Tennis Warehouse Playtest: Solinco Whiteout v2

The added Arch-2 construction is intended to improve stability, comfort and power according to Solinco. I did notice these changes over the v1. For me, the launch angles seem to be similar since the string pattern and spacing remain unchanged.
Stability - yes (my v2 feels a bit heavier than the v1)
Feel/comfort - ohhh yes!
Power - maybe but I add around 15g to my whiteouts so maybe that’s why they came out to be similarly powerful to me. But I did try them in stock as well. It’s a bit hard to add both comfort and power. I am quite sensitive to explosive responses so if anything the difference is (at least for me) too small to have an impact on my game. I did notice clearer feel and more pocketing. these 2 are the main improvements that people will feel right away. V2 is great!
 
First impressions from playing last night. For reference my normal set up is the head gravity pro 2023 with hyper G/ confidential 1.20. I strung the whiteout with hyper G 1.20 at 50/48 lbs. The frame feels very solid – stability is not an issue. I found good feel on shots that I hit in the sweet spot. Last week I hit with a diadem elevate V3 Tour and I thought that had better response than this though.

There was a lot of free power and spin. Launch angle is much higher than the gravity pro, but I really enjoyed it. It let me give shape to the ball, and there were times where my opponent thought the ball would go out, but it dropped in at the last second.

I did feel that on the backend it was a little launchy. My back hand is much flatter than my forehand, so if I didn't time it properly, the ball would sail out. This also might be because of the thinner string. I think that 1.25 gauge would be the sweet spot for this.

Overall, it's a great first hit. I feel as though I miss the head shape of the gravity, but maybe it will take a little bit of time to adjust.
 
uhwg4XC.jpeg

Got my package! So excited to try the racket out. Will be stringing it with my go to string for now with tour bite 16l and tour bite round 17!!!

Racket without plastic on the handle is weighing right at 306g so looks pretty good to me. Don't have a SW machine unfortunately but it feels good.
 
Last edited:
I took my 1st hit with the XTD, it is all positive feedback! No vibrations on the frame, very agile for an extended frames as in comparison I have some older "green" PA+ that feel more cumbersome thru the air.

The power is there, even tho I suspect mine has a lower SW (or at least with 1.18g strings) because it feels more nimble than other frames I have around 330sw, yet is packing a punch above.

I will take it out on the weekend to play some doubles, but so far I am liking the frame very much.
 
Strung with Tour bite 16l and tourbite round 17! With the strings and the solinco hyper-grip overgrip, static weight is at 328.5g. Really like the camo paint job. The silver strings fit in perfectly. Maybe would be cool to have a silver string/ white string hybrid to keep the color scheme going. A bit rainy over the next few days but hoping to get a hit in to try this racket out and give first impressions.

JY5eVLG.jpeg
 
Strung with Tour bite 16l and tourbite round 17! With the strings and the solinco hyper-grip overgrip, static weight is at 328.5g. Really like the camo paint job. The silver strings fit in perfectly. Maybe would be cool to have a silver string/ white string hybrid to keep the color scheme going. A bit rainy over the next few days but hoping to get a hit in to try this racket out and give first impressions

Would love to hear your feedback compared to the 305s and Gravity Tour 98 :)
 
I took my 1st hit with the XTD, it is all positive feedback! No vibrations on the frame, very agile for an extended frames as in comparison I have some older "green" PA+ that feel more cumbersome thru the air.

The power is there, even tho I suspect mine has a lower SW (or at least with 1.18g strings) because it feels more nimble than other frames I have around 330sw, yet is packing a punch above.

I will take it out on the weekend to play some doubles, but so far I am liking the frame very much.


I’ve also hit with other extended frames that felt powerful but cumbersome to swing. The XTD probably is the most maneuverable extended frame I’ve tried.
 
The WO XTD V2 has that fun factor when hitting the ball. It’s become more familiar to use and is really enjoyable. Massive spin potential helps with confidence to go for each shot. Even on defense, it was easy to turn the table and become offensive, While I really enjoyed the WO 18x20 as my main stick for close to two years, I like the XTD V2 better in almost all areas, including the feel. I absolutely love serving with this stick and ripping my backhands for clean winners. If I can dial in my flat forehands, this frame will be my main stick.

I was rallying with one of the buddies who’s used a light K-Factor racket for years, who has massive topspin forehand but has the flattest OHBH. He was having a difficult time dealing with high bounces from my shots and wanted to try the NEW racket I was using. He immediately felt in love with power, spin, and even control after a few hits. He took pictures of the frame and told me he was ordering one, For anyone with massive topspin but aren’t getting the control from their frames should look into WO XTD. It doesn’t feel sluggish at all while retaining all the benefit of an extended frame.
 
Had my second hit with the V2 today. I started hitting with this and then switched to my gravity pro at the end. It was only after switching back to the gravity pro that I realized how much free power I got from the V2. It was so so much better.

In terms of the frame itself, it doesnt quite have that meaty/flexy feel of the gravity pro but it's decent. It probably the expected trade off vs just having too thin of a string. My backhand is still not timing the ball well just yet. Im going to string it up with mach 10 1.25 next time which I think will help with the feel, but im worried that it will become too head heavy. I think the move is to add a leather grip or the weighted butt cap to get the tail weight up a bit. But I will be keeping the racket stock as per the guidelines of review.
 
Last edited:
Had my second hit with the V2 today. I started hitting with this and then switched to my gravity pro at the end. It was only after switching back to the gravity pro that I realized how much free power I got from the V2. It was so so much better.

In terms of the frame itself, it doesnt quite have that meaty/flexy feel of the gravity pro but it's decent. It probably the expected trade off vs just having too thin of a string. My backhand is still not timing the ball well just yet. Im going to string it up with mach 10 1.25 next time which I think will help with the feel, but im worried that it will become too head heavy. I think the move is to add a leather grip or the weighted butt cap to get the tail weight up a bit. But I will be keeping the racket stock as per the guidelines of review.
This flex you are referring to is a trait of Head frames. It's similar to the way a tuning fork rings/flexes when you strike it against an object. The V2 is significantly more dampened in response where it lacks this reverberation.
 
Had my first hit with the v2 today strung with tour bite/tour bite round for about an hour. The racket is definitely quite dampened even with the tour bite setup but the strings make it just enough that I can tolerate it fine. If I used a softer muted string, I'm quite sure it would not be the most fun experience for myself. I've owned and used the v1 a bit as well and I personally much prefer the v1 in the feel department.

While the static weight of my racket is 306g and pretty good, I felt that something was a bit off in terms of the swing weight feeling quite low. I personally felt the plow through for this racket was quite lacking. I don't have a SW machine unfortunately and I 'm trying to playtest the racket without customizing it or adding weight so we'll see how it goes. I'm going to see what the balance of the racket is which may give me some indication as to where the static weight is focused around. It was quite windy today so maybe it was just the subpar conditions, but I was hitting just fine with my 305s and GT98.

Hard to say off of very early first impressions, but I'd say:
Spin: GT98>V2>305s
Power: GT98> 305s >V2
Control: 305s>V2~GT98 (still figuring this one out)

Didn't get much chance to serve or volley with the racket.

Will continue to update. Will also eventually try a higher string tension down the road. Currently strung at 50/48lb.
 
While the static weight of my racket is 306g and pretty good, I felt that something was a bit off in terms of the swing weight feeling quite low. I personally felt the plow through for this racket was quite lacking.
My first one was 289SW, 305.0g static. Wouldn't be surprised if yours was under 290 as well. Added a couple of grams on the hoop and it made the world of difference.
 
Solinco grips run small.
I wish I knew this before i demo’d the v2 305. I figured out that Head, Yonex, Tecnifibre and Solinco all run small compared to like Wilson which is what I’m coming from. So with Wilson I’m playing 1/4, but with all the others I need 3/8 .
 
My first impressions of the XTD...

I will first apologize for the delay guys- I had a tourney this weekend and only got it strung up Friday night. On my Klippermate, it took a little less than 45 minutes to string it up with Tour M8 at 48lbs, which I chose because most people used a Solinco string, so I wanted to try something a little different for my test. 45 minutes is 7 minutes faster than my typical time, so I did find the WO V2 XTD to be pretty easy to string. I hit about 15-20 balls with it yesterday- I had 3 matches in 6 hours, and just wanted to try it so I literally had my dad throw balls at me to hit. I liked the feel, and the power was good as well. No comment on control yet- I honestly struggled with just swinging the racket, so I can't say anything about the control. I hit 5 serves with it- all had great spin, power, and placement. Will check back in once I get some more time with the frame.
 
I wish I knew this before i demo’d the v2 305. I figured out that Head, Yonex, Tecnifibre and Solinco all run small compared to like Wilson which is what I’m coming from. So with Wilson I’m playing 1/4, but with all the others I need 3/8 .

Just change the Stock/Replacement Grip after play test is done to the Wilson Sensation. The nice thing about the Solinco is that butt is more bulky (like Wilson) than for example the Yonex which has a slim butt.

