Djoker saying I can destroy tennis twice
Imagine winning a slam by winning 12 games in an hour and a half lolAnd people were mad when Nadal said the ATP Finals should rotate surfaces LOL
And people were mad when Nadal said the ATP Finals should rotate surfaces LOL
It's actually a bit silly that it doesn't change tbhThat just plain makes sense, I don’t even understand how that can be controversial.
I always just assumed it needed to be indoors because of winter. But it would be a perfect chance to go south of the hemisphere.It's actually a bit silly that it doesn't change tbh
I propose 5 days rest between matches, starting at next US Open
Welcome to the WTA.Imagine winning a slam by winning 12 games in an hour and a half lol
Novak now is looking things by 39 year old point of view.
This wisdom never came when he was playing one 5 setter after another.
Come on champ . Your can think better than this
stupid statement but the sad thing is this could actually happen in 5 years.......the upcoming generations might not have the stamina nor the attention span required to last more than 2 hours in a tennis game......audiences interest and money will drive the sport more than anything.......amerianization of sports is such a bad thing to the world......the hydration breaks at the recent football world cup is probably the beginning of it......
It actually happened last year, even in a shorter time, lol.Imagine winning a slam by winning 12 games in an hour and a half lol
Yeah, I don't understand that Novak thought of saying this. Maybe trolling...That is a ludicrous statement from Novak. That would completely change the sport, wiping out history and also dramatically reducing the need for match stamina.
Mixed Doubles is wildly successful with 4-game-sets. It sells out Ashe Stadium.
The old purists and traditionalists will cry, but they are in the small minority.
The general public are demanding shorter matches!
![]()
Novak's ideas being stupid (and they are ridiculously stupid in this case) doesn't excuse Nadal's stupid ideas.And people were mad when Nadal said the ATP Finals should rotate surfaces LOL
College tennis viewership has increased after employing no-ad scoring, so you've got that all wrong.Games without advantage would be the change that would kill the spirit of tennis the most. Tense tug-of-wars over advantages and deuces are the bread and butter of every epic tennis match.
Did no-Ad help make doubles more attractive? Nope. No-Ad would change the atmosphere of tennis matches for the worse. The electrifying atmosphere that is created in the crowds during the tug-of-war between advantages and deuces would be flushed down the toilet. Tennis without Ad is a impoverished game.College tennis viewership has increased after employing no-ad scoring, so you've got that all wrong.
You fail to understand that purists constitute a small minority of the audience. These purists also tend to be older.
The data shows that young people love the drama and sudden death of no-ad scoring.
Data from the Intercollegiate Tennis Association (ITA) and broadcast partners indicates that no-ad scoring in college tennis increases fan engagement by creating higher-stakes, sudden-death moments. Furthermore, this scoring format has helped stabilize spectator viewership by reducing match durations, facilitating consistent television coverage.
You don't play much tennis, do you.Games without advantage would be the change that would kill the spirit of tennis the most. Tense tug-of-wars over advantages and deuces are the bread and butter of every epic tennis match.
To be fair he was talking about slams being BO3 many years ago even when he was winning.I was tired against Sinner
Make matches shorter, please
yikes.
To be fair he was talking about slams being BO3 many years ago even when he was winning.
I play some, and many times clubs play tournaments in this format (they call it golden point at 40/40). Every player I've discussed this with, agrees that such scoring system it's total cr*p.You don't play much tennis, do you.
americans want everything their way....I've never noticed people losing interest in the 5th Set of marathon matches, so why shorten them?
The most interesting matches are the longest matches, so no need to shorten the sets.
Crowds are louder in the 4th hour of match than in the 1st hour of a match.
And crowds often get behind the player who is losing, because crowds want more tennis!
Well definitely would give him a better chance now at least.We all try to prepare for old age![]()
Yes, US Open crowds are very loud, they love their marathonsamericans want everything their way....
Liked your boldness.This statement disqualifies him from the GOAT conversation
That's really inclusive for the over 40.
Novak is not giving this statement for his career. He is speaking what he thinks now. His career was over after that olympic gold.Blatant attempt to prolong his career, unbelievable. Surely grand slam tennis is all about the grueling five sets, otherwise what's the point of the the Grand Slam tournaments.
Yeah I think anyone not blind to his concoctions of ideas can see what he's trying to do here. Too little too late.Blatant attempt to prolong his career, unbelievable. Surely grand slam tennis is all about the grueling five sets, otherwise what's the point of the the Grand Slam tournaments.
I take it you have played 90-minute long intensive sets where you were stuck in every game for 10 minutes.I play some
So the only ones who care about the records are morons on the internet.
The owner of the records is fine with forgetting them.