Tennis Warehouse Playtest - Dunlop Srixon CX Racquets

Wait is over. Received the CX 200 16x19 so now I know which racquet I will be playtesting. Great looking racquet and head shape is very different than what I am used to.

OwDy1EH.jpg


The racquet came strung which was a pleasant surprise. @TW Staff can you please tell what string it is strung up with?

I will be taking it out for a hit in a few minutes. Initial thought is that it very light and whippy and that it will need some weight to make it more stable and authoritative enough for me. Will report back soon. My final review will have all specs RDC checked as well.
 
Wait is over. Received the CX 200 16x19 so now I know which racquet I will be playtesting. Great looking racquet and head shape is very different than what I am used to.

OwDy1EH.jpg


The racquet came strung which was a pleasant surprise. @TW Staff can you please tell what string it is strung up with?

I believe TW said it would be strung with Dunlop Silk in the email with the play tester instructions. Interesting, the head shape reminds me of the Prince Warrior / Beast - elongated and narrower in the throat and lower hoop versus the upper. But the box beam that transitions to a pressed oval near the tip is unique.
 
Is the frame of the 16x19 really thick at the 12 o’clock? It looks so in the image, was hoping for 20.5 mm beam like the 18x20

Edit: This may be the non-tour version, which at that point disregard.
 
I got the 200 Tour 16x19. It weighs in at 325 grams strung with 16 gauge Dunlop Silk. I popped off the buttcap trap door and it is clean on the inside, so there is plenty of opportunity to add some silicone or bluetac inside the handle if you are so inclined. It is listed at 10 points headlight UNstrung, which makes it really well suited to customize in a variety of ways. I’ll play it stock with Luxilon Elite Dry overgrip and maybe a dampener.

The paint job looks great with a mix of glossy red and matte black. The boxy throat feels great in hand. Also, the head guard is channeled up top, so they’ve eliminated the chance of strings scraping the court on the outside of the frame from 10:00 to 2:00.
 
Last edited:
Is the frame of the 16x19 really thick at the 12 o’clock? It looks so in the image, was hoping for 20.5 mm beam like the 18x20

Edit: This may be the non-tour version, which at that point disregard.
On the 200 Tour: I have calipers that are made for testing how fat I have gotten. So, not the most exact with fractions of a millimeter. That said, it looks like the width is pretty close up top as compared to the throat (maybe 20.5 all the way around). You can feel with your finger where the frame goes from boxy to a little more curved at about the 5th cross from the top. It is at that point where I think any minute difference in thickness would be related to the curve.
 
Wait is over. Received the CX 200 16x19 so now I know which racquet I will be playtesting. Great looking racquet and head shape is very different than what I am used to.

OwDy1EH.jpg


The racquet came strung which was a pleasant surprise. @TW Staff can you please tell what string it is strung up with?

I will be taking it out for a hit in a few minutes. Initial thought is that it very light and whippy and that it will need some weight to make it more stable and authoritative enough for me. Will report back soon. My final review will have all specs RDC checked as well.
Yeah, I was going to post the pic of mine, but its the 200+, which looks the same. I'm really liking the graphics and the PJ: Flat black w/ gloss red. Not overly busy (like the previous version), but not boring (like recent 'CV' paintjobs). Perfect balance IMO. And I also like how the stencil blends w/ the red graphic. Unfortunately, I don't have a Dunlop stencil.

I cut the strings out & restrung it w/ YPTP at 48lbs, but, before I did, I put it on the scale: 306g unstrung (will post pic in my review). Not bad as specs say 305g.

Playing doubles indoors in under an hour. Will report back my initial thoughts.
 
So, initial thoughts: Really like this frame. Solid & stable from the ground, good pop off the serve, good feel (not too stiff, not mushy). Its firm, but comfortable. Don't know what the flex is, but I'd say it feels close to my Black Granite Pro No 1s, which were 62. I'd also put it on mid-low end of the power range. Think of a Pure Control/Storm in a 16x19 pattern. Am looking forward to more hits w/ it.
 
