The Greatest Songs of the 20th Century

NonP

Legend

Highly subjective topic, IMO the greatest songs are those that never get old no matter how many times you listen to them

I skipped "Take Five" 'cause I intended this thread to be more about songs everyone can sing along to, but that's indeed a good candidate. Without question among the most buoyant, life-affirming music ever written.

A simple yet useful definition, too. (y)

Why Do We Even Listen to New Music?
Our brains reward us for seeking out what we already know. So why should we reach to listen to something we don’t?
By Jeremy D. Larson
April 6, 2020


Why do we even listen to new music anymore? Most people have all the songs they could ever need by the time they turn 30. Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube can whisk us back to the gates and gables of our youth when life was simpler. Why leap off a cliff hoping you’ll be rescued by your new favorite album on the way down when you can lay supine on the terra firma of your “Summer Rewind” playlist? Not just in times of great stress, but for all times, I genuinely ask: Why spend time on something you might not like?

It was a question that Coco Chanel, Marcel Duchamp, and the rest of the Parisian audience might have asked at the 1913 premiere of Igor Stravinsky’s The Rite of Spring, an orchestral ballet inspired by the Russian composer’s dream about a young girl dancing herself to death. On a muggy night at the end of May, inside a newly constructed theater along the Seine, those who chose to bear witness to something new experienced a piece of music that would presage a new world of art....

https://pitchfork.com/features/article/listen-to-music/

LOL, wasn't expecting to see a Rite of Spring discussion in Pitchfork of all places, and a serious one at that. Maybe I should pay more attention to its long-form pieces.

Since it's been mentioned twice already - quite a feat for an avant-garde classical work in a thread about popular songs! - I guess I'll throw in my two cents and add that Stravinsky's magnum opus may well be the only music that ever startled me. And when I say "startled" I mean it literally. Was at this symphonic concert (Baltimore Symphony led by Marin Alsop on 1/11/15, if you care), and as is my wont I was dozing on and off through the quieter moments... until that (in)famous "primitive" chord of "The Augurs of Spring" began pounding relentlessly which frightened me out of my slumber:


And I'd probably heard this almost fetishized relic more than a hundred times before that memorable afternoon (always thought this was a nite concert but I see that it took place on a Sunday). Made me look at the whole thing in a whole new light.

Moral of the story: when artsy-fartsy classical buffs tell you to pay close attention at all times, don't listen to 'em for a second. :p

After some time, I think of all the songs I’ve listened to this is probably my favorite. Calm, nice lyrics and chorus, and a wonderful tune that can go with a lot of things.

Anyone that counts a CCR classic as his fave can't be "uneducated" in my book! Not sure if you already have this or would even be interested, but their complete Fantasy box set is well worth getting if you can find a good deal (their 50th-anniversary deluxe set is only on LP as well as ridiculously pricey), not only for the consistently great music but also for the excellent liner notes.

(Will need to think about the best CCR songs, which gives me a good excuse to save a YouTube link.)


One of the most versatile yet underappreciated singers, but she never really came close to equaling her riotous debut with that great album cover which promised great things to come. (Seriously can you imagine later Cyndi toying with gleeful wordplay about fondling herself?) "Time After Time" probably remains her best song, but my fave is her cover of Prince's equally underappreciated "When You Were Mine," which improves on the studio original thanks to her infectious, to-hell-with-it joie de vivre (lovely opening synths, too):


(Still can't quite beat the Purple One's wild live versions, but that's to be expected. :cool:)

My point wasn't so much that Kanye doesn't belong on this list, but having him and the Flying Burrito brothers on the same list reeks of boomers trying to look hip and woke. As RS's influence wanes in the mainstream, it attaches itself to big mainstream artists to stay relevant, a thing it didn't do for about 30 years, which explains a lot of their choices (or lack thereof) in certain genres for certain periods. Downbeat has a similar problem, a guy like Christian McBride was getting voted in the critics poll as an up-and-coming bass player until at least the mid 2010s.

I'd also like to point out there hasn't been a single mention of Duke Ellington or Billy Strayhorn, either in this thread or in RS's list.

