pro 2

How many hours did you play with the shoe? So far, over 20+ hours of tennis on hard courts.

Normal Size: 11.5

Playtesting Size: 11.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort:
The comfort level is surprisingly good. Usually after a match or 2+ hours practice session, I cannot wait to jump into my recovery shoes (currently ON Running Cloudmonsters). But I've been really impressed with the level of comfort. I keep expecting to comfort to drop but so far it has been stellar. May be about the most conforatable shoes I've worn in some time. And for the price? Honestly, top notch.

-arch support:
I have a flat arch but I've not noticed any negatives on the SFX EVO. I don't feel any strange intrusions or discomfort at all.

-stability/support:
Because the shoe ran big, I was expecting to have some issues in this category. After cinching up the laces, there still a fair amount of room in the forefoort but from the midfoot back to the heel, my feet feel securely locked in. I've had no issues running for droppers and back to the baseline for lobs. Again, I've been surprised at the performance level.

-ventilation:
This was a surprise to me: my feet felt a little soaked after hard hitting sessions in the shoe. I didn't expect they would since the uppers are mostly mesh. But perhaps the padding on the tongue and the way the uppers are situated have hindered some ventilation? Venting of the shoe may be the one knock on the shoe but it's not horrible but noticeable.

-sole durability:
Another impressive aspect of this shoe. The soles have lasted incredibly well. They offer great grip, maybe too much for those who wanna slide. But I'm not a slider and these give me great start and stop ability. Even my fellow tennis teammates noticed how well the soles have remained mostly unscathed.

-toe durability:
I don't scrape my uppers much at all so I can't really give a good analysis of the durability of the toe and toe guard. I know some on this playtest have shown less than stellar durability but for me, no issues.

-traction:
As I mentioned in the sole discussion, these have really good traction. They squeak upon every turn for me. Very noticeable grip. Quite a bit different from my Nikes that seem to encourage sliding, If you like to slide, you won't probably like this shoe. But if you want to stop on a dime and turn, these have been stellar.

-weight:
I did not weigh these shoes but they feel relatively light on my feet. The don't feel clunky at all and have a nimble feel on court.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
I really had a low bar for this shoe just based on the price point (sub $100) and, wow, was I surprised at my impressions.
First of all, they do run big. That's great for me because I have a wider forefoot and finding tennis shoes that fit well is always a challenge. The last best fitting tennis shoe for me was the Vapor Zoom 9s. The ability to tailor my lacing gave me a customized feel. But then the Nikes went narrow for me. It was difficult to find any other brand and so I stuck with Nikes and the snugger feel. I did try a pair of ON Running Roger Pros and those brought back that nice well-fitted feel but the price point and questionable durability and lack of color options kept me from going full bore into the Roger Pros. The Nike Court Zoom NXTs brought back some room for my feet and I would have been content to stick with them but then they were discontinued. Lastly, I opted on the Nike Vapor Pro 2 which gives me a snug feel but I could live with them. This brings me to the Babolat SFX EVOs. I will likely get another pair but perhaps a half-size down for a better overall feel. For all the positives of the shoe from fit, comfort, performance and price, I cannot see myself in anything else at this time. I only hope Babolat keeps this design and adds some more color options in the future. This will be my match day shoe for the foreseeable future. Many thanks to @TW Staff, Tennis Warehouse and @Babolat Official for this opportunity to wear, play and test out this underrated big well-performing shoe.
 
Well now I'm going to slightly contradict myself....:cautious:

Played on some looser clay tonight, I think it just needed brushed, and I was sliding [unintentionally] and didn't have enough traction on push-offs.

So clarification, play on decently maintained clay courts only.
 
After about 12 hours in these Babolat SFX EVOs I can say they pack a lot of bang for the buck. It could be that if you are looking for a comfortable, competent, wide shoe at a reasonable price - you need not look further!
These are great all arounders, so for a majority of your hitting and practicing these will get the job done. If you are looking for a Ferrari for the price of a Corolla - you may be disappointed.
I have been really enjoying these shoes - if not for the sizing issue ( these run wide and long and while I am between sizes, I mistakenly got the larger size ) I'd be wearing these everytime I wasn't playing a match!!

I would recommend picking out your favorite insoles (which I always think is a good idea) because the stock set up leaves something to be desired, but other than that I think they do commendable job for the price.

They look good too. Are they durable like higher priced higher performance shoes - no, the uppers are not as rugged, but they breath nicely and don't restrict your feet. For those prone to hot spots where shoe seems trigger pain - these could be just what the (foot) doctor ordered!

If you like to slide or drag your feet to slow yourself down, these do not have the armor to protect you and you will trash them in no time. I may play like that when I need to, but for casual hitting I generally avoid all that. So as I've said before - you have to choose the right tool for the job. If these suit your use pattern - you'll be very happy with Babolat's SFX EVO.
 
Last edited:
Another update: I'm about a week shy of a month since I started wearing these and after a 2-hour practice last night, I saw the first signs of wear on my outsoles. The wear is on the outsides of my shoes from the forefoot to the heel. It's ever so slight though - like I really had to look closely to tell they have worn down. I'd like to say this is about the same amount of wear or maybe a bit less than what usually appears on my Nikes but I won't swear on that. That said, the SFX EVOs still have quite a bit of bite for grip and the comfort level still seems to be there. I did order another pair recently but this time a half-size down.
 
Babolat SFX EVO Playtest - Thanks Babolat and TW for teaming up to make this happen!!

Tennis Experience/Background: I’ve played tennis for since over 25 years and I am a bit of gear-head when it comes to shoes, strings, racquets (and modifications) and other equipment.

Playing Style: I am an all-court player and like to come forward whenever possible or practical. I play singles and doubles and am considered an active player who plays with a kind of controlled aggression. I rely on speed around the court to make my game work.

Current Shoe ( s) : Babolat Jet / Propulse, Asics “Novak” Court FF 2, Nike Ballistec
Hours Played: 13-15
Normal Shoe Size: 9 (depending on brand 8.5-9)
Playtest Shoe Size: 9

Shoe Performance:
-comfort:
Excellent. Both the upper and the sole were very comfortable. The upper is very flexible and fits your foot well, no thick seems that trigger any discomfort.
One of the key features of these shoes is that they run wide, so for those of you who need a little extra space in the toe box – these are a great option for you. The Babolat SFX EVO is cut wider throughout the whole forefoot and toe box, compared to other shoes in Babolat's lineup. I felt they run just a touch long too, so if you are coming from other Babolat shoes please keep that in mind too when ordering. My size 9 in Babolat’s Jet and Propulse line fit just about right, while the SFX EVO was boardering on too big. If you get the right size I think most people will be very happy with this shoe.

