International launch is tomorrow. Not sure when they will get it in stock@TW Staff When is the launch in Europe?
if its shaped poly, i am buying 10 sets tomorrow amI have 2 Aux 2.0 Gravity Pros, 1 strung with Mach-10 1.25 @50, 1 strung with Lynx Tour champagne 1.25 @48. The Mach-10 is a more direct/crisp feel, but still more powerful than lynx tour, more spin, more free depth - even when strung tighter. The lynx tour is heavier and visibly thicker even though the gauge is the same and I feel like it plays more like a 16g string for me. I can see why big hitters and aggressive players would prefer lynx tour, but it’s not a contest between the 2 for me - Mach-10 in essentially every category, at least in a control frame like the GPro
is mach 10 shaped poly ?
It is.if its shaped poly, i am buying 10 sets tomorrow am
this sounds like its the best poly ever made ,, likely blow away Luxilon alu out of the water ? i just ordered 10 sets from TW. and its so cheap compared to to babolat and luxilon polysIt is.
According to TW it is a five sided shaped poly
Yes. It has less of a violent pocket and reject the ball sensation but the result of M10 is just so excellentthis sounds like its the best poly ever made ,, likely blow away Luxilon alu out of the water ?
????????? less of violent pocket,, rejecting ball sensationYes. It has less of a violent pocket and reject the ball sensation but the result of M10 is just so excellent
It is a 5 or 6 sided string. Can’t tell 100% but definitely shapedif its shaped poly, i am buying 10 sets tomorrow am
With alu power, the ball sinks deep into the string bed then gets pushed out with way more velocity than I expected. That’s what gives it it’s signature feel. That sensation is totally opposite of the M10, but the M10 has much less dwell time, but the resulting ball off my racket is in my opinion, the best I’ve ever used.????????? less of violent pocket,, rejecting ball sensation
5 sided for sure- I counted with a pen and dotsIt is a 5 or 6 sided string. Can’t tell 100% but definitely shaped
from my experience with many many poly testing,, Ball pocketing is what gave me that Control off the string bed and spin as well, this is just me. so should i expect less control from M10 than alu power although i think alu power probably has more power than M10 ? alu power is probably the most powerful poly i have ever usedWith alu power, the ball sinks deep into the string bed then gets pushed out with way more velocity than I expected. That’s what gives it it’s signature feel. That sensation is totally opposite of the M10, but the M10 has much less dwell time, but the resulting ball off my racket is in my opinion, the best I’ve ever used.
5 sided for sure- I counted with a pen and dots
No, I did have any issues with control with M10. IMO ALU was less consistent that M10/HGR, but that may be due to the tension loss issues that I had with ALU. I thought that M10/HGR was much more spinny and comfortable than ALU. I can't comment too much on ALU's power, but I thought that the power level was perfect with this hybrid at 48lbs. ALU definitely had more pocketing, but I wouldn't say that the lack of pocketing was an issue, nor did I think it led to any loss of control. I played my best tennis with it yesterday after it already had over 10 hours on it, so I can only say positive things about this hybrid.from my experience with many many poly testing,, Ball pocketing is what gave me that Control off the string bed and spin as well, this is just me. so should i expect less control from M10 than alu power although i think alu power probably has more power than M10 ? alu power is probably the most powerful poly i have ever used
what is HGR part ? from what you are saying, this M10 blows away confidential which i thought was a great poly, best ever from solinco but i always wished it had bit more power. but from what you are saying, this M10 has that little extra pop. which would make this poly basically a Perfect poly.......LOLNo, I did have any issues with control with M10. IMO ALU was less consistent that M10/HGR, but that may be due to the tension loss issues that I had with ALU. I thought that M10/HGR was much more spinny and comfortable than ALU. I can't comment too much on ALU's power, but I thought that the power level was perfect with this hybrid at 48lbs. ALU definitely had more pocketing, but I wouldn't say that the lack of pocketing was an issue, nor did I think it led to any loss of control. I played my best tennis with it yesterday after it already had over 10 hours on it, so I can only say positive things about this hybrid.
It is.