Why are you so hung up on these lists when you claim to be opposed to the hipsterism and parochialism of RS and other mags that published them? In case you haven't noticed you're actually doing their bidding when you go on like this. I can tell you with all honesty that I've glanced at the RS list only a handful of times and never perused it in its entirety, whereas you seem to be familiar with almost every questionable name on it. It's just hard to take your criticism to heart when you're obsessing over the very thing you're criticizing while touting such a suburban favorite as NPR's Tiny Desk Concerts (which I follow myself, BTW).

Also you don't seem to have asked yourself why the likes RS and DB in your view have been pandering to mainstream tastes to stay relevant, or if you have you clearly don't consider it as worthy of mention as these minor acts you claim to have no use for. Again there's no doubt in my mind that these current trends are due to the increasing corporatization of journalism which values profits over all else, but instead of addressing this root cause you're content to diss these music journos who presumably do love their work and are trying their best to maintain some semblance of journalistic freedom and independence in this harsh environment. How come?

And I've explained several times already why I think most jazz standards don't make the cut here, but if you disagree you're welcome to explain why and/or nominate your own picks. Maybe you should spend less time speculating on others' impure motives and more time paying attention to what they really think and say instead.
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
Since the subject of Brubeck came up, here's an example of his influence. You can hear shades of Blue Rondo a la Turk at 4:27 as the dark chords transition:


Like Miles and Coltrane (albeit not perhaps to the same extent), Brubeck transcended jazz.
 

Bagumbawalla

Talk Tennis Guru
I skipped "Take Five" 'cause I intended this thread to be more about songs everyone can sing along to, but that's indeed a good candidate. Without question among the most buoyant, life-affirming music ever written.

A simple yet useful definition, too. (y)



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

There are lyrics.
 
Last edited:

NonP

Legend
The one-of-a-kind producer probably deserves his own thread, but Phil Spector is dead:


I really couldn't tell you how many times his name came up while I was researching and tabulating my choices for this thread, which is a testament to his prodigious talent as well as his sheer impact on the music industry. Of course the man had a legendary temper which sadly culminated in a loss of life, but this is probably one of those rare cases where the hackneyed term "mad genius" is apt as it's hard to imagine anyone with a less splenetic disposition conjuring up the wildly extravagant "Wall of Sound." Also he was much more successful when working with female artists - in a rather twisted irony, generally enhanced rather than undermined by his storied misogyny.

So a very complicated legacy to say the least, but the industry and the world are all the better for it. Expect a truckload of tributes over the next few days and beyond.

Back to our discussion. Looks like we missed another big one:


(In case you're wondering, no I didn't forget about Dylan. I just don't think "Like a Rolling Stone" works that well as a sing-along song, while "The Times They Are A-Changin'" and "Blowin' in the Wind," great as they are, can't quite challenge Bob's best or for that matter "Hallelujah" due to their topical nature.)

And now that we seem to have run out of the most obvious choices let's move on to their less prominent peers. FYI I'll stick to (semi-)popular ones for now before giving the unjustly neglected their due.

One of my desert islanders:


Without question Lou's most drop-dead gorgeous ballad. Gotta dig these memorable lines:

It was good what we did yesterday
And I'd do it once again
The fact that you are married
Only proves you're my best friend
But it's truly, truly a sin

In a similar vein:


Christgau on more than one occasion has named this the most beautiful song in the English language, which is quite an act of chutzpah from a guy who proudly flaunts his ignorance of the classical masters to this day. (FYI John Dowland from the Renaissance alone penned at least two strong contenders in "In darkness let me dwell" and "Flow my tears"... and we haven't even gotten to Purcell and Britten yet!) But this nostalgic anthem at least belongs in the conversation, which can't be said of many of the usual candidates.

And since the Purple One's name has come up:


Of course "Purple Rain" isn't the best-selling single from Prince's eponymous blockbuster soundtrack, nor is it my favorite - or one of the two or three, though listening to "When Doves Cry" for the umpteenth time makes me appreciate yet again what a stupendously daring and inventive record it is - but it's his very greatest song, the one that showcases his genius in all of its idiosyncratic variety and dazzling virtuosity.

(On a personal note seeing Prince perform for the first time was probably the biggest cultural shock I've ever had. His highly performative sexuality coupled with his equally eccentric and, for lack of a better word, androgynous music just made me feel uncomfortably weird all over... and this was during his tamer Gold period! Of course I now love him more for it. :cool::p)

Now the replies:

Since the subject of Brubeck came up, here's an example of his influence. You can hear shades of Blue Rondo a la Turk at 4:27 as the dark chords transition:


Like Miles and Coltrane (albeit not perhaps to the same extent), Brubeck transcended jazz.