Regarding my own "testing" for the Standard 305 : strung mine with CyberFlash 1.20 @ 54/52 with +5lbs on the last mains and crosses on a Lockout so more like 51-52/49-50 on an eCP . I used thinner than my normal string to keep SW closer to my EZ98 (324SW modified) but bumped by tension by 2 lbs. I ended up with 327SW (mine started at 300SW unstrung). I might still do my regular setup later on (Confidential 16L x Cyberflash 17L)

Only did volleys with a partner and hitting against a wall which is my typical first test / hurdle for any racket - passed with flying colors :-D I have no issues with feel, in fact I kinda love it.. I guess after the EZ98 more preferences have changed into two categories with regard to feel... WORKS and DOESN'T WORK. This is squarely in the WORKS category. Nice Launch angle, love it on the slices.

I LOVE the paintjob and really like how Cyberflash looks in it.. also expect Tour Bite and Confidential to look fab. The mains and crosses are not too widely spaced and look great in my eyes. Solinco has a little greenish tinge in the darker grey and a little brownish tinge in the light grey which will open it up to looking good with MANY colors of string... instead of going COOL greys which would have limited things a little.

 
Last edited:
Hello. When is the deadline for the review ? I have been traveling a lot and want to make sure I get it in prior to the deadline. Thanks
 
Hello. When is the deadline for the review ? I have been traveling a lot and want to make sure I get it in prior to the deadline. Thanks

Please post your review by Friday, May 2, 2025 by 5 pm PST.

(Copied and pasted from the email I got from TTW)
 
Last edited:
Just change the Stock/Replacement Grip after play test is done to the Wilson Sensation. The nice thing about the Solinco is that butt is more bulky (like Wilson) than for example the Yonex which has a slim butt.

Regarding my own "testing" for the Standard 305 : strung mine with CyberFlash 1.20 @ 54/52 with +5lbs on the last mains and crosses on a Lockout so more like 51-52/49-50 on an eCP . I used thinner than my normal string to keep SW closer to my EZ98 (324SW modified) but bumped by tension by 2 lbs. I ended up with 327SW (mine started at 300SW unstrung). I might still do my regular setup later on (Confidential 16L x Cyberflash 17L)

Only did volleys with a partner and hitting against a wall which is my typical first test / hurdle for any racket - passed with flying colors :-D I have no issues with feel, in fact I kinda love it.. I guess after the EZ98 more preferences have changed into two categories with regard to feel... WORKS and DOESN'T WORK. This is squarely in the WORKS category. Nice Launch angle, love it on the slices.

I LOVE the paintjob and really like how Cyberflash looks in it.. also expect Tour Bite and Confidential to look fab. The mains and crosses are not too widely spaced and look great in my eyes. Solinco has a little greenish tinge in the darker grey and a little brownish tinge in the light grey which will open it up to looking good with MANY colors of string... instead of going COOL greys which would have limited things a little.

Yeah, not gonna do that with a demo racket I'll only have for 7 days and have to send back, but if I was to buy it, I'd definitely want to change the balance, maybe throw a leather grip on it and make it more headlight. I think it's a solid racket, but definitely wonder if that box beam and 21.7 mm is a little thin for a modern racket. I think they addressed the issues with V1 16x19 that would inexplicably and randomly launch balls into outer space. And it seems like they also gave it a more comfortable plusher feel, something that will certain appeal to a wider audience of players. I must admit, I also really like the paintjob too.
 
Played another three sets tonight. Regular WO 305 performed well. Good depth on ground strokes.. forehand and backhand solid! Serves are solid but I’m not a great server so take my comments on the serve with a grain of salt.
Racquet is maneuverable and easy to get into position. Performed well at the net. I’m still getting the feel of this stick. Played about 5 hours so far and the second match was better than the first.
Gonna get some basket time tomorrow and work on my serve. Another match on Thursday!
 
Just had my 4th hit with the frame. First time with the 1.25 poly tour pro. The thicker gauge definitely helps with adding a more beefy feel, which I appreciated. This is my first time serving and playing a match with the frame. I felt that frame was very solid on returns and it had good feel hitting the ball in the sweet spot. I was honestly surprised on how solid it felt. There were times where I wish I had more head size, especially on my backhand, but I think that is just me being used to a larger head size. Serves had good power and spin, more than my gravity, but im not quite adjusted to the frame yet. I still served better with the gravity, though kick serves were better with the whiteout.

PTP worked well in it. I think i'll break the string this weekend and then will to go confidential a 1.25/1.20 hybrid to see how that plays.

I'd also like to point out that I think it is unique how solid this is just while stock. I dont think theres a need to add weight to the head, though some may want to make it more headlight.
 
Early overgrips bonus review!

I've put about 10 hours on one Solinco Hyper Grip- it's still performing very well. The material is soft and comfortable, and the tack is fantastic. I found it to be much stickier than the Wilson Pro OG. Even though I am a dry-grip user, I've been exceptionally satisfied with the tacky Hyper Grip. It never slipped after my hands got sweaty, and after 10 hours, it is more tacky and reliable than the Wilson Pro OG, and that is coming from someone who used the Wilson grip for awhile. Now that it's colder, I've started to use the Wilson Pro OG more, but I have a strong preference for the Hyper-Grip. My Wilson grips usually become useless after 4-6 hours, but I think that the Hyper-Grip may be able to last 15-20 hours. I must say, Solinco has been impressing me lately with their non-string offerings (even though Mach 10/HGR were amazing as well).

I will also add that the hat feels like it is high quality- I've loaned it to a friend a few times and he really likes it.
 
Just had my 4th hit with the frame. First time with the 1.25 poly tour pro. The thicker gauge definitely helps with adding a more beefy feel, which I appreciated. This is my first time serving and playing a match with the frame. I felt that frame was very solid on returns and it had good feel hitting the ball in the sweet spot. I was honestly surprised on how solid it felt. There were times where I wish I had more head size, especially on my backhand, but I think that is just me being used to a larger head size. Serves had good power and spin, more than my gravity, but im not quite adjusted to the frame yet. I still served better with the gravity, though kick serves were better with the whiteout.

PTP worked well in it. I think i'll break the string this weekend and then will to go confidential a 1.25/1.20 hybrid to see how that plays.

I'd also like to point out that I think it is unique how solid this is just while stock. I dont think theres a need to add weight to the head, though some may want to make it more headlight.
Yeah i have the same thoughts as you do on the weight / balance. Probably I would like to try the butt cap weights starting the the 5 gram one. But I'm also ok with it as is for now. I was thinking leather grip but there's less of a need since the butt cap weights are so convenient. I may order one just to try it out. I just watch a video from Tennis Spin where they did this customization to the 290 frame using two of the weighted caps.
 
Had some basket time serving today with the Wo 305! Found a rhythm and the racquet performed well. Even got a subtle kick serve going and that’s good for me. Pace and placement was good with minimal effort. Serves better if you can relax and just trust. I’m very happy with the serve.
Afterwards played another two sets of
Doubles. Better than the first two matches. I’m getting comfortable playing with this racquet and my confidence is improved. Has several quick exchanges at the net today and maneuvering this stick quickly was no problem. Still dialing in the return but I’m still adapting to this stick. I’ll be playing again Saturday so more to come.
 
Just had my second hit with the poly tour pro 1.25. Really nice feel when taking big cuts from deep behind the baseline. And really easy to shape the ball. The increased power from the back of the court compared to my gravity pro is really addicting. I spent some dedicated time on volleying also and it performed well. Solid feel with good touch.

Also got to hit a few balls with whiteout v1 18x20 to compare. That one has more feedback in the handle and is not as plush or powerful.
 
I tried some comparison today with the Solinco V2 Camo vs Dunlop 300 SX and my older Dunlop 300g using the ball machine and using a basic target test suggested in this video by Stokke
and I'm going to retest this because it was super windy today and my result I think got skewed a bit but what I did find out was the v2 wasn't working as well for me today mainly due to the other two frames being a bit more maneuverable or maybe just more familiar to me when having to adjust after the ball bounce due to the wind. The other surprising thing that I have to own up to is that hitting my backhand slice is quite a bit more accurate with each frame compared with hitting a 1HBH topspin shot. Again, I think the slice is just easier to hit in adverse conditions. I'm going to redo this test on a blue bird calm day and see if it makes a difference. I think I need more time before I make any conclusions.
 
Had my first hit with the v2 today strung with tour bite/tour bite round for about an hour. The racket is definitely quite dampened even with the tour bite setup but the strings make it just enough that I can tolerate it fine. If I used a softer muted string, I'm quite sure it would not be the most fun experience for myself. I've owned and used the v1 a bit as well and I personally much prefer the v1 in the feel department.

While the static weight of my racket is 306g and pretty good, I felt that something was a bit off in terms of the swing weight feeling quite low. I personally felt the plow through for this racket was quite lacking. I don't have a SW machine unfortunately and I 'm trying to playtest the racket without customizing it or adding weight so we'll see how it goes. I'm going to see what the balance of the racket is which may give me some indication as to where the static weight is focused around. It was quite windy today so maybe it was just the subpar conditions, but I was hitting just fine with my 305s and GT98.

