Tennis Warehouse Playtest: Wilson RF 01 Family

codonnell

Semi-Pro
TW Review:

Wilson Pages:
RF 01 Future

RF 01

RF 01 Pro
I like the look of the 335 sw (331 on tw) on the RF 01 Pro too. Based off the balance and static it sounds like it will hit an incredibly solid ball while not being overwhelming. I can’t imagine this frame need close to any weight besides the 340+ lovers where just a small bit of lead at 12 will get you there too. Very excited to see peoples feelings on this.
 
Last edited:

Cowboy

Semi-Pro
Good luck to those who will soon get their hands on a RF! I was fortunate enough to hit with all three and I had a great time with them. I really enjoyed the 320 but I really liked the 300 version the most. The 280 was nice too but for a straight out of the box experience the 300 was my preferred stick of all 3. The RFs made my slice backhand feel like Roger was guiding my shot for me. Sublime. But overall really nice power, decent action and fairly stable all around. Very quick too. Best of luck to all and enjoy!

300-305g seems to be the goldilocks weight for me. I tried a PS X v14 and it just felt....cumbersome. You maintain whipability and don't fatigue after a 3 hour match, but the racquet also has enough plow-through that it isn't getting punished by hard balls. I'm not used to playing with heavier racquets, so that is part of it. That said, I'm no small dude. For that reason, I applied for the PS 01 (non Pro).
 

TheBoom

Hall of Fame
I’m most curious about the 320 because the specs are more up my alley these days, and I tried the 300g Shift but never the 315 - this feels more like a Shift 315 companion but with a more open string pattern. The butt cap is really nice too.
That’s what I was thinking. Probably going to pick one up myself
 

SteveI

Legend
300-305g seems to be the goldilocks weight for me. I tried a PS X v14 and it just felt....cumbersome. You maintain whipability and don't fatigue after a 3 hour match, but the racquet also has enough plow-through that it isn't getting punished by hard balls. I'm not used to playing with heavier racquets, so that is part of it. That said, I'm no small dude. For that reason, I applied for the PS 01 (non Pro).
Yes.. same here
 

Cowboy

Semi-Pro
Well, should I get selected, and it sounds like there is little chance, I have two packs of Luxilon ECO Spin that I'd like to try. My current Blade 100 v8 will be in need of a restring around the time this could arrive. I'd likely string both up with the same string at the same tension to see how they compare.
 

PRS

Professional
The Pro feels really solid in the hands. After playing tonight, the pro shop was already closed, but all they do is turn off the lights in it until the whole club closes, so I took a look and they had exactly 1 in stock. Just held out for a second is all, and it wasn't strung (don't think they have a demo for it either), but it felt good in the hands. I hope I'm able to try it out.
 
I have the RF 01 Pro 320grams strung with Re string zero
How do you describe its difficulty/playability?

I usually use heavier SW racket with HL balance such as RF97 --> Ezone Tour --> Blade Pro v8 --> Strike VS weighted to 315 g unstrung.

But I am a bit in doubt because I tried Pro Staff X and it felt so sluggish. I am afraid now I'm used to 300-315 g static weight with 325ish SW. Want to make this purchase or RF01 regular.
 

TwinCinema

Professional
But I am a bit in doubt because I tried Pro Staff X and it felt so sluggish. I am afraid now I'm used to 300-315 g static weight with 325ish SW. Want to make this purchase or RF01 regular.

I wouldn’t be too worried about that. The X is a Pro Staff and the RF 01 is an entirely new line. This has a smaller head and reviews say it’s pretty maneuverable. I’d be shocked if it were anything remotely like the 100” PSX.
 