For the record it was Brubeck's longtime collaborator Paul Desmond who wrote "Take Five" (if with significant contributions from Brubeck and also the DB Quartet's drummer Joe Morello), but yes it was probably that most unapologetically populist of all jazz standards which brought Dave down a peg among pseudo jazz snobs. (Well, that and the fact that he was a White dude.) But then these are the same type of poseurs who knock a Dickens, Chaplin or Kurosawa as the master of cheap sentiments and little more. Actual pros (including Miles himself) and of course we amateurs know better, which is what ultimately matters.

There are lyrics.

Yes, and in case you haven't noticed @Ronaldo had posted the same thing. Another FYI: the original was a pure instrumental and the lyrics were added later by Brubeck's wife Iola for that very live performance with Carmen McRae.

Besides the unusual (and tricky!) five beats simply register better in the original without the vocal distraction. Still got no problem with anyone nominating it as one of the 20th century's best, but it's not exactly what I had in mind.
 

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster

Never knew this till after the above posts....................................................................................................................late
 
Last edited:

stringertom

Bionic Poster
-wow thats crazy!!
-thanks for the info
-that song in my mind always belongs to Whitney Houston,, she just sings it soo well
-but kudos to Dolly, she is also one of my all time favorites
It was written as a farewell to Porter Wagoner as she shed her role as his supporting talent to start her own independent career.

Ken Burns’ 8-part series Country Music is an absolute must see if you enjoy the genre. It aired on PBS during the autumn of 2019 and I really looked forward to each episode those two months. Check it out!
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
As far as Whitney goes, for me her finest hour will always be her 1986 Grammys rendition of Saving All My Love For You.


She utilized her monstrous chops very tastefully here, with lovely variations that did not take over the song and lyric. Her voice was still in fine fettle, yet to show signs of strain from drugs, touring and overexertion on the high notes.

The problem for Whitney was she got too good too soon. Even as of 1986, her singing was already too accomplished for the barely respectable material that Clive and his team made her sing.

She needed to branch out either into more mature, downbeat material or to other genres (which Mariah Carey did). She couldn't manage either (maybe Clive wouldn't let her) and her career meandered into a cul de sac in the 90s.
 

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
Recall Whitney Houston was to perform as the opening act with Jeffrey Osborne in the Summer of 1985. With the success of her debut album she left the tour.
 

NonP

Legend
Since girl groups have finally made their appearance we can't neglect to celebrate the original and greatest of 'em all:


As with CCR it's almost a fool's errand to try to pick the best item from such a rich treasure trove. (If you must know, yes it's the deathless "Will You Love Me Tomorrow.") Suffice it to say the widely available Varèse Vintage compilation (unlike this one) belongs in every music lover's collection (though neither one has everything, most notably "Putty (In Your Hands)" which the Yardbirds covered on their 1965 US debut For Your Love).

And of course there are the Supremes. Diana Ross' disappointing solo career may have proved once and for all that Berry Gordy's most successful brainchild was a committee effort through and through, but at their best the Supremes are second only to the Shirelles, and I'll confess that when Ross came to Wolf Trap a few years back and began her obligatory Supremes medley I found myself, despite my earlier reservations, almost involuntarily singing along and gyrating like a teenage groupie.

These hits are so ubiquitous they render any recommendation superfluous, so I'll just say the topically groundbreaking "Love Child" - released, fittingly enough, in the tumultuous year of 1968 - has always been one of my faves:


Given that Diana is the only Supreme who actually sings on the record it is likely her very greatest performance, her initial (and understandable) misgivings about the song notwithstanding. Also worthy of mention is trombonist Paul Riser, whose comparatively understated string arrangement fits the record to a T by stripping it of the usual Motown flourish.

On to the replies:


Always a treat to hear the RB "Unchained Melody" one more time but FYI it was almost certainly produced by Bill Medley rather than Spector himself, who took the credit only after it unseated the A-side "Hung on You" as the big hit. It's simply another sign of Spector's vast influence that this (mis)appropriation seemed plausible to begin with.