According to TW it is a five sided shaped poly
5 sided for sure- I counted with a pen and dots
HAHA I love that man but we do disagree sometimes. Great contributor tho.Uh oh! Don’t tell @LOBALOT the truth about this string; you guys are IN FOR IT. *ducks*
I crossed the M10 with Hyper G round. All impressions are based on this setup. If you look towards the rest of this thread, I elaborate much more on my thoughts. Currently working on typing up my full review.what is HGR part ? from what you are saying, this M10 blows away confidential which i thought was a great poly, best ever from solinco but i always wished it had bit more power. but from what you are saying, this M10 has that little extra pop. which would make this poly basically a Perfect poly.......LOL![]()
@jj4545 Solinco Mach-10 is more lively than Lynx Tour, spin is comparable, LT is stiffer, M10 is more comfortable, M10 has better feel. M10 better ball pocketing and preferable launch angle. Keep in mind my comments are based off of the M10 Hybrid with HGR. All in all M10 is a better string for my game. Like the blue color better too ! If you like a much stiffer stringbed you will probably like LT, but if you like some forgiveness you'll enjoy the M10 Hybrid.Can someone compare the Mach- 10 to Lynx Tour(Champagne) 1,25?
Obviously HGR hybrid is working out great for you. why did you choose HGR to hybrid with ? would multi hybrid like NRG or X-1 hybrid with M10 work well too ?@jj4545 Solinco Mach-10 is more lively than Lynx Tour, spin is comparable, LT is stiffer, M10 is more comfortable, M10 has better feel. M10 better ball pocketing and preferable launch angle. Keep in mind my comments are based off of the M10 Hybrid with HGR. All in all M10 is a better string for my game. Like the blue color better too ! If you like a much stiffer stringbed you will probably like LT, but if you like some forgiveness you'll enjoy the M10 Hybrid.
Those that were chosen for the Playtest were sent a set of Mach 10 and HGR and give the option to string it up as a full set of Mach 10 or do a hybrid with the HGRObviously HGR hybrid is working out great for you. why did you choose HGR to hybrid with ? would multi hybrid like NRG or X-1 hybrid with M10 work well too ?
@Nostradamus we had to use full-bed or Hybrid with Hyper- G Round only for the playtest.Obviously HGR hybrid is working out great for you. why did you choose HGR to hybrid with ? would multi hybrid like NRG or X-1 hybrid with M10 work well too ?
would the hybrid work just as well if you used Hyper G regular ? i have some of the regular hyper G 17 Gauge sitting around not being used.@Nostradamus we had to use full-bed or Hybrid with Hyper- G Round only for the playtest.
I've said this before but HGR is a great cross.
Previously I loved the Hyper-G / Hyper-G Round Hybrid in 1.20. However, this hybrid (Mach-10 / Hyper-G Round in 1.25) plays every bit as well if not better !! A touch easier power ( but not too much) spin + or better, control =, and even better touch / feel/ comfort. I was not expecting this due to the thicker gauge and I even strung them a couple pounds tighter.
Solinco's Mach-10 / Hyper-G Round is a great Hybrid that poly lovers everywhere will want to try!! It is a combo I could easily be happy playing from now on. It is that good.
I have been told before that I do have a fear of commitment, but I have seen the light !! This has been the best 4.5 hours of my tennis life !!
Honestly, probably not. The round string helped to tame the launch angle and it added back in some durability.would the hybrid work just as well if you used Hyper G regular ? i have some of the regular hyper G 17 Gauge sitting around not being used.
Started moving and sticking for me after the first 60-90 mins, but it didn’t affect the performance.Same boat. Ordered some more sets for more hybrid testing. One thing I'm finding is that in a full bed it sticks after about four hours. Gonna try some with slicker crosses
So alu is too lively and elastic for you.With alu power, the ball sinks deep into the string bed then gets pushed out with way more velocity than I expected. That’s what gives it it’s signature feel. That sensation is totally opposite of the M10, but the M10 has much less dwell time, but the resulting ball off my racket is in my opinion, the best I’ve ever used.
5 sided for sure- I counted with a pen and dots
Not sure I’d say that- I really like the feel of ALU, and I play fine with it, but I do have a preference for Mach 10. I enjoyed ALU, but it died so quickly that I couldn’t give it a fair review. Spin was definitely easier to achieve on the Mach 10 though, but the pocketing of ALU allowed for some great spin at when I was really hitting out. I don’t remember it enough to elaborate further, as I got less than an hour and a half of good play with it.So alu is too lively and elastic for you.
