The Australian Open 2011: The Early Odds.

Talker

Hall of Fame
Rafael Nadal: 2 to 1

Pros - The relatively slow, high-bouncing surface suits Nadal's game perfectly (especially given the world No. 1's new-and-improved aggressive tactics). In his last healthy visit Down Under, Nadal won the title by defeating Roger Federer despite playing the longest match in tournament history just two days earlier against Fernando Verdasco.

Cons - Not that anyone thought Nadal's 2009 triumph in Melbourne was a fluke, but he put any of those fluke questions to rest by winning another hard-court Grand Slam at this year's U.S. Open. Still, the Spaniard's hard-court prowess is up for debate. He struggled on fast surfaces after his win in New York and even though he reached the World Tour Finals title match, he got run over by Federer. Nadal also won't have fond memories of his last trip to Melbourne, when he was getting blown off the court by Andy Murray in the quarters before retiring with knee pain.

Roger Federer: 5 to 2

Pros - Federer has never dominated the Australian Open like he has Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, but he's not too shabby Down Under. His lifetime record is 54-7 and he has won the whole thing four times, including in 2010. The world No. 2 is also coming off a big win at the World Tour Finals, scoring a crucial confidence-booster over Nadal in the process.

Cons - While Federer had some great moments this year and heated up at the end, it still was not one of his better seasons. Nadal is not only No. 1 in the world, but it's not even that close. Federer is becoming more and more of a momentum player; when he is hot, he's on fire, but when he's cold, he can't find the court. Will the offseason put out his hot streak?

Andy Murray: 5 to 1

Pros - Murray went all the way to the Aussie Open final this year, steamrolling Nadal in the process. The Scot still has not gotten over the hump at a Grand Slam, but the experience of losing to Federer twice in title matches (also at the 2008 U.S. Open) will only help the next time he makes a final. His last match of 2010, against Nadal in London, was arguably the match of the year.

Cons - After losing in the Aussie final, Murray did not come close to making another one in 2010. He had a decent run at Wimbledon but got destroyed by Nadal. Another early loss at the U.S. Open was especially dismal for Murray. He recovered for a solid showing during the fall season, but the Grand Slam questions will be running rampant in Melbourne.

Novak Djokovic: 7 to 1

Pros - Djokovic is coming off one of the biggest moments of his career--winning the Davis Cup with Serbia. He did not get the glory of clinching the final rubber, but he won every single match he played in 2010. World Tour Finals losses to Nadal and Federer notwithstanding, Djokovic was in outstanding form throughout the fall swing.

Cons - In an otherwise stellar year, Djokovic was pretty much atrocious in Grand Slams until the U.S. Open. He suffered upsets at the hands of Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Jurgen Melzer, and Tomas Berdych. The world No. 3's breathing issues were not much of a factor during the second half of 2010, but the summer heat of Australia could bring them back to the fore.

Other odds

Juan Martin Del Potro: 12 to 1
Robin Soderling: 18 to 1
Tomas Berdych: 25 to 1
David Nalbandian: 25 to 1
 
Last edited:
How the hell is del potro favored above soderling? Wtf?

Hell, why is Nadal Favored over Federer? Are they ********?
 
man seriously, these oddsmakers needs to watch tennis once in a while, then they might know what the **** they're talking about.
 
I'd put Djokovic ahead of Murray. His usual foes (Tsonga, Haas, & Roddick) are either injured or extremely unlikely to beat him.
 
Murray's got this one. Nadal hates the low bouncing courts of the Australian Open Plexicushion. Hopefully Fed has an off day or it could be him as well.
 
Well if Nadal has another joke draw, then I guess he'll beat almost whoever there is in the final. If he has to play 1 or 2 top tier players (like Murray, Djokovic, Del Potro, Davydenko, Roddick, Del Potro) I don't see him winning the whole thing.

If Federer keeps up the level he's been playing at since Toronto (reaching at least the semis in every tournament he entered) he's surely in the semis with a good chance to go deeper (there's just no-one who can take him out before this stage unless he gets to play Del Potro in the first round lolz).
 
Rafael Nadal: 2 to 1

Pros - The relatively slow, high-bouncing surface suits Nadal's game perfectly (especially given the world No. 1's new-and-improved aggressive tactics). In his last healthy visit Down Under, Nadal won the title by defeating Roger Federer despite playing the longest match in tournament history just two days earlier against Fernando Verdasco.

Cons - Not that anyone thought Nadal's 2009 triumph in Melbourne was a fluke, but he put any of those fluke questions to rest by winning another hard-court Grand Slam at this year's U.S. Open. Still, the Spaniard's hard-court prowess is up for debate. He struggled on fast surfaces after his win in New York and even though he reached the World Tour Finals title match, he got run over by Federer. Nadal also won't have fond memories of his last trip to Melbourne, when he was getting blown off the court by Andy Murray in the quarters before retiring with knee pain.

Roger Federer: 5 to 2

Pros - Federer has never dominated the Australian Open like he has Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, but he's not too shabby Down Under. His lifetime record is 54-7 and he has won the whole thing four times, including in 2010. The world No. 2 is also coming off a big win at the World Tour Finals, scoring a crucial confidence-booster over Nadal in the process.

Cons - While Federer had some great moments this year and heated up at the end, it still was not one of his better seasons. Nadal is not only No. 1 in the world, but it's not even that close. Federer is becoming more and more of a momentum player; when he is hot, he's on fire, but when he's cold, he can't find the court. Will the offseason put out his hot streak?