Received my CX200 this afternoon. Strung and equipped with a Wilson Pro overgrip and Sampras O-style dampener it checks in at 328g; in my experience this means it should be around the advertised 305g unstrung. It measures at 5.5pt HL, which is a bit less head light than I expected. My first impressions are that the paint job is nice, but clearly designed to work with the stencil. Too bad I never stencil my own string jobs. :) The grip is towards the longer end, make it two-handed backhand friendly, and it includes a rubber ring that helps tidy up the top of the overgrip installation. The head is long and narrow, longer than any other 98 I have on hand for quick comparison, and there is a definite change in the geometry around 10:30 and 1:30. Main string spacing is relatively even but the crosses are much more dense in the center. I plan to start playing with it tomorrow morning.
 
Last edited:
I got my CX 200 Tour 18x20 yesterday and strung it up today. First thing I noticed is that, while it's an 18 main racquet, there's only 6 holes in the throat. Usually if I see 6 holes in the throat it's a 16 main racquet, and if it has 8 then it could be either 16 or 18 mains, but is probably more likely to be 18 mains. That's not scientific, just what I've seen with racquets that I've handled. My usually stick has 16 mains with 8 holes in the throat, so I'm interested to see how this compares.

Unstrung Specs
Weight: 311g (4 grams under)
Balance: 310mm (dead on)
Flex: 65 (one over)
Swing Weight: 277

Strung Specs - Setup how I will play with it, with 17 gauge Dunlop NT Max Plus at 48 pounds, Tourna MegaTac overgrip, and round vibration dampener.
Weight: 340g
Balance: 318mm
Flex: 61
Swing Weight: 310

Specs were measured on an RDC. I will hit with it as is for a while. After a few hitting sessions or when I decide to restring I will do some customizing to bring up the swing weight among other things. I will include my thoughts both pre- and post-customization in my review.
 
Last edited:
Unlike Dunlop’s recent paint jobs, these rackets actually look really nice. Can’t wait to hear how they play.
 
Received mine yesterday. Haven't gotten more than a few games worth of play time but man, it really is a great looking stick. TW and Dunlop rolling out the red carpet with the velvet-y racquet cover and extra packs of different flavored strings. Will post full review later.
 
After an epic two day battle with UPS I finally got my CX 200 18x20. Got to hit it for an hour in stock for. I can already tell that this is an impressive frame. I currently play with a leaded up 4D 200 with a leather grip (about 12.8oz and 340sh SW. Tho of course not a stable as my usual racquet but for it's weight, damn close in how stable it felt.

Can wait to put some time on the frame and to customize it to my spec and my string of choice.

Good time ahead.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
Got my Tour 16x19 today. Getting ready to do a 1.5 hr clinic. Measured it at 331g, 308sw, 32.3cm balance. Strung with Silk 1.32. I also had a Yonex Supergrap. No dampener.

Looks great. Curious to see how it handles a full multi setup.
 
CX 200 + update:

I got out to hit again today, but unfortunately I only logged about 5 minutes with it. The kid I was hitting with (one of the top high school players in my area) is looking to change frames. He's currently using the Aero VS, and has tried a few other frames over the past few weeks (DR98, X Force, Strike, etc.). Well...

After hitting a few balls, I let him hit with it for 'a few minutes'. 50 minutes later he was asking if he could hold on to it for a few days. Of course I said 'uhhhh, no', but I did tell him he could hit with it the next time we're on the court. Compared to how he hits w/ the Aero VS, he definitely was hitting a heavier ball. His serve was practically untouchable, but he's already a big kid (6' 2"), and has long arms, so the 27 1/2" is going to give him a little more leverage. But, on average, I'd say he was definitely hitting a bigger ball. So, from the other side of the court, I'd say this frame has a tad more power & spin than the Aero VS.
 
Got my Tour 16x19 today. Getting ready to do a 1.5 hr clinic. Measured it at 331g, 308sw, 32.3cm balance. Strung with Silk 1.32. I also had a Yonex Supergrap. No dampener.

