RF-18
Talk Tennis Guru
How are you going to add his and not dominance ratio which is often a strong predictor
I didn't see it. I've added it to OP.
How are you going to add his and not dominance ratio which is often a strong predictor
Well one sweet day... Djokovic aint winning when he is 80y old.
Even Nishikori could do it, although only once...
Why not?
Sinner could be really good or really bad. It's impossible to know because of his draw
Dude is still so damn good it’s ridiculous. Its like cars….. they don’t make them like they used to.He will still be playing at 80 years of age I swear lmao
Dude is still so damn good it’s ridiculous. Its like cars….. they don’t make them like they used to.
I have to think those return stats are skewed because Joker played servebot HubiWith a day and half to go until the blockbuster SFs goes under way, lets take a look at how the statistics look in some of the major categories:
Djokovic, just like at RG, is blasting winners (210 in 5 matches) all over the place and leads this stat comprehensively over his rivals. But his return % is I would guess at an all time low at just 18% return games won. His serving has been at times unbelieveable, and holds 96% of his service games. He is also challenging some of the worlds best servers in terms of aces. He has only been broken 3 times all tournament. Sinner on the other hand is at an unreal 34% return games won on grass. He does have one of the best returns in the world, even though the average rank of his opponent has been 78 or something like that, this is still impressive. Broken his opponents serves 26 times, highest in the tournament. In comparison Alcaraz has broken serve 20 times, Medvedev 21 and Djokovic only 18 times.
Djokovic leads the tournament as well in terms of the least unforced errors, at just 97 mistakes. Impressive. 210 winners and 97 UEs is mighty.
Medvedev is at a 90% hold rate, lowest of them all wich is a surprise considering his big serve, but still 90% is a really good hold rate on grass. Compared to his other 3 rivals, his game off the ground hasn't been as steady. 115 unforced errors and we gotta remember he played an injured opponent in R4 who retired.
Alcaraz has been steady all round but what impresses the most is his hold rate. Staggering 95%, only been broken 4 times.
Hold %
Djokovic 96%
Alcaraz 95%
Sinner 92%
Medvedev 90%
1st srv % won
Djokovic 84%
Sinner 84%
Alcaraz 79%
Medvedev 79%
2nd srv % won
Sinner 64%
Djokovic 63%
Alcaraz 59%
Aces
Sinner 57
Medvedev 57
Djokovic 55
Alcaraz 30
Return gms won %
Sinner 34%
Medvedev 25%
Alcaraz 24%
Djokovic 18%
1st serve rcving pts %
Sinner 35%
Alcaraz 34%
Medvedev 33%
Djokovic 26%
2nd srv rcving pts W %
Sinner 55%
Medvedev 53%
Alcaraz 52%
Djokovic 52%
Winners
Djokovic 210
Sinner 183
Alcaraz 180
Medevdev 179
Unforced errors
Djokovic 97
Medvedev 115*
Alcaraz 120
Sinner 121
@weakera
Dominance ratio (return points won/opponents return points won
Sinner 2.14
Djokovic 1.68
Alcaraz 1.52
Medvedev 1.55
Some more stats by @Spin Diesel
Medvedev played 1039 points and won 563 = 54% and ran 15800m
Alcaraz played 1110 points and won 611 = 55% and ran 15400m
Djokovic played 1047 points and won 577 = 55% and ran 15700m
Sinner played 930 points and won 532 = 57% and ran 12300m
Thoughts, TTW?
all the stats taken from Wimbledons official website.
Tom is the last true movie star everWait until you see Mission Impossible! Tom Cruise at 60 >>> Currect Djokveicoic
Wait until you see Mission Impossible! Tom Cruise at 60 >>> Currect Djokveicoic
Tomorrow. Im so excitedTom is the last true movie star ever
he and michael j foxTom is the last true movie star ever
Sinner to beat Egg confirmedDjokovic has the worst return game. Is Sinner the best returner of all time?
Nice stats, OP! Didn’t see this until now.
What’s the benefit of dominance ratio over points won? Alcaraz and Djokovic have almost identical points won ratios but Novak a considerably higher dominance ratio. Is it just because he holds serve more efficiently?
He didn't face anyone closer to Murray or Eubanks.If he were really bad he'd have lost already. A la Tsitsipas