eb_tennis_247
Semi-Pro
I saw two days ago the new 2024 Head Speed Pro in my local pro shop and now the first video review is out:
Last edited by a moderator:
If the Prince Tour 100P (2015) is 80% as good as the Tour 95 (2015) I've played with for a few hours these past 2 weeks, I wanna try that.In that case, you should buy the current one now. Especially in the black paintjob. That’s a sharp looking stick.
We had a Stormtrooper Speed, now we have an Oreo Speed. Credit @Boxbeams4ever.I'm just gonna call it since no one's said it but I think we're all thinking it.
This is the Oreo Speed
And I don't know why they went with this
Haha, thanks but I honestly thought most people when they see that they would think the same in the back of their headWe had a Stormtrooper Speed, now we have an Oreo Speed. Credit @Boxbeams4ever.
2015 100p is too soft n flexible for me but 2019 100p is always in my bag along with new gravity pro n 2022 ezone n DR98... I sold off all other rackets ...but I just bought the aero98 and will see if it can replace a racket..I have limit of 4 in my bag that I have to be strong about or I end up carrying around 9 racketsIf the Prince Tour 100P (2015) is 80% as good as the Tour 95 (2015) I've played with for a few hours these past 2 weeks, I wanna try that.
Can't play enough hours with the Tour 95 these days, but first impressions show a full-switch.
The 100P I'd like to try as I'm seeking for a Pro Kennex Ki5 295 control-oriented 100 sq inch with less dampening/more direct feel.
Even Tennis Spin Solinco Leadout Harry doesn't like the paint finish. Interistingly some of the reviews almost out since yesterday neglect to refer to this issue.
Good think is Harry has shown us the way forwards:
Couldn't Head go at least Matte? I like the design better than the previous one by the way.
This makes no sense to me, why remove the first video if these are also exist now? Unless they will also be removed by mods later. And the new cosmetic Speed has already been seen being used by pros, in matches. At least Samsonova comes to mind. It's be like if they still wanted to limit images of the new Ezone a couple weeks ago
I have only played the Speed MP Auxentic 1.0. I'm not at all qualified to judge anything about the 2.0 playability/make comparisons.You have to wonder when that happens, if they are not singing any new praises about it, what went wrong?
It can't be that bad, but I can't recall lots of people shouting out for a more muted feeling Speed. Not even for a more comfortable one that I can remember.
This makes no sense to me, why remove the first video if these are also exist now? Unless they will also be removed by mods later. And the new cosmetic Speed has already been seen being used by pros, in matches. At least Samsonova comes to mind. It's be like if they still wanted to limit images of the new Ezone a couple weeks ago
I am all about glossy paint, however, this velvet paint looks and feels fine. I would sill prefer Glossy over it, however, the company that made the paint has shown excellent durability of it too.I have only played the Speed MP Auxentic 1.0. I'm not at all qualified to judge anything about the 2.0 playability/make comparisons.
I'm just angry about the paint-finish. Obvioulsy, several YouTube Reviewers, took notice and they don't like it too. One can like or dislike the paint design, but I don't see many liking the paint-finish that is obviously "rubbery-ish".
It doesn't have to be glossy or pro-stock glossy. A decent matte finish would do the job.I am all about glossy paint, however, this velvet paint looks and feels fine. I would sill prefer Glossy over it, however, the company that made the paint has shown excellent durability of it too.
As for the frame, a nit too muted for me -- I love the old school rackets that communicate to your arm on every stroke. On the other hand, the Head team loves the new 2.0, therefore, I assume I am stuck in the past and the market will love it. I also prefer thinner frames, and the TK339 mold has been one of the most successful molds for Head so, again -- my "issue" vs. what market wants.
I assume that if you liked the Auxetic 1.0 version, you will like the 2.0 too.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with it
Head corporate is ALWAYS CORRECT ...fix yourself n like it cause MARKET likes it...quicker you learn the easier it will be on youIt doesn't have to be glossy or pro-stock glossy. A decent matte finish would do the job.
This new Speed-paint texture seems to be something between a Wilson Clash - Diadem Elevate V3 - Pro Kennex Blace Ace (yellow part) / Ace Pro (red part).
This means, in best case scenario "rubery", worst case scenario "sticky" sensation when touching the frame with the off-hand. I don't want that.
He also mentioned that he's the minority and the current frames suit the masses. Just as Yonex is doing with the EZONE (not even changing it this year) and Head with the Blade (sounds like V9 is very similar to V8) are seeing manufacturers simply making minor tweaks to successful layups. I can't fault them really as you don't want to mess with success and there's really only so much tweaks you can make from a successful design before you stray too far from what made is so good in the first place.Even tennis nerd mentioned that he prefers the older speeds with 22beam mold. So it seems it’s not only me bragging about it
I emailed about that someone at head and his response was: why to do that ?
I don’t see any reason going from 22mm to 23mm. Graphenes had more free power than auxetic for sure….. as for feel youteks were the best and also the most solid. The only thing they gained with the thicker mold is the stability was missing but that thing is not a speed through the air anymore. They also increased the SW with auxetic….. 360 and 360 plus were easier to manoeuvre.He also mentioned that he's the minority and the current frames suit the masses. Just as Yonex is doing with the EZONE (not even changing it this year) and Head with the Blade (sounds like V9 is very similar to V8) are seeing manufacturers simply making minor tweaks to successful layups. I can't fault them really as you don't want to mess with success and there's really only so much tweaks you can make from a successful design before you stray too far from what made is so good in the first place.
My YT and Graphene speeds are 22.5mm on the calipers and my 2022 speeds are 23mm. Tiny differenceI don’t see any reason going from 22mm to 23mm. Graphenes had more free power than auxetic for sure….. as for feel youteks were the best and also the most solid. The only thing they gained with the thicker mold is the stability was missing but that thing is not a speed through the air anymore. They also increased the SW with auxetic….. 360 and 360 plus were easier to manoeuvre.