Trip

Legend
Key Take-Aways:
- All new mold, layup and drill pattern
- Like a Shift and a Pro Staff 97 had a baby, without the dual flex
- Designed to be a more modern flatter hitter's baseline-centric all-court attacker's frame
- More dense central string bed, for better control and precision when hitting more flat
- More open outer string bed, for more forgiveness outside the sweet spot
- Crisp feel, without being overly harsh
- Moves much faster through the air and are more whippy in general than any Pro Staff equivalent
- Poly really plays best when strung a low tension (<=50 lbs in the 320, <= mid 40's with the 300 and 280)
- Strung RA's of 66 in the 320, 61 in the 300
- Wouldn't be surprised to see some pro's actually playing the 320 at some point
- The 300 is really the gem for most rec players, and for customization
- Stands a good chance of becoming Wilson's best-selling line
 
Last edited:

dudu

New User
Key Take-Aways:
- All new mold, layup and drill pattern
- Like a Shift and a Pro Staff 97 had a baby, without the dual flex
- Designed to be a more modern flatter hitter's baseline-centric all-court attacker's frame
- More dense central string bed, for better control and precision when hitting more flat
- More open outer string bed, for more forgiveness outside the sweet spot
- Crisp feel, without being overly harsh
- Moves much faster through the air and are more whippy in general than any Pro Staff equivalent
- Poly really plays best when strung a low tension (<=50 lbs in the 320, <= mid 40's with the 300 and 280)
- Strung RA's of 66 in the 320, 61 in the 300
- Wouldn't be surprised to see some pro's actually playing the 320 at some point
- The 300 is really the gem for most rec players, and for customization
- Stands a good chance of becoming Wilson's best-selling line
Thanks for posting. Love what I’m seeing. Though I don’t consider myself a flatter hitter, I think the customization of a 300 is perfect to suit your swing. Love the fast through the air and whippy. That what I want in a racket
 
Today’s the day emails go out! Good luck to everyone who applied and congrats to the lucky few selected!! I can’t wait to hear what the playtesters think!

I’m specifically interested in the Pro as its specs with an overgrip out of the box are one for one exactly what I prefer/play with! Nothing like the pure bliss of a perfect frame with no modding needed.
 

StringStrungStrang

Professional
Ladies and gentlemen, start checking your emails! I'm in!!
Congratulations!! Me too !! RF 01 !!

WR151411U__dc34220b43d234d13e3d147fbdfd4a4d.jpeg
 

Mjolnir

New User
In for the Pro. Thx TW!

Guy at a clinic this past Tuesday had a freshly purchased Pro, just strung up that day with a black multi/poly hybrid, and he very kindly let me hit my turn in line with it. Only 6 balls, but now my objectivity is disheveled! Had started with my custom Pro Staff v14 (331g/329 SW/5 HL), and this 01 Pro felt much much lighter and nimbler, so much so I had to look at the specs on the racquet before handing it back because I was convinced it was the 300g model!

Maybe his particular sample was low on weight, SW, and/or TW, but it felt more powerful than my v14…I liked it immediately.

We’ll see what specs I get, but I’m going in to the playtest with a favorable outlook; will try to be objective nonetheless.
 

OEEspino

New User
Key Take-Aways:
- All new mold, layup and drill pattern
- Like a Shift and a Pro Staff 97 had a baby, without the dual flex
- Designed to be a more modern flatter hitter's baseline-centric all-court attacker's frame
- More dense central string bed, for better control and precision when hitting more flat
- More open outer string bed, for more forgiveness outside the sweet spot
- Crisp feel, without being overly harsh
- Moves much faster through the air and are more whippy in general than any Pro Staff equivalent
- Poly really plays best when strung a low tension (<=50 lbs in the 320, <= mid 40's with the 300 and 280)
- Strung RA's of 66 in the 320, 61 in the 300
- Wouldn't be surprised to see some pro's actually playing the 320 at some point
- The 300 is really the gem for most rec players, and for customization
- Stands a good chance of becoming Wilson's best-selling line
Should I watch reviews before testing the racket out first? I feel like if i watch the reviews, I'll become biased in some way shape or form. Hahaahaha
 

Icsa

Professional
Should I watch reviews before testing the racket out first? I feel like if i watch the reviews, I'll become biased in some way shape or form. Hahaahaha
I'm watching them because they give me ideas on what to look for. But I'm also not easy to be influenced, my review will be based purely on my experience with the racquet, regardless on what others say.
 

Rally

Professional
Congrats to all chosen! For those who are testing the Pro, my one request to you is to please do a comparison with the Pro Staff 85 or 90. I'm really anxious to hear how the RF01 Pro performs relative to the mids.

