2012 will mark the first time in more than three decades I will not watch one ball struck live at Wimbledon. I live in the US and cannot afford cable or an Internet feed/computer. My two-year-old smartphone does not have the operating system required for the newest mobile websites. I am in the dark solely for one reason...Wimby demands a one-channel, all-live coverage promise from the designated broadcaster. WHY??? The NBA is covered in tandem by ESPN and ABC with great success. Shouldn't Wimby get that umbrella approach so cable-free homes can tune in for, at the least, weekend coverage of the game's most prestigious championship?