Looks great. Curious to see how it handles a full multi setup.
Not much to report yet. I dislike this Dunlop Silk string profoundly. Squishy, dull, muted. Will restring tomorrow with a poly and come back with some useful info.
 
CX 200 + update:

I got out to hit again today, but unfortunately I only logged about 5 minutes with it. The kid I was hitting with (one of the top high school players in my area) is looking to change frames. He's currently using the Aero VS, and has tried a few other frames over the past few weeks (DR98, X Force, Strike, etc.). Well...

After hitting a few balls, I let him hit with it for 'a few minutes'. 50 minutes later he was asking if he could hold on to it for a few days. Of course I said 'uhhhh, no', but I did tell him he could hit with it the next time we're on the court. Compared to how he hits w/ the Aero VS, he definitely was hitting a heavier ball. His serve was practically untouchable, but he's already a big kid (6' 2"), and has long arms, so the 27 1/2" is going to give him a little more leverage. But, on average, I'd say he was definitely hitting a bigger ball. So, from the other side of the court, I'd say this frame has a tad more power & spin than the Aero VS.
The classic inverted playtest. Tricky!
 
@McLovin got me drooling
Wasn't it you who went on an extended racquet quest a while back? I seem to remember a thread on demoing extended frames. I was actually thinking of that thread when I was posting, that you (or whoever started that thread) should definitely give this a swing.
 
Wasn't it you who went on an extended racquet quest a while back? I seem to remember a thread on demoing extended frames. I was actually thinking of that thread when I was posting, that you (or whoever started that thread) should definitely give this a swing.
Yes that was me. I have since tried to mod frames to extended length, failed, and picked up the last L2 Storm Ltd+ I could find over here.

Would love to try that frame one day.
 
I am playtesting the 18x20. I have drilled with it twice and played two USTA League matches, 4.0 and 4.5 dubs. I added a Wilson Pro overgrip and a PEACE dampener. I try to stay away from measurements, at least initially, and play by feel. I drilled with the racquet straight out of the box and if that were the extent of the playtest, I was not impressed. Fortunately, I used it in two USTA matches. I played the first set of each match with my usual racquet (customized DR 100) and the second set with the Dunlop/Srixon. In both cases my play picked up with the Dunlop. Fewer UEs, better control, incresed maneuverability at the net and service game holds were the norm with the Dunlop/Srixon. I wish I knew what the starting tension was on the string the racquet came with (Silk?), it has loosened up a bit. I will have pics as soon as I create room on my phone. I will be hitting this weekend and get commentary from my hitting partner. Thanks TW and Dunlop/Srixon. I would suggest lovers of control racquets and "old school" feel give this a demo. More to come.
 
I have about 8 hours on the racquet by now. I am using Dunlop Silk (one it came strung with) for my playtest. My stringer is off for the next week so it works out in the end. I like the racquet in all departments thus far. Except for lack of weight - as I predicted earlier - I did not find any downsides. My detailed review will be up early next week as I would have put considerable amount of hours on the racquet by then. Definitely a decent contender in it's weight class. I must mention that I am doing the playtest stock without any weight added (minus OG and dampener).
 
Who else is playtesting the 16x19 Tour?
I have the 16x19 Tour. I like it so far. Will be able to get a couple of matches in this weekend. It has been a week of rain since I received the racquet. I found some time on a damp court while no rain was falling to hit on the wall and hit serves. Definitely not enough to form an opinion yet
 
I have the 16x19 Tour. I like it so far. Will be able to get a couple of matches in this weekend. It has been a week of rain since I received the racquet. I found some time on a damp court while no rain was falling to hit on the wall and hit serves. Definitely not enough to form an opinion yet
Please, any comments on the launch angle with this racquet so far?. Thanks

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
I have the 16x19 Tour. I like it so far. Will be able to get a couple of matches in this weekend. It has been a week of rain since I received the racquet. I found some time on a damp court while no rain was falling to hit on the wall and hit serves. Definitely not enough to form an opinion yet
Have you noticed how close they drilled the crosses? It’s the tightest cross string section thru the middle of the hoop of any racquet I own which includes the Wilson Ultra Tour.
 