This one’s gotta be in the running


Nah, their best one is this:



Never knew this till after the above posts....................................................................................................................late

Given your eclectic taste I'm surprised to see this. But then I shoulda known not everyone is a weirdo like moi who reads all those liner notes or buys records (still!) in the first place. :happydevil::p
 
Last edited:

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
Since girl groups have finally made their appearance we can't neglect to celebrate the original and greatest of 'em all:


As with CCR it's almost a fool's errand to try to pick the best item from such a rich treasure trove. (If you must know, yes it's the deathless "Will You Love Me Tomorrow.") Suffice it to say the widely available Varèse Vintage compilation (unlike this one) belongs in every music lover's collection (though neither one has everything, most notably "Putty (In Your Hands)" which the Yardbirds covered on their 1965 US debut For Your Love).

And of course there are the Supremes. Diana Ross' disappointing solo career may have proved once and for all that Berry Gordy's most successful brainchild was a committee effort through and through, but at their best the Supremes are second only to the Shirelles, and I'll confess that when Ross came to Wolf Trap a few years back and began her obligatory Supremes medley I found myself, despite my earlier reservations, almost involuntarily singing along and gyrating like a teenage groupie.

These hits are so ubiquitous they render any recommendation superfluous, so I'll just say the topically groundbreaking "Love Child" - released, fittingly enough, in the tumultuous year of 1968 - has always been one of my faves:


Given that Diana is the only Supreme who actually sings on the record it is likely her very greatest performance, her initial (and understandable) misgivings about the song notwithstanding. Also worthy of mention is trombonist Paul Riser, whose comparatively understated string arrangement fits the record to a T by stripping it of the usual Motown flourish.

On to the replies:



Always a treat to hear the RB "Unchained Melody" one more time but FYI it was almost certainly produced by Bill Medley rather than Spector himself, who took the credit only after it unseated the A-side "Hung on You" as the big hit. It's simply another sign of Spector's vast influence that this (mis)appropriation seemed plausible to begin with.



Nah, their best one is this:




Given your eclectic taste I'm surprised to see this. But then I shoulda known not everyone is a weirdo like moi who reads all those liner notes or buys records (still!) in the first place. :happydevil::p
Did not know before posting this collection that Spector had died.
 

Mike Bulgakov

G.O.A.T.
Let It Be...Naked
ALBUM

When The Beatles first set out to make Let It Be in 1969, they intended to record an album that would be a return to live performance. No studio effects or overdubbing of voices or instruments would be allowed - just the bare necessities of the band.

Let It Be… Naked is the stripped-down, return-to-live-takes album that The Beatles originally aimed to create, free of vocal and instrumental overdubs or added effects.

Let It Be evolved from an original plan to make a television show featuring the group playing tracks from the recent ‘White Album.’ That idea changed in three ways. First, abandoning the easier path, they opted to learn a completely new batch of songs for the televised concert. A second innovative approach was added when it was decided to film the rehearsals; allowing viewers to trace the development of each song from its first rough run through to the final polished version. Thirdly, as the climax of the project was a return to live performance, no studio effects or overdubbing of voices and instruments would be allowed at any time.

As usual, George Martin would be the supervising producer but - as he recalls - he had been instructed by John that ‘none of your production rubbish!' was needed. However, amidst the turmoil of the band’s breakup, the album was re-produced by Phil Spector before its 1970 release and it did not represent the raw and unadorned set The Beatles had in mind.
https://www.thebeatles.com/album/let-it-benaked

The Long And Winding Road (Naked Version / Remastered 2013)

Peter Jackson to spearhead new Beatles in-studio film drawn from ‘Let It Be’ footage
By RANDY LEWIS
JAN. 30, 2019


Beatles fans have two cinematic deliveries coming their way.

In the pipeline is a long-awaited restoration of the 1970 film “Let It Be,” which will follow an entirely new film being assembled by New Zealand director Peter Jackson from rare and never-released images and clips.

Jackson’s film has not been titled, and no release date has been unveiled, but it will draw from the same 55 hours of footage of the Beatles in the recording studio shot 50 years ago this month by English director Michael Lindsay-Hogg for the film that became “Let It Be,” which documented the group’s creative process in the final months of its professional lives together.

“The 55 hours of never-before-seen footage and 140 hours of audio made available to us ensures this movie will be the ultimate ‘fly-on-the-wall’ experience that Beatles fans have long dreamt about,” Jackson said in a statement. “It’s like a time machine transports us back to 1969, and we get to sit in the studio watching these four friends make great music together.”