Wish I would've been selected. I've been using the Pro Staff and the RF97 for 19 years. No one better to test this racket and give solid assessments than me. Oh well. Thanks TW
I'm right there with you, except I've only been using the mids and the RF97 for the past 8 years. That's the luck of the draw. I hope there are some playtesters who have a fresh memory of the Pro Staff 85 and 90.
 

mpournaras

Hall of Fame
Got in! Gonna give the 01 a proper test then maybe a second test with leather and lead to get it up to 310g or so
 

Geoff

Hall of Fame
Congratulations to everyone selected. A friend of mine is the buyer at TW and he confirmed the large number of applicants. Looking forward to some great reviews as always.
 

Trip

Legend
Looks like I didn't make the cut this time. I was on the PS 100 16x20 test, so fair enough indeed!

That said, I'm hoping at least one person selected for the 300g will have the tools and customization skill to test their frame at a more appropriate 330g+ and 325sw+.
 

RF2017

Rookie
Looks like I didn't make the cut this time. I was on the PS 100 16x20 test, so fair enough indeed!

That said, I'm hoping at least one person selected for the 300g will have the tools and customization skill to test their frame at a more appropriate 330g+ and 325sw+.
Although I wasn't selected for the playtest, I did end up getting a 01 300 g for myself at my local shop and after an hr hitting with it stock, I decided to customize it to these specs and will let you know how it goes

Specs (Strung Tour Bite 1.20 50/48)
344.9 g
31.3 cm
326 SW
14.0 TW
 

RF2017

Rookie
Hard to say for me. However, I also feel like people in general always love it when new lines come out for brands, so whos to say
 

codonnell

Semi-Pro
If this new Wilson line didn't have the RF name associated with it, you think it would be as viral?
Possibly not as viral but like RF2017 said, a new mold typically gets people interested. I would say based off the specs range and what it appears to be a certain line of frame they are pushing (getting comparisons to the Ezone and Aero 98). It would gain a good amount of hype in addition to have added uniqueness of foam filled, different handle shape, varying stiffness models, and a cool paint job. But absolutely throwing Federer into this as given it a considerably larger platform.
 

TennisHound

Legend
With the RF Pro costing $300, T-Fight 315 has very similar specs.
Of course the T-Fight is way too white, but if it was black…
 
Last edited:

jimmy8

G.O.A.T.
As viral? No, but it would still be a massive launch. I remember when the clash came out and even the hype of the shift (though that was somewhat tempered by the pandemic).
The pandemic made tennis more popular. It is the number 1 safest sport for covid. Every one in the tennis industry loved covid for the surge, but of course hated covid itself, but loved making so much money.
 

Alcawrath

Professional
The pandemic made tennis more popular. It is the number 1 safest sport for covid. Every one in the tennis industry loved covid for the surge, but of course hated covid itself, but loved making so much money.
Sure, but it complicated product launches. Remember the supply chain issues?
 

dgoran

Hall of Fame
So I played with
iu
(Obviously RF 01 Pro come on lol are we RF Minions or not :) ) for about an hour (one set ) and
iu
’s basically weighted pure drive 98.
Mine was strung with vs guy 130 and Alu rough 125 at 57. I wish
iu
was 60lb at times it’s too much power imho combines with aero beam
iu
flies too quickly. Maybe after few matches I would get use to
iu
but this was exactly why I sold pure drive 98 it was too stiff to quick off the stringbed.

Maybe because I got use to prestige pro dwell time lately this new Ed pro felt like I had nanosecond on the stringbed.

I used ps85 Asian k90 us k90 original rf97 back in a day but gave up those for various reasons. Any YouTube review that even mention those in comparison is delusional. IMHO best Wilson racquet these days for my taste is blade pro and blade 98.
 
Last edited:

Alcawrath

Professional
I remember it took me a few months to find any tennis balls. I think by the time the Shift was available, getting rackets and balls wasn't a problem anymore.
I'm talking about things from a producer perspective. Launching a new product during the pandemic was a headache for any company. It's fine you disagree, but my point was originally that the shift was super hyped even though it was developed during the pandemic and launched after it. The clash and the shift represented new silos like the RF. They got tons of hype, but not as much as the RF due to Roger's name.
 
Top