Hard to say off of very early first impressions, but I'd say:
Spin: GT98>V2>305s
Power: GT98> 305s >V2
Control: 305s>V2~GT98 (still figuring this one out)

Didn't get much chance to serve or volley with the racket.

Will continue to update. Will also eventually try a higher string tension down the road. Currently strung at 50/48lb.
After a few more sessions/hits, still felt like the SW was a little low. Tried out putting just a smidge of weight at 12 o'clock. just a few grams and not much. It's not very often I actually put weight in the hoop in a 98 sq in 305g frame. My GT98 and 305s have a leather grip making them a little more head light. Racket felt much much better. Definitely thinking the QC on my racket had the SW lower than what it is rated by TW. Racket felt much more powerful as people have been saying in comparison to V1 and I agree. Was getting really good depth on my balls surprisingly and more than my 305s. Still trying the racket out with tour bite/tour bite round hybrid and not sure if I want to go softer than these strings as it'll be way too muted for what I like. The racket is still muted with the stiff crisp strings, but it's actually a lot more bearable and I can really see the comfort level of this racket.
I'd personally say that this racket plays like a blade but with a smidge more power and spin.

Overall apart from the general muted feel of the racket, playing quite well with it. I personally felt that the v1 was a very very well balanced racket across the spin, power, control categories. The v2 has a bit more spin and power than the v1.

midway racket comparison impressions
Spin: Gt98>V2>V1>Blade 16x19 >305s
Power: GT98>V2>305s~V1>Blade
Control: Blade> 305s> V1>V2>GT98
Muted: V2>Blade>GT98>V1>305s

more to come...
 
Hit again today. PTP is still going. Starting to figure out the backhand and the forehand is getting even better. Easy to hit into the wind from the power. Also started to feel some soreness in the back of the wrist which I think is just from overuse
 
THANKS Tenniswarehouse and thanks Solinco for great racket n strings and this playtest .tennis warehouse thanks again for this great community and forum and playtests using normal people and not influencers.

I'm a 4.5 level baseliner that only comes to net when drop shotted and to shake hands. Played in college some 20 years ago but still clock over 110mph flat serves. I play on a team and compete in local tournaments. I coach on weekends for free to under privileged children.

Just got to test the Solinco whiteout xtd v2 for past week or so and about 10hours. I tested it along side my main tournament racket aero98. Both rackets with mach10 at 45 pounds.

Serves- hit 117mph compared to my aero98 112mph. This is by far the best serving racket I ever tried in a 98 inch. Flat and slice serves had action that kept opponents uneasy. Kick serves are not recommended by my shoulder so can't comment

Volleys- volleys were good as my aero98 after choking up on the handle half inch like RAFA

Returns- great on wide serves n t serves with added help of the extension... struggled on body serves

Groundstrokes- forehands were great just like my aero98 but the whiteout had more power n spin but aero98 had better flat forehands.
Backhands were great especially on the defense better then the aer98


Whiteout v2 had great crisp feel ,not muted.felt more comfy then my aero98 ,especially on off center shots. Power was great and control was on par with my aero98 . Aero98 only excelled on flatter shots and was more maneuverable. Whiteout n aero98 have great slice n topspin .
Stability was great with whiteout and aero98.

If whiteout keeps playing this well after honeymoon period, i'm going to have a problem .
I have 3 aero 98's and only 1 whiteout.
I'm going to have to buy 2 whiteouts as I have a problem of popping strings during matches with open string patterns.
 
Solinco Whiteout 305 v2 Opinion/Review

Thank you to TW and Solinco for including me on this playtest.

String and tension used for test:
Cyberflash 17L 54x52 +5lbs at last mains and crosses : restrung at 5 hours just to keep the bed fresh. I did not wait for string breakage in this case.
Tennis experience/background:
4.0 Recreational Player. Above average pace/spin but average movement so I try to finish points quickly.
Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
Baseline Basher but above average at net for doubles.
Current racquet/string setups:
2022 Ezone 98 Aqua Night w/ Confidential 16L x Cyberflash 17L @ 50 x 48 (334g/7HL/324SW)
How many hours did you play with the racquet?
10 hours

Comments on racquet performance for each stroke:
-Groundstrokes 8/10:
In the beginning, it didn't fit my forehand perfectly. Racquet seems head-heavier than I would want (5HL with OG). Although it was fantastic to drive through, it didn't seem to work with my whippier FH strokes. My Ezone 98 requires 6.5g of lead at 12 to reach 324SW; this was underspec from factory, which I exploited to create an extra polarized configuration. Using my Briffidi (without TW adaptor) I got 13.3TW for the EZ98 all said and done. My Whiteout v2 with no lead and thin strings was 327SW and 14.5TW. Back on the court with this information I slowed down the pace and slowly adjusted myself and then ramped the pace up again. I found a nice groove on my forehand ; that remained through the rest of the play-test. It worked great with my 1HBH from beginning to end which is more with a stable/solid wrist to begin with. Launch angle was perfectly fine despite the thin string. Higher than my EZ but lower than spin frames that I remember trying, the round string helped me as well (also lower launch angles than the Gravity Tour 98)
-Serves 8/10: This is both the strongest (as ingood number of aces) and weakest part (double faults and source of most losses) of my game. I get a lot of free points but also tend to double fault when there is no pressure (yeah yeah, you heard me right and i know....) I don't always hit the center either. Again it took me some time to adjust as it felt slower through the air than my specific polarized EZ98.... But once I had the groove I was hitting better flat serves with the Whiteout. I felt easier to serve with than the Gravity Tour 98 which I ended up selling recently.
-Volleys 8/10: The Solid & Stable feeling was great for volleys. The comfort is of great benefit right here as I tend to mishit a lot of my volleys. Considerably better than the Gravity Tour 98 and in the same ballpark as my modified EZ98.
-Serve returns 10/10: This is one place the Whiteout outshone my EZ98. It just felt easy, the slightly increase launch angle helped get blocked returns over. I never over-hit my returns so the slightly head heavier solid feel was not a negative and if anything helped me have more consistent deeper returns.

Comments on racquet performance in each area
Power/Control 8.5/10 - About the same power as the Ezone 98. And though the string pattern looked more open than the EZ - control still felt pretty good. This particular combination of power and control was unexpected.
Top Spin/Slice 8/10 - The slices felt outstanding. Despite an slightly open 16x19 relative to the EZ; I had no issues with keep the slices medium/low with sidespin when desired. This was despite using a round string that was thinner than my general preference. Topspin was good although I would still rate my Ezone98 higher because I have an optimized string setup and a lot more time with it. With Familiarity I am sure the White Out V2 could be very close.
Comfort 9.5/10- The Dampened Feel makes it feel very comfortable and solid. I have never had arm issues but I can feel the sting on major mishits on serves and defensive volleys... This racket makes them a lot more tolerable than the Ezone98 (reminds me of my Ultra Pro on mishits but those memories are faded and hazy). It also did not feel disconnected which some comfortable frames can be.
Feel 8/10- Solid, Dampened; yet I felt connected and could clearly feel where the ball was contacting and make adjustments. I liked the feel more than the Ezone 98 although this is subjective. The Gravity Tour 98 for example felt freaking amazing instantly BUT I really couldnt do any damage on demand with it which I could with both the EZ and WOv2. I could work with the feel of the WhiteoutV2 racket to improve my ability to use it... which is all I ask of tennis rackets nowadays.
M
aneuverability 7/10- My unit was 300SW unstrung, so a little more than most others have been reporting. This is why I went with a lighter string to keep it in the ballpark of what I normally play. Resulting SW was 327.4. TW (Briffidi without adaptor) was 14.5 (my Ezone 98 is 13.3 and Blade V6 is 13.8/328SW on the same unit). With this setup and thinnish beam it was adequately manueverable. I wish the racket came with a lower SW so I could use my preferred 324SW and my 16L strings.
Stability 9/10- The Whiteout was definitely more stable than my 22 Ezone 98 setup: this was evident on serve returns and flat serves more than any other part of my game. Excess stability is not of ultimate importance to me especially if it comes with reduced Manuverability.

Other Notes:
I loved the paintjob
- the camo was lighter than pics online were and the warmer greys they used make it very versatile for string color matching :-D After the 10 hour test I added 7g of lead in butt-cap to get the racket to 7HL which felt much more like home. The flex profile was more consistent than the EZ98 which had a little more throat flex on hard hits. I have 4 basically new Ezone 98s so I cant buy the Whiteouts right now but in an alternate universe I could easily imagine 4 x Whiteout V2s in my bag instead of the EZs. In my personal case would make sure to buy 286-292SW just so I could still have to room to make it my spec instead of starting at 300SW unstrung like my test racket was.

VERDICT:
Best Jack of All Trades Tennis Racket I have tried in recent times w/ an interesting paint job - Easy to Play With, Good Power/Control, Easy on the Arm.
 
Last edited:
So far the frame is outstanding, even if I don't end up using it as a main frame (still adjusting to the XT length) it is definitely a frame to recommend. Top notch construction, foam they use gives a different feel compared to like Wilson uses and IMO in a positive way and personally enjoying it very much.