The announcement, released on Wednesday’s 50th anniversary of the group’s famous rooftop concert above their Apple offices in London, stated that a restored version of Lindsay-Hogg’s long-out-of-circulation film will be released after Jackson’s.

Lindsay-Hogg caught the Beatles as they were working on songs including the title track, “Get Back,” “The Long and Winding Road,” “I Me Mine” and others during sometimes contentious sessions. The troubled soundtrack, the only Beatles studio album not produced by George Martin, was credited to Phil Spector, who was invited by the group to work on the tapes after others were unable to create an album that the Beatles were happy with.

Jackson believes the new film will counter long-held perceptions that the Beatles were at each other’s throats in the sessions that Lindsay-Hogg and his team documented.

“I was relieved to discover the reality is very different to the myth,” Jackson said in his statement. “After reviewing all the footage and audio that Michael Lindsay-Hogg shot 18 months before they broke up, it’s simply an amazing historical treasure-trove.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...m-peter-jackson-let-it-be-20190130-story.html
 
Hey, No more disparaging IZ remarks!

Talking about saccharin... love the voices of Mathis and Crosby but absolutely hate the intros and the syrupy pop strings. Wish there was a simple way to remove those while keeping the vocals intact.
HAHA. I actually can appreciate the fat Hawaiian guy's version of Somewhere Over the Rainbow, and the song itself. My aversion is a product of some intensive therapy provided to me free of charge by a coworker a few years ago. :mad:

As far as the strings in those songs, I think you and I have a different concept of what saccharine means. I don't mind the high pitch flowing strings at all. What turns me off in many cases is the lyrics. The title of SOTR is already an offender, but when it goes into lemon drops and lullabies, I want to jam a corkscrew in my timpani.
 
No offense, but I can't think of a great songwriter who produced more kitsch than Berlin and to hold up his omission as this conspitorial injustice while touting the RB's overwrought "Ebb Tide" as superior to their classic "Unchained Melody" and knocking IZ's tastefully streamlined (and now almost equally classic) "Over the Rainbow" as "too saccharine" just doesn't wash.

But yes, Berlin's "White Christmas" certainly belongs up there. My rationale was that it's a holiday song and as such perhaps lacks the perennial appeal of its peers, but I'm certainly willing to acknowledge it as one of the 20th century's best. And while we're at it let me also give a shout-out to "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas" (Hugh Martin and very arguably Ralph Blane), given a memorable performance by Judy (again!) in Vincente Minnelli's beloved Christmas musical Meet Me in St. Louis:
Sure Berlin has produced "kitsch" stuff. He was a popular songwriter in the 10s and 20s, how could he not have? But your lack of appreciation of some of his works should not translate to the objective merit of much of his other production. The fact he had that range itself speaks about the man's talents.

I was overreacting for the sake of humor, but I think it is strange that Berlin wasn't even mentioned before I brought him up. The fact that White Christmas is a Christmas song doesn't detract at all in my view from its appeal. The beauty in that song is the melancholy feeling and a subdued sense of loss from the experiences in childhood that everyone can relate to. That is what makes it a great song. We could also add God Bless America as one of the great songs of the 20th Century. A song good enough to substitute for the National Anthem in many occasions, and I think better than America the Beautiful.


Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas
is great also, I agree with you there. As for Unchained Melody vs Ebb Tide, I already said that most people don't agree with me. But I see this as a sign that I have better taste than most people. I have tried to rationalize why Ebb Tide is the superior song for me, and I think it is a combination of things. First of all, it is simply a more cohesive, classic, and classy song. Starting with the lyrics, the structure of the song, and the harmonic progression. I find Unchained Melody to be strangely disjointed in subtle ways that really grate me, the lyrics are corny, and it lacks the harmonic beauty of Ebb Tide. I really can't imagine Frank Sinatra singing Unchained Melody, for example, though he has a nice version of Ebb Tide. In addition, I find that the Righteous Brothers' Bobby Hatfield rendition of Ebb Tide is far superior to Unchained Melody. I think it is probably one of the best performances by a male singer in a popular song ever, and definitely my favorite.

Wait, actually Sinatra did sing Unchained Melody, my bad.


:-D
 
-this is one for the ,"frenchys" of the world; timeless!!
That, and let's not forget La Mer, which became famous later through the English Version sung by Bobby Darin.