-arch support: Good. Not bad at all, but not a strength either. It is minimal, but does the job. I would have preferred a removeable insert, however if it’s a problem for you, you can always augment your shoes with upgraded insoles. I tried these both ways and found that there was plenty of room for whatever supports you may want to insert.

-stability/support: Very good. The structure of these shoes provides a nice base which is very stable. The sole is firm but not harsh. I ‘d say quite good for tennis (or dare I say it even pickleball or padel) on hard courts. This kind of stability and comfort give you confidence to plant your foot and take a swing.

-ventilation: Very good. Upper is mostly mesh and I did not feel like my feet overheated at all. It has been cool, I can’t comment on warm summer days yet. I ‘d imagie even then they perform well.

-sole durability: I’ve played 13-15 hours in these and they are performing and looking almost new. I am usually pretty tough on soles but these have held up nicely. They are have good tread depth so that is a positive and grip well, giving you confidence to run start and stop.

-toe durability: I am not a toe dragger on serves but have been known to drag a foot when extending for a shot as a braking mechanism. The wrap around toe rubber seems to be doing well. The upper toe protection is adequate for most players and situations, but not as rugged as some of Babolat’s higher-end shoes.

-traction: Excellent. No complaints at all regarding traction. The tread compound grips well (better than most) and initially I was concerned they would wear quickly, but so far that has not been the case. Michelin man soles are great, plus I love the Michelin man!

-weight: Good: They are light enough to give that quick and nimble feeling on the court. While not feather-weight ultra-lights, they won’t hold you back! These are not clunky big-box shoes and get you to where you want to go! Being an all-court player there is nothing worse than a shoe that holds you back - these won't!

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

All in all I was impressed with this offering from Babolat! The SFX EVO is a very good shoe, especially considering it’s reasonable price. If you are looking for a great all-around shoe for playing some points, games or practice with your hitting partner these shoes will not let you down.

If you are looking for a wide shoe that gives your feet some room to breathe – these are an excellent choice. Perhaps you need a little extra room, or for orthotics etc. these Babolats have you covered. On top of that, since the top is a flexible mesh they required no break-in, so you are pretty much good to go right out of the box.

If you need or are looking for more performance than these provide - I’d recommend a level or two up in Babolat’s line-up, they make great shoes across their line-up from my experience. SFX EVO have a bit more cushion and you'll sit just a bit farther from the ground, but not so much that you feel disconnected from the court. They strike a pretty good balance of cushioning and shock absorption while still giving you that vital kinesthetic sense of the court. If you are fortunate enough to have several pairs of tennis shoes, these SFX EVO would be a good addition or good solo purchase if you need a competent all-around shoe, or for days when room and comfort are a priority.

Last point, I know this is subjective, but Babolat has a knack for making good looking products; from racquets, clothes to shoes. and these are no exception. Very stylish IMO, but I wouldn't expect anything less from Babolat!
 
Last edited:
Latest update: I mentioned I ordered another pair of the SFX EVOs and they arrived today. This time I ordered a half-sized down and the fit is now pretty great. There shoes are still generous in the forefoot but I feel like I can confidently push off and run on these on court with any reservation. I think I'm gonna like these very much. I just hope @Babolat Official keeps making this version and offer some other color variations.
 
Pretty impressive no playtesters have had a serious criticism of this shoe (yet). Unless something dramatic bad happens in the next week, I won't either.
 
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Baseliner, with really bad net skills.
Current shoe: Nike Vapor Cage
How many hours did you play with the shoe? 10 Hours
Normal Size: 11
Playtesting Size: 11

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort: The shoes are insanely comfortable, almost too comfortable... I love walking around them and it is comfortable to wear on the court. Even after a couple hours of play I enjoy wearing the shoes.

-arch support: I think these shoes would fit people who have neutral feet. I have relatively low arches, but I think the support in the arches were sufficient. However, I put super feet in all my tennis shoes.

-stability/support: I think this is where the shoe could use some work. With shoes so light, sometimes I feel like my shoes were going to fly off my shoes. When I was running out wide, I was a bit worried that I would roll my ankle since the support feel too light like it lacked structure.

-ventilation: Ventilation was okay on the shoes, nothing special about it. My feet did not feel like it was too hot in the shoes nor did I feel discomfort. I do like the area around ankle feel like it was cool which I liked.

-sole durability: I am in agreement with many on the sole durability. It definitely holds up which surprises me a bit since it is a light pair of shoes. However, I like to play with super feet so I slip one in, but I prefer these sole durability of these shoes over my Nike Vapor Cage.

-toe durability: I do not drag my toes, nor do I get too much damage around the toe area. However, after 10 hours, it looks like my shoes are still holding up in the toe box. If you are not a toe dragger, I would not be concern with toe durability of these shoes. I would say if you are, I would consider that there is a 50% chance that these will wear out in the toe area. It seems a bit light on the material around that area.

-traction: Traction wise, after 10 hours it seems to still grip the court well. It reminds me a bit of the Babolat Propulse in terms of grip. It definitely has more traction than my Nike Vapor Cage, I can still hear screeching on the court at hour 10 of my Babs then my nike.

-weight: It is light, and it felt like I was walking on pillows. I was able to move around quickly on the court better in these shoes than in my Nike cages. If I had to compare the weight to another shoe I would compare it to the old Nike Air Max Cages.

Additional Comments: I think pairing these shoes with your favorite insole is the way to go. While these shoes feel great, I have a feeling when I get to 20 hours+, it might break down. If anything if they add some straps around the ankles like the Babolat propulse that stability would be better.

Thanks again TW for the playtest!
 
Trying to squeeze in a couple more sessions before the deadline. One planned at least, not sure I'll get another.
Regardless, staring down about 15 hours and will use them a few more sessions, post-review, and put a few update posts. I really wanted to get to 20hrs but work travel and such interfered.

Sprinting to the finish line now...
 