Please, any comments on the launch angle with this racquet so far?. Thanks

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Relatively low on my CX200, especially for a 16x19. But I'm sure that 1.32mm multi it came strung with contributed to my impression. I just restrung with a hybrid and dropped the tension in the crosses, and tomorrow I will see if it makes a difference.
 
Have you noticed how close they drilled the crosses? It’s the tightest cross string section thru the middle of the hoop of any racquet I own which includes the Wilson Ultra Tour.
Yep, i’d say the 8-10 crosses surrounding 3 and 9 o’clock are pretty even if not slightly closer than on my Angell TC95 18x20.

It does seem like the launch angle is lower than I expected, which i’m hoping turns out to be true.
 
I played a set with the Tour 16x19 tonight. Pretty good stuff. Definitely more inherent power in the frame than my Prince Textreme Tour 95. More control too. Not as much spin and a lower launch angle. The feel is pretty dampened. Not as crisp as I’d like, but it’s not a noodle by any means. Needs the “Troy Lara” treatment of a leather grip and some weight in the hoop.
 
Please, any comments on the launch angle with this racquet so far?. Thanks

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
It has a relatively low launch angle. I found it to be similar to what I get out of the Ultra Tour. I pretty much get the height over the net that I ask for an nothing more. It’s fairly predictable. So far so good.
 
Still early on my playtest of the CX 200 tour 18x20 but I have some good thoughts on how I will continue my test.

I gave the frame a fair try stock form with the string provided and the racquet and string combo was quite serviceable. The string work fine and the racquet was impressively stable ( for it's weight). I couldn't play effectively with it tho, not at this weight. I was able to hit fine and the lightness of the frame came in handy a few time in the few tiebrakes I used it for. my spin service were pretty good but I needed a lot more mass to feel like I could serve like usually do. So I ended up going back to my weighted up 4D 200 18x20 ( 12.8oz, 340ish SW).

Overall, I was just swing too fast and not hitting the ball as cleanly because of it.

I decided to had some weight to the hoop and handle. Got it to 12.2oz and 9 point HL. Worked better but not enough there yet.

Now I'm at 12.5oz 9 point HL. ( 10grams in the hoop: 9grams at 3 and 9oclock and one gram at 12 o'clock. I counter balance by putting 13grams of tungsten potty inside the handle. This ought to be enough to work with my usual swing speed while still being a little lighter than my usual set up.

I'm also going to be re stringing with my usual set up: Poly Tour Spin 16L in the mains at 55lb and gosen micro syn guy 16 ( which I Prefer stretch) in the crosses at 57lb.


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
The first thing that I noticed about the 16x19 tour is the weight. For a "tour" mold, this frame feels feather light especially when compared to my Aerogel 200 tour. I hit just a few balls and the plow through compared to the weight is impressive.

There is so much smoke in this part of the world right now, most schools and colleges are being closed for a few days. The recommendation is to not even go outside if you don't really have to, much less play tennis, because of the unhealthy air. Hopefully it will clear out in a few days and I can give this a real good workout.
 
The first thing that I noticed about the 16x19 tour is the weight. For a "tour" mold, this frame feels feather light especially when compared to my Aerogel 200 tour. I hit just a few balls and the plow through compared to the weight is impressive.

There is so much smoke in this part of the world right now, most schools and colleges are being closed for a few days. The recommendation is to not even go outside if you don't really have to, much less play tennis, because of the unhealthy air. Hopefully it will clear out in a few days and I can give this a real good workout.
It is too light. No question. But low swingweight, low static weight means it’s designed for customization. And the good news is that it handles customization nicely.

My customized specs:

Static weight: 346g (12.2 oz)
Swingweight: 327
Balance: 31.2cm (9 points HL)

I added a Babolat Natural Leather replacement grip and 4x 5 inch strips of .25in lead tape to the hoop at 12 o’clock (5 grams). I have a full bed of Tecnifibre Black Code 4S 1.25mm with no dampener. And a Yonex Supergrap overgrip.