I was cranking the ball so hard playing doubles against my dad (he gives me feedback too) and I just kept on pummeling the returns and hitting harder than usual.

1000022477.jpg
 
Coming back with more feedback after my weekly Old Men Doubles sesh, it definitely packs a punch much heavier than the yellow Q+5 I have been using lately yet feels like the SW would be lower on the WOv2XTD because the Extended length does not make it feel slow or late to the right face angle at contact, I find myself playing very consistent with the frame.

I was serving harder and crushing the returns with more pace (feedback from the receiver) but at my level I am not sure that "extra" punch makes much of a difference, at my level is just not enough to make me win points just based on pace. It is satisfying but not sure that I was playing "better".
 
@Humbi_HTX copy that! I'm heading out now for the OM dubs right now! More to follow ...

Update: ok the major takeaway from last night's session of 3 sets of 4.0 dubs is: this racquet is extremely stable and this really comes out in service returns; I don't have another frame that I've ever felt more confident in hitting out on service returns than this one. For me it has almost the perfect blend of power and control and returns along with stability and this kind of instills a confidence where you know you're not going to get pushed around on that shot because the frame is so stable. The other standout was, once again, the stability, power, control when it came to redirecting pace on volleys at the net. Just angling the frame was enough to redirect hard hit shots and the power returned was enough to put the shot away; so the power and control once again come into play without feeling like I had to do anything "over the top" to put a shot away. hth
 
Last edited:
Had first hit today with confidential 1.25/1.20 hybrid. Strung at 50/48. Felt a bit stiff to start but then settled in nicely. It’s noticeably stiffer than the PTP but not uncomfortable. Playability was great as expected. It was helping me grab the ball on the backhand and I could see the ball jumping sideways on my forehands. Will be playing on Saturday and then will post my final review.

Would also add that I hit a few balls with a blade v9 16x19 also today. That offers more feedback and flex but less solid and unstable on off center hits
 
Going out this morning for my 5th match with the WO 305. This will give me around 12 hours with the racquet. Gonna do some more basket time serving afterwards. Then finally review time. I’ve really enjoyed this stick.
 
After tomorrow, I should be starting my review. WO XTD V2 is an excellent attacking frame that does not require the player to put major effort on all shots, like the Prestige, but it produces some mean balls. I have not modded my frame at all, but I’ll be stringing with the thicker gauge (16G) and maybe add some weight in the handle to help with my forehand. I have fully adjusted on my OHBH, but sometimes balls would fly on my forehand side if I didn’t prepare well.

Overall, WO XTD V2 is probably best playing extended racket that I’ve tried.
 
String and tension used for test:
- Hyper G 1.20 50/48
- Poly tour pro 1.25 50/48
- Confidential 1.25/1.20 50/48

Tennis experience/background:
- Former college player, now 5.0-5.5 level

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
- Attacking overall. Big, spinny forehand. Flatter backhand. Like to finish points at the net

Current racquet/string setups:
- Head Gravity Pro 2023 with confidential in mid 40’s

How many hours did you play with the racquet?
- 12 hours


Groundstrokes:
From the baseline, the Whiteout V2 really shines. It offers an addictive combination of free power, spin, and stability. Compared to my Gravity Pro, the Whiteout delivers noticeably easier depth and a much higher launch angle, making it easier to give shape to shots and extend rallies. Taking big cuts from deep behind the baseline feels effortless, and the racquet rewards aggressive play without feeling unstable or uncontrollable.

Switching to Poly Tour Pro 1.25 improved the feel significantly, giving the racquet a more substantial, “beefy” sensation at contact. With the Confidential 1.25/1.20 hybrid, the ball comes off the racquet extremely heavy, with a solid, authoritative feel that makes it fun to play offensively. The racquet remains comfortable and confidence-inspiring even when stretched out wide or under pressure.

Serves:
The Whiteout V2 offers excellent power and spin on serve, noticeably more than the Gravity Pro. Flat serves come off the strings with more pop, and kick serves have extra jump and height, making it easier to move opponents off the court. While I am still adjusting my timing fully to the frame, the overall serve potential is very high. It’s clear that with more familiarity, the Whiteout could be an even bigger weapon on serve than my current setup.

Volleys:
I spent extra time focusing on volleying and found the Whiteout to be very capable at net. It feels stable and solid on contact, offering good depth on firm volleys and surprisingly nice touch for finesse shots. While it doesn’t offer quite the same flexy plushness as the Gravity Pro, it still provides enough feel to feel connected to the ball during quick exchanges. Maneuverability at net is strong, and the added mass from the thicker string setups only enhanced the performance during fast, reflex-heavy points.

Serve Returns:
Returns are one of the standout areas for this racquet. It remains extremely solid against heavy serves, absorbing pace without fluttering or getting pushed around. Even stock, the Whiteout provides enough weight to block or counterpunch effectively.

The sweet spot feels generous, and hitting clean returns feels very rewarding. It also encourages more aggressive returning because of the combination of stability and easy access to spin and depth.

Power/Control:
The Whiteout V2 strikes a beautiful balance between offering free, accessible power and maintaining enough control for serious point construction. It has much more free power compared to my Gravity Pro, but it never feels “wild” or unmanageable. String choice, especially thicker gauges or hybrids, tightens up the response nicely. Players who like to dictate play from the baseline will appreciate the effortless depth and ball speed without having to overhit. I think that 1.20 strings would be to thin in general for this. Minimum gauge should be 1.25.

Top Spin/Slice:
Spin generation is one of the Whiteout’s biggest strengths. It’s extremely easy to add shape to the ball, whether it’s rolling topspin groundstrokes or heavy kick serves. The 16x19 string pattern still offers good bite, allowing for controlled topspin without feeling locked into a flatter trajectory. Slices also stay low enough to be effective, though not as biting as an ultra-flexy control frame — still very playable and reliable.

Comfort:
Comfort is excellent, especially considering the frame’s stability and power levels. Cleanly struck balls feel smooth and rewarding, with minimal shock transmitted to the arm. It’s not quite as plush or soft as my Gravity Pro, but it avoids any sense of harshness or stiffness that you sometimes find in modern racquets. The thicker strings have helped even further by adding a little more cushion and solid feel to every shot.​
Feel:
Feel improved a lot after switching from Hyper-G 1.20 to thicker strings like Poly Tour Pro 1.25 and the Confidential hybrid. The frame now feels much more connected on impact, with enough feedback to execute touch shots and volleys confidently. Compared to the Whiteout V1 18x20, the V2 feels plusher and slightly more muted — the V1 offered more crisp feedback in the handle but less overall forgiveness and power. As a whole, it’s a solid feeling racket with decent but not great feel.

Maneuverability:
Maneuverability is strong for a racquet with this much built-in stability. It swings fast enough to generate plenty of spin and racket head speed, yet it retains a stable and solid feel through contact. While I may eventually add a leather grip to shift the balance slightly more head-light, even stock, the frame offers a very nice blend of whip and plow-through. There’s no sluggishness even during fast exchanges or quick reactions at net.

Stability:
Stability is a real highlight of the Whiteout V2. Even against big hitters and heavy incoming pace, the frame holds its line without twisting or feeling unstable. One of my main criteria for racquets now is that they must feel solid without needing additional lead tape — and this racquet checks that box completely. It’s rare to find a modern frame that feels this stable right out of the box, making it truly a “pick up and play” option for serious players.

Stringing Ease:
Stringing the Whiteout V2 is extremely easy. The grommet holes are generously sized and well-designed, allowing strings to pass through smoothly with very little resistance. Whether using a full poly bed or a hybrid setup, the stringing process is quick and stress-free. It’s a small touch, but for those who string their own racquets, it’s definitely appreciated.

General Reaction / Overall Performance:
After several sessions with different string setups, the Whiteout V2 continues to impress me more each time out. It offers a rare combination of power, spin, comfort, and stability — without needing extensive customization. Compared to my Gravity Pro, it delivers much easier access to depth and spin, with the tradeoff being slightly less flex and plushness. Still, the overall feel is very solid and connected, especially with thicker strings or a hybrid setup. The racquet hits a heavy ball, feels secure on contact, and simply allows you to pick it up and compete without a lot of tweaking. It’s stable, forgiving, and rewarding across all areas of the court, making it a seriously strong contender for players looking for a modern yet comfortable control-oriented frame. Going forward I’d like to see a 16x20 pattern just to close up the string bed a bit. As it stands now the last cross is pretty far down in the frame so I shouldn’t be too tricky to add another one.

Upcoming: I’ll be adding a leather grip soon to make it slightly more head-light — I’ll post a final update after some playtime with that setup!

Thank you to Tennis Warehouse and Solinco for helping me be a part of this playtest. It has opened my eyes to Solinco frames and I would seriously consider switching if I can sort out the balance with the leather grip.
 

Playtest: Solinco Whiteout 305 v2 Camo

String and tension used for test:
- Hybrid Solinco Mach 10 1.25 x Hyper G Round (MxC) 1.25 52/50 lbs.
- This frame is a breeze to string
- Checked racquet weight and balance as shipped - true to spec.

