The h2h of 6+ Slam winners against each other

[JennyS]

Open era only. I only included players that are less than 10 years apart in age

Connors vs Borg: Borg: 15-8
Connors vs McEnroe: McEnroe 20-14
Connors vs Lendl: Lendl: 22-13
Borg vs McEnroe Tied 7-7
Borg vs Lendl Borg 6-2
Borg vs Wilander Borg 1-0
McEnroe vs Lendl Lendl 21-15
McEnroe vs Wilander McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Edberg McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Becker: Becker 8-2
Lendl vs Wilander: Lendl 15-7
Lendl vs Edberg: Edberg 14-13
Lendl vs Becker: Lendl 11-10
Wilander vs Edberg: Wilander 11-9
Wilander vs Becker: Becker 7-3
Wilander vs Agassi: Agassi 5-2
Wilander vs Sampras: Sampras 2-1
Edberg vs Becker: Becker 25-10
Edberg vs Agassi: Agassi 6-3
Edberg vs Sampras: Sampras 8-6
Becker vs Agassi: Agassi 10-4
Becker vs Sampras: Sampras 12-7
Agassi vs Sampras: Sampras 14-10
Federer vs Nadal: Nadal 13-7.

 

[FedNad316]

Connors vs Borg: Borg: 15-8
Connors vs McEnroe: McEnroe 20-14
Connors vs Lendl: Lendl: 22-13

Lol Connors H2H was owned by Borg, McEnroe and Lendl......didnt know this....Interesting

 

[drwood]

Open era only. I only included players that are less than 10 years apart in age

Connors vs Borg: Borg: 15-8
Connors vs McEnroe: McEnroe 20-14
Connors vs Lendl: Lendl: 22-13
Borg vs McEnroe Tied 7-7
Borg vs Lendl Borg 6-2
Borg vs Wilander Borg 1-0
McEnroe vs Lendl Lendl 21-15
McEnroe vs Wilander McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Edberg McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Becker: Becker 8-2
Lendl vs Wilander: Lendl 15-7
Lendl vs Edberg: Edberg 14-13
Lendl vs Becker: Lendl 11-10
Wilander vs Edberg: Wilander 11-9
Wilander vs Becker: Becker 7-3
Wilander vs Agassi: Agassi 5-2
Wilander vs Sampras: Sampras 2-1
Edberg vs Becker: Becker 25-10
Edberg vs Agassi: Agassi 6-3
Edberg vs Sampras: Sampras 8-6
Becker vs Agassi: Agassi 10-4
Becker vs Sampras: Sampras 12-7
Agassi vs Sampras: Sampras 14-10
Federer vs Nadal: Nadal 13-6

Hi JennyS. Nice list; I think you forgot the following:
Fed vs. Sampras = 1-0
Fed vs. Agassi = 8-3
Nadal vs. Agassi = 2-0
Agassi vs. Connors = 2-0

The 25-10 Becker over Edberg is a little deceiving, b/c Edberg was 3-1 in slams (including 89 French SF).

Lendl vs. Becker is also deceiving, b/c Becker was 3-0 in slam finals (86 Wimbledon, 89 US Open, 91 Aus) and won at least 2 SF against Lendl as well (88 and 89 Wimbledon)

 

[JennyS]

Hi JennyS. Nice list; I think you forgot the following:
Fed vs. Sampras = 1-0
Fed vs. Agassi = 8-3
Nadal vs. Agassi = 2-0
Agassi vs. Connors = 2-0

The 25-10 Becker over Edberg is a little deceiving, b/c Edberg was 3-1 in slams (including 89 French SF).

Lendl vs. Becker is also deceiving, b/c Becker was 3-0 in slam finals (86 Wimbledon, 89 US Open, 91 Aus) and won at least 2 SF against Lendl as well (88 and 89 Wimbledon)

I only included players that were less than 10 years apart. Connors played everyone on that list through Sampras, but he's almost 20 years older than him!

 

[JennyS]

Connors vs Borg: Borg: 15-8
Connors vs McEnroe: McEnroe 20-14
Connors vs Lendl: Lendl: 22-13

Lol Connors H2H was owned by Borg, McEnroe and Lendl......didnt know this....Interesting

The funny thing is my original thread title was "Connors was 8-15 vs Borg, 14-20 vs McEnroe and 13-22 vs Lendl." Haha.

 

[Deleted member 25923]

Open era only. I only included players that are less than 10 years apart in age

Connors vs Borg: Borg: 15-8
Connors vs McEnroe: McEnroe 20-14
Connors vs Lendl: Lendl: 22-13
Borg vs McEnroe Tied 7-7
Borg vs Lendl Borg 6-2
Borg vs Wilander Borg 1-0
McEnroe vs Lendl Lendl 21-15
McEnroe vs Wilander McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Edberg McEnroe 7-6
McEnroe vs Becker: Becker 8-2
Lendl vs Wilander: Lendl 15-7
Lendl vs Edberg: Edberg 14-13
Lendl vs Becker: Lendl 11-10
Wilander vs Edberg: Wilander 11-9
Wilander vs Becker: Becker 7-3
Wilander vs Agassi: Agassi 5-2
Wilander vs Sampras: Sampras 2-1
Edberg vs Becker: Becker 25-10
Edberg vs Agassi: Agassi 6-3
Edberg vs Sampras: Sampras 8-6
Becker vs Agassi: Agassi 10-4
Becker vs Sampras: Sampras 12-7
Agassi vs Sampras: Sampras 14-10
Federer vs Nadal: Nadal 13-6

Before the samprastards dub you the antichrist, Sampras was 20-14 against Agassi

 

[JennyS]

Oops, I just realized I put Nadal at 13-6 instead of 13-7. LOL! So much for me being a *******! I went back and fixed it