The new paint is awesome (if you like matte) and is durable. I have been banging the new speed for 4 months now and not a single chipIt doesn't have to be glossy or pro-stock glossy. A decent matte finish would do the job.
This new Speed-paint texture seems to be something between a Wilson Clash - Diadem Elevate V3 - Pro Kennex Blace Ace (yellow part) / Ace Pro (red part).
This means, in best case scenario "rubery", worst case scenario "sticky" sensation when touching the frame with the off-hand. I don't want that.
So, this is the best selling mold in history of Head. Really…why to do what you suggested?Even tennis nerd mentioned that he prefers the older speeds with 22beam mold. So it seems it’s not only me bragging about it
I emailed about that someone at head and his response was: why to do that ?
Will this paint be a universal update beyond the prestige?The new paint is awesome (if you like matte) and is durable. I have been banging the new speed for 4 months now and not a single chip
You mean beyond Speed?Will this paint be a universal update beyond the prestige?
Lower Launch than the Gravity??So far it sounds like new Speed Pro is nothing special, possibly worse overall than previous iteration. They don’t say it straight, but you can feel it.
Not that it’s something shameful, as 2022 Speed Pro was very good. It’s hard to make it better overall.
My biggest issue with Speed Pro was too low launch angle. Didn’t work for me. And now Chris says it’s a bit lower in the new one… so change - yes. Improvement? Maybe for some. Skip for me.
To me, Speed Pro launch angle felt lower than Gravity Pro. GPro lifts and shapes the ball easier for me. However, it’s not lab test, just personal experience.Lower Launch than the Gravity??
So far it sounds like new Speed Pro is nothing special, possibly worse overall than previous iteration. They don’t say it straight, but you can feel it.
Not that it’s something shameful, as 2022 Speed Pro was very good. It’s hard to make it better overall.
My biggest issue with Speed Pro was too low launch angle. Didn’t work for me. And now Chris says it’s a bit lower in the new one… so change - yes. Improvement? Maybe for some. Skip for me.
Auxetic 2.0 is reported to be more muted and thus less liked than Auxetic 1.0. That is reported for the Prestige and now for the Speed. To be honest, I'm disappointed. How difficult is it for Head, with all its R&D money and testing facillities, to roll out a product that is an improvement, however incremental?
For some, it is an improvement, for some...not. Apparently, the majority of American market prefers more muted. Some of us prefer softer. Some prefer more control and lower launch angle. All of those "improvements" are incorporated in the 2.0.Auxetic 2.0 is reported to be more muted and thus less liked than Auxetic 1.0. That is reported for the Prestige and now for the Speed. To be honest, I'm disappointed. How difficult is it for Head, with all its R&D money and testing facillities, to roll out a product that is an improvement, however incremental?
Well that is solved actually, like you have pros receiving the exact frame they prefer. So if you let rec players get 2022 Speed Pro for several more years as long as they prefer it… or 360 for those who like it… Kinda solves it.For some, it is an improvement, for some...not. Apparently, the majority of American market prefers more muted. Some of us prefer softer. Some prefer more control and lower launch angle. All of those "improvements" are incorporated in the 2.0.
Some, on the other hand, prefer the opposite.
Too bad, you cannot make a frame that will please everyone...ah wait...
Head has done an amazing job LISTENING what the market wants and bringing those pieces together
Well that is solved actually, like you have pros receiving the exact frame they prefer. So if you let rec players get 2022 Speed Pro for several more years as long as they prefer it… or 360 for those who like it… Kinda solves it.
Head Size: 100 in² / 645.16 cm² | |||||||||||||||||||
Length: 27in / 68.58cm | |||||||||||||||||||
Strung Weight:11.6oz / 329g | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance: 12.8in / 32.51cm / 6 pts HL | |||||||||||||||||||
Swingweight: 333 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stiffness: 60 | |||||||||||||||||||
Beam Width: 23mm / 23mm / 23mm | |||||||||||||||||||
Composition: Auxetic 2/Graphene Inside/Graphite | |||||||||||||||||||
Power Level: Low | |||||||||||||||||||
Stroke Style: Full | |||||||||||||||||||
Swing Speed: Fast | |||||||||||||||||||
Racquet Colors: White/Black | |||||||||||||||||||
Grip Type: Head Hydrosorb Pro | |||||||||||||||||||
String Pattern:
| |||||||||||||||||||
String Tension: 48-57 pounds![]() Speed MP ![]()
|
Consumer market 1:1…Well that is solved actually, like you have pros receiving the exact frame they prefer. So if you let rec players get 2022 Speed Pro for several more years as long as they prefer it… or 360 for those who like it… Kinda solves it.
I believe there’re layers to it. Would Head mind selling some volume of 2022 Speeds to people who want exactly them, ready to pay $200 for each and maybe even wait for a month to get it? So partially settling the expenses/production/logistics cycle?Consumer market 1:1…
We all cried about EPS in all cars and how we miss hydraulic steering.
The racket companies are all about the volume selling at lowest cost maximizing (already low) margins.
You are asking to increase production cost.
Aren’t their margins low because of huge marketing budgets? Need to look into financial reports.The racket companies are all about the volume selling at lowest cost maximizing (already low) margins.
You are asking to increase production cost.
I’m ok with innovation. There are modern frames which are overall better in playability, user friendliness and arm safety. Which would never arrive if companies listened solely to the “heavy flexible pure graphite 95 sqin” crowd.It's not how the racquet marketing works. They sell us a new paradigm-bending, liquid metal "innovation" every two years.