This is my ideal spec and this racquet feels perfect to me now. But if you wanted more swingweight, I’m positive it would handle it beautifully.
 
Last edited:
Folks, just came back from hitting with my playtest racquet. I have about 12 hours on the racquet by now. I am working on my final review and updating it as well everytime I come back from my session. Once I have 15-16 hours on the racquet, I will present my final review. So far except for volleys, the racquet is decent in it's weight class. Will provide more in-depth view in final review. Cheers.
 
I did some playing with the "CX Tour 18x20", and stock strings broke. So trying to restring before for my weekend hitting. And need to figure out the tie-off places for mains and crosses on two piece stringing. I can possibly guess it, but would like to see the official verdict. @TW Staff any inputs ?
 
@M Pillai,
Main tie-offs are 9 head (9 holes over from center on both sides). For the cross tie-off at the top of the head use hole 6 (6th hole over from center). Use hole 7 for your bottom cross tie off (7th hole from center at the bottom of the hoop). I strung mine with Cyclone, and did it as a one piece, since the main strings end at the top of the head.

Troy, TW
 
Looking forward to reading reviews of the Tour 16x19 (95 sq in) and non-Tour 16x19 (98 sq in).

- Is Sonic Core with Infinergy a legit technology?
- What is the effect of Power Grid String Tech on launch angle?
- Can anyone do a direct comparison with the Dunlop Aerogel 4D 200 Tour (16x18)?
 
I played 3 sets of doubles with the 16x19 Tour tonight. Launch angle was low, which is perfect for me. I normally play with a 95 sq in 18x20 racquet and felt the launch angle on the Dunlop was pretty similar.

During play, I didn’t feel any comfort problems (I have a sensitive wrist from a TFCC tear 15 months ago). I’ll update this if there is any soreness when I wake up tomorrow.

By the time we finished it was 41 degrees. That said, depth control was very good. There were several times I thought I hit just long or wide, but my opponents said the balls dove in by a few inches. Could be the weather, could be the racquet. We’ll see.

For now, i’m VERY impressed with this stick. My one handed backhand was very strong tonight. I’m looking forward to lots more testing.
 
Well, I finally got back in town late this week and took this bad boy (CX 200 16x19 TOUR) out to hit for 3 hours yesterday, and another 1.5 hours tonight.
Initial Observations:
- I LOVE the paint scheme, and overall aesthetics of the racquet. I won't try to rehash too much whats already been said above, but I will say that the black matte, with glossy red accent is very catching. When I was at my local club yesterday evening, people noticed the racquet, inquired about it, and wanted to hit some with it. The red paint scheme, when paired with the "Dunlop" stencil was thoughtfully laid out which was cool. I also like the fact Dunlop put a lot more specification info on the inner throat than most other manufacturers (i.e. Stiffness, etc). I have a lot of familiarity with Wilson, Babolat, and Head racquets and I can say the grip geometry is most closely associated with the Babolat style grips. Meaning, the octagon isn't quite as "circular" as a Wilson, but not anywhere near as elliptical/oval as the Head grips. With a Gamma Supreme Overgrip, dampener, and head tape, the racquet measured in at 344g (12.10oz). One other thing of note, and you can hopefully see in the side-by-sides below, the grip is in fact a little longer than the other pictures shown- so if you have very large hands, and prefer a 2hbh, you might like this.

I laid out a side-by-side comparison of some other frames I have- from R to L: the Dunlop CX 200 Tour (95sq in- 16x19), Pure Storm Tour (98sq in-16x20), ProStaff 97 (97sq in- 16x19), and Six.One 95 (95sq in- 16x18).

Hopefully the picture above outlines the dense arrangement of the string pattern even compared to the 16x18 Wilson Six.One.