Tennis experience/background:
- NTRP 4.0 rated player, playing on/off since 1972, singles, doubles, mixed; played Jr. High and High School teams, USTA 3.5 / 4.0 teams over the years.
-Stringer for friends, family, club players and our local high school team

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley):
- all-court playing style, 1HBH, semi western forehand, I like to play with spin, and I look to come forward when possible and finish with volleys

Current racquet/string setups:
- Dunlop 300SX Tour / Solinco Mach 10 @ 50lbs
- Dunlop 300g / ISO Speed Baseline Spin @ 50lbs

How many hours did you play with the racquet?
At least 12 hours and still going (but needs a restring now).
Got rained out this weekend; I’m bummed.

-Groundstrokes:
Overall the racquet provides a unique combination of power, stabiltiy, and control on all groundstrokes where I was able to hit targets safely and good depth while hitting out without worrying about hitting long. The launch angle was just right for my swing path. I like the shaped and depth I was able to generate off both forehand and backhand sides. When comparing it to my other Dunlop frames I would say the Whiteout V2 has more power/spin than the Dunlop 300g or CX200 and it has a bit more control than the SX300. Again, it’s the combination of power, control and stability that makes the Whiteout V2 stand out. This frame inspires confidence when hitting out and offers me excellent plough in stock form.

-Serves:
Using this frame I was confident in hitting my spots. I like to use an aggressive kick serve on my second serve; this was not problem and I could place it confidently. First server slice serves also were no problem and it was possible to vary both pace and placement; no issues. I found a bit of free extra pace on flat serves with this frame. All in all it was a very comfortable serving stick. I have complete confidence in it.

-Volleys:
This was really fun. Playing a lot of doubles these days. Maneuverability at the net with this one is super easy and I was able to hit some really nice angle volleys, and touch volleys. But the main think I noticed was just a little bit more pop from this frame at the net making it easier to put volleys down the middle away. The Whiteout’s stability helped a lot; I didn’t get any crazy harshness on off-center impacts.

-Serve returns:
Ok. This racquet was brilliant on returns. Whaling on doubles returns … this was so much fun! Again, the combination of power and control made this possible. Hitting deep, hard, cross-court returns with this one, just wanted more of it! On the other hand, if a forehand slice cross court into the alley … dial that up too. Conversely if you need to lob the return; that’s completely doable. Everything was on the table; all smiles! Low backhand slice return; just a great frame for this. I can honestly say this is the best “returns” racquet I’ve ever hit with.

Power/Control-
It’s definitely not an either/or situation with this frame. It’s a “both/and” … the combination is where it is unique. I never felt like things were getting out of control when putting together a point or trying to hit with more spin. In general I was very pleased with the depth that I could achieve without putting out any extraordinary effort.

Top Spin/Slice-
When compared with my current racquets, the Whiteout’s topspin generation is between the Dunlop 300g / CX 200 on the lower end and SX 300 Tour (spin racquet in that line). So for an overall “control frame” the Whiteout seems to generate above average spin. So many factors go into this but I found it to be very good off both sides on topspin / slice. For me the Whiteout V2 305 is a perfect 98 "tweener control frame" for my bag its outshining my CX 200.

Comfort-
I don’t know what Solinco did for dampening on this frame, but it works well. If I had any issues with comfort it was because I just wanted to play with this one everyday, but at my age I have to take a day off many times between sessions. I think ball pocketing is superb and I didn’t get any crazy jarring or jolting from off-center hits; even chunking a volley off the frame isn’t too bad. On center shots are deeply rewarding.

Feel-
There’s a beautiful feeling hitting the sweet spot with this Whiteout. There’s enough positive feedback to dial you in and keep you connected. Touch shots around the net, angles, small chip shots; it’s all there. There is such a solid feel through contact. I feel really connected with my shots. The ball pocketing is superior to all my other frames.

Maneuverability-
Around the net and moving to poach or just take a hard shot at the net; didn’t have any issues with getting the frame around. I felt like the balance was tending more toward slightly head heavy or maybe balanced after stringing. I’d like to experiment with adding the 5g butt cap weight in hopes making it just a shade more head light. This might put it more on par with the Dunlops. But it is performing well enough, so I don’t know one way or the other but I’m glad Solinco provides this option.

Stability-
This frame is very good at absorbing an opponents power and redirecting that pace. I hit some really memorable rallies with the better players ... 4.5 and up at our club; much younger players that can generate a lot of pace and spin. This frame really stood up to it well. I didn’t feel like it was getting pushed around or need more weight added to it.

General Thoughts:
Would I switch to this frame? For sure! Certainly when it comes to doubles.

For me the Solinco Whiteout V2 in stock form is pretty much what I was looking for when I added a bunch of lead to the CX200 at 12 o’clock to achieve better plough and stability. And Whiteout almost equals the SX300 for spin but has better control and slightly better stability and plough.

The things left to try are just experimenting with other strings (maybe since Solinco Mach 10 and Hyper G Round will be hard to beat) and adding the 5g butt cap weight. But all in all this is quite an eye opener for me as to what a great control-oriented frame is all about with just a sweet little bit of added “pop”.

Also, I passed the frame around to friends and hitting partners at our club and everyone had a lot of positive things to say about it after trying it. I passed the neat little Solinco stringlet bracelet along to a tennis GF; she was all smiles.

Edit: last evening played two sets of mixed 4.0 doubles. Between sets traded off the Solinco Whiteout V2 for my friend's Yonex VCore 100; I've never hit with a Yonex VCore 100 up to this point. Just wanted to mention that the stability of the Whiteout V2, in my mind, does approach the incredible stability of the VCore 100; obviously the feel is different but the Solinco does have this type of rock solid stability; so if you have the VCore 100 you'll know what I'm referring to. He liked the Solinco Whiteout V2 btw; he gets an insane amount of spin with his VCore so he's happy with that one.

Special Thanks:
Thanks so much to Solinco and Tennis Warehouse for allowing me to participate with the team in this amazing test and to enjoy this wonderful Solinco Whiteout 305 V2 Camo! Best paint job ever!
 
Last edited:
Solinco Whiteout V2 Part 1
(two parts due to character count limit)​

String and tension used for test: Solinco Tour Bite 16l mains at 50 pounds and Tour Bite Round 17 crosses at 48 pounds.

Tennis experience/background: I started around middle school and had a lot of coaching and played high school varsity singles and doubles in a relatively competitive area (Northern Virginia). I played on and off very inconsistently for the next decade. I ended up gaining 70 pounds of weight and started tennis back up a bit more seriously 2-3 years ago in an attempt to get back in shape and lose weight. I have been really getting into tennis equipment over the past year or two to really get down to the ideal setup for myself. I am finding that there was so much I didn't know about rackets and strings that could have really made an impact during my earlier years of tennis. But it's never too late!

Describe your playing style (i.e. serve & volley): 4.0 Aggressive baseliner. Singles player. Full swing forehands with a driving spin sort of mechanic moreso than a vertical whippy style. Flatter two-hand backhand. Mixture of solid flat serves and average second kick serves. I am weak with volleys.

Current racquet/string setups: Main racket currently Tfight 305s with the same Tour Bite mains and Tour Bite round crosses setup.

How many hours did you play with the racquet? 15 hours

Comments on racquet performance for each stroke (each section should be 3-5 sentences minimum):
-Groundstrokes: I played about 6 hours in the beginning completely stock, and I personally felt that the racket might be a bit underspec in terms of the average listed SW for this racket. Forehands felt quite a bit anemic and slow when really swinging at the ball. It felt as if there was no mass in the head of the racket helping with plow through. The launch angle is medium-high and definitely requires some spin to keep the ball in, which the racket is sufficiently good at producing. I ended up having to put some tungsten tape in the hoop at 12, and the groundstrokes immediately felt better with the additional mass and felt closer to what the stock SW should have been around. I thoroughly enjoyed my forehands with this racket as it provided good depth. Backhands for me were average with this racket as I feel heavier weight, stability, and denser string pattern are the best for my backhands.

-Serves: Similar issue here with serves as I did with my groundstrokes in terms of stock weight distribution. Here, even with the addition of some lead tape at 12, both my flat first serves and kick second serves felt a bit anemic. Power with the flat serves and kick with the second were average at best. The racket just wasn’t coming through as well as I wanted it to, and stability felt a bit lacking. As someone who also prefers a more crisp and non-muted racket, I personally felt it harder to control ball placement with serves with this racket as well.

-Volleys: Maneuverability felt quite good to get the racket around, but the drop in stability made it harder to counter balls that were fast. Volleying is one of my weaknesses in my game, so I need what I can get. I have been trying to practice improving my volleys. I can’t say that I would choose this racket to improve my volley game, especially with the muted feel making it harder to get a good touch on the ball.

-Serve returns: Similar to volleys, easy maneuverability lends itself to getting in the proper placement to return fast serves, but the lack of stability makes it difficult to be consistent and controlled. Balls get a little floaty and short at times. Not the best at redirecting pace or pushing back with proper depth.
 