Very confused by what this means? I’ve never experienced and don’t know what a violent string pocket or reject the ball sensation is.Yes. It has less of a violent pocket and reject the ball sensation but the result of M10 is just so excellent
OK, there is no description that suffices for the unique feel of ALU. In the words of Lou Holtz, “Those who know [ALU Power], no explanation’s necessary. Those who don’t, no explanation will suffice."Very confused by what this means? I’ve never experienced and don’t know what a violent string pocket or reject the ball sensation is.
I don't think that M10 and PTP are comparable at all. IMO this is much more spin focused and less soft than PTP. They are both made for power, and M10 has far more power potential than PTP. I thought that PTP's power was only average, while this was above average. A lot of people are confusing this for a soft string, and PTP is a soft and plush string. M10 is by no means soft by any stretch of the imagination. It's just a softer version of one of the stiffest strings on the market. I can't ever comment on comfort, as I do not have existing arm issues, and I swing fast enough that I get tons to snapback on just about every shot, so nothing feels "harsh" to me (I'm pretty well known around my local club for playing barefoot in 5 pocket pants with a 67 RA racket strung with 4g at 58lbs after forgetting my bag). I much prefer M10 to PTP. Better spin, tension maintenance, power, and honestly, control as well. Feel was more connected with M10, but that's just personal preference. PTP isn't a bad string, and it's an alright all-arounder, I would probably recommend it for those who want a round, soft string.Any thoughts on this vs PTP? They seem to be in the same swim lane...
Thanks. I’ve used Alu power many times. Have 2 reels of it.OK, there is no description that suffices for the unique feel of ALU. In the words of Lou Holtz, “Those who know [ALU Power], no explanation’s necessary. Those who don’t, no explanation will suffice."
Best way I can put it is that it's like a marble in a rubber band, where it just sinks in, then pops back out with seemingly more energy than was put in. Super cool sensation, and I can see why the pros love it. As I've described earlier, it just wasn't worth it for me because it lost tension so quickly, but ALU Power is something that everyone should try at least once if they can afford it.
Do you agree with my assessment at all? Am concerned that my experience is a one-offThanks. I’ve used Alu power many times. Have 2 reels of it.![]()
No, not very similar at all. PTP is a very good string for one session. Performs well for longer if prestretched. PTP notches pretty easily, turns into fettuccine pretty quickly as a cross, has pretty awful tension maintenance unless it’s prestretched.Any thoughts on this vs PTP? They seem to be in the same swim lane...
They heard you and have updated the product descriptions by removing all words such as 4 sided and square.I saw that on the TW web site. So are they going to update Hyper G, etc.?
They heard you and have updated the product descriptions by removing all words such as 4 sided and square.
"Solinco Hyper-G is a shaped co-poly with an impressive combination of spin and precision. Developed for an ATP top 50 player, this medium firm string will allow big hitters to take massive cuts at the ball without having to worry about overhitting. Topspin players who like hitting balls that dive sharply and explode off the court should love this string."
"Solinco Tour Bite is a firm and durable monofilament that delivers an almost unbelievable combination of spin and precision. Popular at the highest levels of tennis, Tour Bite will enable you to attack the ball with your most powerful strokes. Did we mention the spin potential? "
"Introducing Solinco Confidential! Several years in the making, this co-poly has met the rigorous standards of elite ATP and WTA professionals. With its ultra precise response and shaped profile, this string has exceptional control and impressive spin-potential. According to our TW playtesters, Confidential not only rewards full swings with surgical targeting, it also has above average comfort for a poly-based monofilament. All in all, this is a very impressive addition to Solinco's polyester lineup."
I guess some are trying to understand why you must see the words, 5 sided, in the description of each of these strings when there is photo and video proof provided online?I guess I am trying to understand why if they reference this new string as "5 sided" why they wouldn't do it for all their strings if as these folks say are 5 sided as I have not heard a good answer to that yet?
It really doesn't matter to me as while I string a lot of it I do not use the stuff myself.
This is curious. Were they being challenged with the counts?I guess some are trying to understand why you must see the words, 5 sided, in the description of each of these strings when there is photo and video proof provided online?
It really doesn't matter to me since I string alot of it for myself.
Seriously? IDK why they don't, but i know it's 5 sided.![]()
Best review I've read yet and my exact impressions!Not time for my review yet, but I did want to give my impressions so far for those trying to figure out if they want to try this string.
Set up - Hybrid M10 1.25 with HGR 1.25 @54 lbs in a PA 2016. My normal string in this is TB 1.20 @56.
I’m an aging 4.5, former 5.0/Open level player 25 years ago. Aggressive all courter, big forehand, big serve, 1 HBH.