Andy Murray: 5 to 1

Pros - Murray went all the way to the Aussie Open final this year, steamrolling Nadal in the process. The Scot still has not gotten over the hump at a Grand Slam, but the experience of losing to Federer twice in title matches (also at the 2008 U.S. Open) will only help the next time he makes a final. His last match of 2010, against Nadal in London, was arguably the match of the year.

Cons - After losing in the Aussie final, Murray did not come close to making another one in 2010. He had a decent run at Wimbledon but got destroyed by Nadal. Another early loss at the U.S. Open was especially dismal for Murray. He recovered for a solid showing during the fall season, but the Grand Slam questions will be running rampant in Melbourne.

Novak Djokovic: 7 to 1

Pros - Djokovic is coming off one of the biggest moments of his career--winning the Davis Cup with Serbia. He did not get the glory of clinching the final rubber, but he won every single match he played in 2010. World Tour Finals losses to Nadal and Federer notwithstanding, Djokovic was in outstanding form throughout the fall swing.

Cons - In an otherwise stellar year, Djokovic was pretty much atrocious in Grand Slams until the U.S. Open. He suffered upsets at the hands of Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Jurgen Melzer, and Tomas Berdych. The world No. 3's breathing issues were not much of a factor during the second half of 2010, but the summer heat of Australia could bring them back to the fore.

Other odds

Juan Martin Del Potro: 12 to 1
Robin Soderling: 18 to 1
Tomas Berdych: 25 to 1
David Nalbandian: 25 to 1

i totally agree with that

except with del potro being so high
 
i would really like to see Murray win his first grand slam. a Nadal/Murray final i think would produce some awesome tennis. but i'd probably go with Nadal or Fed
 
man seriously, these oddsmakers needs to watch tennis once in a while, then they might know what the **** they're talking about.

Is that why they predicted fed would win at the WTF? What idiots.
 
lol at Murray ahead of Djokovic....complete joke.

Murray and Djokovic are pretty evenly matched.
Murray won the last three meetings with Djokovic quite comfortably although that was a while ago now and Djokovic has been showing some great form recently.
Toss a coin as to who is ahead.
Certainly not a complete joke as you make out.
I lolled.
 
those are terrible odds!
I have:
federer - 3.5
nadal -3.1
djokovic - 10
murray - 7.8
soderling - 36
del potro - 44
berdych - 120
roddick -70
 
I think one possible why they have Nadal as the favourite could be that the AO is a best of 5 set tourney. Thats not to say that Federer cant win, but if they were to meet and it goes to a 5th set, Nadal has the advantage.
 
Last edited:
Sam Querrey. And we will DIE!!!!

I'll bet on this Dimitrov kid.

Grigor is in the midst of being suspended after attacking a chair umpire at a challenger he played over a month ago.

spoiled brat, he's a month younger than me and acting like a spoiled unappreciative scum****
 
Grigor is in the midst of being suspended after attacking a chair umpire at a challenger he played over a month ago.

spoiled brat, he's a month younger than me and acting like a spoiled unappreciative scum****

I think he is safe. We didn't hear a word from ATP officials about it and they continue keeping silence about - I think he won't get hard penalty. Some conditional maybe.
 
Del potro 43/1 £10 seems like a wise investment if he is fit and in any kind of form then he can play his way into the tourniment.

Needs a kind draw with his ranking as it is.
 
I trust a bookmakers to pay up more then I trust you to pay me 700 quid.

How very dare you! ;)

Fair enough mate - but the offer was genuine.

Look - I like the big fella - cheered for him at last year's WTF final - but there's very little likelyhood that he's coming back from a major wrist problem and winning a slam straight out of the blocks.
 
How very dare you! ;)

Fair enough mate - but the offer was genuine.

Look - I like the big fella - cheered for him at last year's WTF final - but there's very little likelyhood that he's coming back from a major wrist problem and winning a slam straight out of the blocks.

He should be just as fit as all the other players who are going to play, he cut his season short, he was fit enough to play paris. Say he wins a title before the ozzie his odds won't be any bigger then 10/1.

I think its the value other then Roddick I guess, but Roddick won't win this as players the caliber of Kholschriber and Tipsy can beat him now even at the open. Thanks for the offer.
 
idk why people are flipping out about delpo being placed higher than soderling. soderling has absolutely horrendous results down under, losing in the first round this year. If it were me, I'd put him and del potro at equal odds, but I can understand delpo being given the better odds.
 
Del potro 43/1 £10 seems like a wise investment if he is fit and in any kind of form then he can play his way into the tourniment.

Needs a kind draw with his ranking as it is.

That looks like a much more reasonable bet.
We'll find out in Sydney what kind of shape he's in.
 
How the hell is del potro favored above soderling? Wtf?

Hell, why is Nadal Favored over Federer? Are they ********?

I agree with the first one, I don't get Delpo over Soderling at the moment, I mean Delpo has a slam and is a great player when healthy but its way to early to give him those kind of odds to actually win a slam.

As for Nadal over Fed, that is not completely Ridiculous, Federer may be the defending Champ, but Nadal is a former Champion, has beaten Fed there before, and has won the last 3 slams, if he didn't get good odds to win this one I would be shocked and the oddsmakers would be seen a jokes.
 
Back
Top