Solinco Whiteout V2 Part 2
(two parts due to character count limit)​

Comments on racquet performance in each area (should be 2-3 sentences minimum)
Power/Control- Power is quite good in this racket and it is definitely increased from the Whiteout V1. I was quite surprised with the depth and power the racket produced which is partially influenced by its higher launch angle. As I said, top-end power was a bit lacking, but improved significantly with some tungsten tape placement in the hoop. Even with stiff strings, the racket felt more powerful than I expected. In comparison to other 98sq in frames, the control is on the lower side for me. I think the only 98sqin racket that had less control for me than this V2 was the PD98.

Top Spin/Slice- Spin generation is above average in this racket. Was pleasantly surprised. Pairing a higher launch angle with good spin generation allows for the ball to have more horizontal bounce/pop which is usually harder for my opponents to receive. Slices are above average, but can get a little floaty and will just need some technique adjustments. For a “boxish” frame, this racket produces very good spin.

Comfort- Comfort is by far this racket’s strength. In a modern-day world where racket manufacturers are pushing for comfort across the board, this racket provides the best in my opinion within the 98 sqin offerings. This racket is muted even with my stiff, crisp string setup and I can’t imagine how much more muted it can be with other string setups. Comfort is better than other muted rackets such as the new Blades, Radicals, Ezones, Boom, etc.

Feel- Throughout my time on Tennis Talk, I’ve learned that feel is very subjective and can have varying definitions from person to person. I personally define it as a racket that is crisp and provides a lot of racket vibrations to the user’s hand/arm and can provide immediate feedback to where the ball was hit on the stringbed. And usually for me, as power and control are generally on opposite ends of a spectrum (not always 100% the case), feel and comfort are also on opposite ends of the spectrum for me. So while comfort is maxed out in this racket, the feel is bottomed out. Some may say that a muted racket is what feels best for them and that the new T-Fights and old Babolats are the “worst feeling” rackets they’ve ever tried.

Maneuverability- As I’ve mentioned above in terms of groundstrokes, volleys, and serve returns, the maneuverability in this racket is quite good. Even with a static weight of 306g, the racket generally felt light and easy to move quickly. I would say that this is an effect of an underspec SW. It was easier to move the racket around than the other rackets I currently have.

Stability- Stability is a weakness in this racket that is also most likely a byproduct of a possibly low SW. The racket gets pushed back when receiving balls with a lot of pace on all strokes. It’s difficult to also produce top-end power and plow-through capability consistently and is not very good at redirecting shots despite the maneuverability.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:
Static weight is 306 grams, so it’s very close to what is listed.

It’s unfortunate I don’t have a SW machine, but I feel like some additional tweaking with lead tape placement will be necessary for me to get the most out of this racket, especially in the serve and stability department. Can’t say that my review of this racket is fully comprehensive of what this racket should offer due to its high chance of being underspec. And I say this in comparison to what others have said about this racket, and also comparing it to the Whiteout V1 16x19 that I have and have played with for a couple of hours as well. Will have to tinker with weight placement at 3 and 9 or even 10 and 2 and a leather grip to increase overall stability and SW.

I think my string setup was more than good for this racket and may try to string it 2 pounds higher to around 52lb. I do not think I will try other string setups as it would make it even more muted than what I like. I’ve tried Mach-10 in my other rackets and don’t think Mach-10 in this V2 would help me personally as it would feel more muted while providing even more power than I comfortably want. I think a more spin-oriented string that is relatively stiff would be best in this racket. Hyper-G, Toroline Caviar, Lynx Tour is what comes to mind for me at least.

I personally prefer the Whiteout V1 due to its increased feel. In my opinion, the V1 is honestly one of the most average or slightly above average in everything/well-rounded racket that I’ve tried in the 98 sqin department. Akin to probably the Head Radical? Solid in every aspect, but not amazing at anything specifically. The V1 offers more feel than the Radical. V2 improves in the power and spin department compared to the V1 or the Radical. If I had to choose, I’d love to have the V1 feel with the V2 playability.

Small aside from performance aspects, the camo paint job is unlike any other paint jobs and is definitely one of my favorites on the market right now :)

Who Would I recommend this racket to?
I don’t think flat hitters will benefit from this racket with the higher launch angle. This racket offers a good blend of spin and power. I’d say that those who use a blade looking for just a smidge more power and spin in their game should consider this racket. I also think that out of the many 98 sqin frames that I have tried, this is the most muted/ comfortable racket out there even in comparison with the Ezone 98. Even with very stiff, crisp strings, the racket was quite muted and comfortable. For those arm/shoulder issues looking for a comfortable 98 sqin frame, trying this racket out is a no-brainer. The other “max comfort” 98 sqin racket I can think of is the Boom Pro, which has its own unique characteristics.

My subjective personal 98 sqin racket comparison chart:
Spin: PA98> GT98>PS98>EZONE98>V2>PD98>V1,Boom Pro>Blade 16x19 >305s
Power: PD98>EZONE98>BoomPro>PA98>GT98,PS98>V2>305s~V1>Blade
Control: Blade> 305s> V1>PS98>PA98>GT98>BoomPro>EZONE98>V2>PD98
Muted: V2>BoomPro> EZONE98>Blade>GT98,PD98,PA98,PS98>V1>305s


Much, much thanks to TW and Solinco! Always been a fan of solinco strings as my go-to. Very interested now to go ahead and try out the blackout lineup as well.
 
SOLINCO WHITEOUT 305 V2 CAMO


String and Tension used for test:


Solinco Mach 10 Crosses at 45 lbs., Solinco vanquish mains 50 lbs. wt. 330 grams strung and Yonex super Grap over grip and Solinco dampener. Swing weight 326.

Tennis experience and background:

3.5/4.0 since 1976, singles and doubles with one 10-year break. I'm 72 and play mostly with other old guys like myself.

Describe your playing style:

Aggressive baseliner with 1 HBH, semi-western forehand. Will adventure to the net when the opportunity presents.

Current Racquet /String set up:


Prince Textreme Tour 310, 2019 Model. Strung with X-one biphase 17 Gauge 50 lbs.

How many hours did you play with the Racquet:

14 Hours singles and doubles against my regular opponents.

Ground strokes
I have always loved my Prince TT 310 Racquets. Didn't miss a beat with the Solinco. Great power and control! Deep balls without extra effort and able to absorb pace from a heavy ball. Control was good and can't remember hitting a flyer to the back fence. Able to hit my targets without difficulty. Seemed to improve my backhand as I was able to hit slice and topspin without difficulty. This helped my backhand become my most versatile side. For sure fells like I'm able to take big cuts without fear of losing control.

Serves:

The serve isn't my best shot but I surely seemed to get some help with this stick. Deep serves with good spin, I even hit a few baby kick serves and that's good for me. Easy to swing and hit targets. It's a keeper for the serve. Able to block bigger serves with good control.

Volleys:

Really enjoyed playing the net with this stick. My regular opponents could see the improvements in my net game and commented so. Deep and short angle volleys were great and overheads easier to put away. The great maneuverability of this racquet really helps with net play.

Serve returns:

Now this is my thing! I'm an aggressive returner and the racquet helped my stroke. I mostly play the forehand side in doubles and was able to go big on my return with no loss of performance. Hard cross court shots improved with this stick. Able to lob inside in from the forehand side without difficulty to keep the net man honest.

Power/Control:

This racquet has all the power needed with great control. Great combination of both! At 72 years old power is a good thing but I'm not ready for a granny stick yet. Being able to hit with power and depth without over swinging helps with control. No problem putting the ball away on a short ball or ripping a winner to the open court. Deep top spin shots to push the opponents behind the baseline are easily achieved.

Top Spin/Slice:

No problem with spin production with this racquet. Ball drops hard on the baseline and maybe the best backhand slice racquet I've played with. I play with a hybrid set up and I thinks this helps with spin production.

Comfort:

I've played with more effort with this racquet during this playtest. A little more effort than I usually put out, trying to get the most out of my serve and with all of my strokes. After all the extra effort no arm pain at all. A little soreness but this is due to extra effort. At my age you have to pace yourself to get three matches and a practice in in one week. No arm discomfort at all. This a very comfortable racquet.

Feel:

Provides a very solid feel. No vibrations or strange sounds when you hit the ball. Racquet is a little dampened. I get a solid pop sound with I connect with the ball that feels good. Easy to feel where my racquet is when I'm playing a drop shot or touch lob. I feel connected at all times with this racquet.

Maneuverability:

No issues at all! One of the strengths of this stick. Good solid swing weight but feels light. As I said earlier the ability to get this racquet into position quickly helps with net play.

Stability:

I had no problem with stability but I don't play with big hitters. I have a grandson who's a 4.5/5.0 and any racquet I play with feels unstable when I play him. Racquet feels stable with the group I play with who are over 65 and 4.0 players. So I guess stability is relative to who you play with and somewhat your skill level. I don't get and wobbling or racquet turning in my hand with this great racquet.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

I'm switching to this racquet. Yes, I really like it!! Plays just fine stock for me. Just got the 5 gram butt cap in and I'll try it the next time I play. I love the effortless extra pop I get with this racquet. Makes tennis easy to play. The paint job is great and I get comments almost daily and how good it looks.