Tennis experience/background: Played in HS. Casually in and post-college. Took several long breaks. Started playing a lot more against in the last 3 years. Now I play about 2-3x a week during the warmer months, maybe 1-3x a month if I'm lucky in the winter.
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Used to be a net rusher. Don't know what I am now. Guess my heart is still there but the body is not.
Current shoe: Vapor 9.5 / Asics Gel Reso 8
How many hours did you play with the shoe? 10 hours
Normal Size: 9
Playtesting Size: 9

Comments on shoe performance:
-comfort: This might be the most comfortable tennis shoe I've ever worn. This largely comes down to how roomy it is. I probably could have sized down a half or even a full size and still felt like there was enough room. I've been searching for something like this for a while. I have a few extremely stable shoes like my Gel Resos and my ON clay court shoes, but they tend to be a bit heavy and firm. The SFX Evo is super light, roomy and breathable. The upper material has a lot of give. I was worried at first about stability/support for that reason. But that's addressed below.
-arch support: I assume arch support is fine here. I've never had any arch issue (knock on wood), but nothing about this aspect stood out to me either positively or negatively.
-stability/support: This is where I was most concerned when I first put on the shoes because of the lightness and softness of the materials, but it turned out to be an unfounded worry. There are certainly shoes that feel firmer or where your feet feel more locked in. I was a bit hesitant at first to take significant cuts on the court / change direction / decelerate. Then when I actually started playing points, I never really thought about the shoes again. Which is a good thing. They just kind of performed.
-ventilation: Ventilation is good. The weather is cold here and I've played both outdoors and indoors with these and my feet don't feel overly hot or sweaty, even given the qualifications as to the lower temps. Not a surprise as the uppers feel pretty breathable.
-sole durability: This remains to be seen, as I've only worn them for about 10 hours but so far they are holding up just fine.
-toe durability: Toe durability seems fine but I don't drag my toe a ton, and I serve platform these days. I think along the lines of the sole durability, there isn't anything happening so far that would be a cause for concern.
-traction: No concerns here but I have been playing on indoor and outdoor hard courts where traction typically hasn't been an issue for me. I would be curious to play on clay, which is where I do a majority of my summer time hitting. Unfortunately I won't be able to do that in time for this review.
-weight: Light and fast! Exactly what I had been looking for.

General reaction/comments on overall performance: Finding a good shoe is hard for me because I have a really wide right foot. Think double E for that foot only (left being just regular E). Asics fit well but feel a bit clunky. The Vapor 9.5s I have been wearing make me feel fast and light but with thick socks are a tight fit and can feel uncomfortable if I'm playing for more than an hour. With the SFX Evos I have so much room and feel like I can play for hours. When I'm not actively engaged in a point and can be conscious of my feet and what they're standing on, I do occasionally think that these shoes might let me down with respect to lateral support, but I've played a few tough matches where none of those worries materialized into anything. These are not the most stylish shoes but I do appreciate the no-nonsense sort of air about them, and I think I might even use them to walk around the city in general!

I'm hoping to play on clay starting later this month and intend to follow up once I have those impressions.

Thanks very much to @TW Staff and @Babolat Official for the opportunity to try these!
 
Last edited:
The Chairman3's review of the Babolat SFX EVO

Tennis experience/background: 4.0 NTRP, been playing about 6 years, no prior experience
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): All-court, enjoy coming to net in both singles and doubles, try to utilize every shot situationally
Current shoe:
Clay: Le Coq Sportif LCS T01 and ON Roger Pro
Hard: Vapor 9.5 Tour, previously Ubersonic 2
How many hours did you play with the shoe? I played about 15hrs (going to play at least 20 though and add some updates on durability). I played 70/30 hard and clay court, respectively. The additional time will all be hard court.
Normal Size: 11
Playtesting Size: 11

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort: I would say comfort from the cushioning was average. They weren't super plush, super cushioned but they had a good level of cushioning for me and never left my feet sore. I'd say they are on par with most other shoes, especially at this price, but the foam is probably designed more for longevity (i.e. a little firmer). The outsole rubber also appeared to be designed for durability so was a firmer/harder rubber and didn't provide extra shock absorption. The uppers, however, were very comfortable. They flexed and felt very forgiving on your foot. The comfortable uppers did hurt lockdown a bit, but I will touch on that in the stability section. The tongue as well was nicely padded and in nice contrast to the more minimalist tongues that seem to be the trend in new shoes. You didn't feel any hotspots from any part of the shoe. Overall, it just depends where you need comfort but they are generally comfortable. A custom orthotic/fancy padded socks would definitely up the comfort level for those with sensitive feet.

-arch support: Arch support is a little low. I will admit, the size being slightly too large could be putting the arch support in the wrong spot. But you can put your hand in or just look in the shoe and see the footbed is relatively flat in the arch area. I have pretty average arches, so it never felt like I needed more but high arched people would probably need to throw some arch supports in there. This would probably be a positive if you have wide, flat feet.

-stability/support: In terms of stability, the outsole was very stable. It has a nice footbed and them being a little wider definitely helps with that. The profile is fairly slim, though, and I never tripped on my own feet or caught the edge of the shoe or anything that could cause ankle-rolling when shuffling or quickly changing direction. For the upper, lockdown was a little below average. The only caveat is the shoes are a half-size bigger than I need, so I did have extra room. I could sense this extra space in some very quick movements. Regardless, it's more the design of the upper. It is a mesh/woven/fabric but it is pretty soft and flexible. It doesn't seem as stiff as the "Matryx" upper used on the Jet Mach. While this is great for comfort, it doesn't contain your foot as much as some stiffer uppers do. For a heavier person (I'm a svelte 160lbs, 5'11) this could be problematic if you are an aggressive mover, it may not hold your foot in place as well, particularly if you play singles. This also likely comes down to cost. These are a more budget priced shoe. So again, outsole stability and support is pretty good. Upper support/lockdown is not as good. This shoe could benefit from outrigger style lacing where the eyelets connect to the midsole to hold the foot in place more. This would be a great improvement for a V.2 and likely not drive the cost up significantly.

-ventilation: I am bad at rating this category because my feet just get hot, regardless. So I would rate them as average, with one caveat. This all black color did get a little hotter. I'm down in FL (the sunshine state), when that sun hits the black fabric, they heat up from the outside and the inside. If in FL, I'd get a lighter color. There also aren't alot of specific ventilation features such as holes or perforations. Again, for me, they didn't seem noticeably hotter than my normal shoes so I give them an average rating.

-sole durability: The outsole durability has been very good so far. I commented that the rubber seems a little harder and I think this benefits durability significantly. Not sure if the Michelin branded rubber really does anything extra, but so far I see very little wear on the outsole. These are above average in terms of outsole durability. I am going to keep playing these to about 20hrs and will post some updates about the durability.

