Playtest review for the Solinco Blackout XTD V2 16x19
String and tension used for test: Hyper G 16L / 125 , 52 lbs
Tennis experience/background: USTA 4.5 male, Playing tennis single high school years, played club tennis at Uni, now play USTA leagues
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): Mostly a baseliner when playing singles, but do tend to play more doubles recently. One hand backhand. Always looking for opportunities to attack.
Current racquet/string setups: Current racket Pro Staff 97 V14, Usual strings: Hyper G 16L, Otoro Tour 17
How many hours did you play with the racquet?: about 15 hours (5-6 hours of hitting/drills, rest is match play)
Comments on racquet performance for each stroke (each section should be 3-5 sentences minimum):
-Groundstrokes: Very easy to hit great depth with this racket on ground strokes. Full swings are rewarded with both power and control. I have a flatter one-handed backhand and a spinner forehand, and both the shots responded great to this racket. The racket has almost all the good attributes you look for in modern racket: a huge sweet spot for forgiving off center hits and easy defending, predictable string bed to simply hit through the ball and not be surprised, great spin potential to have the ball dip with spin and solid comfortable feel (looks like the foam filling really works). Of course it is still a power racket but it is the first one for me which has a lot of unique control and feel built in. I have hit with pure drive, pure aero and ezone 100/98 recently, and each of those lack something to compensate for another thing. Even the slice feels really solid and penetrating. But I would say if I tensed up my swing or didn't complete it, the ball sometimes popped up a bit too much. This doesn't happen in a more control oriented racket like ProStaff. But then the defensive capability and the ability to hit the ball deep from any position in the court using this racket is awesome. I think this racket can definitely be adopted by users of prestige/blade/prostaff users who want a little more help from the racket.
-Serves: Serving was amazing with this racket. It had pure drive type power on the serve but didn't feel harsh at all. I could hit all three serves flat, slice and kick with it with no problems. The extended length is not apparent at all. I still needed to remind myself of following good serve mechanics, as it is easy to try to muscle the ball with this and still get great power. But for control with power, one needs good fundamentals of the serve. The racket however rewards and accentuates all your qualities in serving that you possess.
-Volleys: Successful volleying with this racket required the "point and direct" approach. As long as I was catching the ball firmly and pointed the racket in the right direction, I didn't need to do anything else in the volley. The racket in stock form is extremely stable and agile. I was able to hit some very solid volleys. But if you bring bad technique to it and start having backswings in volleys then they sail long.
-Serve returns: I had to dial in my returns a bit especially while playing doubles (due to tighter margins), but once done I was able to have great depth in my returns immediately. You can hit block returns or hit back topspin returns well with this racket. As long as you don't hesitate, the ball goes where it's supposed to. Indecisive jabs sometimes sailed long, but that's just because it is a power racket at the end of the day.
Comments on racquet performance in each area (should be 2-3 sentences minimum):
Power/Control- I believe this is the aspect where the racket shines the most! It has pure drive 100 or ezone 100 level power, but control of a 98 square inch racket. I could swing with a 40% swing speed, have clean contact and have the ball land at the baseline. The defensive bunts / flick / push when I was out stretched wide in the court would land deep easily as long I was balanced and controlled the racket face. In the other hand, I could hit a 100% full speed swing and have a massive ball which goes in. The only thing is if you tighten up or don't have good control of your racket face (too open or too closed at contact based on swing, court location etc), then the inherent power will just accentuate what you are already doing wrong. I mean with power does come big responsibility
Top Spin/Slice- The racket has inherent access to topspin. But it can't be called a spin racket. It doesn't have a naturally high launch angle, but more a neutral one. However, whenever I was taking big cuts on the forehand and giving the ball some air, it would always dip down near the baseline. It have the "grabbing" feeling in the string bed. I was using Hyper H 16L at 52 lbs as mentioned before. Slice was very smooth too. I could hit deep and heavy. Since the racket has some power, in slice all I had to focus on was cutting down on the ball while stepping in. Tentive slices sometimes floated long, but that will happen with any racket. Somehow I did struggle with low slices (ball went into the net), but it's only 2-3 instances that come to mind. Am sure with more play time I can tune that in.
Comfort- As everyone probably knows this racket is foam filled, so comfort is not an issue as well. But I wouldn't call it a soft racket. It has some crispness to it but the off center hits still don't feel jarring. In all my time with the racket I never felt any arm/wrist discomfort. It is not as dampened as the Ezone 100 just for reference for folks. But you do feel the flex in the racket slightly, not boardy like pure drive.
Feel- The feel is very unique for this racket. I never tried the BO V1 so I can't comment if it has changed from the previous version, but I can't think of any other racket which has a similar feel. It has a combination of flex, power, forgiveness and predictability in the stringbed which is rare in a 100 sq inch racket. My guess is if coming from a power racket there might be no adjustment needed to tune in and if coming from a traditional control racket you need to spend some time to understand the strengths of the racket and fix any kinks in your game to get the most out of it.
Maneuverability- There was some concern I had around maneuverability given its an extended length racket, but i noticed none! I have a one handed backhand, so issues on that side as well. It basically played like a regular length racket. It didn't feel chunky or difficult to swing based on beam thickness as well, probably because of head light balance. I swung more smoothly and naturally for me than a regular length pure drive. I didn't feel twist weight was too high either (I didn't measure, but just from feeling based on swings).
Stability- The racket is plenty stable like any other thick beam 100 sq inch racket. Trading ground strokes from the baseline or on defensive balls I never felt the racket flutter. At recreational level, I highly doubt this racket needs any lead tape for more stability. On volley as well, if I just gave a firm face to the ball, it just deflected easily with good pop. On return as well against big flat serves, the racket does not flutter. I could take short backswing and time the ball deep on returns.
General reaction/comments on overall performance: Overall this is a racket which will surprise and delight a lot of people. Whether they are coming from modern power racket side or a control racket side. Solinco has put together a lot of great attributes in a single racket and made something special. I highly recommend folks to try it if they get an opportunity. Definitely don't be deterred by the extended length, you don't feel it while playing. It adds a little bit extra to every shot so it will be fun to experience that. A great offering by Solinco and a racket I wouldn't hesitate to recommend to a variety of players. I will be spending more time with it the upcoming holiday season and potentially making a switch.
Thank you so much TW and Solinco for the playtest opportunity and an amazing racket.