Special thanks to TW and Solinco for allowing me to participate in this playtest!! This is my first time and I really enjoyed it!



'
 
JK208's V2 Whiteout XTD Review

Tennis experience/background:


Started playing tennis just to knock the ball around 3 years ago, 1.5 years ago I decided to get serious and I started playing every day. Declined several D3 offers, gearing up for high school season. Today I would say that I am a solid 7ish UTR who hits with just about everyone- I am competitive with the 9 UTRs, and I can beat up on 5 UTRs pretty easily.

Describe your playing style:

I have pretty big strokes but need to improve on consistency. Definitely lean towards an all-court style of play, and I love moving to the net. My coach says I have one of the biggest serves in the club and some of the strongest touch shots and volleys he's seen, so I definitely look to complement those strengths.

Usual set-up(s) and preferred tension(s):
2022 Ezone 98 with Mach 10 mains and Hyper G round crosses at 48lbs.

What string/tension did you use for this playtest?
Grapplesnake Tour M8, 48lbs

How many hours did you use this racket for?
About 35 hours (Installed fresh M8 after each 10 hour increment)

Comments on racquet performance for each stroke

-Groundstrokes: 6/10 or 10/10 (DEPENDS ON WHO YOU ARE)

I really enjoyed groundstrokes with the XTD. I thought that even though it isn’t especially whippy, it produces very heavy balls. It felt like it was easier to generate pace than it was with the Ezone 98. However, my next-gen strokes and wristy technique suffered with the high swingweight. The lack of aero throat affected my ability to feel confident bringing it to a match, but for more traditional players with a blade-like frame, I think they would really enjoy this. Forgiveness was high, and off-center hits still produced a solid ball.


-Serves: 9/10

Serves were the best part of this racket. I thought that the kick serves really jumped up, but slice serves floated a bit more than they should have. Power on flat serves was well above average. Unfortunately, during this playtest my serving was not at its strongest, but I found a lot of consistency with this frame, which has traditionally been a weakness for me.

-Volleys: 9/10

I tend to like every racket for volleying, and this is no exception. Lots of weight behind the ball and a generous sweetspot proved key to a solid, punchy volleys that could be placed on a dime. Stability was great for volleys, but maneuverability was compromised due to the high SW. I thought that it cut through the air on volleys relatively well, and for the most part, it was an extension of my arm when I was at the net.

-Serve returns: 10/10

This is an excellent racket to return with, whether you like to punch through the ball or take a full stroke. The high SW led to deep returns that could push the server back, especially on kick serves. I could slice the ball back deep and move in off many returns, which was surprising, given that that’s not something that’s normally in my toolbox. Backhand returns were phenomenal, being heavy and deep, and it could quickly neutralize the point.


Power/Control

Power levels were above average, less than an Ezone 98, but much more than something like a Blade. I think that Blade V5 users would really appreciate the regular V2 Whiteout, and for those who like a bit of lead, they may prefer the XTD in stock form. Consistency was high and not even once did a ball launch on me, which is impressive for a 16/19. Control was good, especially directional control. I felt like I could really move my opponents side to side with this frame.

Top Spin/Slice

Topspin was one of the most impressive parts of this setup. Balls that I thought were going out dove in at the last second and kicked back up in a way that made it quite difficult to return. I though that it was difficult to use with a super vertical swing path, as a 330+ Swingweight combined with a box beam isn’t exactly conducive to ultra-modern technique. I thought that slices floated a bit, but they were always controlled and had tons of sidespin.

Comfort

I’m not someone to pay attention to the comfort of a racket, as I don’t have existing arm issues, but I did think that it was more plush than something like an Ezone. The foam dampened all of the jarring that I normally feel, and I would say that this is one of the most comfortable rackets I have used.

Feel

I was extremely impressed with the solid feel of the Whiteout V2. The foam filling instilled an extra sense of confidence, and against heavy balls, I felt good swinging out. There were no vibrations, but I knew exactly where the ball was contacting on the swing bed. It was very connected, but still fairly muted.

Maneuverability

The maneuverability was by far the weakest part of this frame. It was fine on volleys, but for those with whippier technique, they will probably think that between the high SW and the box beam this is not the racket for them. I would be curious to try the regular version of the V2 WO and see if my SW concerns are fixed. On forehands, I felt like I was often late to the ball because the head wouldn’t come through contact.

Stability

As I said before, the stability on this frame was excellent. The foam really helped to keep the twisting minimal and the plowthrough high. Serve returns were excellent as were forehands through heavy balls. I thought that this is up there with the ISO 305 in terms of stability, which is a massive complement, as the ISO is one of the most stable rackets of all time.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

I was just about the farthest person from who would typically use this racket, but I really enjoyed it nonetheless. This is not a frame I am able to use for the season, as my next-gen forehand was difficult to execute with this frame, and I will play up to 3 best of 3 matches in a day, and the swingweight would really hinder my ability to play well in later matches. When I used a more traditional technique, this frame absolutely shined. I would recommend it especially to people who like the 18x20 Blade, or any early Blade user who leaded up their frames. Ezone Tour or Ezone+ users should also give this one a try. For anyone else, I would suggest trying the V2 Whiteout regular version, as the high SW on the XTD may become an issue.
 
Solinco WhiteOut V2 XTD Racket Review


String and tension used for the test: 1. Mach 10 16L at 53 lbs. (approximately 9 hours), 2. Razor Soft 16 at 52 lbs. (approximately 5+ hours)

Tennis experience/background: Started playing tennis in the 80’s with college tennis experience. Currently playing at 4.5

Describe your playing style: Attacking baseliner who is trying to develop an all-court game. Trying to come up to the net more frequently to shorten up the points.

Current racquet/string setups: Recently switched to Ezone 98 2025. Previous rackets were: Auxetic Prestige Pro (Hyper G 18G between 48 - 50 lbs.) & Solinco WhiteOut 18x20 (Hyper G Round 16L at 50lbs).

How many hours did you play with the racquet? Around 14-15 hours total. Spent a lot of time rallying to get more familiarized with the racket. Played mostly doubles.

Comments on racquet performance for each stroke (each section should be 3-5 sentences minimum):

-Groundstrokes: One thing that was immediately noticeable was effortless power. Hitting deep near the baseline didn’t take much effort. It actually took some time getting the balls in on the first few shots. The launch angle also took some time getting used to coming from Ezone 98 & Prestige Pro.

After the initial few hits, it was pretty easy to start hitting well. The spin potential was amazing, again, coming from Ezone 98 and Prestige Pro. Topspin was super heavy and the slices were biting hard. The only shot that I had problem with was hitting forehand flat drive shots. Unlike high topspin forehands with nice predictability, some of the flat drive shots flew off and sailed way long. I contribute to the issue with my forehand being the weaker side technically and not being fully familiarized with the added length. Long rallying sessions definitely helped (*working on the basics of my forehand repeatedly helped a lot) and switching out the string to the thicker gauge also helped with control better.

Overall, my feeling is that WhiteOut V2 XTD is a beast of a frame for intermediate/advanced baseline bashers. This is really a fun stick to hit with. I practiced hard to really gel with the frame because hitting with this racket was fun and rewarding. I wanted the racket to really work for me.

-Serves: This was my absolute favorite part of this playtest. It’s important for me that I get the high bounce/kick on my second serves. It’s probably the combination of having the added length, being very maneuverable and having lots of controllable power that led to my second serves being more effective than they have been. I do like the predictable control I get from Ezone 98 on serves, but this racket creates much heavier balls with more spin.

Also, all I had to concentrate was to not overly swing hard or fast on the flat or slice serves. As long as the balls were well struck, they came off fast and hard. Placing the balls where I wanted them was simple and predictable. One of the best serving rackets I’ve tried recently for sure.

-Volleys: When playing doubles, I usually don’t move up to the net unless both me and my partner are moving forward together. That usually creates less reaction volleys and more of us setting up to attack the incoming balls. I’m not much of a touch volleyer, but the angle volleys and attacking punch volleys were great. Controlling the depth or angle was predictable and felt solid. The extra length didn’t hinder the attacking movements, but I felt that the added length would be risky to try anything too cute.

-Serve returns: Absolutely a beast in serve returns. It felt stable against impact and maneuverability was never an issue. There is effortless power even with having to attack hard, and even the slice returns were turning into hard returns to handle. Playing doubles where almost all shots are struck really hard, this racket adds a little more oomph on the returns.

Comments on racquet performance in each area (should be 2-3 sentences minimum)

Power/Control- Power was the most noticeable thing when I hit my first ball. Without even trying the ball landed near the baseline. It was not hard to control the balls but did take some time getting used to because of its high launch angle and power.

Top Spin/Slice- Coming from Ezone 98 (*also Auxetic Prestige Pro), it felt like I was getting spin like those spin friendly 100” tweeners. Though it takes more effort to create the same top spin as larger headed tweeners, those players with strong, whippy forehands could use this racket as a major weapon. WO V2 XTD just adds a little more power and spin than most rackets I’ve tried.