I prefer the French version, the English one is soiled by that Jazzy lounge act-feeling that is dissonant with the spirit of the original one, though it is still a good song.

 
Last edited:
Regarding non-American songs, there are so many, besides La Mer already mentioned. The ones that come to mind for me are:

From Germany, Lili Marleen (Marlene Dietrich)


From Spain, Amapola (Placido Domingo)


From Italy, Io Che Non Vivo (Senza Te) (Pino Donaggio)


Though I have to say in this case I far prefer the American version from Dusty Springfield:


From Argentina, Volver (Carlos Gardel)


@Sudacafan

From Mexico, Caminemos (Los Panchos)


From Puerto Rico, Obsesion (Pedro Flores)

 
Last edited:

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
HAHA. I actually can appreciate the fat Hawaiian guy's version of Somewhere Over the Rainbow, and the song itself. My aversion is a product of some intensive therapy provided to me free of charge by a coworker a few years ago. :mad:

As far as the strings in those songs, I think you and I have a different concept of what saccharine means. I don't mind the high pitch flowing strings at all. What turns me off in many cases is the lyrics. The title of SOTR is already an offender, but when it goes into lemon drops and lullabies, I want to jam a corkscrew in my timpani.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
Regarding non-American songs, there are so many, besides La Mer already mentioned. The ones that come to mind for me are:

From Germany, Lili Marleen (Marlene Dietrich)


From Spain, Amapola (Placido Domingo)


From Italy, Io Che Non Vivo (Senza Te) (Pino Donaggio)


Though I have to say in this case I far prefer the American version from Dusty Springfield:


From Argentina, Volver (Carlos Gardel)


@Sudacafan
Gardel is GOAT in Argentina.
We say "Cada día, canta mejor"
 
Gardel is GOAT in Argentina.
We say "Cada día, canta mejor"
Gardel is GOAT in more places than Argentina. And Volver is a solid candidate for the best song of the 20th Century, at least for me. Unless you speak Spanish some of the beauty of the song is lost, however, as the lyrics are a big part of it and augment the purely musical component of it. The same happens with Obsesion.

My favorite version of Obsesion is not by Pedro Flores himself, though, but by Chavela Vargas.

 

stringertom

Bionic Poster
Nah, I actually can appreciate it at an abstract level, and I think the song itself (the music, not the lyrics) is really nice. The problem is that I had to listen to that song (that version) involuntarily a few hundred times and I don't want no moar.
Oh nose! Eye fourgot The Vortexian Council voted two ewese Izzy’s vershun uv dat toon four ewer Ludovico Technique sesshuns.
 
Oh nose! Eye fourgot The Vortexian Council voted two ewese Izzy’s vershun uv dat toon four ewer Ludovico Technique sesshuns.
0cQsCKK.gif
 

Harry_Wild

G.O.A.T.
Probably one of the most performed and recorded songs in the world!


K.D. Lang does it with feeling.
 
Last edited:

SystemicAnomaly

Bionic Poster
To be clear the Concierto de Aranjuez is a work by Joaquín Rodrigo, not Miles, and this greatest of all guitar concertos is so perfectly tailored for the neglected instrument (in the classical world) that it's impossible to name any performance with a different lead instrument as the best out there.
To be even clearer, Miles Davis' rendering of Concierto de Aranjuez is based on the Adagio (2nd movment) of the Rodrigo composition but not quite the same. Miles and Gil Evans reinterpreted the Rodrigo's Adagio and expanded on it. Their use of the Rodrigo melody is more of just a starting point. Their arrangment starts with Rodrigo's guitar melody (on flugelhorn) but then diverges from it. The mid-section of their rendering is not related to Rodrigo's composition but it does relate to other compositions on the (Sketches of Spain) album. The Davis/Evans arrangement then comes back to Rodrigo's melody at the end-- somewhat altered.

A number of other artists have performed and recorded versions of Concierto that are based on the Miles Davis recording. Chick Corea also has also done a version of Concierto de Aranjuez. But often, he just uses the Rodrigo Adagio melody as an intro to his own composition, Spain.

In the early 1970s, before I had heard Miles Davis recording, I had learned (part of) Rodrigo's Adagio on classical guitar. But it's been decades since Ive played it.
 
Last edited:
Top