Everyone's saying its so obviously Roddick. Has everyone just forgotten the 90s or too young to remember?
Chang's portfolio beats Roddick hands down. Best one and done major winner, easily. 7 Masters series, 34 titles, top 10 for a decade. Came one match away from #1 (at the height of Sampras' powers) in 1997.
Compare that with Roddick's 5 Masters series, 32 titles, top 10 for a decade, and a very brief stint at #1 sneaking in before Federer's reign.
Chang's portfolio is clearly stronger.
as Mac says you have to be kidding me...
Chang:
AO: 2 SF's, 1 Final in 10 attempts
RG: 1 Win, 1 F, 2 QF's in 16 attempts
Wimbey: 1 QF in 14 attempts
USO: 1 F, 2 SF's, 2 QF's in 17 attempts
Roddick:
AO: 4 SF's, 2 QF's 11 attempts
RG: 0 QF's in 10 attempts
Wimbey: 3 F, 1 SF's, 1 QF in 12 attempts
USO: 1Win, 1 F, 6 QF's in 12 attempts
Total:
Roddick:
1 Slam, 4 Finals, 5 SF's, 9 QF's in 45 attempts
Chang:
1 Slam, 3 Finals, 4 SF's, 5 QF's in 57 attempts
Chang:
7 years ranked top ten, highest ranked - #2
2 years ranked top 5
Roddick:
10 years ranked top ten, highest ranked - #1
3 years ranked top 5
Roddick can rack up 3 more titles to move in front, he has won 2 titles just this year.
Roddick is the better of the two, and I pick him as well as the best 1 slam winner.