-toe durability: For me, there are two parts to this; toe durability and the drag guard. So toe durability so far is great. I am a toe dragger and there is very minimal signs of wear. You can also look and see the thick rubber that comes up the front to protect the toe. So the shoe gets high marks for this. The shoes also have a little of that "rocker" kind of feel where they don't feel like you're completely flat footed, they help your feet move a bit and this helps transitioning in/out of toe dragging. So I posted a pic of shredding the red threads that are on the drag guard. I somehow developed where I pronate and drag my trailing, left foot, not sure how I did this, so I did expereince some wear on the drag guard. I'm not a hard court slider, I guess I do it for support/stability when slowing down after running and maybe it is because I play alot of clay court tennis, but if you do hardcourt slide, the drag guard is weak. It is a very thin piece of vinyl (?), guessing it's vinyl. So it would probably get shredded pretty easily. I think this likely isn't applicable to the target audience of this shoe but regardless it relates to durability.

-traction: Traction was pretty good. I did slip yesterday, running forward to get a short ball, but this had more to do with the court; it was a little silty/sandy. But thanks to the stability of the outsole, I was able to slide into the "slip" and maintain my footing. This is a positive for both traction and stability. The rubber gripped well and this is kind of an old school, flatter herringbone-ish pattern. The rubber is harder, as mentioned, but heats up and grips well. I don't think these are designed for sliders but they do have those "air channels," so your mileage may vary. On clay, traction is ok. If you play mostly doubles and don't aggressively move, you'd probably be ok on clay. I had mixed results depending on the court conditions. Just get the clay version and save yourself the trouble.

-weight: Weight is pretty good; I weighed them at 394g or 13.90oz. This is pretty lightweight compared to alot of shoes these days. Shoes seem to be getting heavier but I don't think it is always for a purpose. These are nice, light feeling pretty fast shoes. The uppers feel very light on your feet and the outsole provides good stability without being a brick. I rate them very good for weight.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
So the overall experience was very positive. YES, they run big, I would need a 10.5 to more comfortably wear them. Half-size lower than my normal size.
These have nice, long laces, but they are braided so can snag or fray a bit if they come in contact with the ground (mine did).
This is a very good budget priced shoe. I liken them to a base model car, there's enough good parts in them that you could mod them up to a higher performing shoe. Add an arch support, add an orthotic and go to town. However, the weakness lies in the upper, to be a really high performance shoe they would need a stiffer upper to provide more lockdown and support. For alot of rec/weekend warrior types, these are a terrific shoe. Even for more competitive play, these would suit alot of people. I used them in plenty of matches with full confidence. If you are wide/big -footed person these are a really competitive option. Just a good combination of light, fast-feeling and durable for hard court play. The price is great for what you get and they aren't bad looking. I really like the white/blue colorway.

Huge thank you to @TW Staff this was an excellent playtest and a nice offering from Babolat for those with wider feet or who play tennis on a budget.
 
Babolat SFX EVO Playtest


Tennis experience/background:

I started playing tennis in high school and was immediately hooked. My competitive nature forced me to improve and I ended up playing intercollegiate tennis in university. I’ve continued to play tennis since then and have always paid meticulous attention to my gear. Over the years I’ve learned to string and customize my own gear and am usually running one test or another at all times.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
I like to play an all-court attacking style of tennis. I enjoy dictating play with my serve and forehand to finish points at the net when possible.

Current shoe: Asics Gel Resolution 9

How many hours did you play with the shoe?
Approximately 30 hours with 3 sessions per week over the course of a month.

Normal Size: 10.5 2E WIDE
Playtesting Size: 10.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:

I was originally worried because if I don’t get 2E wide shoes, the break-in period kills my feet. To my surprise, there was no break-in period with these shoes. They were very roomy, both horizontally and vertically. I did not feel any pressure points on my feet. I can confidently say that I would have been fine with going size 10 with these shoes. The soles felt a bit on the firmer side and did cause some fatigue to my lower legs; although this could just be that I’m getting too old to be playing 3-4 hours per session. The uppers were soft and comfortable, yet provided enough support during lateral movement. After playing ~10 hours with the included insole, I put in my normal orthotics for improved comfort.

-arch support:
This is probably my one knock on the shoe. As someone with high arches, I felt the arch support was lacking. However, as I mentioned above, I did place my arch support orthotics without issue to remedy this shortcoming. If someone with high arches like myself was interested in this shoe, I’d definitely recommend using an orthotic for additional arch support.

-stability/support:
Shoes without lateral support protruding into the uppers usually don’t work for my feet, so I was pleasantly surprised at the level of support I had from The SFX EVOs even though it does not look like there is much in the way of “lateral support tech” from a first glance. My feet felt perfectly locked down into place, especially once I started tying a runners knot with the considerably lengthy laces that are provided. These shoes are slightly less supportive than my Gel Resolution 9s, but at the same time are much softer on the feet. For me, this is probably because I have a foot type to fill these shoes out. I can definitely see someone with narrow feet not getting as much lockdown of their feet as I did.

-ventilation:
I usually don’t pay attention to how hot my feet are feeling during play, but I did for this review. While my feet did feel hotter than the rest of my body, I wouldn’t say they were particularly hotter or colder than they are in my other shoes. I’d imagine the black color variant does get hotter than say a white one would. I’d say the ventilation was pretty average for me because nothing extremely positive or negative really stood out.

-sole durability:
I am not typically a toe dragger, however, I notice most of my shoes have a greatest wear under my left big toe joint, presumably from my excessive running around the backhand to hit forehands. After 30 hours of play, I did not notice any significant wear on the outsole of these shoes as of yet. I’d say the sole durability is top notch, at least from the testing that I’ve been able to do so far. Furthermore, since the outsole feels pretty stiff, I’d imagine it would last quite a long while. I will update the review in case I discover something contrary to what I’ve said already as I continue to play more in these shoes.

-toe durability:
Again, I am not a toe dragger. However, the outsole wraps around pretty high around the toe; and since the outsole seems pretty durable after 30 hours of playing in these shoes, it would follow that the toe is pretty durable. One problem that could arise is if you were to drag the rubbery part just above where the outsole toe protection ends. The rubbery material seems pretty soft and would likely not last too long being dragged on a hard court. The good news is that part is pretty high up the toe and would be difficult to drag for most people.