First time out, I kept thinking this is a shaped KMP. I went back and forth between solid, firm, solid, firm…. I finally landed on solid. It was very dead feeling, not crisp. There is no trampolining with this string, meaning incredible consistency and depth control. Really, take KMP, subtract the shock on impact, add in much better spin and a bit more power, and it would be M10 first time out.
Spin - A bit less spin than the typical Solinco string. HG and Confidential get spin from pocketing, TB from string/ball friction (bite). This does neither of those well, with just a bit of bite and very little pocketing. Still, it does get decent spin, just nothing special. This gives it a very predictable and slightly lower launch angle compared to Solinco’s big 3. You don’t have to worry about over-spinning the ball and having it land short. This is also a better string for flatter hitters than the other Solinco strings.
Power - Was consistent - you get what you put into it, no more, no less. Consistency and control are perhaps this string’s best points. With TB/HG, I can hit a heavy ball that explodes off the court into the back fence. Because the spin wasn’t quite as easy, I couldn’t hit those as well with M10. Flat drives were easier, but not heavy enough to bother my regular hitting partner the way I can with TB.
Comfort - It is stiff, but there was no shock. I could see the firmness bothering someone that has arm problems.
Second time out, the string softened up a bit. It felt very similar to YPTP - no pocketing or trampolining but you could feel the whole string bed flex on contact. It was still very dead and solid, not crisp, like YPTP. Power was a little more the second time out, but spin didn’t really pick up.
This is different than Solinco’s other offerings. I would lying if I said I didn’t miss the typical Solinco crispness. If I were a flatter hitter looking for a great control string that isn’t too low or high powered, I would consider this string. I will string the M10 hybrid looser in my next demo in the PD.
I am looking forward to trying M10 in a thinner gauge. I don’t think the 1.25 is best for my game, but I could see a thinner gauge working really well for me.
Not time for my review yet, but I did want to give my impressions so far for those trying to figure out if they want to try this string.
Set up - Hybrid M10 1.25 with HGR 1.25 @54 lbs in a PA 2016. My normal string in this is TB 1.20 @56.
I’m an aging 4.5, former 5.0/Open level player 25 years ago. Aggressive all courter, big forehand, big serve, 1 HBH.
First time out, I kept thinking this is a shaped KMP. I went back and forth between solid, firm, solid, firm…. I finally landed on solid. It was very dead feeling, not crisp. There is no trampolining with this string, meaning incredible consistency and depth control. Really, take KMP, subtract the shock on impact, add in much better spin and a bit more power, and it would be M10 first time out.
Spin - A bit less spin than the typical Solinco string. HG and Confidential get spin from pocketing, TB from string/ball friction (bite). This does neither of those well, with just a bit of bite and very little pocketing. Still, it does get decent spin, just nothing special. This gives it a very predictable and slightly lower launch angle compared to Solinco’s big 3. You don’t have to worry about over-spinning the ball and having it land short. This is also a better string for flatter hitters than the other Solinco strings.
Power - Was consistent - you get what you put into it, no more, no less. Consistency and control are perhaps this string’s best points. With TB/HG, I can hit a heavy ball that explodes off the court into the back fence. Because the spin wasn’t quite as easy, I couldn’t hit those as well with M10. Flat drives were easier, but not heavy enough to bother my regular hitting partner the way I can with TB.
Comfort - It is stiff, but there was no shock. I could see the firmness bothering someone that has arm problems.
Second time out, the string softened up a bit. It felt very similar to YPTP - no pocketing or trampolining but you could feel the whole string bed flex on contact. It was still very dead and solid, not crisp, like YPTP. Power was a little more the second time out, but spin didn’t really pick up.
This is different than Solinco’s other offerings. I would lying if I said I didn’t miss the typical Solinco crispness. If I were a flatter hitter looking for a great control string that isn’t too low or high powered, I would consider this string. I will string the M10 hybrid looser in my next demo in the PD.
I am looking forward to trying M10 in a thinner gauge. I don’t think the 1.25 is best for my game, but I could see a thinner gauge working really well for me.
looks like not going to bother trying this one out. TB is also my goto.Best review I've read yet and my exact impressions!
We can only continue to hope that they will officially drop TB round.Yea, I was hoping Solinco’s next string might be like TB only with more pocketing and feel, better for net play. This isn’t that, at least not in the 1.25.