My initial thoughts are generally very positive with this racquet. I'd say it plays quite similarly to the Babolat Pure Storm Tour / Control Tour line up. However, it has an even more plush feeling to it with no sense of a hollow feeling to it- which would be expected from its low stiffness (RA64) rating. Coming from someone who had major elbow issues a few years back this racquet was very arm friendly. Normally when I hit with my Storm I can feel soreness in my elbow but even after hitting back to back days, and 3 hours on the first day, my elbow (along with my shoulder and wrist) all feel GREAT- which, for me, is a HUGE plus with this frame. I found this racquet to really be all about control- as long as I kept the ball near the center of the frame I could play my shots with lethal accuracy. It's a very nice player's frame- I'm finding I have to swing through it and I really felt connected to the ball- a lot like my Storm Tour. I didn't feel my balls were launching out of control on me unless I hit a ball way off center than the launch angle was noticeably increased. For regular ground strokes, given the dense string pattern I found the launch angle to be relatively low and as I would expect it be. I could generate ample spin with the ball with my 1hbh and forehand. Volley's are solid as well. I'm going to hit with it again tomorrow and try and focus a little more on my serve with this racquet- I think I can get more out of it than I did initially with a little more use. Overall, initially it plays very similar to the Pure Storm Tour model- it doesn't sacrifice control for cheap power- it will reward you for hitting through the ball with solid strokes. I'm very pleased with this racquet initially. I'll continue to post more after Sunday as i'll have a few more hours logged on it.
 
Would be interesting to see your comparison with other racquets you have...I think you use a Prince 93P now?
Yes, 93P is in the bag and I do take it out every now and then but I will mostly be comparing this CX 200 with my Pure Storms as they are a closer match in feedback.

And no way is the CX 200 in the same league as 93P in stock form. I'm being brutally honest here. Straight out of the box, the 93P is heads and shoulders above CX 200 in every department. Not sure of comparison between the two is an apt one though given completely different specs of the two.

I haven't weighted up the CX 200 for this playtest as I wanted to give feedback stock. I am sure it will be a different playing stick once weighted up :)
 
it will be a different playing stick once weighted up

Would be interesting to hear how it handles tweaked if you can document the tweaks well enough.
Certainly sounds like it might be easily customized like the Ultra Tour but it sounds a lot more comfortable than the UT.
 
Does Anyone know the tension of the string job that these shipped with? Not sure if they came from Dunlop already strung or if @TW Staff did it. I’m thinking I can go a little bit lower next time around.
 
Just popped a string in my Tour 16x19 after only 4 hours. I’m a breaker but usually not until the second week. Probably an anomaly but thought I’d mention it here.
 
And no way is the CX 200 in the same league as 93P in stock form. I'm being brutally honest here. Straight out of the box, the 93P is heads and shoulders above CX 200 in every department.

I also have a Prince 93P "in the bag." I learned to play in the 1980s with smaller graphite racquets and I really appreciate the 93P, and I've played some very nice friendly matches with it. But I think the CX 200 is easier to use and more forgiving, which still having very good control and feel. For that reason I think many players would still prefer a CX 200 or one of the related Tour models over a Phantom 93P. The Phantom probably still packs a bigger punch on a full swing due to its weight, but it's less lively and harder to use defensively.
 
Last edited:
I also have a Prince 93P "in the bag." I learned to play in the 1980s with smaller graphite racquets and I really appreciate the 93P, and I've played some very nice friendly matches with it. But I think the CX 200 is easier to use and more forgiving, which still having very good control and feel. For that reason I think many players would still prefer a CX 200 or one of the related Tour models over a Phantom 93P. The Phantom probably still packs a bigger punch on a full swing due to its weight, but it's less lively and harder to use defensively.
I am not sure I agree with you. There are several factors here you need to consider. A big one being level of play. I am a former DII player and hit with college players regularly. Stock CX 200 is actually harder to use for me. It lacks depth on groundstrokes on heavy exchanges, flutters every now and then and balls not hit in the sweetspots feel harsher compared to 93P because it is not hefty enough. I actually had a much harder time keeping up with good players using CX 200 than 93P because I was having to swing out more on every ball to compensate for lack of depth. Also, 93P might be a 93 square inch on paper but it plays more like a 95 and has a big sweet spot so unless you are playing college level tennis or above, it is absolutely fine defensively. In fact, it is one of the most easiest mids to play with. Different strokes for different folk I guess.
 
Back
Top