-traction:
Traction feels just as good as my Asics Gel Resolution 9s. I do not slide on hardcourts and can report that the shoes did not slip even a single time during play. One slight issue I did have was the “screeching” sounds coming from the outsoles whenever I would take small steps to adjust my footwork. It had been a long time since I’ve worn shoes that screeched like this so it was rather noticeable and difficult to ignore. Other than that, the outsole grips the court really well and would probably not work for those looking to slide on hardcourts.

-weight:
These shoes shine for me in the weight department. They feel light and nimble. I barely noticed them on my feet. I was able to take small footwork correctional steps effortlessly and get in position to focus on my strokes instead of having to worry about my footwork. I would rate these shoes pretty highly in the weight category.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
Having 2E WIDE feet with high arches makes it difficult for me in finding the right shoes. I basically have to think twice before I make a shoe purchase. After having tested these shoes, I can confidently say that my experience playing in these shoes was a positive one. Even though I’m a size 10.5, I’d probably try a size 10 next go around. As such, I’d recommend most people to drop down half a size if they were considering purchasing these. These shoes are relatively lightweight, comfortable, supportive, and durable. The lack of proper arch support (speaking only has someone with high arches) can be easily remedied with orthotics. If you are someone with wide feet, I’d recommend taking a serious look at these.

Thank you Babolat and TW for providing this playtest
 
Tennis experience/background:
Former HS and college player.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Baseline plater, but covers the court all around.

Current shoe:
Asics Gel Challengers

How many hours did you play with the shoe?
13 hours singles, 7 hours doubles

Normal Size:
12

Playtesting Size:
12

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):

-comfort:
Very comfortable right out of the box for me. Shoes were a little large in size, as I typically were 12 size in all shoes for decades. Two pairs of socks made fit feel best. Next time, I would get a half size smaller, as that would probably fit ideal.

-arch support:
No issue here. Arch felt in right place, and made a comfortable feel.

-stability/support:
Very surprising that for a light weight shoe, stability and support was good. I have rolled ankles in past with some low supported shoes on the past, and these gripped the feet nice like a glove.

-ventilation:
Feet felt very comfortable , although outdoors was cool weather this time of year, but a number of hours was indoors hitting, and with wearing 2 pairs of socks, feet were not overly hot.

-sole durability:
With the hours I put on shoes, very little wear. This must be a durable sole. The indoor courts have a rubber type surface, and shoes normally do not wear down much, but the outdoor hard courts and the red clay outdoor hitting they held up nice. I most likely will get a great deal of time wearing these before they are worn down.

-toe durability:
I am a semi toe dragger on serves, and these shoes are holding up great. This not an issue for me. For a light weight shoe, it has great durability.

-traction:
On the indoor courts I hit the majority of the time with, those courts have a rubberized surface, and these shoes had good traction, something I did not even have to think about. Also good traction on red clay court, as these shoes can work for hard court and clay.

-weight:
Feels light on feet. I like to run, and cover entire court, so I typically one of my priorities is to get a light weight shoe. These fit the bill. Nice light weight along with stability. Biggest plus of these shoes for me.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
Being a light weight shoe, with stability, comfort, makes this a great show for me. After first outing with these, when I was on court hitting, I really did not even think about those shoes, and that's a great property for tennis shoes to have.
As I said earlier, if I was to get another pair of these, I would down size a half size smaller, as fit was a little big.
This show was a winner for me as I like to run , and cover the court as much as possible, and with these so light, along with stability, it makes it a winner.
Thanks TW.
 
Got to play on clay with these today. More of the same, lightweight, felt secure, super comfortable. Word of caution: don't hit your shoes with your racquet to get the clay off. The lack of rigidity on the outside of this shoe made me hurt my foot with my racquet, oops haha.
 
Friendly reminder: Playtest comments are due by this Friday, April 26th by 5 pm PST.

Thanks,
Brittany, TW
 
Babolat SFX Evo Review:

Tennis Experience/Background: Been playing tennis for over 30 years. Many leagues and tournaments, last rating was 4.5 pre-covid then had some injuries so I'm probably playing at a solid 4.0 level right now.

Playing Style: Mostly baseline in singles but very aggressive in doubles, S&V on both serves, get to net as much as possible.

Current Shoes: K-Swiss Hyper Court Supreme (10) and Adidas SoleMatch Control (10.5)

How Many Hours Did You Play With The Shoe? 17 (10 singles, 7 dubs)

Normal Size: Size 10

Play Testing Size: Size 10.

Comments On Shoe Performance:

-Comfort: These shoes were comfortable right out of the box, which is rare for me. I usually wear shoes for a week or so before playing in them. With the SFX Evo I only wore them a couple hours before playing in them. Although I would go down a 1/2 size in the future, these shoes were still quite comfortable with 2 pairs of socks and my insoles and runner's loop. My feet were not fatigued after 3+ hours on court.

Instep, ankle and heel comfort are excellent on this shoe. Plenty of room in the ankle area but it does not feel loose at all because of the extra eyelet you can use to lock the ankle in with a runner's loop. Really formed the shoes to my feet despite the large volume of the Evo. Midfoot and ankle cushioning is very good. Ankle collar felt fine and quite supportive. The Evo is longer, wider and quite a bit rommier than the Hypercourt Supreme and the SoleMatch Control.

53676994831_804fe21145_c.jpg


-Arch Support: I found arch support to be slightly low with a pretty thin insole but I use aftermarket insoles for extra cushion and arch support.

-Stability/Support: With the comfortable ride and mesh upper I was concerned the Evo would not be the most stable shoe. I was pleasantly surprised to experience good stability with the Evo, even in singles. Once I got my feet properly locked in I could cut aggressively with no worries. I imagine the shoe would be even more nimble and stable a size smaller.

-Ventilation: Ventilation was OK. Honestly, this is something I never really notice. I wear thick socks so they get sweaty with every shoe I wear, this one didn't feel significantly better or worse. Highest temp I played in was low 80's and my feet never felt hot.

-Sole Durability: The outsole is showing some wear but seems pretty durable. I am pretty hard on shoes when hitting singles and these shoes have a lot of rubber under foot so I don't see durability being an issue at all. Definitely more durable than the Hypercourt Supreme, probably about even with the Sole Court Control.

-Toe Durability: The toe area is sturdy. I am not a toe dragger, but the little toe dragging I do had little to no effect on the shoes.

-Traction: The Evo has excellent traction. Didn't feel too slick on worn down courts and didn't feel too grabby on gritty hardcourts. I felt extremely confident moving in these shoes. In fact after the brief break in period I never gave it any thought, which is the best attribute a shoe can have.