Slices were also fantastic. I usually like to hit topspin on my OHBH and mostly use the slices as defense. With this racket, my slices were hard and aggressive. My first few really aggressive slices were hit into the net, but it didn’t take long for the slices to become a major weapon once I got used to the feel. My hitting partners were commenting how spinny and it was difficult handling some of the slices.
Comfort- This frame is super comfortable. The dampening system works really well. Even when poly is strung above 50 lbs, it didn’t feel boardy or harsh at all. My arm also didn’t feel any stress from hitting with poly strings even after a long rally and a couple sets of matches. Even on (*many) mishits, the jarring effect was minimized.

Feel- I’m probably going against the grain, but I preferred the dampened feel of the V2 better than the V1 (*I also tried my buddy’s V1 XTD). It may not feel as connected as the V1 in feel, but I like that I can still feel where the ball is struck. With Ezone 98, it feels like I struck the ball well but the feel is very muted. To me WO V2 XTD feels dampened but not full out muted in feel like Ezone 98. Some say Ezone 98’s entire face is the sweetspot and the disconnected feel comes from having a large sweetspot. I think WO V2 XTD has a very generous sweetspot and still offers a more connected feel when struck well.

Maneuverability- This was my biggest concern with the XTD version. I like the extra power and reach, but often extended versions hinder my OHBH, limiting me to just hit slices, or lose control on my forehand from being late on my shots. WO V2 XTD is one of the most (*if not the most) maneuverable (*APD+ 2013 comes to mind as something closer in maneuverability) extended frame I’ve used. Of course it did take a few minutes to adjust, but the adjustment came easily and swinging it freely without any hindrance was a big, big plus. I recently switched from Prestige Pro to Ezone 98 seeking some free power without losing too much control. The fact that I don’t have to put any more effort into swinging the extended racket and getting more out of my shots makes WO V2 XTD an appealing racket.

Stability- During hard exchanges, or returning powerful serves, this racket never felt unstable. I didn’t notice any twisting in my hands. Very stable and comfortable.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

Comparing it to the V1 XTD, the feel was definitely soft and dampened. It just feels like an update of the V1 with its feel and what feels like added spin and power. I love the paint job, as well. The camo paint immediately got noticed by the people around me. It does stand out from loud yellow, blue and red paint jobs.

Within my hitting group one is using the Black Out (*demoed various Solinco frames after trying my WO 18x20) and another hitting buddy just switched to WO V1 XTD. Other than Babolat, Wilson, Head and Yonex, there are more Solinco rackets than other brands right now.

Mach 10: Lovely feeling string. Even strung at 53 lbs, it did not feel boardy or harsh. The control is ok for being a poly string, but for those that like to hybrid or come from using non-poly strings, Mach 10 would be a good poly string to try as their introductory poly string.

Overgrip: My go to tacky grip is Tourna Tac XL. The provided over grip felt soft, tacky and perfect for cold weather days for my tennis. I sweat too much to use on hot days, but since Solinco products are high quality, I’m going to try their dry versions of the overgrips.

Vibration damper: I really liked the vibration dampeners that were provided. It felt like they provided a little more feedback than Tourna O dampeners while still reducing the vibration. I also liked that (*though it was hard to put it in place) it stays in place.

That said, I wish it came in different colors. That silicone green color stands out too much. Same goes for Solinco Hyper G. As popular as the string is with the players, why does it only come in green? Couldn’t there be Hyper G Black? Something to consider, perhaps?

_______________

This was a super fun playtest. I was looking for a new racket to move away from the traditional players’ rackets, and I think I’ve found it. I still need to play around with different strings (perhaps more deader feeling poly strings) and maybe replace the grip with leather for a more solid, connected feel, but I’m completely happy with the racket’s performance and feel. It feels so fun and rewarding to hit with the racket.

Thank you, TW!!!! Thank you, Solinco!!!! Thank you so much for the opportunity to participate in this playtest.
 
SOLINCO WHITEOUT 305 XTD V2 CAMO

String and Tension used for test:


Solinco Vanquish in mains @ 50 lbs. / Solinco Mach 10 in crosses @ 46 lbs., wt. 332 grams strung and Wilson Pro over grip and Solinco dampener.

Tennis experience and background:

USTA 4.5 Doubles - 56 yrs old and also play ALTA A-1. No senior leagues yet. Still holding my own against the youngbloods.

Describe your playing style:

All court player with 1 HBH, eastern forehand, more flat than topspin strokes. Love net play and my slice backhand.

Current Racquet /String set up:


Wilson Blade Pro 16x19 V9. Strung with Tier One Firewire 17G in mains @ 46 lbs, and Isospeed Cream 16G in crosses @ 48 lbs.

How many hours did you play with the Racquet:

20 Hours singles and doubles against my team mates, and UTR 10+ high school junior son.

Ground strokes
I loved my Wilson Blade Pro, but I was craving a bit more power, and the Solinco XTD delivered instantly. On the forehand side, it gave me slightly more control, likely thanks to the added stiffness, while still giving me the extra pop I was looking for. Hitting deep, effortless shots were easy, and when I wanted to amp it up, a quicker rotation was all it took - boom.

But where this racquet really shined was on my slice backhand. With the Blade Pro, my slice would sometimes float and lose that low, skidding bite. Not with the XTD. Remember the 1980 Ginsu Knife commercial? “Slices through a tin can and still cuts a tomato.” That’s this racquet on slice backhands - precision and bite. It’s the Ginsu Knife of racquets.

I love attacking the net, and this stick had me carving clean, low slice winners down the line all day. Topspin was just okay for now, but that’s on the string setup. Next time I’m dropping in a shaped poly in the mains and will report back.

Serves:

This racquet is an absolute cannon on serves. Thanks to years of baseball training from my dad—Little League through high school—I still have a live arm, and the added length on this frame delivers more pop and precision than my Blade Pro, which is no slouch itself. My serves were noticeably faster, and my first-serve percentage improved too. When my son reacted with a simple, "Dude!", I knew it was legit. Overheads were effortless. Spin could be better, but that’s more about the string setup than the racquet. All in all, I’m loving it!

Volleys:

I really enjoyed coming to the net with the Solinco - it performed well overall. Deep volleys and short angles felt solid, and punching volleys off approach shots was easy. Even in fast-paced doubles exchanges, reaction volleys held up. That said, I still give the edge to the Blade Pro when it comes to feel. With the Blade, I can carve sharper angles and place drop volleys with more precision.

Serve returns:

As an aggressive returner, this racquet really complemented my game. I usually play the backhand side in doubles, and my slice returns were outstanding - low, biting, and consistent. Cross-court shots also saw noticeable improvement with this stick. And to keep the net player honest, I like to rip the occasional forehand down the line and this racquet delivered the punch I needed for those moments.

Power/Control:

This racquet delivers all the power I need, without sacrificing control - a perfect blend of both. At 56, I definitely appreciate the extra power, but I’m not ready to pick up a grandma stick just yet. The ability to hit with depth and pace without over-swinging gives me better consistency and control. Whether it’s putting away a short ball or ripping a winner into open space, this frame handles it with ease. The racquet really inspires confidence to take full cuts from anywhere on the court, producing impressive depth, pace, and spin.

Top Spin/Slice:

This is easily one of the best racquets I’ve ever used for the backhand slice. It delivers incredible slice shots from any position - high, mid, or low - with precision and bite. I typically play with a hybrid string setup, so once I restring this frame, I expect the topspin to improve. But as it stands, the slice performance is outstanding even with a non-shaped multi in the mains.

Comfort:

This is a comfortable racquet. I demoed the previous version a while back, and I think this update is a noticeable improvement. I felt connected on every shot - it’s not overly dampened, but definitely not harsh either. It’s firm, solid, stable, and plows through the ball with good feedback. Even while dealing with some mild golfer’s elbow, I experienced no arm discomfort. That said, in terms of overall comfort and feel, I’d still give a slight edge to the Blade Pro.

Feel:

The racquet has a slightly dampened feel, but still offers a very solid, connected response with minimal vibration. There's a satisfying pop on contact that sounds and feels great - definitely not hollow, I guess due to the internal foam. Overall, this frame strikes a nice balance between being responsive and communicative.

Maneuverability:

No complaints here! This is one of the racquet’s standout strengths. It has a solid swing weight but still feels light in hand, making it easy to generate racquet head speed with minimal effort.

Stability:

I had no problem with stability. Definitely more stable than my Blade Pro.

General reaction/comments on overall performance:

I love the effortless pop this racquet provides right out of the box - it really makes the game feel easier. The paint job is sharp too; I get compliments on it all the time. It offers a rare blend of power, spin especially the slice, comfort, and stability. Compared to my Blade Pro, this frame gives me easier access to power, depth, and slice, though it does trade off a bit of flex and plush feel. Still, the overall response is solid and satisfying. It hits a heavy ball and feels stable, forgiving, and reliable from all areas of the court. For players seeking a modern frame with control and comfort, this one is a serious contender.

Many thanks to TW & Solinco. Two amazing companies.
 
Back
Top