-Weight: The Evos (13.5 oz) are a bit heavier than the Hypercourt Supreme and about the same as the SoleMatch Control and although the Evo is a very roomy shoe (and runs long) it does not feel bulky or heavy on court at, they feel pretty light.

General Reaction/Comments On Overall Performance: I was impressed with the SFX Evo. It performed well for me in every catagory, especially comfort. The Evo is roomy in all areas which allows you to customize the fit to match your foot. I would highly recommend this shoe to those with larger feet who value comfort with a good blend of stability and durability.

Thanks to Tennis Warehouse and Babolat for the opportunity of reviewing these shoes!
 
Good evening. First, many thanks to Tennis Warehouse for picking me for this playtest.
unboxing:
AP1GczOstUNZSmezvpoH53oKC7tDBpQNVkrl6rpiIk8B2UzbwiSY4FrcN8sOlQqwz1_K1msrsdjm1GubpwUZ4Y4PwkWURwtXux5aj8JHorYPzVyEFfGZgNRlhgVi4Iq3Jzv6ezxFUXpd70RumdA6y1AD0akX4A=w1411-h1059-s-no-gm


Tennis experience/background: I have been playing tennis for about 32 or so years starting in my 20's. Never played as a junior. I play singles almost exclusively - as in I would rather practice serves than play doubles. I used to play 4.5 USTA league years ago but these days I play really only non-USTA tournaments (sporadically). Judging from the results against currently ranked players I'm still at 4.5 level on a good day. I'm getting older and slower every day - but still trying to play or practice at least every other day.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): I am a baseliner with my game being based on grinding. Compared to other players of similar level I would think my backhand is above average, and my return of serve is the worst. Fairly reliable first and second serve. These days playing perhaps more offensive as I just can't grind as much anymore. I try to play as often as possible on har-tru outdoors but it is obviously not possible year round in *******.

Current shoe: Yonex Eclipsion 3 for har-tru, Yonex FusionRev or K-Swiss or Asics for hard courts. I'm not attached to any particular brand - I've played in Yonex, Adidas, Nike, K-Swiss although never had Babolat shoes. For reference - for me the best shoe ever was Yonex SHT 305 - a perfect blend of weight, cushioning, fit, stability, although not the most durable.

How many hours did you play with the shoe? about 20 playing for points, plus perhaps another 20 practicing

Normal Size: 9.5 Sometimes I need to go to size 10 to fit inserts.

Playtesting Size: asked for 9.5 as I've read these Babolats run big so I figured even with inserts they should not be too small.

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
let me pre-face the review with the following. I really wanted to have nothing but good words about these shoes. You know, with it being essentially a gift. But one needs to be fair...

-comfort: 5/5 one has to start with the sizing. I do not know what Babolat was thinking here. Sure, they are advertised as 'run big and for wide feet' but for me this was way too much. I felt as if these shoes are 3/4 size larger than the size would suggest. Even with insole inserts they were, let's say, very roomy. Not only long but the entire front area width and height wise is just big. That being said, or because of that, they are very comfy. No break in needed. I suppose the verdict depends on what you use these shoes for. If you need shoes to use for after-match cooldown/stretching, while the feet are tired and swollen - these are perfect. If you need them as a coach for hours and hours of feeding the balls - great as well. If you need them for match play - you would be wise to order probably even a full size smaller than normal size. For me they felt 'too comfy' so to speak, as in not a performance shoes for serious play. More like walking/workout/all-around shoe.

-arch support: 2/5 - These days I religiously use inserts, and I think if you ever have arch related issue inserts are must have with these shoes. The footbed area is pretty flat, I would be worried to use these Babolats with stock inserts only.

-stability/support: 3/5 - Perhaps having a smaller size would help. With the 'regular' size no amount of lace cinching would firmly secure my feet. The issue is in the front, the heel locks in nicely, no problems there. The sole is also a bit 'suspect' - like too soft/gummy. With few days of nice spring weather I had a chance to play on har-tru and thankfully I did not hit the sole too hard when trying to shake off clay - because I felt it.

-ventilation: 2/5 - probably the most disappointing part of the shoe. The upper is made of what looks like mesh-like material, and one would expect it to provide plenty of ventilation. But there's none of it. They are no better than a full-leather shoe. A bit surprising for sure, honestly expected these shoes to excel in this category.

-sole durability: 4/5 - probably the most positive surprise. Maybe it's because my first time with Babolat. By the look of the sole, as its gummy-like feel one would expect them to show visible wear fairly quickly. But I have not noticed any. Granted, I'm not a toe dragger, and in general I do not wear out shoes that much. But still, a very pleasant surprise.

-toe durability: 4/5 - these are nicely designed in the toe are, with rubbery-like material between the sole and the mesh covering the rest of the shoe. It is a bit hard for me to judge that aspect of the shoe as I have literally never worn any shoe out in the toe area. Definitely no issues that I have observed, but probably others that employ more sliding would have better analysis.

-traction: 5/5 - No complains at all. No slippage, nice grip. Perhaps my mind was playing tricks on me but with gummy-like feel of the sole I had the impression they 'glue' to the court in a good way.

-weight: 4/5 - pretty good. Again, these are perfect for post-match cooldown, when you need something light, big, and comfy to let your feet rest. They feel light taken out of the box, and they are indeed definitely not on a heavy side. My 9.5 size came in at around 360g.
AP1GczOst-AoH28PQW2izgeqbcwy9X834cQAe1VZ66VobNzK5HDzq2aOTERylqLSNdqo_D7odLlLLRD4TmN27MHgUqRKioAYsE_xrrxf6c39FFnYZ3iXTSwEgYcczWfGWQW7KxDZkkS__AoHjVkXZKl8glHJJw=w1411-h1059-s-no-gm


General reaction/comments on overall performance: 5/5 - I'm torn a bit. First anybody should be warned about the sizing - these are not your regular 'running a bit too big' shoes, these are like: if you wear 10 get yourself 9 they might be tad too small but will likely stretch to be just right. If Babolat's intention was to make an inexpensive, light all-around shoe - these are great. But I can't with clean conscience say they are on par with performance shoes let's say like Mizuno Enforce or Yonex PowerCushion. They are good but perhaps not great looking. Now that I think of it, given that the entire upper shoe is made out of mesh like material I would actually think they should be even lighter. As a final thought - if you are looking for a reasonably priced all-around shoe you can use for workout, cooldown, and some light on-court tennis activity - nothing wrong with a pair of Babolat SFX Evo.
 

Playtest: Babolat SFX EVO​


SFXevo.jpg


Tennis experience/background:
Late bloomer with 15+ years playing tennis at different levels. Currently plays mostly recreational singles tennis at level 4.5. Also an experienced Stringer and official tennis equipment consultant for the local club. Also enjoy random tennis talks.

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Counter puncher. Pushing opponents to compromised positions and using their own pace to finish the point is a usual play. Enjoy building the point slowly, even though I can be more aggressive from the baseline if needed.

Current shoe:
Prince T22 Lite

How many hours did you play with the shoe?
22 Hrs

Normal Size:
10.5

Playtesting Size:
10.5

Comments on shoe performance (3-5 sentences per category):
-comfort:

Excellent. This is what the shoe is made for. Comfort++++. I have tried other SFX series shoes in the past, and so it was not a surprise to me that this new SFX EVO also doesn’t disappoint anyone who is looking for a very comfortable shoe, especially for folks who like slightly more room in forefoot/front. Lot of room, very soft uppers and mesh, low-arch, with really comfy insoles. I am pretty sure, you won’t be in a hurry to change to your sneakers after a long tennis match. This shoe may even be more comfortable than your daily sneakers to walk around.

-arch support:
Excellent. There is good enough arch support. But if you need any extreme support you may still have to depend on your personal insoles. The provided insoles provide very good support for medium to low arch shaped foots. These are orthodontic insoles.

-stability/support:
Adequate for most adult rec play. But below Average for aggressive movements in higher levels of play. This is definitely a conscious trade off when creating an extremely comfortable tennis shoe for the larger percentage of recreational players. The uppers and the mesh-side materials are so soft, flexible and comfortable, so that it does not provide the “rigid” feel needed for extreme change in directions from side to side. Of course it is better than a normal running shoe, and there are extra internal layers + some extra outside material on the side of the shoe to provide some extra support. In summary this is not the shoe for everyone, but the provided support/stability should be enough for most recreational players. For some, it may be worth having a daily tennis shoe(SFX Evo) and another pair of non-as-comfortable, but stable shoes for that once in a while competitive match play.

-ventilation:
Excellent. The mesh material does breath really good, and allows for good ventilation. Folks who live in humid areas or sweat a lot would really appreciate the design and materials of SFX EVO.

-sole durability:
Good. The Micheline sole is made with less hard material and allows for some bounciness. So comfort is still a design goal here. The michelin rubber sole is definitely more durable that it may appear at first. But again, there are definitely other shoes which have more durable soles (at the cost of comfort). After 22hrs of use I don’t see any drastic/alarming wear.

-toe durability:
Excellent. I am not a toe dragger. I still do wear out the toe a lot faster than other areas of the sole. In SFX EVO also I do see the same trend, but the toe sole materials are thick and the stitch/build in this area with the uppers are of good quality. I also like the fact that the rubber soles come around in this part, so you are pressing your toe against the sole when doing hard stops. So in general it appears that the build quality is solid in the toe part of the shoe, and less things to worry about.

-traction:
Excellent. In fact the traction by itself is excellent, because of the premium quality sole. I used the shoe on a couple of misty/wet mornings, and the shoe does provide confidence even on slightly slippery surfaces. But that being said, don’t expect that you can take advantage of this traction for extremely aggressive change of directions. Even though the shoe can and will stop on a dime, you may not feel enough confidence to press against the soft uppers, which is required for aggressive change of directions.

-weight:
This is probably a personal preference. The shoe is definitely towards the lighter side. Compared to my Prince T22, Babolat SFX EVO is a lot lighter. I personally prefer heavier shoes especially on a more competitive match, since it provides a feel of stability for me on court, even though it may be slowing me down. But a lot of my friends like lighter shoes.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
Comfort is the keyword here. SFX EVO is definitely more roomy in the front and I definitely recommend this shoe to someone looking for a roomy cushioning and comfortable shoe. That being said, no one size fits all. If what you really want is a sports car, don’t go and buy a comfy luxury car. If you are a high performance junior, and are extremely aggressive on the change of directions etc, you may have better options (of course at the cost of comfort). On the other hand, if you are an adult recreational player, even at high levels, you may be willing to trade slight quickness for comfort and longevity of your tennis. For example if you are an adult player who struggles to play on continuous days, because of foot pain or even general leg pain, you may prefer SFX EVO. I personally use two different pairs of shoes nowadays, one for a more competitive match day, and other for less competitive match plays and casual hitting days. SFX may not replace my most confident match shoe, but can be my casual hitting and practice match shoe. Also this is a very good looking shoe, especially in black color. If you usually wear sneakers to your workplace, and you go to work after tennis, you may not have to carry around another comfortable sneaker around for those days. It won’t look out of place, like many other tennis shoes. Essentially Babolat SFX EVO is one of the best in the specific market category.

Thanks Babolat and TW for this great playtest experience.
 
Babolat SFX EVO Tennis Shoes: A Playtest Review

As a recreational tennis player who moonlights in USTA leagues, I’ve spent a good chunk of my life chasing fuzzy yellow balls across the court. My playing style? Picture a mix between a stealthy ninja and a ballet dancer – mostly baselining with full court coverage in singles, and aggressive net play in doubles. I’m all about ball placement and finesse, with occasional bursts of “I’m going to smash this overhead like I’m Thor wielding Mjölnir.”

Now, let’s talk shoes. My previous kicks were the Head Revolt Pro, but I’ve got a soft spot for K-Swiss due to their wider fit. Enter the Babolat SFX EVO – a shoe that promises comfort, stability, and maybe even a dash of French flair. I laced up, hit the courts, and here’s my take:
  1. Comfort: The SFX EVO is like slipping your feet into a cloud made of marshmallow fluff. The flexible rubber outsole and Ortholite insole cradle your soles like a supportive hug from your tennis-loving grandma. The synthetic upper? Soft as a kitten’s belly. No hot spots, no grumbling feet – just pure cushy goodness. And that roomy forefoot? It’s a VIP lounge for your toes. Just be warned: the upper expands a smidge after a few hours of play, so choose your size wisely.
  2. Arch Support: These shoes are the shock absorbers of the tennis world. I sprinted, zigzagged, and leaped for overheads like a caffeinated squirrel, and my arches stayed happy campers. No pain, no drama – just solid support. Even my knees gave a nod of approval. Babolat, you’ve got my arches’ vote.
  3. Stability/Support: Listen, I’m no shoe tech guru, but I know when my feet are misbehaving. The SFX EVO kept my tootsies in check. That soft upper material? It didn’t let my feet slide around like a greased-up banana peel. Nope, they stayed planted, ready for sudden direction changes or emergency stops. Pro tip: tighten those laces and maybe throw in an extra pair of socks (because why not?). Oh, and there’s an extra eyelet for a heel lock – fancy, right?
  4. Ventilation: My feet stayed cooler than a cucumber in a snowstorm. Granted, I played indoors on hard courts, so I can’t vouch for Sahara-level sweat situations. But hey, no complaints here. Ventilation? Check. Comfort? Double check.
  5. Sole Durability: The outsole’s holding up like a champ – no signs of wear yet. I’m not exactly a shoe-shredding tornado, but these babies have some mileage left. My only worry? That Ortholite insole. I’ve seen it wear out faster than a toddler’s patience at bedtime. Fingers crossed that Babolat’s version is sturdier.
  6. Traction: The Michelin outsole – yes, like the tire brand – grips like a gecko on a glass window. No sliding, no slipping. My playstyle demands quick moves – acceleration, direction changes, and sudden stops. The rubber even squeaks a bit, like it’s saying, “Hey, buddy, you’re doing great – keep those feet moving!”
  7. Weight: At first, I thought these shoes were smuggling bricks. But guess what? Once I got used to them, it felt like walking on air. Or maybe like floating on a cloud made of marshmallow fluff (see point #1). Either way, they’re comfy, and that’s what matters.
Final Verdict: The SFX EVO is that unassuming superhero who saves the day without flashy capes or laser beams. They’re simple, effective, and surprisingly stylish. Babolat shoes might not be the talk of the town in my area, but I’ve converted a few souls. So, here’s to another customer won – and to many more matches in my trusty SFX EVOs.

PS: Playtest duration: over 20 hours; My regular shoe size: 10; Playtest size: 10 (recommend going down 0.5)
 
Last edited:
Ah, shoot I'm a tad late on the review, apologies! But I've gotten well over 30+ hours so here's my review:

Tennis experience/background: Just got into 4.0 and now playing against 4.0/4.5 buddies (4.0 for official matches)
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): aggressive baseliner (trying to approach net more, but 90% of game will be around the baseline)
Current shoe: (Fila Axilus 2)
How many hours did you play with the shoe? (30-40)
Normal Size: 9 Wide or 9.5 normal
Playtesting Size: 9

Comments on shoe performance:

-comfort/fit: These shoes were very comfortable. They are obviously on the larger end as they cater to wide feet. You would have to size down if you're used to like Nike sizing, and I would argue, it's possible to size than even a full size (but half is probably safest). Even the length felt a tad longer than that of my other size 9 shoes, given, not as noticeable as the width, but it's still there. I had my feet cramped in a few other shoes, and these shoes did not ever make it feel straining on my feet and always comforted in a thick and soft shoe. 4/5

-arch support: The insoles were great. I felt as though I had the support I needed inside but they were on the thinner side and after 20+ hours, the soles would slip a tad being relatively thin. However, compared to other tennis shoes, it wasn't really anything drastic or worse. The soles were relatively low and provided all of the arch support that I needed, but if you want more support, I'd suggest adding your own insoles to them especially if the arch does not fit your foot shape. 4/5

-stability/support: I think this shoe had OKAY support. I felt that it priortized being roomy for all types of feet, but it was very easy to lose stability when going for aggressive or shots on the run. Felt like this was where I felt like I would love the shoe on a consistent basis, but in a tournament setting, I may have other preferences. I have wide feet, so I don't think this is a sizing issue, but if someone were to go their size in these shoes without, I would assume their experience would even be worse significantly. If anyone slides or drags their feet, these shoes may not save your life! 3/5

-ventilation: Definitely a strength of these shoes. The ventilatiion was there and the mesh design, I constantly felt the breeze through the shoes. My worst area of sweating is probably my feet, and these shoes held up in keeping my feet cool (and less sweat-smelly than other shoes, a big plus, haha). 5/5

-Combining toe/sole durability: DURABILITY is TOP NOTCH. I wear out my shoes QUICKLY. I AM a toe dragger, and my soles vanish much quicker than I would like. The reason I even switched to Fila Axilus II is because they were on the cheaper end, cater to wide feet, and I can replace them faster. Now, with these michelin SFX EVO, durability is TOP notch. I do see wear in them, but in the same amount of time as other shoes, it is noticeably much more alive and both the soles and toe durability are still very evident. I can see it wearing down, but I would even say it is taking MORE THAN twice as long compared to the last 2-3 shoes I've tried. So now I have a shoe that is on the cheaper end and needs to be replaced less? May consider grabbing another! Major props, 5/5 here.

-traction: I felt like the traction was great. Not perfect, but really really good. There were plenty of times that I thought the traction was perfect moving one direction, but when I had to change directions quickly, I felt that the traction was not as noticeable. But that is just me being picky, and even on slightly wet mornings, I never felt any major slippage or concerns and think that the traction was also a pretty strong point for the shoe. 4/5

-weight: opposed to others in this playtest... I actually wish the shoe was lighter or bouncier (less to do with weight). I felt like I was wearing anchors initially when I started the play test, but I've grown accustomed to them. However, yesterday, I went back to slipping on 2 of my previous shoes, and it was night and day. But I guess the appeal of the SFX EVO isn't necessarily a speed shoe. So if you're used to something made for speed, I wouldn't recommend this shoe, but there are plenty of other reasons why one should consider this shoe. 3.5/5

Overview:
Yes, I would recommend this shoe to many. Durability is amazing. Traction and support are great. Fits well on my feet. All at a lower price point. As long as these shoes fit you, you WILL get bang for your buck. That is a guarantee. For the lower price point, this shoe does much better overall than some shoes at a much higher price point. Again, props to Babolat for creating this as I do think it fills a niche in the market that has an audience it can market to.

Thank you so much TW and Babolat for the play test, and I apologize for the late review (won't happen again)!
 
wait so how do these compar to regular sfx 3? They are said to be a small takedown to the sfx 3 and that a sfx 4 is coming but do they feel so?
Upper is more bargain material
Midsole/cushioning is average, probably slightly firmer for durability.
Outsole high-end Michelin-branded rubber

Overall, yes they are priced as a budget/affordably priced shoe.
 
Back
Top